CINEMA GEEKS
Hitchcock Retrospective – Psycho Review

About this Episode
Hey Tara strong here and you're listening to
the geek cast radio network Hello and welcome
to episode 213 of the cinema geeks I am one of
your cinema geeks optimus solo and joining me
today as Usual is the comic concierge. Hello
there. Hey, how's it going? Going well. We are
back at it once again Dealing with some more
Alfred Hitchcock films. We've covered eight of
them so far and this is number nine this is going
to be our coverage of the 1960 horror film Entitled
Psycho as you can guess produced and directed
by Alfred Hitchcock. Otherwise, this wouldn't
make a whole lot of sense And, uh, the film stars
Anthony Perkins, Janet Lee, Vera Mills, John
Gavin, Martin Balsam, and a few other folks.
And as we usually start off these, we kind of
briefly talk about our experience with the film.
Dan, I know you mentioned last episode that you
have seen, had seen the, the remake, I guess
you would call it the shot for shot remake that
came out. Was that in the nineties or the two
thousands? Think it was the 90s. It was late
90s. I think 99 maybe I forget exactly that was
your only experience with this movie, correct?
Yeah, I I think so I might have like I definitely
haven't sat down to watch the entire thing before
Okay And what without going in any like specific
details? What was your opinion or your take on
the 1999 film? Yeah, 98 was that or 98. I know
I know it was late 90s. I can't remember when
I I don't know. It was fine. I was young and
I didn't really understand the context of it,
really. I knew it was a remake, but I didn't
realize it was a shot -for -shot remake. So I
enjoyed it. It did feel kind of odd because it's
modern, but also it does have that old -timey
feel. I don't know. I know people hate it. Hated
it, but obviously at the time I didn't have the
comparison. So I didn't hate it I remember enjoying
it well enough, but clearly not enough to go
back and watching the original But I don't know.
I don't know how it would feel now going back,
you know comparing it to see Right Yeah, I I
had no experience with this one had never seen
it I had really never been Interested in seeing
it. Like this is one of the ones that like had
we not been doing this I don't know if I would
have ever watched this film just because The
way it's billed as a horror film and I'm just
not like a horror film fan for the most part
So like generally I watch them if my wife wants
to watch them because she loves horror films
but it's not stuff that I seek out on my own
and I probably would have just let that like
the stereotype of what kind of film it was maybe
Cloud my judgment of just watching it because
it's a classic or watching it because it's a
Hitchcock film or whatnot But yeah, I had no
Not only no experience with it. I had somehow
like actually avoided all Information about it
like I knew nothing had been spoiled for me on
this mill on this film Which is kind of odd to
say like I knew there was a shower sequence But
outside of that I knew nothing None of the twists
and turns had been like revealed to me. I hadn't
stumbled across it or something like that So
somehow I I guess I'd avoided talk about psycho
for my entire life So I I did appreciate the
fact that I got to see it without anything being
Spoiled for me or known about in advance so I
will say that much this one is based off of the
1959 novel of the same name like a lot of the
Hitchcock films we've talked about typically
based off of short stories novels plays things
of that nature so you got to watch the original
now Dan and I Before you get into your thoughts.
I have a sneaky suspicion We've been somewhat
In line with each other throughout this. I mean
there might have been some films that like You
liked a little bit more than me or I liked a
little bit more than you but we've generally
been about Pretty similar opinions on all of
these films and I have a feeling this may be
a difference in Opinions for the two of us, but
I'm interested to see so what was your take on?
The original version of this story the 1960 Hitchcock
film psycho It's interesting you say like you're
you're able to watch this without being spoiled
because it was watching this I I kind of felt
like this had the similar thing to like The pirate
strikes back in the sense of it's so ingrained
in pop culture that can you actually experience
it the way it was meant to be originally experienced
because it a lot of it is designed to subvert
your expectations a lot a lot of it's designed
to subvert your expectations because you know
at the time the idea was that story would follow
Janet Lee it almost would be and the first I
would say hour or so is set up like It is more
of that classic noir thriller Where and if you
go in not knowing anything, you know, you would
you wouldn't I think you're you're waiting to
see What's happening next in the sense of like
this, you know Norman Bates doesn't seem like
it's going to be the main focus of the story
but then that all changes and not like that is
the big huge surprise of the movie and You know
like like you mentioned well, I guess you were
able to avoid that but like that shower scene
is so iconic and so well known it's Obviously
the point where that's impossible, especially
if you're like myself and watch the original
Remake before this so um, I I still really despite
all that I still rather enjoyed the movie a great
deal. I I did like Then it does have that meshing
of both noir as well as you know The horror aspects
to me the person that like really shines in this
the one person that makes the movie work It is
Anthony Perkins Norman Bates. He is so good in
this in this like, you know at first he does
feel a little bit all shucks He feels you know,
he's like oh this he does seem like no like a
nice guy basically, you know this normal everyday
guy of standing citizen, but then The way he's
able to slowly show you kind of the darker underneath
elements of him, especially in that opening,
when he's having dinner with Marianne and they're
talking about taxidermy and things like that.
