CINEMA GEEKS
Quentin Tarantino Retrospective Reservoir Dogs Review

About this Episode
Hear your names. Mr. Brown, Mr. White, Mr. Blonde,
Mr. Blue, Mr. Orange, Mr. Pink. You ain't gonna
be in here no more than ten minutes. Man, I ain't
riding in no goddamn trunk for no minute, man.
I can't ride up front with you. You can't ride
up front with me. The surprise element is 90
% of it. You shoot me in a dream, you better
wake up and apologize. It's a bingo! Each and
every man under my command owes me one hundred
nasty scouts! And I want my scouts! All right,
and welcome to another special episode of Cinema
Geeks as we continue our Quentin Tarantino retrospective.
Today, we'll be reviewing rest of our dogs. Before
we get into our review, let's go over who's here
today. Of course, you have me, movie revolver
Dan, and joining me as always is Kevin Omsma
-Solo. How's it going, man? It's going well,
and I'm ready to kick this thing off. I'm excited.
Yes, yes. If you have not listened to our introduction...
To the series, definitely go back and do that,
but as we mentioned previously, we are getting
into the career of Quentin Tarantino and what
better place to start than his first film, Reservoir
Dogs, which was released in 1992. Which, of course,
is starring an assortment of people from Harvey
Cartel, Tim Roth, Michael Madsen, your normal
crew of Quentin Tarantino stars. Interesting
that a lot of the people that you see in Twi
- Tarantino movies actually, you know, we're
in this film and they were of course will actually
see more of them as we continue this series But
as we talked about in the introduction We mentioned
the movies we've seen from Tarantino once that
we haven't and I know you mentioned this has
been a film that you saw Way back when so it
had when was the first time you actually got
the opportunity to see reservoir dogs Honestly,
I did not see it anywhere near when it was released
When I was in college was when I really I mean
I went to movies all the time in high school
but it was more for the experience it was more
to do something outside of working and going
to school it was you know because I like movies
and that type of thing but when I went to college
that was when I really started getting into a
much more diverse group of films. And it wasn't
until my sophomore and junior year of college
where I was living with a few roommates that
were also huge into movies that we really started
knocking a bunch of films out and seeing a bunch
of films multiple times that I'd seen before.
I remember going through, you know, we saw, we
watched Lethal Weapons, the movies probably like
10 times over the course of those two years,
the Die Hard films, Goodfellas, Casino, The Usual
Suspects, Reservoir Dogs. Those are all films
that either I had seen before and I watched a
whole bunch those couple years of college or
I think that was probably one of the instances
where that was probably the first time I saw
a reservoir dogs just because one of them one
of my other roommates was big into it I hadn't
seen it so I'm pretty sure that's probably where
I watched it if not the last couple years of
high school so it was much later than it came
out probably a good 15 years after it had actually
been released that I actually saw it so Was my
first exposure and it fit right in with all those
other films that I mentioned and how much I liked
all those other ones So I just remember having
a very positive Experience the first time watching
it. Nice. Nice. Yeah, I don't remember exactly
the first time I think the first time I saw it
was raw dogs this before like I knew anything
about I was so out of the movie Real most, you
know younger than I think it was like on TV or
cable of you know some premium channel and Stumbling
upon it and like what is this weird thing and
then? I watched a little bit of it and then a
few years later, my brother introduced me. He's
like, you got to see this movie. It's like, it's
a really great movie. And, you know, I'm, I never
heard of it. And I'm like, I don't know. I don't
know if I want to watch it. And I think I was,
I want to say, you know, late high school, high
school, 11th, 12th grade or so. So it ended up,
you know, being kind of fascinated with it and
like, what is, this is kind of weird and being
like, they're just. Talking but I'm somehow still
really interested, you know, and that's at the
time we're like I didn't like drama films I just
wanted like action and things like that. So,
you know wasn't the money ducks I don't know
if I cared all that much but If you if you had
to put a guess on so, I mean we both probably
our first exposure was within the same age give
or take a two years probably If you had to put
a guess how many times have you seen this film
overall? Good question It's got I mean, I feel
like sometimes we say that you overestimate it,
but I would say Probably saw it first in 2000.
