CINEMA GEEKS
Mad Max: Fury Road Review

About this Episode
Hey, this is Steve Blum, and you are listening
to the Geekcast Radio Network. Today on Weekend
at the Movies. Um, that's not our name anymore.
Wait, what? We changed our name? Yeah, don't
you pay attention? But we already did that once.
First we were called NY Weekly, then our name
got changed to Weekend at the Movies. Why would
we change our name again? Uh, have you Googled
Weekend at the Movies lately? True, that's a
good point. I could see how it might not come
across as the most original name. But what's
our name going to be now? Um, let me think. Well,
you are geeks, and you are a part of the Geekcast
Radio Network. But it has to be something to
do with movies, too. Exactly. It should be something
that tells everybody exactly what type of geeks
you are. You're cinema geeks. Cinema geeks. I
like it. But why do you keep saying it like Dan
and I are the only geeks? You keep saying you.
Shouldn't it be we? I mean, you're a part of
this too, Geekette. Alright, alright. Then we
are the Cinema Geeks. Much better. And this week,
we're taking a look back at last weekend's box
office. And giving you our predictions for the
week ahead. And as always, we'll break down the
biggest cinema news stories from the last week.
And we'll each give you a yay or nay on a trailer
from this past week. Oh, don't forget, we'll
break down what we've been watching with our
thoughts on films like Maps to the Stars, Slow
West, Chappy, and Kingsman the Secret Service.
And finally we'll give you our main attraction
with our thoughts on Mad Max Theory Road. All
that and more coming up with the Cinema Geeks.
That's right, it's another episode of Cinema
Geeks and I am one of your hosts Optimus Solo,
and joining me is two people. We haven't had
three people on the record for a little while,
so this is going to be fun. First off is obviously
movie revolt Dan. Hello. Hey, how's it going?
Not too bad. And then also joining us once again
is hard candy Mandy. Amanda, hello. Hola. And
this should be fun. This is the first time that...
We've all three been able to record, so we'll
see how it goes. But before we get into the box
office and the news and whatnot, Dan, I want
to toss it to you and get a snapshot of how your
last seven to 10 days has gone. It's been an
adventure. Yeah. Thanks, you guys, for holding
on the fort while I was gone. My wife and I were
lucky enough to welcome our son into the world,
and it's been a lot of pooping and peeing since
then, a lot of cleaning up diapers. Pete on a
few times. Not poop time? But it's going really
well. You know, lack of sleep, you kind of adjust,
but it's been a lot of fun. Awesome. And I don't
know if you put the name on, I don't know if
you put the name out there or if you're willing
to put the name out there, but what did you name
the little guy? His name is Connor. Nice. So
little Connor into the world and... The question
is, what's the first movie you're going to show
him? That's funny, because it's either Goodfellas
or Aladdin. They're similar films, right? Well,
technically the first one he was around was when
I was watching Whiplash with my wife, which he
did react to the music, so it's a good sign.
There we go. Awesome. All right. Well, as for
us, at least for me, the week's been going pretty
good. I was on a staycation this week. So we
had my vacation to Florida almost a month ago,
and I had one more vacation I had to use before
it ran out. So I did a little staycation, stayed
at home for a week, did some yard work, some
housework, and stuff like that. So nothing too
exciting, but it gave us a chance to watch a
whole bunch of movies. And then Amanda had to
get used to me leaving in the morning to go back
to work now. So she's not a big fan. But as we
start every episode, we will go to the box office.
And it's actually probably one of the more interesting
box office visits we've had ever on the run of
this show. man and i both made some predictions
last week and we were both terribly wrong because
we were talking about if mad max or avengers
would be number one and and how that would all
play out and of course neither was number one
so coming in at number one last weekend was pitch
perfect two with around seventy million mad max
fury road came in second at forty five avengers
dropped all the way down to the third spot with
thirty eight million and running off the top
five was hot pursuit and Furious 7. Dan, if you
were on the episode last week, would you have
set us straight and told us about Pitch Perfect
2 coming in at number one? Yeah, I probably would
have picked Pitch Perfect 2, mostly because I
didn't think Mad Max would actually do it. It
actually did better than I thought it would.
