GeekCast Radio
Star Trek TOS vs TNG Face-Off

About this Episode
Football is on at Yard House. Step up your game
at Yard House with Monday night happy hour from
kickoff to the final play featuring appetizers
starting at $5. Enjoy game day favorites including
boneless wings, pizzas, poke, nachos and more.
Plus, catch all the action on over 20 flat screen
TVs and enjoy the largest selection of draft
beer with over 100 beers on tap. This season,
make Yard House your home for football. Visit
yardhouse .com for details. Geekcastradio .com
presents GCRN Wars. Two geek topics will be challenged.
The ultimate battle will come to pass. One shall
stand. One shall fall. and welcome to episode
13 of GCRN Wars. I'm your host, as always, Optimus
Solo, and joining me for this war is Steve Megatron
Phillips. Hello. Good day. Hello. And Fridley
Scent. Hey there. Back for another war. And Mike
the Birdman Dodd. Hello, sir. Woo! Hi. And today
we will tackle a classic science fiction argument.
We will force Trekkies to face off against Fellow
checkies, the topic today is which series is
better, Star Trek, the original series, or Star
Trek, the next generation. So let the games begin.
Anybody have any opening things to say before
we get into the categories, Mr. Birdman? Man,
the classic series is so boned. Before we even
looked at the, before any of you guys saw the
script, before anybody saw any of the categories,
etc., just kind of thinking of the two series
in general, traditionally do you have a leaning
one way or the other, Steve? It depends on the
category, but without having to look at it, I'm
kind of torn between both because those are my
top two. Track series for multiple reasons What
about you Matt? Did you have a preference going
into this that you thought before you started
breaking it down? Honestly before I looked at
the script that I I thought exactly what Birdman
was saying was that TNG is gonna win this hand
over fist But I don't think it's as close. I
think it's closer than that when I look at the
script We have yet to have a blowout, I believe.
I don't have all the scores right in front of
me, but I'm pretty sure they've always been pretty
darn close, which brings up a good point that
we should get to before we get completely into
this one. We still need your help for episode
12 of GCRN Wars. If you listen to that one all
the way through, you will hear that that one
did end in a... Complete deadlock a complete
tie. There's a poll up on the website that will
continue to run until we record episode 14 So
once we record episode 14 that poll will close
and we will deem a winner in the pirates versus
ninjas War that we had so go to GCN and find
the page and vote in that poll so we can get
a winner on that All right that business aside
Anybody else have thoughts before we get into
category one? No. All right. Then let's start
it off here with the first category for Star
Trek versus Star Trek. And that is, of course,
the iconic ships, the USS Enterprise versus the
USS Enterprise. Who wants to start on which was
the more impressive ship? Well, it depends you
want me to break this down via what it accomplished
or the technical details because the galaxy class
Starship would kick the ever -living crap out
of the Constitution class However, you whichever
way you'd like to go sir Okay, well, let's talk
about the Galaxy Class Starship, which is the
USS Enterprise, which was, I think, the second
Galaxy Class ship constructed because there was
the original USS Galaxy, which was the prototype.
Well, the phaser banks on this thing, I think
their Type X phasers would cut... right through
the other enterprises whole like it was nothing.
The photon torpedo loads are significantly larger
on the galaxy class starship as opposed to this
one. Mind you're also talking about a hundred
year difference in technology as well as the
original enterprise didn't have replicators,
the transporters didn't have as long a range,
science facilities were not as advanced, holodecks
need I say more, computer power, storage capacity.
I mean the galaxy class structure could effectively
move civilizations if it had to. Like they could
evacuate planets with the proper support. A constitution
class, not a way in hell could it accomplish
something like that without significant support.
Um, plus it just was There were more people on
board a galaxy class starship I mean, I think
I think minimum you could staff the galaxy with
170 people I think that's what the technical
status. I'm not a hundred percent sure on that
In fact, where's my technical manual? I'm just
looking on my shelf here. I don't see it. But
if the Constitution did have one advantage over
the galaxy is that it did require less of a skeleton
crew, but required more maintenance. Because
you saw how often Scotty was always in engineering.
Something was always breaking. You could make
the same argument for the Enterprise D in the
galaxy class line of starships. But with the...
the invention of isolinear chips doing a lot
of their computing power. A lot of that, a lot
of the wear and tear was kind of reduced because
they could identify problems before they happened
and kind of do preventative maintenance, whereas
the other way around, it really wasn't possible.
Let me see, Steve, what am I leaving out here?
Steve, what does the Constitution have any, give
me the upsides of the Constitution. Well, the
upsides of it is its maneuverability, its the
ability to be jury -rigged in whatever fashion
that they need, not saying that the Galaxy class
couldn't do the same thing because they did it
on many occasions. However, the Constitution
class, for one, it got a nice upgrade that actually
happened, not an alternate timeline like the
Enterprise -D did, and it's just the fact that
there was a lot more that you could Customize
more or less with it Basically, I think there
were a lot more Configurations you could do with
the with the Constitution class There was a game
that came out about 15 or 20 years ago now when
you really look at it I think it was called It
wasn't Starfleet Academy. It was like stars Star
Trek battles or something it was done by interplay
in like 98 or something like that and I remember
there being a crap ton of Configurations you
could do with the enterprise and the galaxy class
sure you you could do a lot of configurations
But I didn't see many more. I think the galaxy
class was a little bit or the Constitution class
was a little bit more versatile Matt is this
one a slam dunk? I you know like they're talking
specs and numbers and things but like if you
look at them just look at them the Constitution
looks way more what I think of when I think of
classic sci -fi whereas the the D it just looks
like a giant frumpy space city it I definitely
have to agree I if I had to compare the two the
the original Constitution version wins for me
every time only because it was the first and
it just it it just looks like the space exploration
vehicle whereas the other one screams 90s or
screams 80s so if you could have flying saucer
if you could if you could either captain one
or if you could have a model of one if you're
looking at it in that respect does that does
that change the way you look at it which one
would you rather have or which one would you
rather pilot Galaxy class man holodecks I'm not
leaving and you and you all know exactly why
if you if you had to have a model of one The
Constitution does look a little cooler. I will
give you that one. I I definitely Swing definitely
towards the the Constitution class. I've always
been a fan of it my favorite iteration is the
the a that from the original series because it
still counts. There's definitely a lot of different
ways to look at it and I guess you know you could
look at it which one looks cooler which one can
do more which one did more I guess there's it
depends on what which way you look at the ships
but does it doesn't I don't know if you guys
have your minds made up or not but we'll go around
and see if we got votes Steve I'm assuming you're
voting for the original series Enterprise? Definitely.
Okay Matt what do you think? I'm going to go
with the D. I just think it doesn't look as cool.
It doesn't look as cool, but still gets your
vote. I'm with you for a couple of things that
Birdman was saying. As far as in a fight, it
wins. And there's a lot more things to do on
board. So I've always kind of leaned towards
the next generation version. What about you,
Birdman? Oh, definitely Galaxy. Definitely the
Enterprise D. Alright, so that does it for the
first category we're gonna get into a series
of categories that is comparing the Characters
of these two shows and then we'll get into some
other stuff towards the end outside of the characters
But starting off obviously makes sense We have
to do the classic comparison of the captains
of these ships that we were just talking about
So we're talking about James T Kirk and we're
talking about Jean -Luc Picard Matt why don't
you start with this one? What's your first thoughts
when you think about these two individuals? Well,
they're both very cocky, confident guys, which
is something you kind of want in a TV show, Captain.
I don't know how good it'd be in an actual military
setting. But I don't know. I think of Patrick
Stewart. He's this huge Shakespearean actor and
known worldwide. And then you've got William
Shatner. who's known worldwide for other reasons.
The Shattisms. Yeah. Like, there's definitely
some disparity between acting skill, but I don't
know if there's disparity between captaining
skill, you know? They're different guys and they
approach things differently. And I know that,
I don't know, I think of Patrick Stewart as huge,
but I don't know if he's as well known for his
Star Trek role as Shatner is, you know? There
may be a reason for that too as you mentioned
if you're gonna look at this one from a purely
acting standpoint We don't even need to discuss
it Patrick Stewart is superior actor than William
Shatter in any way shape or form you look at
it. You cannot more than that Birdman, what do
you think when you think about these two guys?
I think TJ Hooker versus Professor X is a pretty
easy fight. Just saying. Honestly, for me, it
comes down... I mean, actors... Patrick Stewart,
I was going to call him Captain Picard. In terms
of captaining Picard, without a doubt, because
yes, Kirk, you did accomplish a lot, but you
pissed off the Klingons more than once. Picard
didn't start any wars and he defeated the Borg.
and he made Q spare humanity Kirk sure you may
have saved the Federation Picard saved humanity
let that sink in for a minute boom headshot the
other thing is from a personality standpoint,
even though they're both captains, and they're
both from Star Trek, and they're both the captain
in the Enterprise, et cetera, et cetera. And
there are a lot of similarities that you can
compare. They're very different as far as personalities
go. I mean, I know you said that they're both
a little cocky, a little arrogant, et cetera.
But I still think from a personality standpoint
that they're vastly different. um from a maturity
standpoint um from an intelligence standpoint
their characters are are very much different
um you know obviously Kirk when he's taking over
uh when he's taking this position you know he
is he is young he is green um You know, he's
in a completely different position than when
John Luke Picard's character is introduced to
us in the next generation as obviously a more
of a seasoned veteran type character So they
do have a lot of differences as well. Steve.
What do you what do you think of when you think
of these two? Well, I do love Kirk and he That
was my original captain that I Remember as a
kid growing up in addition to Picard I still
have to give it to Picard only for the fact that,
one, he's had to grow as a captain. For one,
he had his heart stabbed out by the Nausicaans,
which is what caused him to become the captain
that he is, whereas Kirk was kind of like, he
was more cocky, whereas Picard was cocky until
that point and then... everything was more calculated
and diplomatic and thought through. Whereas Kirk's
like, let's gamble and see, you know, and hope
that the dice roll in his favor more or less.
And I think that that's why, I mean, both of
them have commanded more than one Federation
ship. I mean, Kirk's had, you know, the original
enterprise, the reconstructed enterprise, the...
U .S .S .A. and then you have Picard that's had
the Stargazer, the Enterprise D and the Enterprise
E. They've each had three ships that they've
been captain of, but I think that the reason
that Picard stands out more so is because he's,
for the very same reasons Dodd said, he's just
overall a better captain. Alright, so your vote
is for Picard, Steve? Correct. And Dodd, you're
the same? Oh, absolutely. Yeah, I'm gonna give
it to Picard, but I think Kirk could have beaten
just about anybody else Hey, he's going to get
anybody else. I will agree I could make a pretty
passionate argument for Janeway and Cisco and
I'd ignore you except Archer fuck Archer Yep,
exactly Go back to quantum leap asshole anyway
Clean sweep in this category four votes for Picard
All hate mail can be directed to. Exactly. I
know there's a ton of Kirk fans out there and
there's a ton of people that like him better
than Picard. I just don't... I don't... If I'm
joining a crew and I get to pick who I... who's
gonna be my captain, I'm taking Picard every
time. I feel more secure and more safe about
my life. He's not reckless. Yeah, and about what
we're gonna accomplish and the things, you know,
not just in a battle sense, but on a... just
like from a humanitarian type thing and all that.
So, you know, I guess it goes back to what their
voyage is all about. I think Picard can handle
that better. I know going through here that some
people are going to question which people I paired
up with, which people, et cetera, et cetera.