It's been about 15 years later So I would say
once a year might be as much as I see it So I
would probably say around 15 times a while full
fully through I would from beginning to end I
mean that give or take a few Like there might
have been a few times where like I didn't finish
it or so, but I usually watch it I would say
almost Once a year or okay once every few years,
so it's anywhere from 10 to 15 You're gonna be
much more familiar with it than than I know I've
probably seen it Four times maybe maybe four
times five at the very most So like I said, probably
two or three times in college there once probably
since then and then once recently here in this
last little bit to rewatch it for this episode,
so probably about five times total for me. If
you're going back into a time machine, back to
1992 when it was released, obviously like we
said... In the introduction episode, this was
more of a, you know, Quentin Tarantino started
out small, started out in more of the independent
circuit. And this film did not receive a, it
was a limited release. The widest release that
it ever saw was 61 theaters. So obviously it
wasn't a mainstream film by any means. It made
$147 ,000 its opening weekend. And all in all,
it made 2 .8 million domestic. So obviously it
wasn't a huge, uh, you know, blockbuster type
thing. It's production budget was 1 .2 million.
So, I mean, it did double that. So, so that was
good. And even if you take Box Office Mojo has
a cool way that they even have rankings, not
just for the wide releases, but they can, they
have rankings like just amongst the limited releases.
If you just take the limited releases from 1992,
it still comes in at 24th, just amongst limited
releases. And going over the stuff that's in
front of it, there's a whole bunch of stuff I've
never heard of. I guess Glenn Ross was a limited
release that year, and Howard's End was. But
yeah, there's not a lot of huge ones ahead of
it. So I mean, it wasn't necessarily a moneymaker
back when it came out, just to kind of give you
guys a time frame, because a lot of people probably
think Tarantino now, especially the younger generation,
and they're just thinking stuff like Django and
Glorious Basterds, which Both did fairly well
at the box office, but it was you know That wasn't
all the always the case nor was it ever the intention
probably for the most part with Tarantino at
the beginning No, definitely not and it's interesting
too because we talked about box office each week
But you kind of realize we look at retrospective
like this how in you know years later How much
movie made doesn't necessarily great impact how
much it remember it? And sometimes the movie
you think did really well didn't actually do
Amazingly well in the theater. I think that's
I think it's an interesting thing. You know,
like I said, I would never judge films films
worth based on That sounds silly to say a film's
worth based on its box office, but you know I
would I would never judge how good a film I think
it is based on the box office But I do think
it's interesting especially when you get into
films that you saw when you were a kid When you
had no even like box office didn't even that
wasn't even anything to you like you know what
I mean like you knew if a film was popular or
not but when you go back and look at some of
the films you saw during your childhood is sometimes
it's very interesting which ones did well and
which ones did not do well and If there was people
podcasting back in the 90s when we were growing
up or the late 80s, what the conversations would
have been like when you had certain films doing
really good and certain films not, you know what
I mean? Because right now, it's just a completely
different thing and everyone's so much more tuned
into what everything is doing. So a movie like
Reservoir Dogs that a lot of people probably
figure, that's a great movie. It's Quentin Tarantino.
It probably was successful. It was a very small
release that didn't make a ton of money, but
it was well received in other ways. So I mean
if you if you look at its current Rotten Tomatoes,
it's at 92 % on the critic rating and 94 % on
the audience rating So, you know, it's not always
about about the money like you were saying Okay,
so we know how well it did box office wise we
know where we're currently stands Rotten Tomatoes
wise and you know, we know that we've seen it
we it seems like when we first at least watched
it as Originally we had high opinions of it or
at least enjoyed it. So now that it's Years later,
we've watched it multiple times. And where do
you currently stand on rest of our dogs? I'm
currently still pretty pretty high on it. I don't
know if I'm as high as the first watch I don't
think with a movie like this you can be maybe
that's not fair I don't know but it's not a mystery
movie 100 % but it's more of like a you know,
like a true crime almost But there's a mystery
aspect to it, you know, obviously as you're trying
to figure out who did it, who didn't, you know,
who's the rat, this type of thing. So, I mean,
on a rewatch, I don't know if a movie like that
can be 100 % as good as it was the first time,
but I don't think that necessarily takes away
anything from the quality of the overall film.