And that's like he is kind of showing itself.
And I don't know, I found his performance to
be really captivating throughout. I will say
the downside is I don't think anyone Comes close
to him. I think a lot of the other characters,
especially after Janet Lee Exits like they're
not nearly as strong performance wise like the
other characters I think you do lose a some but
he's you know, he courses still there But I thought
it was very effective. I thought this of course
it has you know, one of the most iconic scores
of all time that you know, the soundtrack of
the stabbing is you know, one of the probably
one of the most Imitated, you know pieces of
music you outside of jaws probably So I still
rather liked it. I wouldn't say I was I Wouldn't
put it looking at the best films we've watched
thus far I don't know if I would put it there
like I didn't have that I wasn't as captivated
with it as some of those other films because
like I mentioned I don't think the the performances
were strong as throughout the as strong throughout
and I I think it I don't think it loses something
after that scene, but I do think it's like the
climax It's had its height within those moments
in the next 30 45 minutes It's almost it doesn't
have that same Never captures that again. I don't
think but I don't know. I still really liked
it I still thought it was well made I think the
idea of being able to shoot it in black and white
was the right choice It helped I think really
establish that atmosphere overall, but I'm getting
getting the sense. Maybe that he felt the other
way Um, I I'm still wrestling with it a bit.
I feel like This may end up somewhat like in
the same realm as vertigo for me in a way like
it's something that is very Highly praised right
like this film is on a lot of people's top lists
It's on a lot of like famous top 100 lists a
lot of people put this as even the number one
Hitchcock film out there. So part of it may be
that There was Super hot pretty impressive resume
of like it's lauded very well and all this type
of stuff So it's hard when you've heard so many
like fantastic things about a film. Yeah, you
go and watch it You know it most films can't
live up to that like even if they are fantastic
like it's just like you you get such a high expectation
and a high like Thought process going so like
some of it. I'm trying to wrestle with whether
that's part of why I came away a little lower
on it. Not low, like as if it's a bad movie,
but like in a similar way, like what we talked
about with Vertigo, where it's just like, I don't
quite see it hitting on as many levels as I expect
when I'm hearing the praise that I hear. So that's
one thing that I'm a little wrestling with. And
the other thing that I'm wrestling with, which
is a hundred percent more on me than it is on
the film. And I was thinking about this. Oddly,
as I was reading some other reviews from some
other folks on letterbox, as they were reviewing
some older films like from the fifties and whatnot
that I had. Well, I'll just say it for example,
so like. In session film just did a episode on
my fair lady. And they're going through, I believe
all of the best picture winners and reviewing
them. I don't. know exactly if they're covering
all of them or just certain ones or whatever.
But they talked about My Fair Lady and I read
the reviews on Letterboxx and they were both
very low on it. And it caught me off guard a
little bit. I'm a little bit biased because I
got to perform in a version of My Fair Lady in
like my college age years. And so I have a little
bias going into it. But I was reading the reviews
and thinking Well, you're you're seeing this
in through the eyes of somebody in 2025 versus
somebody that was watching it in the time period
that it was made and Then I was like immediately
thinking the same thing then was psycho I was
like is this fair because I'm viewing this through
2025 lens not 1960 and it's hard when you've
seen all of this done because obviously this
inspired a lot of other films to do similar things
right like there's a there's a lot of stuff that
has that little twist at the end and there's
like the whole like uh I don't know you think
of like the sixth sense and you think of like
different things that have come out along the
way and like so some of that steals some of that
because now I've I you know I I got 65 more years
of movies that I've seen here and there not that
I've seen everything but I've seen a few so it's
like now trying to like take that away and take
that knowledge of all the different films that
psycho influence and view it as it was which
is something that really kind of broke a mold
in a way and almost created a whole genre like
a lot of people give this credit for like introducing
or being one of the first like slasher films
in a way or what leads to a lot of those. So
some of it's like wrestling with my own perspectives
versus like what the film is and I'm still kind
of coming to terms with that. Another thing that
I was like a little bit debating with myself
is like this is It's listed as a horror film.
It's known as a horror film But I'm having like
these discussions with myself like in my head
on What separates this from all the other films
that we've watched it outside of that it's a
little bit more Like that it shows a little bit
more But in many ways like you said like the
first whole half of this or anything just lines
up with a lot of the other stuff We've seen as
far as the thriller suspense like noir aspect
Yeah but this one gets a hundred percent like
described and portrayed as you know an all -out
horror film and I don't know enough about horror
films so I don't know if it's just the fact that
they the sour sequences here or that they show
a little bit more of that that it's a little
bit more graphic that makes it a horror film
because otherwise you're dealing with a lot of
the same aspects right except Guess in this situation
out instead of the the killers that we've seen
in like almost every other film We've watched
so far cuz almost all of them have all of them
had a killer All of them have had a murder, right?