There's probably 12 different ways you could
do this, but it is the way it is. So you can.
direct your hate at the comparisons and who I'm
pitting against each other directly to me and
that's all my fault. Send it to feedback at geekcastradio
.com. Just say Optimist Solo is retarded. Hashtag.
But her next category, I decided to somewhat
go with the science officers, quote unquote.
And I know also some people had different roles
throughout the run of their show, which we didn't
mention. But I guess we can get that out of the
way. Most people that are watching this, I'm
assuming no. But Star Trek, the original series,
obviously, was a three season show, 79 episodes
from 1966 to 1969, whereas The Next Generation
was a seven season show, 178 episodes from 1987
to. 1994. And the science officers we're comparing
here in this third category would be Spock and
Data. I think they're a good comparison for multiple
different reasons. I know when we get through
all the characters, we'll talk about some of
the other ways we could have matched them up.
But I like Spock and Data going against each
other. And I'm actually starting this category
off with no idea how I'm voting, because I keep
going back and forth on these two for different
reasons. So it might depend on what you all say.
Birdman, how do you how do you break these two
guys down? How do you compare these two and how
do you decide who's better? Well, it depends
on when you're comparing these characters like
do you do data? pre -emotion chip or post -emotion
chip? Because that's an important distinction
to look at, too. Also, are you factoring in anything
expanded universe, such as video games, comic
books, and, well, books? And for Spock, you have
to kind of apply the same kind of rules there
as well. I mean, this is a harder category than
you might think, even for me. I mean... I'm probably
gonna go data, but at the same time Spock does
have that half human intuition, whereas he wouldn't,
I wouldn't use the word reckless, but he takes
calculated risks with that little bit of a human
hunch, whereas data, it breaks down by data.
There literally is no... well let's take a shot
and see what happens he's like okay if i factor
this that and the other thing i calculate x amount
probability of success whereas spock it's a gut
thing and logic it's a logical gut response if
that makes any guy mad how would you break this
one down or how would you start to tackle it
um yeah i'm just as on the fence as you are i'm
thinking like who makes a better like Co -star
or you know person to bounce off of because I
think of like Kirk and Spock's interaction like
you green -blooded heartless bastard and things
like that and I think like data gets more like
It's like a data about this like oh, he's just
a robot And I think that like Spock is more interesting
to have in a group than data is I was just about
to say something similar I was gonna say what
if we look at it as who was more important to
their individual series because to me Initially,
I'm thinking that Data has so much more going
for him. But if you look at who is more important
to their individual series, that to me seems
like it's Spock, because does the classic series
survive and is it as good if you take Spock out
of it? Whereas Data, as good as he is, maybe
has a stronger supporting cast that you could
take Data out and that show still survives easier?
Yeah, because Part of the appeal and the power
of the original series is that chemistry between
Nimoy and Shatner, not just on Street. Well,
and DeForest Kelly. Yeah, and DeForest Kelly.
It's that trio or even that duo working together.
And as much as I love Data, he's not second in
command. He's third at best. And even then, Picard
will always default to Riker. He's like, well,
what do you think number one not well, mr. Data,
what's your opinion, but he doesn't ask them?
You know what? I mean, he's gonna rely on Ryker
more so than data So I guess you can look at
it one or two ways who is more important to their
series or who makes the better science officer?
Because data makes the better science officer
Oh without a doubt without a doubt Spock is probably
more important to a series Steve, how do you
break this one down? I'm still not sure where
I go Well, I definitely see where Spock is more
important to his series. However, data has come
in just as much of handy just because of the
technological aspect throughout the series, whether
it be hacking into systems or his positronic
net. For instance, Think First Contact, would
Picard have gotten out of that by himself? Probably
not. He needed data. I mean... There's a lot
of I mean and I'm not saying that Spock hasn't
helped Kirk get out of life -and -death situations
because he has but I think the key thing would
between the two of them is one's actually alive
and one's not and The interactions that they
have between everybody not saying that data is
treated any less by his You know the senior crew
because it's not but at least in one season he
was but But I think that Spock overall has had
the most lasting effect on the entire franchise.
Yeah, I mean, I guess if you're going to take
just your generic people off the street and say
Star Trek and ask them to come up with, you know,
think of a name or think of a character from
Star Trek, people would probably come up with
Spock before they came up with Data. Well, I
mean, I think that most of the original crew,
despite people not really associating with them
as much, think that those are the most iconic
still just because I mean you say me up Scotty
or you know Kirk to Enterprise or you know You
know and then Spock is Vulcan, you know salute
so I mean it I definitely see that I mean, especially
you look at Spock and this kind of coincides
with the original series and kind of doesn't
and kind of coincides with the next generation,
but He's been in The Next Generation, as has
Kirk, as has Scotty, as has McCoy. And he's also
in The Rebooted Universe and in that original
series. I mean Spock's just he's had the longest
reach out of any of the original crew And I guess
although you I was making the argument that Spock
is more important to his individual series I'm
saying that from like a casting standpoint data
may be more important to his series from a writing
in a story standpoint as far as the different
types of Moral questions they were able to bring
up with data as a character on that show well
I definitely see that too just because he's he
kind of It was the the dilemma of what do you
consider life? Yeah, and the human the human
side of things although I mean not saying there
wasn't similar storylines for Spock, but they
definitely had they definitely Data allowed them
to go into areas that they wouldn't have been
able to do without that character How close are
you to making a decision birdman? Well, on one
hand, Spock is awesome. On the other hand, Data
did get the bang -tash -a -yar. That's true.
But Spock got Savick and got whoever the chick
was in the original series. In that case, Spock!
He won up some. Thanks for the power of sex appeal!
Matt, what do you think? What's making the ultimate
decision for you here against these two guys?
Honestly, one point that hasn't been brought
up is that I think on more occasions Data was
a threat to the Enterprise than Spock ever was.
There were a number of times Data once took over
the whole D by himself just to go see his dad
one more time and other situations like that.
You can argue the same point with Spock though
because he took over the original Enterprise
under Kirk's command to get Captain Pike adhering
to send him back to Talos IV. But you could reason
with Spock, whereas Data, if... Once he has a
program, he's not going to be able to divert
from it. No, but Spock could have diverted from
his whole setup, too, but he did it anyway. True.
And he's done similar things for, you know, like
his father and for, you know, other other reasonings
that he's kind of broken the code of Starfleet
to do what he thought needed to be done. and
data has done the same, and also in the same
regard. Both of them have been taken over and
manipulated in their minds before by other forces
within the Star Trek universe. So similarities
can be tossed around. So Matt, I guess what is
it? Is it the iconic more important to the series,
or is it who makes the better science officer?
Which way do you go? I'm just going to go with
Spock, just based on my human intuition. All
right, that's fair enough, Steve. Spock and Matt
Bergman your official vote with Spock also. Yeah,
I'm sorry data I know well I since the category
has already decided I am going to just throw
a vote out for data just because I don't feel
like this should be a clean sweep of a category
because these two guys are too similar there's
too many things going for each other and I'm
gonna go with who do I want to be my science
officer and in that case I'm gonna go with data
um but obviously the category will still go to
Mr Spock and I could also raise another point
for data he has a cat that's true and I like
cats so And Birdman, you like cats, so we can
share that. All right. Moving on to our fourth
category, another pairing of characters here.
And in this time, we are going with the chief
engineer. Interested to see what you guys have
to say about this. Scotty versus Mr. Geordie
LaForge. Matt, start this one off. These two
are obviously very iconic individuals. LeVar
Burton, all the beam me up Scotty stuff. Where
do you start to try to break this one down? Well,
I don't know like a part of me wants to just
be like well who Seems like they're better at
their job and I feel like in most situations
it feels like it's the TNG guy But at the same
time I feel like Scotty did a lot more thinking
on the fly Like, Jordy knew things by the books
and he did a lot of interesting things like the
time he loaded up that holo program with the
designer and bounced off of her to get new things.
But I feel like Scotty did a lot more. He seems
like the more down and dirty handyman type of
engineer. Well, this is kind of how I see it.
Scotty is more, not only is he down and dirty,
but he also Back in the 23rd century, there were
no other alternatives and you were out in deep
space by yourself. He had to come up with things
on the fly or kind of rig things up to work to
how they should be or close to how they should
be. Even as far as enhancing the Enterprise compared
to what Starfleet specs were. Whereas Geordi
kind of had to just maintain. And he had to make
modifications depending on the mission but Scotty
had to do it because They were out in the middle
of nowhere and they didn't have a choice I mean
he was the ultimate Starfleet mechanic or could
you flip it around and say that Geordi was possibly
Shouldering a bigger responsibility because he's
dealing with such a more massive system Geordi
had more support and had data True. Jordan had
help. Yeah, exactly. He had an entire staff in
engineering. Scotty had the three people. Scotty's
like, dammit, laddie, show up to work for once.
Yeah. I mean, think of... How often do you think
Scotty left engineering? I bet you he had a bunk
just off of the warp core. Whereas LaForge, he
had time to go be Sherlock Holmes and everything.
He had time to hang out in 10 forts. Scotty ain't
got time for that. He's got a ship to run. He'll
take a Scotch in engineering, please. Exactly.
OK, so if you have your own version of the enterprise,
who do you want to be your chief engineer, Dad?
Scotty, because A, he thinks on the fly. Two,
he doesn't need help, pretty much, because he
can figure it out for himself. He's resourceful.
And if he can't find a part, he can probably
build it or procure it somehow. Whereas Jordy,
as much as I love Mr. Reading Rainbow, he's...
Too much of a disadvantage. He's a 24th century
wimp What about the we haven't brought it up
yet? Does does the visor add any points to LaForge's
character? Makes it makes them look cool. He's
used it though to do stuff that Scotty wouldn't
be able to do true true While that may be true
It's also been a hindrance because I mean look
the Klingons got a hold of a code to the Enterprise
by piping into it and crash the ship Geordi shows
the evil of Google Glass. He does. Steve, are
you picking Scotty as your engineer? We're assembling
a dream team crew here. I would definitely take
Scotty because, I mean, think about it this way.
If you're stuck with no life support and you
have the option of being locked in a transporter
for 75 years with the option to possibly live,
I think I'd take that option. And Scotty, I think,
knows how to do that, obviously, because that's
what made him survive. What about you, Matt?
Yeah, gotta give it to Scotty. Alright, this
one I will allow to be a clean sweep because
as much as I love Geordie LaForge, like he is
one of my favorite characters in the whole franchise,
but if it comes down to actually who do I want
to, and that's how I broke it down, I guess,
to the science engineer. Who I wanted as my science
engineer would be Data. Who I want as my engineer
is the guy that can make something out of nothing
that doesn't matter how much book learning you
do. He's gonna know. which thing to hit, which
thing to put together. So I got to go with Scotty
on this one as well. So a clean sweep for the
original series in this category. And we will
move on to. I know some people were these positions
and some people weren't and as the series went
on people changed positions But we're kind of
looking at the navigators slash security officers
of the two crews So we're looking at Chekhov
and Sulu for the original series We're looking
at wharf and Tashiar for the next generation.
Is it a disadvantage that Tashiar dies? I don't
know but Birdman, how do you how do you start
looking at these four? She was killed by black
goo She was killed by Tar. It depends on when
you look at these guys and the main reason I
bring that up is the original series It was a
pretty serious time of, I wouldn't say war in
the Federation, but there were constant skirmishes
with like Klingons and Romulans, Tholians, you
know, basically all sorts of really bad shit.