I just wondered if that would have a math appeal,
because every time I was in the theater and that
preview came on, I felt like the entire audience
was turned away from it. And I know Pitch Perfect
has pretty... It had a pretty big audience when
it came out and I think it's kind of gained it
over the years of being on TV so much. I think
it's one thing, you know, you look at how the
first one did and I think that's very misleading
because a lot of people actually didn't see the
first one in theaters. Yeah. It was something
that got more popular as it got released, you
know, to like Redbox and DVD and Blu -ray and
stuff like that and that's when the word of mouth
really started spreading so you can't necessarily
look at that first one and kind of predict what
the second one would do and I guess I kind of
just completely forgot about. how many people
are actually into Pitch Perfect 2. I didn't even
see the first one until last year. Yeah, I made
her see it. We're an odd couple because I actually
like both movies better than she does. Anything
else surprising from this last weekend, Dan,
from the box office? That people want to go see
Hot Pursuit. It's kind of surprising. It's made
$23 million. That is mind -boggling. I don't
understand that at all. I just felt bad if everyone
involved in that movie. I don't know who pitched
that movie and why there wasn't someone in the
room that just said, hey, we did that last year.
And we've done it before that as well. Overall,
for the year now, Avengers has taken the crown.
Not that that's a surprise to anybody, but it
did pass. Furious 7 within the last 7 to 10 days.
So now we have Avengers Age of Ultron reigning
supreme at number one obviously followed by Furious
7 Looking ahead to next week. I was starting
something new here with the box office now that
we got our new name and everything Trying to
make it feel fresh and whatnot, but I'm gonna
let everybody make predictions each week one
official prediction it can be anything it can
be uh... you know something's gonna drop x number
spots something's gonna come in third something's
gonna come in first whatever you guys want to
predict the stuff that we have coming out this
next weekend would be poltergeist and tomorrow
land so dan let's start with you give us a prediction
for next week anything box office related i would
say that uh... poltergeist does not finish in
the top three okay so poltergeist will open not
in the top three. Yeah, I feel the, you know,
the Tomorrowlands and the Mad Maxes and Avengers,
and I just don't think it's gonna, I think it's
gonna do decent, but I don't think it'll, that'll
be somewhat of a disappointment, be my guess.
Okay. Could be way off. Well, we were way off
last week, so you can join the club then. Amanda,
what's your prediction for next week at the box
office? I say I agree with Dan. I don't know
that Poltergeist will come in and do a lot of
damage, but I'm hoping it's at least in the top
five. I think there's, you know, good amount
of hype around this reboot. Craze so maybe I'll
do some do some damage that way. But other than
that, I think Paul Bart's gonna keep holding
Stay right where it's at. Oh Man. All right.
So you guys are both going with with poltergeist
I'm gonna make a prediction and I guess that'll
be that mad man Mad Max Fury Road. I'm saying
that's gonna stay in second spot Yeah, that's
actually nice. I was I was debating that prediction
as well. I could see it Look at that word of
mouth. It's been pretty Great So I'm predicting
I'm not gonna say I'm not shouldn't go any further
with the prediction because that leaves a possibilities
for what comes in first and what comes in third
But I guess in the line of thought here is that
it'll flip -flop with pitch perfect and that
tomorrow land would come in first But I'm just
sticking with Mad Max in second place next week.
We'll leave it at that. I don't care how it happens
All right getting into the news then We'll kind
of go around the news desk as we have in the
past when we have more than two people on. So
since we started with you, Dan, with the box
office, let's start with you for news. What's
one thing newsworthy in the world of movies this
past week? Well, the one thing that kind of came
to my mind was... there was news regarding the
Blade Runner sequel that is occurring, and one
was attractive, but the other, the thing that
actually kind of caught my ear a little bit more
was the fact that Roger Deakins is gonna be the
cinematographer for it, which is great, because
he's one of the best cinematographers out there.
He does pretty much all the Coen Brothers movies.