when notorious didn't really notorious was more
the There was some implied. Yeah, they're like
it like some people got killed, but it was right,
right Yeah, so so like they've all had a kid
or most of them have had like a murder or a kill
killing of some sort but They just deal with
it in a much more subtle way I guess in some
situations where it's implied or where we don't
necessarily see it a hundred percent of the time
so I guess that's the difference but I don't
know enough about like Genre studies to figure
out like which things make this one a horror
film. That's you may more know more about that
I know it's a good question cuz it like I guess
it's idea like the horror of or still there where
it doesn't I think it's more so labeled as a
horror because as you mentioned the influence
of like And of what it led to because you know,
then the the motels I don't I don't know if this
was the first movie like this to have a motel
scene of this nature there may have been others
but clearly it helped popularize it and then
we got more and more of it and then maybe because
the like The murder becomes a central story.
It you know, it becomes like kind of the focus
it is designed to scare like that is like where
I think that becomes Like where yeah, I get that
where other movies like vertigo certainly was
an element there without like there was much
romance as Thrills, I guess. I don't know. I
think it's a fine line I think you could you
could I think you could even say, you know vertigo
certainly is horror elements like North by the
North Northwest Perhaps not but it's like after
where there's a thriller end in a horror began.
I guess it's right. Yeah Yeah, that had nothing
to do with my like Opinion about the film. I
would just it was just something that I was thinking
about that was like You know back in this time
period if this is like one of the first ones
of its kind I was curious like how that evolves
and like I get it like Maybe in some situations
you have the jump scares, right? You have a soundtrack.
It's like a little bit different It's it's it's
trying to influence those scares a little bit
Like you said, you know, you can see the influence
that this has on jaws and things like that where
like you have that soundtrack that's really amplifying
the scares a little bit as well. And then I guess
perhaps to like the motivations of the of the
person involved in the killing or the murders,
maybe that's like where you could draw a line
to. Not that everybody's not a little bit off
if they're killing somebody, but like, you know,
this situation, obviously, there's there's there's
more to this character that's Putting down the
position that he's in. So I kind of get that
a little bit as well Yeah, and it's you know,
this kind of did for showers what Jaws did for
going to the ocean It's like now it's it played
against you know those fears I don't know if
it so they created them but certainly like that
those places where you feel feel the most vulnerable
and Something, you know, I'm sure everyone's
had that moment where they heard something outside
of a shower and then like quickly opened Quickly
open the curtain, uh just to see what exactly
was there. Um, yeah, so I think it was I did
was I did read something that said janet lee
didn't take showers again During her lifetime
after this. Yeah, it wasn't because of like anything
besides I think she said While she was watching
the film after it was done or at one point she
was watching it and it was more so the fact that
it kind of hit her hit home for her that like
How vulnerable you are in the shower? Yeah, as
far as that goes and she was I don't know if
it's true now I said that she didn't take it
like she swore off showers for the rest of her
life and just took baths But then I heard I read
something else that somebody else had been Wrote
I don't know if he wrote Hitchcock or wrote somebody
or put it in a review or something that like
There they were mad because their daughter was
already afraid of bass because of some other
film that had come out Around this time and then
this one made the daughter afraid of showers.
She he was like, no, I can't watch this one Yeah,
and Hitchcock said something about like we'll
send her to the dry cleaners or something. I
have to go out back with a hose Go ahead speaking.
I was just talking with a shower scene what like
I I couldn't remember this if this was done in
the remake or not, but like i didn't like i was
impressed with how that shower scene happens
and i was waiting for it to kind of cut but like
it it stays like after that happens we stay there
you see norman come down kind of go through it
and you know i think That's where I was I was
thinking about like the mindset of not knowing
because I knew obviously the twist or whatever
Did you know that at that point or did you not
know about? I did not know I hadn't put it all
together. I don't think at that point What what
I think I was so distracted by the fact that
it happened so early in the film Okay, so I was
not anticipating the shower I was I thought the
shower scene was gonna be something at the end
like I thought that was gonna be like leading
up to the final climax and things like that.