And whereas the Enterprise era, the Enterprise
primarily was an exploration and science ship.
Like it was pretty much a peace vessel. However,
that being said, war of Klingon race, first Klingon
in Starfleet Academy, could you argue Star -
starship combat experience be kind of light all
things considered and then you look at checkoffs
experiences young and inexperienced you could
probably get up pretty good parallel might be
between uh... check off and war sulu uh... as
a security officer and uh... sorry navigator
sorry uh... once again he's got that uh... that
think on the fly thing and uh... I do appreciate
that. I really do. Then again, Tashiar, it's
Tashiar. And I know a lot of people like Tashiar.
I couldn't stand her as a character. She had
to bring her back. I couldn't stand her as a
kid. I can't stand her when I rewatch episodes
of that show. I don't know what it is. So for
me, it's it's literally can is worth good enough
to beat out Chekhov and Sulu. You just hate Denise
Crosby. Yeah, I guess. I mean, I liked her better
as a Romulan, I guess. Sudo Romulan, whatever
you want to call it. Oh, you mean her daughter?
Whatever. But. Man, Worf as a security officer
is hard to beat. As far as, like, if you're looking
at it from a Navigator standpoint, obviously
you gotta go check up on Sulu. But man, Worf
is just so darn cool. Matt, how do you do this
one? I don't know, I feel like it's unfairly
stacked. Because, like, when I think of Navigators,
I think Sulu versus Wesley. Yeah, you could throw
him in there and take Toshihara out, I guess,
if you wanted to. No, don't do it. It won't be
fair. Take Wesley out of everything. Oh, come
on! He's got the Lawson sweater! He likes the
Wesley crushers. I got nothing against Will Wheaton.
Like, I think he's a fine actor, kind of a douchebag
in person, but a fine actor. I think the problem
with that one was all script and they wanted
to force him in. But that's neither here nor
there in this category. Like, I don't know. I
really, I really like Tasha Yar and Worf, but
I also really like Sulu. You know, like, can
you compare Warf's bat left skills versus Sulu's
fencing skills? I mean, they both pulled out
weapons on their ships in various times. They're
interesting guys. It's a hard one. Sulu looks
a lot cooler and goofier when he's got his fencing
sword out, though. Yeah, man. Shirtless fencing
down the halls. That's what I want. My ship.
Fucking A. Steve, what do you think? While I
do like the original series cast See, I'm kind
of torn because there's one I like on either
side More than more than the other Is that Sulu
and Worf? Or Chekhov and Worf? It's Chekhov I
don't like Tashiar at all. I never have. I was
glad when they Decided to kill her off and put
Worf in her position Think it was like I mean
it was the line the same times that they got
rid of Dr. Crusher and then they brought in Pulaski
and then they were like, oh we screwed up You
know, so I Think that it it caused wharf to become
a better character that again he get to touch
two series instead of just one So what's that
Possibly a third isn't there isn't he supposed
to be trying to head up his own new? He's been
trying that for about four years now. Yeah, I
think it's getting some headway though So they
say That's the same, you know Chekhov is doing
renegades and he's an admiral on that so yeah,
there is that option too, um But no, I mean,
I think that it makes For a better case for at
least wharf I think because he's kind of the
jack -of -all -trades. He does both of their
jobs and one He does, you know kind of the navigation
tactical and communications all in one spot Plus
he was their security officer if it was wharf
and O 'Brien would it be better? Probably but
O 'Brien get shipped over after like third season
name in the first season He was just Transporter
Chief, and that's it. Yeah, well, and he also
did a little bit of here and there and, you know,
navigation stuff, but they, they booted his ass
pretty quick. Plus, he was always the O 'Brien
must suffer, so that means if he's on your ship,
bad shit's gonna happen. Pretty much. So as soon
as they get rid of him, then, because Worf would
say, would you like me to fire? About every,
you know, time that he was at Tactical. And Picard's
like, no. So how are we gonna vote in this one?
I'm still I don't know if it's just which single
person out of those four is the best then it's
warf for me But if I have to pick a team of warf
and Tasha or check off and Sulu that becomes
a lot harder Matt How are you gonna vote in this
one? First I mean, you know, it's fine. I don't
know. I think I'm I like Tasha more than anyone
else here, huh? Like I feel like I like the the
strong female lead on the bridge always there
Like, I think she was great from a writing standpoint
and I liked her as a character. Though I think
that Worf became a better character once she
died. I wish there was a better option. Like,
maybe getting her in trouble and putting her
in a different place or something. I don't know.
You know, I don't know. Like, George Takei is
one of my favorite people in the world. So it's
hard to vote against him. But I think I'm gonna
have to go with TNG on this. Alright, Birdman,
how do you think? I'm going classic series here.
Alright, Steve, it's one to one so far. Son of
a bitch. Because I like the one team more, but
I like the one character more. I'm gonna have
to go with the dwarf here. Alright, that makes
it hard for me now. Man. I'm in a similar situation.
Do you go with the team or do you go with the
one person? I mean, I understand what you're
saying about Tashiar and she is good from a writing
standpoint. Something just rubbed me wrong about
her. I don't know if it was the actress or the
appearance or what it was. Can't put my finger
on it. Never have been able to. Man, who do I
want as my navigators and security officers?
I like the dynamic, I think. Even though I don't
like Tashiar, I like the dynamic of the two.
And I like wharf as my security officer, so I'm
gonna go with the next generation on that one
All right, let's get on to the next category
which would be the medical staff so for the original
series we have mr. McCoy dr. McCoy and nurse
chapel who appeared sporadically and then we
have the Alternating doctors of the next generation
Beverly crusher and Katherine Pulaski. I guess
we should start I want to start with crusher
and Pulaski. Which one did you prefer just amongst
those two Birdman? You see, I actually like Pulaski,
but Beverly Crusher is hotter. It's sad. That's
actually a factor for me. But the thing is, I
feel like McCoy and Chappell were more pioneers
in their time, whereas Crusher and Pulaski did
have the huge advantage of having Starfleet Medical
behind them and all the advanced tech, whereas
McCoy and chapel had to make it up as they went
along so I'm with you at times. I like Pulaski
better, too I kind of went back and forth on
which one of those but as far as a category I'll
get mine out of the way because I think this
is a slam dunk I think With or without nurse
chapel McCoy wins this one. Yeah Yep, but I think
it is interesting on who likes crusher and who
likes Pulaski better But I will cast my vote
now and let you guys continue talking Matt, what
do you think? Think Pulaski was the worst thing
to happen to next generation since Wesley crusher.
Oh man, but she didn't have a bitch in sweater
Yeah, see that puts her down even lower like
an episode though where she grows old it's so
kick -ass Yeah, I wish she would die. She didn't
die She was the one that ended up fixing wharf
right when he broke his legs or spine or whatever
Yeah, it's like that's the one thing she's got
to her credit But even then, she didn't think
it was going to work or whatever. Yeah. And she
had no hope and wharf and anything. I don't know.
I hated Pulaski. Crusher was great, but I, you
know, I have mixed feelings about the whole tension
between her and Picard, like the will they get
married? Won't they get married? That was annoying.
I wish they wouldn't have done that as well.
Will they wear pants? Will they not? It was like,
I don't know. I think it is like unquestionably
has got to go with bones, man. Is that unanimous?
Yeah. Well, I mean, the one thing that Pulaski
made her really hateable is she hated data. She
really did. She had a mission to destroy data.
She's like, I hate you, you stupid android. She
was kind of a racist in a weird way. She was.
I think I liked her because there was no fear
of just going with the whole love angle with
anybody. She was just like, F you. He liked her
because she was unlovable? No, because she made
it so that there wasn't going to be a love story
line in that episode if it was dealing with her.
Because she hated everybody? Yeah. She's like,
you suck. But no, I'd have to go with McCoy because
he was the medical badass coming up with solutions
to problems that nobody had ever heard of before.
Right. And even in the comics he continues to
do so because they had one where they had Bashir,
Crusher, Pulaski and the EMH and they couldn't
figure out some disease that came about from
the original series time and Starfleet Medical
was wiped of the resources of it and Bones happened
to have it on his medical tricorder that he stole
from Starfleet that he never turned back in when
he quit. All right, so it's unanimous for the
original series as far as the medical staff,
which leads us to our last grouping of the actual
crews of these two ships, and that is the communications
members, which would be Lieutenant Uhura and
Deanna Troy. Birdman? The space cheerleader or
captain, we have an incoming message from Starfleet.
Yeah Well, hold on we can't we can't The other
one the other one was was sleeping with two of
her comets Hold on. Hold on. We can't use the
word Useful and not talk about how useful Deanna
Troy was every time Picard needed to be like
Mule screen for a second. What is that guy thinking?
Well, she can't read their thoughts she can read
their emotions, right Good poker player can do
that. No, but she was very good at allowing the
obvious to be stated There's a lot of hate for
Deanna Troy here, I mean like her as a character,
but come on she was very useful Yes, I candy
on the bridge see I don't see her as I candy
at all Matt. I do hate her, too No, she was actually
one of my favorite characters in that whole series.
I don't even feel like talking right now I don't
get it I Mean when you're when you're a beta
Zed that is that is a one -up Is to have one
of them on your crew? Yeah, her mom was annoying.
It's all get out. Although good, but she was
also nurse chapel, right? I understand and obviously,
you know big -time connections to the whole thing
Also the computer right and the computer so her
best role yet I don't know it's annoying as storylines
at times were with Riker and some other things
like she's very useful to have on your crew compared
to your who just basically was the definition
of communications person only. Although I guess
in the reboot maybe you could make an argument
for the new character but this is just the classic
series so we can't go there. Matt defend Deanna
Troy I'm doing a bad job of it. Yeah I don't
know. Well, I personally, the opposite of the
crusher Picard love interest, I liked Ryker Deanna.
See, that I did like. That'll give you... I think
that was well executed and it was, you know,
whenever there was a step forward or a step backward,
I felt like it was actually, you know, a real
story, not just like, well, that's what we're
doing this week. And I don't know, I like impacts
as an idea. I think that's a fun concept. I don't
think it gets enough time in fiction, so adding
it as a character that's usually on the bridge
is great. Would you rather have a communications
person that's strictly gonna give you communication
or a communication that also can read those feelings,
et cetera? Like, it's the same person, but then
she has an advantage to me. This is no contest.
Well, I mean if you're going strictly from a
useful point of view of what was shown on screen
between the two series Then I think it's no contest,
but that's not what we're doing here necessarily.
I Mean there were there's more to it and you
know Troy had the the largest wardrobe of anyone
on the D Like she had two different like I don't
know yoga outfits She had that awesome dress
the the blue one then she had her dress dressy
uniform that wasn't the dress uniform space cheerleader
so you guys are going for the the bland lieutenant
you're her she may be bland but she's got tech
skills what can you do dude diana you don't even
have a console in front of you she doesn't need
one Alright, so are we gonna have a split category
on this? Steve, are you voting for the original
series on this? As useful... I mean, they both
have their different uses, but I'm gonna have
to vote TNG on this one, I think. Oh. Alright.
Dot, are you going with the original series?