So I would still rank this one pretty high. If
I was given a score on it on our regular Cinema
Geeks scale, like a 1 through 10, I would probably
sit this one right in the Probably seven and
a half to eight range I would probably score
the first time I watched it and eight and I would
probably say on rewatch that I'm probably at
a seven and a half It's definitely a lot different
of a watch when I first watched it because I
was so much younger I don't think I you would
even it's hard to really compare them But I still
I mean I still really really love this film It's
interesting just going back and watching it and
after seeing Tarantino years later it just seemed
like Little tidbits of things that come, you
know It's like a little like appetizer into like
the difference how choices that he'll will certainly
make his his ability to Definitely use not only
of storytelling and of course without a doubt
the key is the dialogue and And how it's amazing
it is and how we can create him and as well as
the actors can create memorable characters within
one scene it's like i you know i know who these
guys are what they're about yet they're just
talking about things like what like a version
means and what it means to tip and i just i just
find like that introduction to a scene just seeing
it years later realizing that wow there's a lot
of just character moments here even though they're
not really talking about anything in particular
uh so i i still strongly like it Would still
I don't know we'll get the rankings probably
near the like when you get over it, but when
you finish everything and you know Scoring wise
I'm probably about the same as so again eight
maybe eight point five for me Just because of
it's it does a lot with so little which I was
I'm always depressed with it takes place mostly
in one location and look use that location really
well and the flashback storytelling which is
always quite interesting and just you know how
it plays out into the story and of course just
the actors i i always think one of the best things
tarantino does is casting and his taking like
actors that a lot of people have either give
it up on or don't really use or you know and
using it in fun ways and even small bits and
we'll actually probably talk about this too in
uh we talked about pulp fiction because i recently
rewatched that too is how he i didn't realize
how often he gets like comedians and puts them
in in roles and in this it's stephen wright who's
like the dj who you hear And it's funny because
Steven Wright's not at all someone who had a
voice that you would think, yeah, he'd be a good
DJ. It's terrible. But he puts them there. And
it's just odd choice. It just seems a little
different. And I think that's the thing about
Tarantino. He just knows how to just use different
choices. I think in a way that really brings
out a... genuine feel or a realistic feel even
though some of his films are very far from realistic
in certain aspects but in a film like this I
think it adds something because you know someone
who's just doing like the the nightly Radio host
or you know, whether it's local or even if it's
national sometimes those guys are not the the
greatest speakers You know what I mean? Like
sometimes it's it's it's especially if it's a
local thing It's almost like watching the local
news. You're not gonna have your most polished
Speaker presentation, you know presentation type
person in those in those situations So I think
it adds somewhat of a genuineness to the film
and our real feeling to it But I think you've
touched on two things that I would agree with
you 100 % are very much in Tarantino's Strong
points is is number one casting and then go to
go back a little bit further before what you're
saying is the dialogue But even to expand on
that It's dialogue in two different ways for
me. It's it's number one It's the dialogue where
you have some very clever very witty commentary
on different things like you like you were getting
that with the The tips and some of those types
of scenes and some of this films, but then it's
also just the the head ridiculous Out there,
fun dialogue that you get when some of the characters
are yelling at each other too. You know what
I mean? It can be something that's a little more
serious conversation or it can be just someone
that's ticked off and just going off. And the
dialogue works in both situations for him. So
he's done a really good job of making dialogue
interesting in multiple settings and for multiple
reasons. So I think you've hit two of the big
things that come across, at least in this film,
right away. Obviously, we'll track this as we
go through the films, but I think right away
in Reservoir Dogs, you get a sense of casting
and you get a sense of the importance of dialogue
in this film. Yeah, and I think and we talked
about with Steve around being a DJ obviously
that incorporates with the music and Tarantino
is really great at using music and how he pairs
it with different scenes and of course like one
that comes to mind is that you know the torture
sequence right and you know how that song is
gonna ever be scarred because of because of You
know seeing a man get his ear ripped off And