And it happens like less than halfway in or at
the halfway. I don't know where you're at, technically
minute wise, like, but it feels like almost halfway
through. And I was just like, wait, what? I'm
like, she's not going to be in the rest of the
film. What are we doing here? I thought this
was all I thought this was her film. I thought
this was like we just spent like half the movie
building up this character, learning about her
and all this other stuff. And I think that kind
of led me to some of the same feelings that you
had that like once she was gone, I was like,
Okay, like who do I care about now? It's like
watching a game with their own season and being
like well everybody I cared about just died in
that season So do I need to come back for season
two? I don't know What I could get that I think
what kept me wanted like I said, I thought Anthony
Perkins was really good and I was just interested
to see like them being able to Go back and see
if they could actually I mean the route that
what was going to happen. So I think I think
we're good then. But like they used females to
do that voice. And so I I'm too like, I guess
maybe I'm too practical or logical or something
in my brain. So I would have never like it was
clearly a woman's voice. It wasn't a man throwing
his voice to sound like a woman, even if it would
have been like a really good job of it. So like,
I don't think I would have ever been able to
put those two together because I had already
like it wouldn't have fit my other pieces of
logic I have in my head going there. And then
I really need to re -watch the film because I
thought I was paying really close attention to
a sequence where he's taking his mother down
the stairs. And they must have done a phenomenal
job filming that sequence because I was looking
to see if it was real or not. Because what I
thought I thought different things and then they
would do something in the film that I was like,
oh, well, that eliminates that thought when it
actually didn't. So they did enough to keep me
guessing throughout that. And the voice, like
I said, would have thrown me off. And then I
looked up afterwards, I was like, well, who's
doing the voice of this? And they cast three
different people to do her voice, which is also
interesting. So throughout the film, there's
three different, there's two female and one male
that does her voice. so apparently there is a
point where a male is throwing his voice, but
it sounded so much like a female to me that I
was like I Was just thrown off by that a little
bit. So I yeah, I did I definitely didn't wouldn't
have predicted it Happening until obviously there's
there's more clues along the way out that sort
of reveal it But yeah The other thing I was interested
is kind of thrown off at the beginning number
one was the shower sequence happening so soon
and number two was in a manner I leaned over
to me about five minutes in and she's like She
was convinced that this was that we weren't going
in chronological order anymore because they had
gone back to black and white and I was I thought
I was trying to figure out what the Reasoning
for it was what the you know, how why they were
doing it because obviously we had just had a
color film in The last couple and then they go
back to to black and white and I was Interested
to see like why that was I read a couple different
things I don't know which one's more true like
one of them said that they had to do it because
of the graphic nature of the film and making
it in black and white made it not quite as a
Gory, but then I also read something that Hitchcock's
was just using black and white because he tried
he was trying to make this film as cheaply as
possible or as inexpensive as possible because
he Was afraid that it you know, it wasn't gonna
make very much money because of its the nature
of the film So, I don't know which one maybe
both had an influence, but I do think it works
as black and white Yeah, for sure. I Think I
think it is a better movie because of it in a
lot of ways because it I think especially like
the basis house it just looks that much more
and I think the Mom of course like even Being
able to I think you can hide it a little bit
more for longer with it being in black and white
like if it's in color It comes off a little you
can maybe tell her it maybe it's a little bit
more obvious But yeah, it's I do agree with you
though that the characters in the first half
are there's more to them and it's and they're
more likeable to me like not I don't know if
likeable is the right word, but in the beginning
obviously we get her and her lover And we have
her boss, her coworker, and then the idiot guy
that is coming in to try to make some type of
deal with her boss. But they all have some character
to them. Obviously, we get Hitchcock's daughter
again as the coworker in that first office sequence
or whatever, the same person that we saw in...
Which one was it? Strangers on a Train? Yes,
Strangers on a Train. So we get to see her again.
I was much more invested in all of those characters.
And obviously, Norman Bates is enough to carry
the rest of the film. I'm not saying he's not.
It's interesting to watch. There's enough intrigue
there that you're trying to figure out what's
behind everything and all the elements of this.
And he's enough to carry it. But I did find that
second half, like her sister, I could care less
about her. Perfectly blunt and like the guy becomes
less interesting her her lover that was I mean,
he was never real interesting but like just the
fact that we're left with those two in a way
was kind of It left a little bit for me to desire
because I was hoping that There would be some
more little Fun pieces along the way as we're
kind of I wanted more interaction with Bates
from these other characters But like I said,
Norman Bates is phenomenal. He carries this well.
I don't can't picture anybody else playing that
role Yeah, so I which you feel bad because you
know, like for the rest of his career. That's
all anybody's gonna be able to like View him
as yeah, which you can either accept that or
you can let that like get to you But but I do
think he was phenomenal. Like you said Yeah,
it I think at that point, you know, it's like
those characters are just odd devices purposely
like what they're just there to try to Let you
figure out what exactly is happening in the push
to mystery forward a bit and maybe in the novel
You're able they're able to kind of go deeper
into it and stuff like that. But yeah It's interesting
too because like, you know, obviously This all
stems from her stealing $40 ,000 and it had me
thinking like how much is that in today's money?
I don't like I don't know how accurate this calculation
is but it was like 400 it's over 400 That four
hundred and twenty nine thousand dollars would
be how much it is today, which is kind of Just
and then there would be it would also be interesting
to know like that there was the in that car interaction
like how much that like Yeah, um equated to because
they're definitely throwing around some different
money and it was it was interesting too. Like
I they didn't They have this big plot moment
as far as her taking off with that money and
I still feel like that's not fleshed out a hundred
percent like it seems Really odd at first like
her decision making and like what she's doing
with that and I was interested to try to like
get to see more about Some underlying factors.