That's right! That's right. Alright, you're the
only one. I like Ohura! I'm progressive! I like
Ohura, too. I just like Deanna more. That's where
I don't necessarily like either one, but if I
had to pick one on my crew, it's gonna be Troy
She's more helpful to me. I Put Dax Yeah, yeah,
you know what Dax should be in this cuz arguably
she she at least has cool tech skills and as
generations of experience true We couldn't put
everybody. We had a lot of other people we could
have put in. Not room for everybody. Including
this other one who I have down as category eight.
Who's the better number one bridge officer? William
Riker? Or the one that didn't exist for the original
series? Now I know a lot of people would say
this is where we could have had Spock versus
Riker as the second in command type thing. But
really there's no comparison for Riker in the
original series. If anything Kirk is a closer
comparison to Riker. Exactly card in my opinion
as far as like a personality age You know all
the different traits that go into Kirk and Riker
are more similar and Picard's almost like the
the dad Picard's almost of a league of his own
whereas Riker is Well for one his idol was Captain
Kirk, right? Which is shown on numerous occasions
plus He's got that same kind of grittiness and
kind of gamble and kind of, you know, the way
that he carries himself is almost like Kirk,
but it's more refined. We couldn't compare him
to Kirk because that was already going to be
Picard, and I didn't want to compare him to Spock
because we already had data, so I really didn't
have anybody to compare Riker to, but I at least
wanted to acknowledge that he existed. Birdman,
is there anybody I should have put him against?
You could argue. Chakotay from Voyager. That
would not fit this debate. The original series,
though, there's really nobody. Yeah. Like, I'm
trying to think here from the original series.
Well, what if we looked at the movies? Is there
anybody even in there? I don't really remember
anybody that could compare to that. Kirstie Alley.
Nobody. I mean, Decker. Kirstie Alley. There
we go. So that would have been an unfair advantage
and Next Generation would have got a slam dunk
on this one. But she was in Cheers. Does his
existence give... I mean, this isn't a category,
so to speak, but does his existence in The Next
Generation give a point towards that series in
general as a character type that we didn't have
in the original series? .com .com .com . Would
almost argue so even though I don't want to just
for the fact that They had the same amount of
cast You know the seven and then if you count
Wesley, it's eight, but I try not to But They
it seems like the next generation crew made more
use of their cast of their seven Whereas the
original series did not Thanks an amount of episodes
thing though because yeah, I mean I I get that
too But I think that also a lot of it Evolved
when Roddenberry was no longer involved with
the series when Berman kind of takes the helms.
Yeah Okay, so that's just for fun. I just wanted
to at least acknowledge that right here exists
So we don't seem silly for not having him involved
in this debate somehow even though we're not
comparing him against anybody Moving away from
the actual cruise a little bit obviously both
series deal with a variety of alien species,
enemies, etc, etc. There was a couple pretty
significant ones though that exist in both that
I wanted to compare here. So we're comparing
the old versions, the original series versions
of these guys, to the next generation versions
and we're talking about Klingons and Romulans
because they are probably the two most prominent
ones that exist in both. Do we like the old Klingons
and the old Romulans better or the newer Klingons
and Romulans going when it comes to these two
series. Matt, how do you how do you start comparing
these two or is or does Klingons go one way and
Romulans go the other way? Well, you got a good
point. I don't know. I like I feel like they
were fleshed out a lot more in Next Generation.
That might be because there's more time and then,
you know, all that. It definitely looks cooler
in the Next Generation. That's a budget thing,
though. That's hard to compare. Um, but you know
at the same time the Klingons in the original
series had that storyline of they look so much
like humans they can blend in and Like I can't
think of a parallel to the next generation and
I like that story sometimes dressed up like Klingons
Yeah, yeah, I mean the humans could always just
graft things to their faces and do things like
that But they were like, hey wharf dress up like
a Klingon What? Nothing. Continue. Geez. I don't
know, I got nothing. Warf, looking like a man.
Birdman, how do we start trying to compare these
two? I felt the Romulans were more effective
in the new series. They're more of a subtle threat.
Whereas in the original series, in my opinion,
they were a whole lot of who gives a fuck. Whereas
the Klingons in the old series, they were more
of a military threat, and they are still very
much a military threat in the next generation.
You can negotiate with these ones. There are
ones who want to talk. For me, I might go to
what he was saying, and obviously there's more
episodes, so it's easier probably to flesh out
these races in the next generation. But to me,
the Romulans, if we're comparing the two, are
a closer comparison between the original series
and the next generation. Like, I can't separate
them as much. Whereas the Klingons... the storylines
that they did with the Klingons in the Next Generation,
and maybe it's an unfair advantage since you
have a Klingon as part of your crew and all the
different things you can do involving Worf, but
those are some of my favorite episodes of the
Next Generation are the ones including the different
Klingon relationships and power struggles, etc.
So I can't necessarily say a clear cut winner
in Romulans, but for me, I like the Next Generation
Klingons way better than the original series.
Steve, what do you think? I like I like them
for different reasons. I like the Romulus just
I like their style and how they look better in
the original series Better although they are
more more militant in the future Thinking that
they're better than everybody else whereas the
Klingons still do but they hold uphold their
honor and Whereas in the original it doesn't
seem like they had one had an honor system. It
was more of just you f'd with me I'll come after
you. But I have to argue also that the Klingons
look cooler in the 24th century and there's a
lot more going for them. Does anybody want to
make an argument before we try to get votes for
either side? Well, speaking on the honor code
thing, like, you would hear half of the Klingons
of Next Generation talk about honor, and then
the other half just ignore it entirely. Like,
that was a constant thing of, uh, that guy's
got no honor. It's like, yeah, and he's winning
right now. Right. Like, that happened a lot.
I don't know my vote only like I said not for
the Romulan standpoint because I think it's almost
a washer It's too close to call but for Klingons
it swayed me to vote for next generation in this
category overall Birdman, what do you think?
Honestly, I'm gonna have to go with the new the
new kind of generations Simply more or less because
of the Romulans Okay, because like I said, there
are more subtle threat. They've infiltrated the
Federation deep they could literally be anywhere
at any time. It wasn't even more of a subtle
threat, but it was a more subtle threat, but
also a more serious threat. Yeah, I mean, their
ships are massive. Their spy network is unparalleled.
I mean, the Romulans, honestly, they're pretty
badass, whereas in the original series, ooo,
cloaking device. I don't know, although... Like
I said Klingons in the original series they were
they were a pretty big threat to the Federation
now not so much But yeah, I'm gonna give my vote
right now. I'm saying no. All right The classic
Romulans used to have like a giant bird painted
on this hull of their ship. Yeah You gotta give
them points for that shit, right? Is it enough
points for you to cast your vote for the original
series? Giant bird and maybe give them a space
mullet and they could like mud in the space.
I'd be down I'm gonna give it the next generation
for all the things Birdman said. All right, Steve
I'm gonna have to go next generation just because
the the sheer Amount of ships the coolness to
them the the Klingons. I mean Overall, it's it's
just a better pick. All right, so a clean sweep
for the next generation Which brings us to our
halfway point in category number 10 here. Looking
away from people for a minute, we've compared
the ships, but let's get right down to it. For
the most part, most of the action took place
on the bridge. Which show had the cooler bridge?
I know there's different versions of them, and
you can break them down however you'd like to,
but what show has a better bridge, Steve? Now
does it have to be the original series bridge,
or can it be one of the original series movies
bridges? Either I say technically we're going
to the series against the series. OK, maybe we
should stick with that. OK, because it's it's
even that it's still a hard choice between choosing
film to film. Look at it this way. Which bridge
would you rather spend sitting for eight hours
on? Which is more comfortable? You can't really
sit on the next generation one unless you're
one of the senior most crew members Well, actually
that's not entirely true those cabinets underneath
all the terminals and the sides and the back
They actually pull out his seats And it's a hell
of a lot brighter so you wouldn't need glasses
for eyestrain So I think I'm gonna have to go
to next generation just because the the bridge
just looks more comforting more relaxed And there's
more than one way out. Yeah. It also just looks
more intimidating. If you get on the view screen
and you're about to have some type of interaction
with one, if the view screen comes up and it's
the original series bridge, you're like, what
is this hodgepodge? I'm not afraid of this. If
the next generation one comes up, you're like,
dang, son, these guys are serious. Like, I'm
not messing with these guys. I screwed. Yeah.
So I agree with you guys. I'd be going with the
next generation bridge as the one I would prefer
to be a part of. What about you, Burban? Yeah,
definitely. Because once again, if you look at
the bridge from the original series, there's
one way on that bridge and one way off. So I
don't know how you'd even get to the bathroom.
Which, yeah, where's the bathroom on this thing?
Well, it's on deck 17. Also, this one gave you
quick access to... The captain's ready room?
The captain's ready room. Well, on the other
side, it is the bathroom. Okay. It seems to be
on the next generation bridge, you have got a
lot more... custom ability plus you can obviously
you can run the entire ship from the bridge you
can run engineering from there you it just seems
like there's more more control options on the
next generation plus those chairs look really
comfortable you can adjust everything on the
original bridge those don't look like adjustable
chairs and more stuff happened on the next generation
bridge yeah you know as like other characters
outside of the crew showing up yeah the board
Exactly. All sorts of crazy crap happened on
that bridge. Plus, you've got that wonderful
skylight looking in the space. Right. Crack it
with a hammer. Yeah. They all die. All right.
So clean sweep on category 10. Sticking with
objects and things like that. It's category 11.
We're going to move into just weapons in general.
Now, you can look at this as phasers. You can
look at this as the actual enterprise weapons.
You can look at this as the villains weapons
that they came across. Just overall, if you're
going to watch the entire series, of both shows
which one features cooler weapons i like the
phaser rifle from the new series but the original
one looks so sci -fi as to be really stupidly
badass because it looks like the ultimate giant
phaser ray gun right uh but the weapons of that
era were because they were more primitive in
some ways they were more disruptive i mean Think
about the Klingon Blaster from Star Trek 3, when
it just disintegrated people. Yeah. I wouldn't
want to be shot by that. Fuck disruptors. Whereas
in the next generation, phaser and disruptor
hits are more survivable. They're almost a little
bit more civilized. Well, that's because the
90s hit and they had a different government set
the phasers to stone. In the 60s, you could kill
people. Now, are we also including starship weapons
in here as well? In that case, the next generation
quantum torpedoes, Nuff said. If we're also going
to talk about weapons, we can also talk about
armor, a blade of armor, which Janeway brought
back from the future. But if we're talking strictly
next generation, because that would be technically
in that timeline, if you really want to stretch
it out, because she was back in Nemesis. So the
technology is there. um trying to think of other
big ass weapons uh well you have the i mean think
about it this way you have the tractor beams
uh that are more advanced you have the deflector
dish um you have uh you know the tacan pulses
you have the the borg cubes that are nanite weapons
the nanites yep um you have the ability to adapt
and prevent So, I mean, I think it's going to
be pretty obvious since the next generation is
so much further in the future that the technology,
et cetera, is going to be there to allow for
better technologically sound weaponry, et cetera.