I guess originally that was gonna be the only
song that was gonna play in this entire film
Because he spent a decent amount of his budget
for music trying to get this film in there because
he wanted it so badly. I guess he has some help
from some of the other people involved behind
the scenes to kind of fund the ability to get
some other deals for other songs. But that's
how badly he wanted that song in there. He was
willing to make it the only music or song in
the entire movie at one point. Yeah, I mean you
could definitely understand why I mean man first
music writes crazy Yeah, especially back then
but it's just it's interesting and I think to
it like it's to something I don't think I realized
until I don't know how often it's maybe like
half the fifth time watching Reservoir Dogs and
that's how like in a lot of ways it's a dark
comedy and I think the there's a lot of like
humor in it and I think in Pulp Fiction it's
obvious but even in this in just something like
that that torture sequence would I think it when
I originally saw it I was just screamish and
found it disgusting but like watching it later
I don't know if I'm just desensitized or what
have you but I find it I'm like it's almost kind
of funny now in some ways it's just and two just
of course with Tim Roth's character just I don't
know if it's supposed to be a running joke but
I feel it's like a running joke with them Pounds
of pounds of blood that just keep coming from
this body. It's like I don't think a human body
can it would have that much blood in it But it's
it's kind of almost I don't know to me. It's
almost seem like as a joke apparently Because
I was doing my research I came prepared today
but apparently they actually had a paramedic
or some type of person in the medical field there
during this to try to make sure that the amount
of blood was was somewhat still accurate or really
believable and like yeah but um another funny
thing is he was laying in that that uh blood
quote unquote for so long that i guess whatever
you use for fake blood you know as it dries it
gets pretty sticky and i guess he was on the
floor and that for those scenes for so long that
when he finally was done and was trying to get
up like he was like stuck to the floor And and
they were actually had to it took like a little
bit of time to like get him off of the floor
That was kind of funny. I Also, I think something
that struck me in this film was just how young
everybody was. It's like Tim Roth and Steve Buscemi,
especially as like, good God, these guys are
young. Yeah. And like, Steve Buscemi kind of
looks like a normal guy. I didn't know what happened
to him like when this and like Billy Madison
came out. But after that, he just went down and
he's morphed into something. And you talked about
music, something that I would have never caught
the first time around, obviously, since a certain
film hadn't come out yet. But did you? In your
rewatch, did you catch the hooked on a feeling
song? Oh, I did. Yes. I remember that coming
on. I'm like, so that song has all new meaning
for me now. Like they stole this from Guardians
of the Galaxy 20 years before. Honestly, if someone
told me that wasn't measure our dogs, I mean,
I guess I could have guessed, but I did not realize
that until we watching it, because it's not,
you know, it's not like a. It's just like them
driving, but now that song has a new meaning
to it. And it's the beginning of it, really.
It's like you hear that first little part and
you're instantly taken back to Guardians of the
Galaxy. So that's something interesting on a
re -watch that I'd never had experienced prior
in my other three or four times watching this
film. Yeah, that's pretty funny. I mean, I'm
a huge fan of crime and like the caper gone wrong
and I do like the fact that like Tarantino Never
shows you the actual, you know thing that happened
never actual the heist It's just you just you
just see kind of the aftermath and the effect
of it and it sounds kind of cliche But it does
seem like you can make this movie into a play
and it would work just as well Just because it's
so you know, like we mentioned dialogue driven
and just these characters and it's just this
one room and how much like drama can just be
created within the dynamic of these guys. They
either everybody's gonna hate me or everybody's
gonna love me during these. You'll have to give
me some feedback listeners to tell me to stop
doing this or not but you mentioned the idea
that it could be a play and they actually did
a like a dramatic film reading. They had a series
of them like an ongoing series back in 2012 and
one of the ones they did this is the Los Angeles
County Museum of Art, apparently. But one of
the films that they did a reading, a dramatic
reading of was Reservoir Dogs. And director for
this was Jason Reitman. And he actually flip
-flopped and cast everybody in reverse, like
all the white original members got cast as African
American and vice versa. So he had Lawrence Fishburne
as Mr. White, Terrence Howard as Mr. Blonde.
Anthony Mackie as Mr. Pink. Cuba Gooding Jr.
as Mr. Orange. Chy McBride as Joe Cabot. Anthony
Anderson as Nice Guy Eddie. Common as both Mr.