I know they do have some conversations between
her and Norman Bates that kind of go to it and
obviously like she decides To that she's not
doing the right thing at one point There's a
whole redemption sequence which is you know symbolic
with her taking the shower and all the other
stuff but like I did there was a few moments
that I was like, oh, I want to see a little bit
more. I want to get like, I'm not, when she first
steals it, I'm like, I'm not buying that this
character is doing this at first, which was kind
of a little tricky. And then there was another
thing that I wish they would have fleshed out
a little bit more, which was, and I don't know
how they do this. You really can't because you're
going to have this big reveal at the end, this
big twist, et cetera, which even for me not knowing
The movie or anything like that. I think there
was enough breadcrumbs there that It wasn't very
shocking We've just seen I've seen too many movies
that do similar stuff so you can kind of predict
it in 1960 I'm sure it was a that would have
been a lot harder to do but in 2025 like we've
seen that so I kind of put that together, but
then after that it's kind of a weird sequence
where There's just a dialogue there's like a
uh dump of information like a narrative dump
between the at the police station or wherever
it is that i i wish there would have been a way
for them to do that without just i don't know
like when that happens in today's films critics
are all over it like they're usually very much
against those types of things where we just get
a narrative dump like that I guess it's okay
in psycho because it's a classic that they do
that but I also don't know how they would have
avoided it because You're basically at the end
of the film. So you have to explain things somewhat
quickly But it did come off like oh we're getting
a whole bunch of information right now to like
tie up all the the loose ends and a nice bow
And I wasn't sure how that worked for me in a
way Yeah, I could see that I think also part
a lot of that too is I think the idea of psychology
is so are we Unknown for a lot of people at that
time at that level. Yeah, but you had it like
The way do you approach it? It's interesting.
Did you ever? So I know this is based off a book,
but a lot of this is based upon a real -life
story of Eddie I think it's Eddie keen how you
pronounce it and you heard so I actually read
there's this really great comic Do you know what
Eddie Gein did? Uh and goes into like his story
And it's interesting like watching that because
a lot of like a lot of that real life story Is
this what inspires this? It's what inspires texas
hate saw massacre uh, it would um violence of
the lambs They all kind of come from a similar
vein. So I do think when you mentioned like how
a lot of movies Like you know, like you you were
able to put together, you know Because you've
seen a lot of movies. I think a lot of that too
is because a lot of them At the core is like
the same Real -life story that they're all kind
of breaking off from so I think that is also
part of that at this time like that story Right
sure what exactly it was, but it wasn't that
far away from when this movie came out. So it
was you know far more New like it was so yeah,
and I think the other thing too is not just movies.
It's like the type of TV we've had in the last
I Don't know. Let's call it 20 years 25 years
Maybe even 30 with all the different criminal
minds and CSI's and NCIS's and law and orders
and all that kind of stuff. Like I feel like
each one of them has done this as well in some
way, shape or form. So it's like, you're not
just getting it in movie form. We've been getting
in and all the, like the crime drama TV series
as well. Like at some point, like there's little
tiny twists like this. So like, I don't think
that helps either. That's why like I, I'm really
trying to like view this and take like the 2025
like lenses off, but it's really hard to do.
Get that also though. I do think it's also like
being hitchcocked or something like amazing shots
and that's like the yes shot of him when he takes
a Looks through the wall into her room like that.
Like that's pretty incredible after you know,
of course you have the like Iconic sour she's
a shower scene But then like after that like
how he goes through the room and like like that
like that entire sequence Like it goes out of
that's like incredible for the time so Also spying
on her or looking in or doing all of that stuff
So I think it's an interesting thing that Hitchcock
does occasionally at least that we've seen where
he's making the viewer Almost part of the film,
but but more so like in the inner characters
View and like in their perspective in a way that
you feel like you're doing something wrong also
Which I think is a very genius move by him. This
is like yeah, this entire film is like Dedicated
the taboo like the opening scene is of My goodness,
so I had to forget her name Generally, you'll
generally open see is generally like in in her
underwear, which like which is also on the movie
poster Which is on the movie poster? Which you
know certainly is something that? is unbecoming
for I mean, it was a 60. So maybe, you know,
it was starting to loosen up a little bit, but
still, and like, of course, looking into the
shower, it is that they have a relationship,
they're not married to like, I think this is
an exercise like he loves to revel in the taboo.
And I think this is kind of escalates that further
and further from that opening moment to like
all these different uh, aspects of like, you
know, the, what is considered indecent, um, to
the point we were having, you know, the, the
idea of, I mean, being a transvestite, uh, which
is said in this movie, of course, which is obviously,
it means a lot of different things now, but it's
just like, it's just interesting, like. It's
interesting that he got it made. Yeah. Especially
it's, it's kind of crazy that there wasn't a
bigger, maybe there was, and we just didn't know
about it, but like. Feel like there's a lot of
things here that could cause a gigantic uprising
considering everything involved but and it seems
like the biggest thing that so so you have like
the the the shower sequence you have the stabbing
you have the The lack of you know, it's not nobody
is nude or things like or it's not shown But
like, you know, you have illusions to it. You
have scantily clad, you know a woman in the first
sequence you have all these other things that
you think that someone would have a problem with
and Yet the biggest thing that they had to try
to get around to allow it to be filmed was the
flushing of a toilet. Like that, that seems bizarre.