But what if you're going about just how each
series used weaponry, weapons? You could argue
the original series was more brutal because of
things like the Doomsday Machine. You never saw
a planet killer on a scale outside of a bore
cube in the next generation at least Well, maybe
that tin man thing if it turned evil, but um
Yeah, because the next or the original series
had a lot more like I said Brutal weaponry when
you really think about it Plus there are a lot
of blades used in the original series if I remember
I remember a lot of stabbing So I Don't know
it it it's hard I would not want to get shanked
in the 23rd century, but I sure as hell don't
want to get shot in the 24th so Wasn't it against
uh, well didn't kirk make a like a piecemeal
blunderbuss when he was fighting like a garner
once something like that Yeah, I forgot about
that. We got to count that weapon because that
was awesome That's true like explosive crystals
and john jammed him down a bamboo shoot and shot
a dude Yep, mccard never did that He just turned
it into a weapon I don't know. I think the the
classic standard issue phaser Like, I like that
the original series, it looked like a gun. Whereas
the other one, it looked like, I don't know,
could have been a scanning device. It could have
been anything. And I guess that that's, you know,
probably a possible thing in the future that
not all guns are gonna look like guns. But like,
I don't know. I like the pistol aspect of the
old one. So is your vote for the original series,
Matt? I don't know. I don't have a vote. Steve,
what do you think? How are we going in this?
Which series uses the weapons better? Which series
had better weapons? How do you want to go there?
Well, I do like the styles of some of the original
series stuff. I think I'm going to have to go
TNG on this one just because of the technological
advancements. I mean, although I don't like their
hand phasers in the 24th century compared to
the 23rd century, I do agree on the same thing
as the rifles with Dodd there. Original series
ones look like dogs not compared to the TNG ones
But I I just think overall it's a hands -down
TNG I mean you have the original series not only
were they brutal with their weapons, but They
they use their phasers from the enterprise to
light a friggin mountain. I mean torch it but
Birdman agree or disagree I agree Matt back to
you. Yeah, I'll give it the TNG Although the
homemade blunderbusses are major points. Alright,
that makes it three clean sweeps in a row for
the next generation. Let's see what happens as
we get back into some people. We've talked about
the crews and we talked about some of the races.
We didn't get into specific villains. So which
series had the best villains? We had people like
Gorn, General Chang. Khan, Commander Kruse, Harry
Mudd in the original series and a bunch more
that I'm sure all you guys will want to mention
as we discuss this. Some of the main ones you
might think of for the next generation, Arbus,
that's the character that killed Tasha Yar. You
have the Borg Queen. You have Q. He may be enough
to win this category alone. The Tura sisters,
as far as Klingons go. Lor, Data's brother. Which
series did you like the villains in better, Birdman?
TNG I felt they were more memorable. I mean out
of the original series. I can name General Chang
the Gorn con mud and Tremaine you asked me Who
I can name out of TNG I can rattle off like ten
And the other thing is we are somewhat cheating
here because the villains were coming up with
for the original series are technically from
the movies mostly Yeah, well the only one that's
not is is the Gorn con and Harry mud and the
Gorm is only one dude I know, it was one episode.
You got killed by a homemade blunderbuss. Keep
going with your thoughts, so you can name more
for the next generation. Does that make a surefire
thing for them? I think it does, plus the fact
that the villains outside, like, I think the
villains in TNG are more, they seem more like
a galactic threat. The Klingons are a regional
thing. You look at the Borg, something like that
could consume the Milky Way. Conceivably like
they eat everything the Borg could come at you
out of nowhere and Seemingly had no limits to
their reach and Q really didn't seem to have
a lot of limits to his reach either Not until
Voyager anyway Yeah, but that was so great about
Q is that like he was clearly the first villain
they ever fought But ultimately he was rooting
for humanity like if it wasn't for Q There was
no way the Federation was ever gonna be prepared
for the Borg Like him him throwing the enterprise
at the Borg way before they would have ever encountered
him is what allowed them to start their research
and everything That allowed them to fight. Yeah
Like and just think of like if you were to take
these and switch them right like Khan versus
Versus like Picard like he got duped by Kirk.
So how easily would he get duped by Picard? But
then like Q versus Kirk. I Think that I made
for an interesting story. Well, they would have
been Battling each other with with you know sarcastic
remarks. He would have just been having fun with
him. Yeah, and Kirk would too But I don't think
Kirk would have outsmarted Q No, he wouldn't
outsmarted him, but he would have gambled in
the right way just to piss him off and make him
leave He would have rikered him. Yeah So Matt
is your vote for TNG? Yeah, I don't think it's
really comparable Steve, you have two votes going
TNG. Are you going to be dissenting among them?
I think ultimately the original series only had
actually two real villains in Khan and Chang.
But again, the only recurring villain that the
original series had was Khan. You could argue
with races of people, but Harry Mudd is not really
a threat. I mean, Khan's really the only threat,
and he was only in one episode of the show and
one movie. I mean, that's... You look at TNG,
I mean, the Borg are in half the series after,
you know, season two or three. You have the Dura
sisters, which are a pain in the ass. You have
Lore, which shows up upteen times, and then you
have Q that shows up eight. So... And he's there
at the beginning of the end of the series. Right.
So, I mean, I would say overall that the next
iteration wins it hands down. Alright, fair enough.
Getting back away from the people then for a
little while, basically for the rest of the time
here. And this one, you do not have to look at
specifically just one crew versus the other crew.
Looking at the series as a whole, which series
had... The better style, the better uniforms,
the better clothing, the better outfits for either
alien races, you can talk about the actual crew
uniforms, which one you liked better. Just overall,
which series had better clothing? I know this
seems like a weird thing for us to be comparing,
but we're trying to break these down in any way
possible. Birdman, what do you think? How do
we break down the clothing? How quickly can you
get it off if you got to go to the bathroom or
you want to get some nookie? That's how I break
it down. That's one way to look at it. Not good
for TNG. Honestly, the original series uniforms,
I like how simple they are. The problem is telling
ranks, it's a little too much effort because
you have to memorize it, in my opinion. Well,
not only that, but it's like, here, let me see
your arm. Yes, please, show me your wrist, fine
sir. Raz, you know, look at my chest or look
at my arms. At least I can make it look like
I'm looking at your eyes. Functionally, I think
the TNG uniforms look better from a military
standpoint, because I think it's easier to identify
officers. Their pants were cooled down by the
shoes. Sorry. Yeah. Although the original series,
like I said, they would seem more comfortable,
like you could maybe get a uniform. an extra
size too big so you can fit into it. Whereas
the next generation, man, you better hope you
look good naked. Because it hugs in all the wrong
places. It was actually very distracting, oftentimes,
seeing Picard pull his uniform down because it
was starting to ride up inside. Yeah, like that
got a little tedious at times like he goes it's
writing my crack number one So you'd rather wear
the ones from the original series, but you like
the ones from the next generation better Is that
what I'm hearing? Yeah, although I do like the
later TNG era when they get as I call them the
corduroy uniforms Yes, I like those as well,
but I do like the later versions where they where
they were still the they were still colored,
but they weren't as jump soupy spandex, I guess,
like the ones with the collars. Yeah. Yeah. Those
I liked the best, but corduroys would be a second.
All right. Am I the only one who really hated
when the captain had like the the jacket with
the leather shoulders and the gray undershirt?
That was Pimpacard. Oh, I hated that outfit so
much. Kurt pulled that one once, too. But he
had the green shirt. Oh, no, I like I liked that
what he had like the green open chest shirt Like
I liked that Kirk and I hated gray shirt Picard.
I don't know. I hated gray shirt Picard as well
I like the green shirt Kirk, but Kirk look like
he spilled pea soup all over himself. I know
the color well if if Now if you were talking
movies, I would say the original series and the
next generation would be tied as far as because
I like the red jumpsuits and the the the next
generation corduroy clothes but um again I'd
probably still go with the original series for
that um but I think even for the the regular
uniforms I'm going the original series just because
it's simpler and you know they need to take the
damn shirt off and just take the damn shirt off
they don't have to like number one unzip me Good
point. Now here's a question for the panel here.
How do I put my pants on? Who had the most comfortable
casual clothes? Well, the next generation, because
they actually had clothes. Whereas the original
series had jumpsuits. Everybody in the future
has jumpsuits. I think in the future, obviously
you had a lot more options. Although there were
certain races I thought had Better you like I
like the older style Klingon uniforms. I know
I'm weird Because the the newer ones look like
they'd be very smelly and uncomfortable With
all the body armor and spikes whereas the other
original ones they look okay kind of like the
Romulans You know they they look like they're
completely uncomfortable wearing the padded shoulders.
They look you see When I look at a ramen from
the next generation, I feel like they'd feel
to the touch Like the inside of a pizza delivery
bag. It does look like that, like they're fuzzy
and they're just, they poke you. That is awkwardly
accurate. Like I just want to walk up to them
like, I'm sorry, sub commander, whatever the
hell your name is. Can I just touch you for a
minute? I'm just really curious. The card walks
up. It is static electricity. Fascinating. Mr.
Data, come here. But yeah, so I'm going for The
Next Generation. Matt, that means you're the
only vote I need here. Which clothing would you
prefer? Which one do you like better? I like
what Steve said earlier about if you were comparing
the movies, because I feel like just the uniforms
and the jackets from Wrath of Khan were some
of the coolest costume design in any Star Trek
ever. Oh yeah, easily. It was so good. So I'm
gonna go with the original and I know we're not
doing movies But I like the original outfits
like if you were to load up my Star Trek online
account If you could ever find it like all of
my crew were in original uniforms. All right,
good to pay for which is stupid Then in uniforms
we have a split two to two two for the next generation
two for the original series our first Tie in
as amongst the category goes Um, see how that
plays in effect later on going into category
14 You can compare the theme song. You can compare
the underlying themes the different musical scores
Which series did music better birdman? Tng beyond
the shadow of a doubt. However, that being said
the original theme is more iconic Um, and a lot
of people recognize all those star trek sound
effects because they're kind of part of the pop
the pop culture Identity is not the word, but
kind of the nerd social fabric. Like, you know
what a phaser is, you know what a photon torpedo
is. With Star Trek The Next Generation, yeah,
it's got really good sound design, but... I agree
with that point. I don't necessarily agree that
the original series has the more iconic theme
song, though. I don't know. If you were to pull
people on the street, they'd be able to tell
you, especially with that... I think more people
these days would be confused if you're taking
outside of the geek circles. Well, the funny
thing is is the original series theme they reincorporated
and all they did was just add a little bit to
the end and threw it into the new rebooted films.
a nap a guy knows more isn't always better unless
we're talking about full size vans. These beasts
do more than get you from A to B. They have so
much space. A man can live in it with shag carpeting
water bed and a sweet lava lamp. These mobile
abodes have all the comforts of home with quality
parts and plenty of Napa know how you can keep
the original tiny house running longer, stronger.
That's Napa I don't know. I just feel like if
you took just a general person and played both
themes, I think more people would identify the
Next Generation theme song before they could
figure out what the heck was going on with that
original one. But maybe that's just me. But I
think it would also depend on if they saw the
rebooted films, because if they saw the rebooted
films, then it's the same theme. Yeah. Next Generation
is the better theme, though. I like your original.
What do you say, Matt? But like, what if they're
Tenacious D fans, because Tenacious D plays the
original Star Trek with its completed lyrics
every concert. That's true. Have you guys heard
that version? No, but it sounds interesting.
Thankfully not! Oh, I'll put a link so you can
put it in the show notes, because it's worth
seeing for everybody ever. And we just lost our
viewership. Ouch! Don't hate on the D. I like
the D, I just don't want lyrics to that song
because it's so good. It's like singing the X
-Men theme song. Matt, who has a better theme
and who used music better throughout the series?
Well, I don't know, I feel like this, I can't
fairly judge this category because when I hear
just the first three or four seconds of Next
Generation, I'm like five again. And it's like
that, that was what I grew up with and that's
what it's going to be. Like, I like both themes.