Brown and Officer Nash, the guy that gets tortured.
And then Patton Oswalt, since the mentor cop
was originally African -American, this version
was white, so it was Patton Oswalt. That that
would have been interesting to hear but you're
right. It lends itself to that type of thing
now You know, I just mentioned a bunch of characters
and if someone hasn't seen the film first of
all Why are you listening to us right now? You're
supposed to you're supposed to watch the film
already, but It was his rest of our dogs. I mean
Yes, go hit yourself in the face for they're
not seeing that yet. But uh Do you think this
is something I can't necessarily put myself back
in? my body for the first time I watched this
But do you think it's something that's confusing
for people with all the different with all the
different names of the characters trying to keep
stuff straight? And yes and no, like maybe the
finer details of who did what as it goes on,
you understand who's who. You may not get exactly
then that Mike Madsen's character is the one
who went insane because you can't remember who's
what color. But I think. Overall the colors are
most don't matter because it's it's really just
their interaction that I think it almost adds
a layer to to the the kind of vagueness or to
the mystery aspect of the film and it gives you
something to to actively be doing while you're
watching, not only listening to the dialogue,
but also trying to keep track of who's talking
about who. Like I said, I think in some instances
it doesn't necessarily matter. It's just two
people that aren't currently in the room. We're
talking about someone that's not in the room
compared to we're talking about someone that's
right here. But I think it does add an element
to kind of make it a little more fun on a rewatch.
Definitely, definitely. I do like to how Tarantino
can, it's almost reminiscent of how he takes
like moments that should mean nothing and makes
him look ultra cool, like them walking in the
parking lot is one of the most iconic moments
in the entire movie. It's like four guys just
walking down, but you can't watch people walk,
see people walking slowly, you know, in a vertical
line or, you know, shoulder to shoulder without
thinking. Oh, yeah. Yeah, there's definitely
some iconic stuff involved in here now. Question,
did you realize that? There's not a single line
of dialogue for a female in the entire film.
I didn't realize that, but now that you say it,
I don't think there was even a female in the
movie. I guess that's only strictly if you're
watching the theatrical cut, though. I guess
there is other versions out there where there
must be a small character that says something.
But in the theatrical cut, yeah, there's no female
dialogue in the whole film. But there is a lot
of fucks. Yeah, yeah, there are. Yeah, a lot
of other words that Christina likes. He's not
someone who shies away from profanity or racial
slurs. Right, exactly. That was another interesting
aspect of if this film comes out now instead
of 1992, do you think we have to deal with a
whole bunch of nonsense? People getting upset
about it? I would probably say so because there
were some issues with Django Unchained when that
came out. So I can only imagine it would be it
would be something of the same. Nature was it
was it all being white people in it except for
one like you mentioned Maybe I don't know like
you what what the reaction would be but yeah,
I'm you know, we love to make Yeah, it seems
especially this year every film has to have some
type of controversy over it. It's gotta create
something They would complain that it has 9 -eleven
imagery somehow Oh The sad thing is I've heard
that from even some of the people I listen to
on other podcasts. So stop with that, people.
Stop. I did have a question for you. I guess
you can say that this is a spoiler alert for
a film that came out 20, 23 years ago. 13. Oh,
well, yeah, 23. I was like, did I do my math
wrong on that? I went back in time. So a film
that came out over two decades ago. So if you
don't want anything ruined, I guess stop listening
for the next couple minutes. But I was going
to ask you a question. You've seen this, like
I said, 10 to 15 times, probably. Obviously,
you're a big fan of the film and a big fan of
Tarantino, at least thus far. Would you? What
would you grade it though as far as just strictly
rewatch ability for just the average moviegoer
person do you think this is something that that.