I mean, I guess this is the first time that a
toilet's flushed on in American film. And really?
Yeah. Like literally. And I guess it was a thing,
like somebody involved, it wasn't Hitchcock,
but somebody involved, I think in the screenplay,
whoever was the writer, possibly Joseph Stefano
for some reason, wanted to flush a toilet on
the film and get past this. rule that you couldn't
do that and was in conversation with Hitchcock
like I want to flush a toilet on a film and Hitchcock's
like well then you better write it in so that
it makes sense and that's why they have the whole
sequence where she tears up everything and on
these numbers and throws it in there and like
he had to do it in a way that was so important
to the plot that they couldn't cut it because
I mean not that it was so so important but something
that was like you know relevant to the plot where
they can't just be like well take that sequence
out So like, yeah, it's the first time a toilet
flush. And that's the thing that that had to
get past the sensors, not the not any of the
other stuff, which is which is interesting. I
do also find it interesting, like how much Hitchcock
was and it seems like like a lost art, right?
Like these days, everything gets spoiled for
you. Like nothing can happen on anything without
it being like told you in advance or like I think
of like even outside of the film world, like
just. I know not everybody's into professional
wrestling but like professional wrestling is
like a perfect example of where we're at today
with like the internet and Everything and how
many people are involved like almost nothing
is ever a surprise, right? like it's very hard
for them to keep something under wraps and make
something to look like a legit shocker surprise
because people are like making their livings
out of exposing that stuff and So he was very
Put a concerted effort to try to Avoid people
knowing how this was gonna end. So he bought
the rights to this book kind of on the down low
or kind of like somewhat subtly and what and
then apparently went out and tried to buy as
many copies of the book as possible to prevent
More copies being out that someone could read
and find out how this is gonna end Like this
that seems like maddening like there's no way
you could buy all of the copies of this book
and prevent anybody from knowing but like he
He made an effort to try to do that, to try to
prevent people from knowing how it was going
to end. And then he also did something that ends
up being somewhat impactful, I guess, from the
movie theater business is he made movie theaters
sign a contract that if they were showing this
film that nobody could go into the film if they
were late, late to the start of the show. Yeah.
So like, yeah. And like before this, like movie
theaters would just show a movie on loop and
it would just be playing like all day and. People
would come in at different times. Like sometimes
you'd come in halfway through. Sometimes you'd
come in like whatever, and you'd catch what you
could and stuff like that. And like, this is
probably a piece to the puzzle that leads to,
and it probably would have happened for other
reasons and different stuff, but this helps escalate
the process of actual having start times where
you pay for a predetermined time, not just you
go up and pay your ticket and get to go into
the theater and see what's playing. Like you
had to buy you know, like we do now a 720 showing
or an 820 showing but and then he had like big
signs made put in the theaters that were like
if you try to like Come to this movie after it
started like we're gonna remove you with force
and stuff like that Or I don't know. I don't
know exactly what it said, but it was like literally
a quote from hitchcock That was like don't do
this. I want the theater people to make sure
that you can't go in halfway through um, and
part of that's too because of the fact that He
knows how much happens in the first little bit
first half or whatever and that if you come in
and Miss some of that like it's gonna change
the viewing and and whatnot So it was it was
very interesting about how secretive he was about
the ending coming out and things of that nature
At least I thought that was kind of interesting
Yeah, that is I I heard that before regarding
it helped it helped establish movie times which
to me is just crazy when you think like I couldn't
imagine just like going to the theater and then
Just you know this is the Can and now it's like
you you not only do you have the movie times?
But you get your you know, what seat you're at
before you even leave the theater, right? But
you know, I remember that we're old enough to
remember if you wanted to see a movie opening
weekend You had to get there early and you're
standing the line. Yeah I remember doing that
for like camp out. Yeah, Spider -man all those
and whatnot. But yeah, I did that for a few Star
Wars films So yeah, but anything else you had
that you wanted to The film was nominated for
four Academy Awards best picture best supporting
actress I believe Score or cinematography or
something like the other two were more on that
side of the things I didn't realize until doing
some more like research in the last like a couple
weeks since we've been doing this that Hitchcock
never won a best director for anything Which
is crazy seems like a crime against humanity
there, but he at least got nominated for this
one I don't remember I don't know which film
beat him out in this specific. Let's see. This
would have been the 33rd Academy Awards who won
best director Billy Wilder won for the apartment
It's a great movie. So I I would probably I would
actually go apartment over psycho personally.
Yeah So but it's weird that he never won one.
But yeah, so like I said, I'm a little bit probably
not as high on this one as everybody else. I
was checking out like the people that I'm connected
to on letterbox and literally every single person
rates it either four and a half or five star.