I really do. I don't dislike both themes, but
the original series one gets on my nerves faster
than the next generation one does. Like, I can
just listen to the next generation theme in the
background, like on a somewhat softer tone and
just be like, yeah, this is awesome. Where the
original series eventually I'm gonna be like,
stop that. Fingernails on the chalkboard, please
stop. Ah, see, I enjoyed it. I like all Star
Trek themes, like from, well. Other than the
Enterprise. Yeah, I hate Enterprise. What was
that doing? I like that theme! We have now concluded
that Birdman has terrible theme song. No, I'm
just kidding. Totally kidding. Matt, where's
your vote going on the music? Next Generation,
but that's only Nostalgia. Fair enough. Steve?
Well, the funny thing about the Next Generation
is actually it's part of the motion picture theme.
Like, part of it. Okay. But anyways, I'm going
TNG. I just prefer the theme and the ship sounds
instead of here. I hear, you know, as it goes
past and I know it's something minute and stupid,
but plus just the tune to it is better and you
have instead of space, the final frontier. These
are the voyages of the Starship Enterprise. I
don't know, it's more fun. Good point. Alright,
now for a category that I completely need your
guys' help on because I know nothing about it.
Which franchise has had the better games? You
can talk about board games, card games, video
games, arcade games, or however which way you
want to go with this. Which franchise has produced
better games? Where do we even start with this
one? They have good games there have been some
good games. I mean I can even talk about some
of the role -playing game stuff done by Fossa
last unicorn and decipher I think arguably the
best was probably the decipher one. Although
FASA did put together a pretty good board game
for the original series There was actually even
a Starship battles miniatures game very similar
to Star Wars Empire. That's out right now It's
like that little x -wing game um there were a
number of really good star trek original games
that came out on the pc in the 90s there was
like star feet academy i think it was called
star trek star trek command they were done by
interplay and like i said i think from 1997 98
till probably about 2003 2004 They're really
good set in the original kind of universe you
can plays the Romulans the gore and the Klingon
the Federation They were really really cool There
were games on the next generation like Star Trek
Federation really good game there is Federation
2, I think it was. I can't remember. I reviewed
one on my show like a year and a half ago. There
was also Star Trek Elite Force, which is more
Voyager but still set in the TNG era timeline.
There was a couple games on the Genesis. There
was a couple games on the Super Nintendo. There
were games on the NES. I would argue that the
better ones were the original series because
I think then you could explore the lore a little
bit more than the TV series could and You could
really expand upon it and you could mod them
because I remember playing Starfleet command
Modding the crap out of my ships. I could have
Starfleet Marines board Klingon ships and that
was so cool Although some of the later TNG games
did start to get it right, but I haven't played
one that's truly great. There was one that came
up for the 360 a couple years ago, or sorry,
not a couple years ago, probably about eight
years ago now. I can't remember what the hell
it was called, but it wasn't bad. Yeah, someone
else. I'm going for hours. I've never played
a next generation game. I remember renting or
getting from somebody or something, one of the
original series games, and it had to be either
for the Nintendo, the Super Nintendo, possibly
the Nintendo 64, but it was one of those early,
you know, first couple generations of Nintendo's
games, systems, and all I remember is that the
game was freaking impossible. I remember being
Kirk and then you had like your your your away
team Which you could pick I believe certain members
to join you Are you talking about the one where
you get under the planet and you get stuck in
the cave? Yeah, I still have that one the 25th
anniversary game. All I remember is it being
hard as hell Blue label, right? Yup. And I just
couldn't figure out what the heck I was supposed
to do. It was like one of those where you had
to get one thing in order to do something else
in order to do something else. Yeah, it was a
pain in the ass. Even the controls were difficult
on it. It was not a very good port. I think that
was a port of the Apple II version or the one
for the Mac anyway. That is the limit of my Star
Trek gaming experiences. Steve, you've played
a few games though, right? I've played some on
where you just command the ships. I've played
them all the way back to when they were like
DOS games. Okay. And various incarnations of
that as well. Is it true that the computer has
had better Star Trek games than like the actual
consoles? By far and away. Yeah, I would definitely
say so. The console versions pale in comparison
usually. I've had a few that have been entertaining
for about an hour, and the PC, I'm at least able
to keep entertained for a few until they get
too difficult to continue. Which games have you
had the most enjoyment from, Steve? Like, I've
played Star Trek Online. It's halfway decent.
I wouldn't say that it's perfect or anything.
I enjoyed back in the day the 25th anniversary
game until I got stuck in that cave. Because
I did figure it out pretty well. I just once
I got in that cave I screwed there was and I
guess there's a lot of episodes to that that
game Once you get past that point. I never did
and DOS is dead. So can't play it anymore Don't
know why I still have the disk I've also played
not necessarily on the computer. I've I've played
like the hero clicks board games Okay of the
the original series and like the the Federation
verse the Klingons and It's it's actually It's
actually quite fun Matt what's your gaming experience
when it comes to the Star Trek franchise? Have
you had you played any of the Star Trek games?
Maybe a dozen of them like I know I've played
at least a little bit of bridge commander I played
Ship Creator. I mentioned earlier I played the
MMO. I played Starfleet Command 1 and 3. I played
whatever that ground -based RTS was that was
really bad. Oh, man. I was waiting for someone
to mention that. I still have my disc somewhere,
and I bet I could find it in five minutes if
I needed it, but I would never need it. Like,
that thing was glitchy, even patched up, you
know, years later. to the point of being unplayable.
What about any gaming experience outside of video
games with Star Trek? Does anybody have any?
Oh, God, the role -playing games. As you guys
know, I'm a huge tabletop gamer. I do thesewordsareterrible
.com. There's my one shameless plug. There'll
be more, guys. For me, I'd say I like... There
have been different games for the various franchises.
Back in the mid -90s, there was a company called
Last Unicorn, and they produced games for the
original series, TNG, DS9. There was a Voyage
one, but it got canceled because the company
lost the license or they went out of business
or something. later 2000s done by decipher I
think it was and those ones I didn't mind although
I like fascist rules that those are the early
ones in the early early to mid 80s and it came
in a box set and I've always just like how fascist
rules they're really easy and quick to kind of
learn I mean kind of like Shadowrun if you're
familiar with that particular role -playing system
now I don't recall what system they use for that
but I do like the box art for it. I'm trying
to think here if there's anything superior about
any of the other non -video gamey stuff. There
is a Starship Battle game which is like I said
is played very similar to Star Wars Rebels or
Empire or whatever the hell it is right now and
that's a lot of fun and that's classic TNG. or
sorry, that makes no sense. And that's classic
series stuff and that's a lot of fun. I think
a lot of classic RPG for the classic series can
be a lot of fun because your imagination has
to do more because you don't have... You almost
have too much when you involve the stuff from
TNG forward with the kind of role -playing stuff,
because like I said, you can put in the Borg,
you can put in the Ferengi and all this other
stuff. And if you're not a decent game master
and storyteller, you can lose the storyline in...
the details like you transport to this and starbase
83 and the fringy whatever whereas with the classic
series i find you had the story came first because
you had a limited tool sets you really i found
you had to work a little bit harder now that's
a debatable point because you could make the
same argument for tng from a purely role -playing
standpoint but i would say classic series is
a little bit better on that side of gaming, because
I think they treat the franchise, this is a little
bit better, because it is so beloved. But one
of the things that no one talks about, and this
is a video game, there were two of these that
we haven't brought up, there's one called Borg
Assimilator, which is essentially a torture device.
You grip a stick and it gives you this electric
shock. It's like you're being assimilated, and
you have to hold on for as long as you can. And
the other one was an Elite Forces phaser rifle
light gun game that was in the arcades. Wow.
That was pretty friggin' cool. But overall, if
I had to say classic series wins here, because
I think the era forced you to be more creative,
and the video games were treated better. Fair
enough Matt, what do you think as far as the
overall games go which which franchise do you
think has the better selection? Well, I feel
like it's unfair as far as my vote because my
friends would never play the card games with
me and though I I've you know Had a regular rb
group, you know all my life. They're all like,
well, you know, we'll do D &D but Star Trek rp
is too nerdy So I haven't had too much experience.
Yeah. Yeah, I don't think it's the opposite I
have very interesting friends, let's say. So,
like, I never got to experience anything but
the video games, and I don't know, I feel like
the next generation video games, you know, since
it was closer to the video game era, were treated
better. So I'm going to say next generation,
though I probably would have more fun playing
the other ones. Steve, what do you think? I'm
going to go... We have one vote for each. I'm
going T... NG. Alright. Two votes for TNG. I
will simply revert back to the fact that first
of all I know Birdman plays a shit ton of games
and he voted for the original series. And second,
the only game I've ever played for any of them
was the original series. So even though it was
hard as crap, frustrating, and not very rewarding.
I will cast my vote for the original series,
which makes it another tie. All right, moving
on to the 16th category. We're almost done, folks.
Only a few more to go. 16th category, we can't
break down the series without breaking down the
movies that came from the series. So this is
our one chance to really delve into the movies
a little bit. Which franchises had the better
overall movies? Obviously for the original we
have The Motion Picture, The Wrath of Khan, The
Search for Spock, The Voyage Home, The Final
Frontier, The Undiscovered Country, and I guess
you could then think about the recent reboot.
And for the next generation you have Generations,
First Contact, Insurrection, and Nemesis. Matt,
how do you break down the movies for each franchise?
Well... I think with TNG, everyone has their
opinions. I think with the original series, everyone
has the same opinion, which is that half of them
are bad. That said, I think in a lot of respects,
some of the older series movies are more known
than the older series, but that might just be
a time factor since I was born after almost every
one of the movies were done for the original
series. and the series had been off the air for
20 years. Yeah, I do think you're right though.
There's usually more of a universal accepted
opinion about with the original series that this
movie's bad, this movie's good, this movie's
bad, this movie's good. Whereas the next generation
movies, there's a lot of back and forth. A lot
of people will like a certain movie and a lot
of people will hate a certain movie. Birdman,
what do you think about the movie franchises
of each one? I think... Arguably, and this is
obviously my opinion, with TNG, the one everybody
says is awesome is First Contact, right? Yeah.
When you ask people what's the best original
series movies, you get a bunch of different opinions
because they're frankly better. Wrath of Khan
is a film classic, and that's a movie I actually
call a film not a movie and that meant that to
me it means it's a step above your average popcorn
flick um you get such a great chemistry in almost
every single movie because that cast is so good
together i mean voyage home is the star trek
movie for non -star trek people it draws people
in you don't need to know sweet and crap all
about star trek and it's still fun NUCLEAR WESSELS!
TRANSPARENT ALUMINUM! DOUBLE DUMBASS ON YOU!
Oh, man. There is some... Okay. I know some people
really hate certain next generation films, but
overall, I enjoy all of the next generation films
to different levels. Insurrection? I even enjoy
Insurrection. Very terrible. Maybe at a different
level, but I enjoy them all, whereas there is
some of the original series movies that are just...
Awful. The first one is what they originally
used for torture in Guantanamo Bay. And that's
not the only awful one amongst them. Come on.
Final Frontier is goofy because what does God
need with a starship? That's hilarious. That
is one of the worst movies ever. Why does Shatner?