Outside of people that are really into either
this genre or this director would find enjoyable
on a rewatch given like I said given the fact
that you know it is somewhat of a mystery and
after after one time you're gonna have you kind
of kind of know like obviously people like us
that are really into movies can appreciate it
more for You know like we were talking about
the dialogue and the performances and that doesn't
get old no matter how many times you watch it
But just like you're making a general recommendation
to someone Do you think it has a lot of rewatch
ability for them if you're if you're the type
of person who like tends to like Enjoy like mostly
plot like that's what you go into you want to
watch a movie because you want to see a story
Unfold I would I would say probably not it would
be not like something you would watch every year
Maybe every you know, you watch it every few
years because maybe you forget aspects of it
or you would appreciate it But yeah for that
that person who maybe doesn't really care about
the you know, the nuances of dialogue or how
Tarantino sets up the shots or it's used to music.
Maybe not not so much But I don't almost wonder
if that person would enjoy the movie in general.
I'm just sure like Would they just be like well,
there's nothing really happens, you know It'd
be like they're just kind of in the room and
nothing really goes on so to me I think if you
like the movie, I don't see how it would not
be enjoyable on a rewatch, but I don't know Yeah,
and that makes sense. Like you said, if you're
not going to enjoy it on a re -watch, you probably
didn't enjoy it the first time. So that makes
sense to me. I was also going to ask you, we
were talking about dialogue a lot, and I have
a quote that definitely stands out for me as
my favorite quote of the film. But I was looking
at some of the different things, some of the
accolades, and obviously it's been nominated
for a bunch of different stuff from AFI when
they do all their different lists year by year.
And one of the lists that they've done at one
point was AFI's 100 years 100 movie quotes And
it didn't have anything that actually made the
100 movie quotes But it did have a nomination
and the nomination it got was the quote Are you
gonna bark all day little doggy or are you gonna
bite? Yeah, that's not my favorite quote from
the film I didn't know if you had anything dialogue
wise that stood out to you as your favorite part
whether it just be a quote or a set of dialogue
And I can give you my favorite Give you a second.
I don't know. I can't really it's not necessarily
It's like a subtle dialogue. It's it's really
the beginning with a super shit pretty much anytime
super shaming opens his mouth I find rather hilarious
and But it's interesting that you say that quote
though, because I had a poster. When I was in
college, I got one of those posters with that
quote on it. So yeah, I was one of those guys.
I'm the type of person that watches a movie and
I hear a quote and I'm like, that is the greatest
quote ever and I need to use that in my real
life. And then by the time the movie is over,
I have completely forgotten what that quote was
if I haven't written it down. So what is your
favorite quote? Well, this one I actually made
sure to write down because I was like, I love
that quote and there's probably... It's in the
same set of dialogue that you're talking about
in the beginning when it has to do with all the
tips and whatnot. But at some point, they get
to a little part where Mr. Blonde says, hey,
Joe, you want me to shoot this guy? And Mr. White
says, shit, you shoot me in a dream, you better
wake up and apologize. And I just thought that's
like the most badass line I've ever heard. So
I'm going to try to use that sometime in my.
I'll have to switch shootout with something else
because nobody's gonna threaten to shoot me at
all. Yeah It's gonna be hard to get that to work
Hey threaten to shoot me so I can say something
I'm gonna have to like modify it slightly, but
I just thought that was that was hilarious Great
quote and a great example of some some great
writing in a Tarantino film I had one other question
for you about the film and then I thought for
me, but Obviously since we're like I've worked
talking about, like there is the mystery angle
where they've identified that somebody, somebody
ratted them out. There's some type of trader
amongst their group. And that's kind of the premise
for the whole film is, you know, we don't see,
like you said, we don't see the actual heist.
We're dealing with the aftermath and the aftermath
is, you know, that the cops were tipped off and
that's why chaos ensued outside of obviously
one individual going a little gun crazy. But
so then we're left in almost a situation where
we're, we're putting the all the different characters
and trying to see who's the rat, who's not. As
that is the premise of the main thing, do you
feel as curious on if you thought, well, how
fast did you have it figured out the first time?
And if you can remember back then, or just as
far as a re -watch, do you think it would have
paid off even a little bit better to hold that
information a little bit longer as far as who
the actual rat was? there's a there's a specific
scene towards the end where the rat reveals himself
to one of the other characters. Do you think
it would have been even more beneficial if that
was the first time we we learned that? Hmm. The
issue with that be is that that's like right
near the end. So then it's like you have to go.