I didn't find a single person that rated anything
lower than that. So I'm probably in the minority,
but I think some of that's just because it's
just really hard for me to view this. I think
if I saw this in 1960, it probably would have
been very impactful and very effective. And I
would probably have a lot more high things to
say about it i just there's something about the
second half characters that are a little bit
of a miss for me and i just i don't know like
norma bates is amazing like i get how impactful
this is for not just like we're talking about
with the theater going process but with all of
the horror genre as we go forward i see all of
that and i appreciate all that i don't think
this is a bad movie in any way whatsoever i just
Came in with probably too high of expectations
would be like my overall thought. What about
you? Yeah, I like as I mentioned, I don't looking
at the his cock films. We've done so far It's
not up there as my favorite, but I still really
enjoyed it. I still think it's well done and
there's a lot I was really impressed by it Starting
with the ambition of it and it's and then you
include the importance and I could understand
like you mentioned because they're so it's the
thing where A lot of what this does well is so
old hat by now. It's hard to, especially with
horror when it's horror. So it depended upon
concept of fear. You don't have that because
like you're kind of ahead of the film. It's,
you know, and especially if it doesn't have another
thing for you to. Being invested in I could see
where that is, but I like even with my issues
with you know The characters in the second half
everything I've ended up liking beyond that.
Like I said, this it's so well crafted uh, and
I I find it is There's even like we didn't talk
about but there are so many so many great lines
in this the even though, you know, they're You
know, you know the there's so many that become
really well known, you know, of course the the
line regarding, you know, the Best friend is
a mother and all that stuff. I say that and I
can't remember that line. No, I know I know exactly
what you're talking about. Grain is broken but
But I and and like I said, I think that is partially
to like I just it's interesting Just it's a movie
that is just as fascinating regarding everything
surrounding it And then also just learning about
like the real -life story that inspired it and
seeing I think that honestly makes it even more
impactful because you realize there's a lot of
truth in what's happening here. Like it didn't,
obviously, it's not the Eddie Gein thing. It's
very different, but it does involve a lot of
what's brought up in this, like in the sense
of like, you know, how he, I don't even want
to get into it. Like, you know, the, you know,
it's not that far off. So I think that like knowing
that piece, like it almost makes it even More
impactful because it's like oh, yeah, like this
actually is closer to reality than we like to
know. So yeah, it's not me. Oh, yeah. I was gonna
say I did that made me think one other thing
too is like and I don't I would need to be a
psychologist or Somebody to like be better spoken
When it comes to this type of thing, but I did
think that there the the explanation of what's
happening and What the real situation is once
all the curtains pulled back I still question
how that connects and like Works or how you reconcile
that with the final murder attempt in this film
because it's it truly seems as if the character
Knows that they're about to be caught and then
runs over to the house and does something very,
I feel like that last sequence of his actual,
of the actual last murder attempt doesn't line
up with the psychology that would have been,
that they're trying to say is present. But I
don't know enough about that world to say that
100%. But I did question, it's like when someone's
trying to put on a defense or build a defense
of being, not mentally sane to be, you know,
to be culpable of their actions. And then you
can see that they're doing stuff that proves
that they're sane. Like there's there's something
in that that didn't 100 % work for me. But like
I said, I'm not knowledgeable enough in that
arena to say that for sure. But it just it did
seem kind of jarring because it's like, no, now
now he's clearly being a character that's that's
doing this because he knows it's something like
the jig is up. and he's just putting on a costume
and doing this. You know what I mean? There wasn't
enough time for him to transition into another
personality, so to speak. I don't know. That's
just me being overly critical. Well, you can
continue your thoughts, but then I guess we forgot
to point out any of the Hitchcock -isms that
we saw in this film as well. Yeah, one of the
thing was gonna ask if you had any interest in
I didn't even realize that they're sequel So
that's not there's like the second and third
film and he's in it right like yeah It picks
up like in real time afterwards after that would
be interesting So I would yeah, I mean I've never
watched it. You don't really hear anyone ever
talk about it So I might have to we might have
to have like a appendix after this we're gonna
keep we're gonna have enough content down for
the next couple years like We're just gonna keep
expanding this this series even though those
aren't obviously directed by Hitchcock but I
would be intrigued at least in the second one
that would the How good or bad that one is would
probably influence if I wanted to watch the third
one But I could definitely I definitely think
it would be interesting. What other Hitchcock
things did you pick out? That we've talked about
throughout this series. Well, you know, of course
you have the Hitchcock blondes. Uh, this didn't
have someone, you know, I guess maybe for a brief
moment. Yeah. Uh, the, didn't have someone that
was wrongly accused, although I guess you could
say like her sister maybe, but not really. Well,
almost the, like they tried to for the, her lover.