Dancing in the desert should just be an animated
gif somewhere It's hilarious, but you got over
actually doing something If you include the reboots,
I guess that's not fair but since there hasn't
been any reboots for the next generation yet
But I think the reboots are really good no matter
what everybody else says about them I have really
enjoyed both of the film so far in this new chapter
of the original series so that there's definitely
more movies to pick from so I guess even if you
take the three or four shitty movies out from
the original series and you add the reboots in
you're still left with a bunch of good movies
so there's definitely more volume I don't know
Steve what do you think? In the Darkness was
crap though man. Which one? In the Darkness was
crap. I disagree. I agree. It was a cobbled together
piece of shit that was... We're not getting into
that, because we've gotten into that. Yeah, Captain
Robocop, so that I will give you. We've gotten
into that before. I will forever disagree with
your guys' opinion on Into Darkness. But, Steve,
we haven't got your opinion overall, which...
Well, being that that's a reboot, it doesn't
count in this category, so... Well, I would say
that... I have... I mean three out of the the
four TNG films I enjoy I will argue that that
first contact is the best of the TNG and I almost
argue that Nemesis for some reasons and Generations
for some reasons I Generations the only good
part about it is the beginning is Captain Kurt
That's just that's just the whole movie for me,
but it's a bitch way for the enterprise to go
out to Yeah, because Troy was at the controls.
The Enterprise was killed by Google Glass. Yep.
It's... UGH! There's just as many moments from
The Final Frontier and The Motion Picture. Well,
The Motion Picture was just a piece of shit anyway,
and then you get a figure two that it came out
after Star Wars. So they were competing. Don't
ever watch those two movies back -to -back, by
the way. Don't ever watch star trek the motion
picture and then any star wars film back to back
or The motion picture was just too damn long
and it was just I couldn't tell, I couldn't even
appreciate it barely until I got older and even
then I still don't like it. I think Birdman does
bring up a good point though, if you were taking
which movie out of all of them gets the best
acclaim, Wrath of Khan is definitely set on a
pedestal above any other Star Trek film that's
ever been made. I'll tell you why. Because it's
because it was actually well written. There was
some gravity to it as well because when Spock
died that was a game changer I Mean, it's like
like films today where they don't actually kill
any main character. Yeah, and they get saved
by magic blood Sorry, I had to I'm a horrible
person you are it's okay, but the right guy said
Khan and that film and the wrath of Khan Let's
get into some more nitpicks on a new movie. I
think I enjoy more of the original series films
overall. I just, I find that I enjoy Wrath of
Khan, Search for Spock, Voyage Home, and Undiscovered
Country. And for me, because Wrath of Khan and
Undiscovered Country are my top two in that whole.
I mean, I like Voyage Home too, but those are
my top two out of the series. I find that it
trumps TNG in this category. Fair enough and
Birdman you're voting for the original series
as well. Absolutely Just the original cast has
better chemistry though. My favorite Star Trek
movie is first contact One movie doesn't make
it the best Matt. What do you think I? Don't
feel like it's as cut and dry for me as it is
for everyone else Like I mean, I love all of
the the next generation movies Don't know some
of my earliest full -form memories are about
watching insurrection on VHS in my parents bedroom
cuz I didn't have a VHS player when I rented
it Which is not a sentence you can say much anymore
but like I Don't know wrath of Khan is iconic
Like I think still today if you hear the word
Khan everyone goes to that movie, even if they've
never seen it just for the quote That's true.
Well the other thing too not to not to cut in,
but the Wrath of Khan, that was deep, plus it
brought back a villain from the original series.
Also, I find that the undiscovered country had
gravitas as well because, for one, it didn't
have to do with whales, but it had to do with
saving a species so they could stretch their
faces. But the undiscovered country stopped interstellar
war between the Klingon Empire in the Federation
True That's my favorite though, yeah, I think
I need to rewatch the old ones personally like
all of them just in order There's so many - I've
heard a lot of bad things about Three. Three's
hilarious! Come on, Doc Brown as a Klingon! I
actually don't mind that one as much as... Man,
One -Five. I really don't like Undiscovered Country
either. But I think of it this way. If you had
to sit me down and say... I'm not gonna tell
you which one, but we're gonna watch a Star Trek.
film from the classic series or a star trek next
generation film i'm always going to pick the
next generation film or if you said you're going
to have to watch all of them one through you
know six or one through four i'm going to pick
the next generation films to watch ten times
out of ten but if you were asking me if we're
comparing it to the series i guess and this is
the way i'm going to cast my vote the next generation
films i don't need them because the series was
so good whereas for me the original series movies
are better than the series most of the time like
they add a lot more to the series i know that's
happening after the fact but i mean too if you're
looking at it as an overall franchise they add
so much more to that than the next generation
films do um if that makes any sense whatsoever
Um, it does in my head, so I'm going with that.
No, I'm gonna have to agree with you 100 % because
I feel like the next generation movies, at best,
all they are is a longer episode. It's like a
deleted scene on a film. It's like, oh, you love
this series? Here, watch this little bonus. Yeah,
it's like, like, there's no, you know, some of
them don't even have, like, the moral quandaries
that were so huge in TNG. Some of them just feel
like more action movie than... It's just, we
didn't get quite enough of that group, so let's
see some more of them. Whereas... to me you can't
take the original series movies out of the if
you take them out of the equation then not as
many people are still talking about the original
series in my opinion because some of those movies
meant a lot to a lot of people so so that's the
reason i'm going to cast my vote for the original
series even though i would always watch the next
generation films over them um i'm 100 with you
for exactly the same reasons All right, so that
is a clean sweep for the original series when
it comes to movies, and luckily we, for the most
part, avoided any tirades and debates on the
reboot. So that's a positive, that's a win. Going
into the 17th category here, which franchise
is the most Wotable. Here's a fun one for you.
So you got Khan, the scream there for the original
series. Fascinating for Mr. Spock. Mr. Spock's
all over the place. Live long and prosper. That's
highly illogical. The needs of the many outweigh
the needs of the few or the one. He's dead Jim
or I'm damn it Jim or I'm a doctor not a blank
Or Scotty we talked about her him earlier with
I'm giving her she's got captain Next generation
you have obviously the different call signs from
Picard engage or make it so Resistance is futile
from the Borg shields up red alert things like
that which happen almost in every episode To
me this one's pretty clear -cut, but I'd like
to get your guys opinions when you look back
at ones which which One gave me more quotes that
stuck in your mind, Birdman. Without a doubt,
the original series, because that cast sold it.
And you know, they're like, I don't know, just
it seems to me those classic Star Trek quotes
are literally part of a geek social consciousness.
Like we just all know them. Once again, you can
do the same thing for TNG, but I don't know.
I look at the original series and I feel more
towards them. Now, obviously, I love TNG with
engage, make it so obviously Worf's thing and
the Borg thing. I don't know. I think the original
series is infinitely more more kind of quotable
and it resonates more. I really think it does.
I mean, they just they mean more with the TNG.
Not so much. Don't know if I necessarily see
it like that, but I definitely do see the original
series as being more quotable I think I might
go into some stuff that we'll talk about in a
little bit with the writing and stuff. Whereas
there was more Engaging things for them to deal
with in the next generation where they didn't
need the quotes. Maybe I don't know But but the
original series just has quote after quote after
quote that every character seems like they have
a call, you know quote most known for them, whether
it be the way Kirk talks and gives him a bunch
of quotes, podcast quotes. Bones has quotes,
Scotty has quotes, everybody had quotes that
they kind of went to. That just wasn't part of
the next generation, whether it be by design
or just by happenstance. So that's why, for me,
it's a sure thing for the original series. Matt,
what do you think? With shag carpeting, waterbed,
and a sweet lava lamp, these mobile abodes have
all the comforts of home. With quality parts
and plenty of Napa know -how, you can keep the
original tiny house running longer, stronger.
That's Napa know -how. who in the last two years
we sat down and watched all of Next Generation
and the movies. Oh, with the movie? Yeah, it
was actually before Nate moved back up, so you
and I weren't even talking at this point. Damn
it. So, like, and I think to that group, and
I feel like the number one most quoted thing
wasn't even something said in the show so much
as an attitude from one episode. which was the
one where Picard's the negotiating the contract
between the two races and he was just a cocky
bastard the whole time and it's all like what
are we gonna do last time we had like 30 legislators
like well this time you've got me I'm the Picard
bitches and it was just like I'm the Picard bitches
is probably the most quoted thing of that whole
series and he didn't even say that he just kind
of threw it out there I think it's no no question
Well, I think it's pretty cut and dry here for
me, but the original series has a lot more...
quoteable lines from every character because
there were, I mean, I would say the films had
more than this original series did itself. I
mean, the original series had a lot of iconic
lines that people were known for, you know, the
beam me up Scotty, the I'm giving her all she's
got or, you know, I'm a doctor, you know, blah,
blah, blah. But anyways, but I think the films
added extra stuff to it as well. You know, the
double dumbass on you or, you know, I've never
trusted the Klingons or whatever the needs of
the many and. You look at TNG, they do have things
that are specific to each character as well.
I would almost equate that to being a Roddenberryism
because the later series don't really have the
same type thing as these two. There are a few
other ones that are on there for TNG as well.
Overall, I'd have to go with the original series
here. Alright, so another clean sweep for the
original series. Quotes are one thing, but what
if we break it down to the actual writing on
the show? Which series had better writers, had
better stories, had better plots, had better
things that they tackled in general? Which series
is superior in that respect? Matt, why don't
you start this one off? Well, I feel like a lot
of us are gonna go into this category thinking
well, this is just entirely one -sided But I
think the one thing I want to say in the defense
of the original series is that though I've almost
every episode of next generation was great like
I think I can think of a couple of old series
episodes that just stand out and I can't think
of very many episodes of the new series that
stand out and that might be because the old series
had more bad in between the great ones, but like
I can't think of an episode of Next Generation
that really hits as hard as like and let that
be your last battlefield with the Frank Gorshin
and the the red and black and the black or the
red and white or the fucking black and white
and white and black guys like it's like he's
black on the right side like I don't know like
I think the writing in that episode and there
are a couple other ones but I mean some of them
are just really stand out and I don't feel like
there's anything like that in the Next Generation
though maybe on an episode to episode basis,
it was probably better. Yeah, I can see what
you're saying with that. Birdman, what do you
think on the writing overall for the series?
I think there are some great questions that the
next generation poses. I mean, one of my favorite
episodes being Measure of a Man, another one
being, oops, sorry, Inner Light, I think it is,
that season four episode. There are some just
there are some damn good TNG episodes, but when
I think of episodes that changed attitudes in
the decade they were produced I think of Star
Trek the classic series I really do and Honestly,
it's it's weird because I honestly would probably
go the other way if if I If I had to go on impulse,
but the classic series it knocked it out of the
park when it needed to If I had my own idea for
a show or my own idea for a franchise or whatever
it might be, and I got to pick one of the writing
teams, either the writing team that worked on
the original series or the writing team that
worked on The Next Generation, I would not even
hesitate in picking The Next Generation's writing
team. The topics they tackled, the moral dilemmas
that they went after, the way that they put in
the science fiction fantasy world things that
you could directly correlate with, you know,
stuff that we were going through in real world
stuff, you know, just human issues in general,
to me far exceeded what the original series ever
was able to do, whether it be the different stuff
they did with data and the human element, whether
it be, you know, different things with honor
and different stuff like that with wharf, just
the even more so what they did with it was in
the different aliens or different species, different
forms of life that they came into contact with
and how they use that to explore different parts
of our own psyche and of our own, you know, the
human element. To me, this one's a slam dunk
for the next generation. Steve, what do you think?