And I wouldn't want to miss like his story of
like how he became who he is. I would say not
the reason being. Think what's interesting about
that when you have that information and you have
that knowledge of who he is and the fact he's
really a rat it almost It makes Harvey Carter
tells character that much is more interesting
in this decision that more interesting because
you realize he's rooting for the wrong side and
he's wrong and his convictions and I think it
makes that those conversations he has and those
like the fact that he's sticking up for the guy
Like that more tragic because you see what he's
doing and you kind of realize well, he's doing
it And he's wrong in that aspect of it. So yeah,
I think maybe it would have been like a little
bit like that part of moments may have been what
would have probably been better. But I think
the movie as a whole is better for the way that
it's set up. And you mentioned the individual
story pieces where they kind of take one character
and they go back and kind of show their past
a little bit to set that character up. Which
one of those did you find the most enjoyable?
And I think personally that it was a good choice
that they didn't do everybody. Yeah, I agree.
But was there one that kind of stood out to you
as the most interesting or the most me to it?
I'd probably go with Tim Ross, so it was the
one I enjoyed the most. Yeah, I think I'm probably
with you there because it obviously is the big
reveal of the film and sets up some interesting
things. I think you've made a good point though.
It does make, even though you do as an audience
already know, I think it adds an element to the
fact that you know, but the characters don't.
And then you're kind of watching trying to figure
out, you know, number one, if he's going to be
able to continue to hide it or number two, you
know, like you said, is Harvey Geitel going to
make the wrong decision and back him up or, you
know, you kind of know what's happening or even
earlier on when it's when it's Tim Ross character
and the policeman that is being held hostage.
Yeah. And, you know, kind of trying to figure
out what's going to happen between those two.
And when you have this other guy that's that's
torturing him. Yeah, because you do get it a
little there where you know You you see him get
shot and you're like, well, why do you shoot
him? And then you find out it's cuz he's a cop,
right? So so you do kind of get it there So you
do have that little bit of a shock of like holy
crap and right, you know In addition to the fact
that he's kind of alive still so so you got to
be like Why didn't you do it earlier when he
was cutting my ear? Did you have any questions
or anything that you wanted to pose about it?
Yeah, so some of the burning questions I had
not nearly as detailed and as thought -provoking
as yours, but uh If you're in this situation,
what would be your color name? You know, I thought
I had an answer before I watched the film and
then I watched the film and I'm like I'm that
douche because there's a there's a scene where
where Joe is talking to him about the colors
and Where Steve the shimmy's character is complaining
about being mr. Pink? And you know, he's kind
of going over like why they can't choose because
if I let you choose you're all gonna be fighting
over who can be Mr. Black. I'm like, shit. I'm
like, I can't do that now. No, but I would say
that I would probably, I'd probably side on being
Mr. Gray. I'm gonna go with Gray. Not just be
Mr. Silver for myself. Oh, there we go. We're
somewhat in the same line. People that would
know me would say that's because that's half
of my wardrobe. I wear white black and gray and
that's about it. But you know gray is kind of
cool It's kind of in that that unknown area where
you're not necessarily, you know, it's not black
and white So yeah, I guess I would go with gray.
You're going with silver I'll go with silver
because it's a little off the beaten path. I
like it flashy and it sounds like Like, old -fashioned?
I don't know. Yeah. It was absolutely perfect
that Bishami's character was pink, though. It
does. It somehow fits him. Did you know that
the character, Mr. Blue, was a real -life criminal?
No. I'm not that surprised, but I was not aware
of that. Yeah, he's actually, like, a lifelong
criminal, or at least... criminal of some point,
but he's also in multiple movies so and he wrote
a book about his life as a Convict or a felon
or whatever and you know, there's there's been
characters in certain films I want to say one
of the characters in heat is actually based off
of him and Yeah, he's the actor that plays mr.
Balluda. So that's kind of a weird real -world
connection Again like Tarantino's love of casting
strange. Yeah for roles exactly and like non
-actors Interesting. And I guess starting with
one of the first questions in the movie asks,
do you yourself believe in tipping? Oh, I forgot
about this one. I did want to say that I did
want to punch Steve Hashemi's character at some
point because only because and maybe this is
different state by state, but he's he made the
comment that he didn't need a tipper because
she makes minimum wage. Yeah, tipped employees
at least where I live don't make minimum wage.