I can't remember the character's name, which
is terrible, but her lover, like for a split
second, but then it's pretty much. Put to bed
after that. So they like they At least touch
on it, I guess For a second. Yeah, I Think if
he had a cameo in this but I can't remember he
does he does I have to watch the end cuz I didn't
catch it But I read that he he has a cameo super
early on and he said he intentionally did it
like real close to the beginning of the film
because he didn't want he I guess at this point
it had been such a known thing that like some
people would be like distracted by the film to
watch to try to find his cameo and he didn't
want anybody to be like thinking about anything
else throughout the rest of the film so because
of the the twists and the turns and stuff like
that so he put it real early on but I don't remember
where it happens but it is in there I'll have
to like rewatch part of the first part of the
film to see that and then obviously we do have
the the son -mom relationship Oh, yeah, definitely
iconic of them all Yeah, and then there is a
there is some obviously some of the mystery elements
as far as What's gonna happen there we don't
necessarily have a a Small like a one -room set
or a one -state, you know, like a stage set or
whatever where it's all confined into a small
space But it is still mostly happening at this
hotel Yeah, so like you do have some other spots
you go to obviously like there's a half a dozen
probably But you do mainly focus on the hotel
and you do have at least for the whole second
half of a pretty limited cast So I think that
kind of plays into some of the things that we've
seen as well I didn't I don't know if I picked
up on anything else. Did you? Know that's all
I could really there wasn't any I guess the trinket
in the sense of you know that like yo says a
little small item She had that note like first
the the things she wrote down and like the newspaper
with the envelope that becomes like a huge But
eventually the money almost really I guess Yeah,
but I'm almost like you said as a red herring
because Makes you think like, oh, that's the
most important thing. But halfway through that
money, I mean, it's still important to the story,
but it's like, it's no longer the story. So I
do think like, he was really smart in this and
like, he knew what people expected and was able
to really use that in smart ways to subvert expectations.
It is interesting that we go from North by Northwest,
which you could say like almost influenced an
entire genre of James Bond and those types of
films and then you have psycho which you could
say, you know influences the entire slasher genre
that would come to be Seen in the horror genre.
So it's interesting how much impact you can see
some of these films having which I wasn't necessarily
Aware of before we started this journey. So that's
kind of cool, too Yeah people I've seen that
like people people ask like what is like the
best, you know three movies like, you know, who's
had like You know, uh, movie sequence or whatever
you want to say and like vertigo north by northwest
and then psycho I mean suspicion. Oh, that's
a tv series or the wrong man, which is we have
not seen I have not seen so I can't say that
vertigo north by northwest and then psycho like
that's It's hard to beat those three like even
though we didn't love vertigo But still like
that's it's like hard to beat that three with
any type of films after that. So No, I totally
get that. Um, so That's a psycho the 1960 film.
We still have one more in what I guess we could
call is the first half of our Hitchcock series
because we have decided based on some conversations
that we've had off of line and you could have
kind of picked up on on the I don't know if his
last episode of the one before where we kind
of mentioned that we weren't tired of Hitchcock
yet. So we have decided to expand this series.
So we're going to be doing Number of other films
as well. We haven't a hundred percent narrowed
down the exact number, but there's a good chance
that this is Right around the halfway point of
this We might do a couple different episodes
in between the two halves, but we're gonna we're
gonna Charter through some more Hitchcock Waters
But the last one we have for this part of it
this first half the original lineup is 1963 the
birds Dan what is your experience with the birds?
I have no experience with the birds. I have seen
Birdemic, of course. And Sharknado. I have not
seen Sharknado. Oh, OK. No, I have avoided that.
I saw Birdemic. It was one of those, like, awful,
like, you know, with friends because you laugh
at it. But I've never seen the birds. Honestly,
I've heard mostly of all the movies we've done
so far, the birds is the one I've heard the most
mixed reaction to. Like I've heard a lot of people
who don't like the birds. So i'm curious with
that going into it like how i'll end up enjoying
it i'm intrigued too I know nothing about it.
It's another one that I have completely blind
spot too So i'm i've been interested in watching
this one for sure I don't know exactly what angle
we go to with this one But I know that I am a
fan of other films that whether they're campy
or cheesy or whatever When there's a lot of a
certain type of animal or insect or something
like that. Like I I like those types of like
setups so we'll see if that works with the birds
or like them like you like you have you seen
them but i haven't i haven't seen them but it
reminds me of an episode of macgyver that killer
ants try to take over and uh he has to figure
out how to how to survive in this remote wilderness
that everybody's getting killed by ants I if
you love like cheesy sci -fi them is great. It's
I think obviously pretty even pretty good for
its time, but it's it is that you know That is
it is very much of its time awesome. So if you
want to keep up and Ask us questions or keep
track of what we're doing outside of our Hitchcock
retrospective. There's a bunch of different ways
you can do that first you can search out the
show which is I should know this name of the
show which is a cinema geeks and you can search
our handle out on Twitter Facebook Etc or the
website that most of our stuff is Held and housed
in which is the geek cast radio Network, you
can search out all that kind of stuff if you
have specific questions or comments for either
of the two of us Dan How can people reach out
to you? I am comic concierge on pretty much all
social media platforms and I am at optimus solo
on a few of them not nearly as many as dan is
uh because i'm just a slacker but uh you can
reach out to us there as well if not for sure
tune in next time for another chance to listen
to more of the cinema geeks as we go one more
step into the alfred hitchcock filmography with
1963's the birds
No chapter markers for this episode.