I'm just gonna have to go slam dunk next generation.
It was just overall It's it's better plots better
story better writing conversation. Everything
overall is just just better in that category
What do you think Matt? Well, I don't know bird
man's got a really good point that the original
series changed hearts and minds and and I don't
know if that's because of the quality of the
writing or because back in the 60s there were
fewer TV shows that it had to compare to I wanted
to say they both had great writing, and though
I think Next Generation's probably my favorite
TV show of all time, I'm gonna give it to the
old one just for the hard -hitting episodes it
did have. Alright. Maybe I need to re -watch
some of the old series, but it's somewhat painful
sometimes. Alright. That would cause that category
to come out with our third tie of the... of the
show and that will leave us in our last two categories.
See what happens here in category 19. We're looking
at the critical acclaim of The shows whether
it be awards nominations whether it be, you know,
just like the overall impact We're not talking
about the overall franchise and which franchise
you liked or which series you liked better But
just more of what the series was able to accomplish
From a critical acclaim standpoint, I guess Obviously
if you went straight by the data then that wouldn't
be a discussion But there might be a little bit
of room for debate within that if we're going
on straight on awards Maybe not fair because
the Next Generation was on for so much longer,
but the original series was nominated for 28
different major awards, won five of them. The
Next Generation was nominated for 86 major awards
and won 32 of them, including the first ever
syndicated series to be nominated for Outstanding
Drama Series. How do you break this down as far
as critical acclaim, what it meant to maybe pop
culture or to the franchise in general, without
necessarily giving your opinion on which series
you liked better? Bergman, which one's better
for acclaim? I would argue TNG for sure, just
because it won some really important awards,
especially for writing, plus sound. So, ultimately,
critical acclaim. I got to go TNG for sure. I
think the other thing that the next generation
might have done was more so legitimize Star Trek
as a franchise in general. Maybe that's too strong
a wording, but it did more to like say that this
isn't just a science fiction thing. This isn't
just a reboot or a second try at the original
series to try to introduce us to new fans or
whatever. I mean, it really Took something said
this is serious and this is something we're doing.
Well, we're doing and we're gonna do a good job
with it You know based on all these awards whether
it be this technical aspects the sound aspects
the writing or whatever like This is a serious
show that deals with serious issues and it wasn't
just this You know popcorn science fiction type
series. So I'm gonna have that going for it to
Matt. What do you think? I'm not saying that
the original series was any of that. I'm just
saying like, you know decades later Had a certain
impact with the next generation that allowed
deep space nine and and the voyager and etc to
to happen Which might not happen without the
success of the next generation Yeah, yeah, I
mean Star Trek was huge in the 90s at least as
far as I I've ever seen um I don't know like
part of me wants to just be bitter and be like
well Will Wheaton get two awards on next generation
so the next generation is disqualified but like
you think about the original series and had such
far -reaching social things all the way across
the world and I don't know you know maybe I'm
just not versed as well but I don't know that
happening with next generation you know in a
critical acclaim of the viewership rather than
just the award organizations like I don't think
it's as clear -cut to me as it is to everyone
else Fair enough Steve. What do you think I?
think that Just for starters, I think the original
series got kind of shafted just because it was
nominated For one it was almost double the awards
groups that Right, more awards groups exist now
than they did back then, so that's definitely
a good way of looking at it. Which I get, and
the fact that it was so kind of new and different
that it was either you liked it or you didn't,
whereas by the 80s when TNG came out in the early
90s, sci -fi was pretty much everywhere because
the 80s kind of blew it out of proportion and
so did the late 70s. If you were a sci -fi fan,
this was kind of right up your alley anyway And
not only that but you also had you know this
show because of how successful it was spawned
two other shows that are in the same century
continuity right and I don't want to make it
sound like obviously without the original series
none of it happens I guess if it's not successful
and lasts for the three years that it does thank
God it lasted past that pilot but You know, so
I don't want to make it seem like that, that
Star Trek Next Generation should get all the
credit or something, because obviously the Star
Trek is the original series for a reason. And
you're right, there's a lot more award groups
around later on, so that's possibly a factor
as to why the Next Generation had more awards
and nominations and stuff like that. Steve, where
do you think you're going with vote on this one,
though? Just because it was just overall, there
was more memorable... Aspects to the series which
is why it actually won more nominations So I'd
have to go with the next generation Matt. What
did you think after all that? I'm gonna I'm just
gonna say the original one. I don't know if it's
close. They both got good arguments Fair enough,
which leads us to our final category Last chance
to influence the overall tally. This is just
your own personal opinion Which series is better
Dodd? Ultimately, TNG, because it did run longer.
It had a chance to tell more stories within it.
Do you like TNG better? I like TNG better, but
I like the movies for the original series better.
That makes sense. And I think I do appreciate
what the original series accomplished in terms
of the social impact that it needed to happen
during the sixties, as Matt said, hearts and
minds. That's very important in terms of the
history of television. But in terms of creating
a new generation of people opening up to science,
I would say the next generation. All right, Matt,
what do you think? I casted my vote like three
ago when I said the next generation is my favorite
TV show of all time, and I'm not changing that
opinion. I have a lot of love for a lot of 60
shows, including the old Star Trek, but The Next
Generation. Not only did I grow up on it, when
we rewatched it, like I mentioned like two years
ago, when we got to like season seven and we
had that realization that this is going to end,
like I almost wanted to cry. I was like, this
is so good and I don't ever want it to end ever.
That's true. Steve, what do you think? Actually,
I'm going to have to side with... I'm gonna have
to side with Mike completely on this one. There's
there's no There's no no way I could argue anything
different All right, so that is three votes for
the next generation if I'm hearing everybody
right And I will echo that I've never made a
list, I guess, of what would be my favorite TV
show of all time. I have a feeling Next Generation
would be in my top three, maybe edged out by
MacGyver. But that's just me. Is that a joke?
No, no. MacGyver is my number one favorite series
of all time. Interesting. But Next Generation
would be very probably close second or close
third. I'd have to really look at a whole list
of every TV series ever to figure that out. But
I love Next Generation. I've probably seen every
episode, I don't know, six, seven, eight times.
I remember recording them on VHS tapes in my
basement, like in middle school or whatever.
And I was going to try to record every one so
I could rewatch them again and again because
it was before DVDs and all that kind of stuff
were really popular, et cetera. It just is a
great series to watch. And like you said, I watched
that and I don't want it to end. I want to just
keep going and keep seeing more of these characters
because I love all the characters and I love
the topics they cover. So I will make this again
for the next generation, which ends that category
and ends the show. So we're going to take a quick
time out and we'll be right back with the final
verdict. Returning for its second year is Grand
Con Gaming and Comics Convention on September
19th through the 21st at the Crowne Plaza Hotel
in Grand Rapids, Michigan. This year, be prepared
for more. With a guest list that easily doubles
that of last year's, with artists such as Mark
McKenna or game publishers like Jeff Grubb, it's
easy to want to come check them out. There will
be a silent charity auction, tons of panels for
gaming and comics fans, and the list goes on
and on. Registration is open. For more information,
visit the website grand -con .com. Alright, thanks
for sticking with us. The votes have all been
tallied. And unlike episode 12, we do not have
to worry. There is no tie here. So there will
be a clear -cut winner between... Trek the original
series and Trek the next generation. If you go
total votes, it's 47 to 29. If you go categories,
it's 11 to five. So it's not even close. We were
right in the initial thought process that we
thought it might be a little bit of a slam dunk.
The next generation takes this one hands down.
So 11 to five. If we went By individual basis,
Birdman, you voted Next Generation 10 to 9. Matt,
you voted Next Generation 11 to 8. Steve, you
voted Next Generation 12 to 7. And apparently,
I'm the most biased one on the group because
I voted Next Generation 14 to 5. So all four
of us had Next Generation winning this matchup.
So we can put this argument to rest. Apparently,
the Next Generation is the better Star Trek series.
Final thoughts, Birdman. I was in the cod, bitches!
Fair enough. Final thoughts, Steve? I just...
I'm kind of not surprised. But... But yeah, that's...
It's undeniably the better series. Fair enough.
Matt, what do you think? Final thoughts? I think...
Or the way it should've? Yeah, yeah, I think
I would have been happier if it was a little
bit closer. But I think if it had tied like Pirates
and Ninjas, I'd have been a little upset. That
said, if I had to be on a ship with all of the
people, I would much rather be on the original
guys, because I feel like there would be a more
fun ship to be on. But yeah, no. Minus the technology
differences. The people were just so much fun.
Great characters. I think it'd be fun to sit
at that poker table with with number one and
wharf and Jordy Yeah, if you like losing a lot
of money, I'll just create some more at the holodeck
and be rich in there All right, anybody else
any final thoughts that we haven't got out there
besides the big hard bitches Alright, I would
like to thank Birdman Steve and Matt for joining
me today in the war zone and of course Thanks
to everybody else for listening several ways
to get in contact with us or leave feedback for
the show visit the website www .geekcastradio
.com where you can comment on all our posts you
can also go to episode 12 pirates versus ninjas
and cast a final vote to try to Determine a winner
for there. You can send email to feedback at
geekcastradio .com Please go to iTunes and leave
us feedback there. Obviously wars is just now
making a resurgence We've been off for a while
So go to iTunes and give us some thoughts on
how the show is going follow us on Twitter Geekcast
Radio Steve, what's your Twitter? SCP 21 Birdman
it is at Birdman dot hashtag Picard bitches Birdman
anything else that you'd like to pimp out as
far as things that people should be going to
find you at Well, you can always find me at this
week in geek net you can occasionally hear me
on Toronto radio I usually on news talk 1010
depending on who's producing that day and I'm
always around on television So keep watching
always causing havoc on Twitter. So follow him
there See what all the stuff he made fun of me
about I'm just kidding. Uh -huh. Matt. What's
your Twitter? I'm at Fridley sent And I have
one podcast that's not on the GeekCastRadio network,
which is RhapsodyCast. We're on YouTube, Potamatic,
iTunes. You can find us. Absolutely. Check that
out. And I would be on Twitter at OptimusSolo.
You can also become a fan of us on Facebook.
That way you can see everything that comes out
that's GeekCastRadio -related episodes and everything.
All right. So we hope you enjoyed this episode
of GCR and Wars. Hope that you'll join us next
time when we once again take two geek topics
and pit them against each other in an epic battle
to the death. For now live long and prosper and
engage You just listen to GCRN wars on keycast
radio calm If you would like to leave feedback
on the show there are many ways to do so You
can visit the website keycast radio calm or you
can comment on the episode in all of our different
podcasts Be sure to rate our show on iTunes and
leave us feedback. Follow us on Twitter at Geekcast
Radio. Become a fan of us on Facebook by searching
Geekcast Radio Network. You can email us at feedback
at geekcastradio .com. Call the voicemail line
502 -526 -5821. Please remember to tell us the
show you were leaving the message for, and your
name. So until next time, oklishtra kikendu.
The Napa guy knows not to judge a man by his
car's multicolor paint job or absence of modern
gadgetry. Who cares if it's technically old enough
to vote and the windows are powered by the strength
of your left arm? Your monthly payment is zero,
and it'll stay that way. Because with over 500
,000 parts and a little Napa know -how, you can
keep anything on the road. She may not be pretty,
but she's all yours. That's Napa know -how.
No chapter markers for this episode.