So I think that's I think that's most okay. I
was gonna say because our minimum wage in the
state of Illinois is 825 and a waiter waitress
or any type of tipped employee makes $4 .95 an
hour. So yeah, and I know when just north of
me in Wisconsin, they only make $2 .95. So, if
you're not tipping those people, good God, I
can't abide by that. So, yes, I tip. I tip. Has
there been a time that I haven't tipped? Yes.
Has there been a time where I didn't pay for
my meal? Yes. But that was an extreme situation
in college on a trip where we literally never
got our food. So, I didn't feel like I needed
to pay for what I didn't get. We're going to
pay for it. I mean, you didn't get it. I think
there were six of us. The two people that got
their food and were able to eat it paid for their
bill and the rest of us just left. So we got
portions of our food, but not ever the complete
meal. So, but no, and in a regular situation,
I am going to, I'm going to tip no matter what.
Um, it has to be pretty blatant for me not to,
um, not saying I won't be nice when, when someone's
nice, but, uh, yeah, I generally will tip as
someone who has, uh, been, uh, In charge of people
that are making tips Even if I have horrible
service always have to at least have 15 % I don't
know why it's just like it's like next time I
come I'll spit my food But it was a cool speech
by him regardless society says tip McDonald's
workers and not waitresses, but it's like yeah,
because obviously the functionality of how they
get paid But I don't think that would you know
limit and kind of undercut the speech a little
bit But every time I don't I always question
it is like when you pick up food from someplace
It's like and they have a tip line. It's like
do I do I tip because I just you just made it
the only time I have a problem outside of that
is is at like a buffet Yeah, it's really hard
then because literally I don't know. They're
not doing the same that a server or a waitress
at a restaurant is doing. They're bringing drinks
to everybody. I feel like I dropped the percentage
a little bit for them. If I go to a place on
multiple occasions, like a regular place, I always,
I tip when I pick it up because I figured, you
know, that'll lend you good things later. Right.
But it's always like that question because it's
like, I don't, I don't know. Then you have those
people that like ask for tips that you're like,
I don't think you should get one. Uh, like things
like fast food or something like that where it's
like, I don't subway. I don't know. It's like
that tricky situation where you had a classy
place and there's that bathroom attendant. Oh,
yeah. And you're just like, I don't need your
help. And if I don't need it, can I not pay you?
I can put my hands in this thing. I've been doing
this on my own for a long time now. Thanks for
handing me that towel. That means I have to give
you money now. I never carry cash on me, so it's
like, it's never... Or we'll say, though, the
absolute worst thing, if you're one of these
people out there, correct your ways immediately.
But if you... pay for food that's delivered to
you at your house and you don't tip that person
you are an evil evil human being that is not
just lazy to the point where you can't get it
yourself but then you're not going to pay the
person who brought it to you like that's just
wrong especially if it's nasty outside that's
why if i get delivery i pay online and do So
tip right and do a little bit more and hoping
that maybe they'll get there quicker, even though
probably has no effect on it. But, you know,
in my head, it helps. Well, yeah. Or if it's
like snowing really bad and I feel bad, it's
like I don't feel like going out, but I'm going
to make this person maybe a little bit better
because I'm driving. Yeah, I've had so many stories
of people that are delivering stuff in snow,
rain, ice or whatever. And it's like their bill
will be like 1937 and they'll give them a 20
and ask for change back. Oh man, you are an awful
person. It's like, wow. Anyways, I'll end my
rant or I would keep going with lots of stories.
As you can see, we both definitely enjoyed Reservoir
Dogs. I gave it like an 8 .5 and you said an
8. Yes. So which leads us into next week, which
we'll be getting into, which is I think largely
considered maybe still today is his Reservoir
Dogs was big, but I think My Twitter is at Optimus
Solo. And I am Attenborough Vault, but that'll
be it for this week. We'll see you next week
when we talk about Pulp Fiction in our continuation
of the Quentin Tarantino retrospective. Thanks
for listening.
No chapter markers for this episode.