He did Skyfall, which I think is one of the best
-looking action movies. in recent memory, and
it has me somewhat intrigued knowing that I could
see him kind of taking that world of Blade Runner
and making it look rather cool. Yeah, he did
excellent work with Skyfall, so I'm with you
on that one. I think that adds to the excitement
or fuels some excitement behind the Blade Runner
sequel, which, you know, now we've got Dennis
Villanueva and Roger Deakins, and I know Ryan
Gosling has been tossed around as far as... either
a main star or co -star in the film. So yeah,
I think all that bodes well for Blade Runner.
I mean, if you just said, hey, Blade Runner's
getting a sequel, I probably wouldn't be that
excited about it because I don't necessarily
know if it needed one, et cetera, all that type
of stuff. But when you're throwing these names
around, it doesn't actually make me pretty interested
in it. Yeah, I'm actually more excited that Ridley
Scott's name's not attached compared to... There
you go. Exactly. Amanda, any interest in Blade
Runner sequel? I haven't seen the original, and
I don't know if I've seen any of this guy's work
at all. You didn't see Skyfall? No. Oh, man.
Okay, well that's what we'll be watching next
week. Because that's a sin that has to be rectified.
All right, Amanda, what's your first story that
you'd like to bring up? I thought that the news
about Chris... Pret confirming some more non
-Guardians -related MCU appearances was a little
intriguing. It kind of makes me mad because I
don't like when somebody's in the same cinematic
universe and they try to do more characters than
just the one. I feel like it makes it less real
for me. I don't know if it necessarily meant
that he was going to be doing different characters
or if it meant that just Star -Lord was going
to be appearing in some of the other films. Maybe
I read that wrong. Guardians of the Galaxy films
can do a few more of those and then there's a
couple more that Are not gonna be guardians movies.
So I don't know if it's different characters.
He's just popping up and he's definitely coming
into the Infinity war so maybe he will be a Star
-Lord still but I guess out of his film Yeah,
I guess it's just in the nine that I understand
that there's crossover between all the different
Marvel films I guess I never considered The possibility
which is stupid on my part of some of the Guardians
showing up in some of these other movies I don't
know why I didn't consider that I mean I knew
there was a Guardians 2 coming out That would
get to see more of them, but am I just silly
Dan? Did you ever did you already have that kind
of down that they would be appearing in like
the Infinity War? Yeah, I assumed it would be
especially since they dealt with like the Infinity
Jam in the in the first in their first film so
I figured I figured my assumption was that they'd
probably be in the second Well, I guess the the
fourth movie the second infinity one would be
my guess I I didn't expect him to be like in
anything other than that I mean I could see him
maybe in Miss Marvel because she's kind of a
cosmic character too or maybe even dr. Strange
so Yeah, I would assume if he was in any of the
other films It would have to be something that
has that we haven't seen yet Like it doesn't
make sense to me for him to be in like a Captain
America film or no, you know Maybe I mean maybe
I could maybe maybe Thor but Maybe like I would
it would have I would I would think more of a
cameo than an actual like right like part because
I they're very Considering they're doing ragged
Ragnarok. I don't know right. I see Star -Lord
fitting into that Yeah, I think you're we're
closer on with like things like Marvel or Captain
Marvel or Doctor Strange or something like that
that would make more sense if it's if it is anything
outside of just the you know appearances in the
actual Whatever you want to call and we're gonna
keep going with Avengers 234 or are they gonna
just start calling the different titles? I don't
know But yeah, I mean I think that is intriguing
I don't know why I never even thought of that,
but he's definitely a cool character There's
a bunch of other not to go off on another news
or whatever but other Chris Pratt rumors and
news that were going on there because he was
saying that he was shooting down some of the
other rumors he was rumored to be in a few months
back we talked about the Ghostbusters and He
said that he's not involved in that. I'm hoping
I'm not getting my Chris's mixed up. It was Chris
Pratt that was rumored for Ghostbusters, wasn't
it? It was him and cheating Tatum were rumored
to be in the next, like the, there's supposed
to be like a guy spin -off. Right. And that was
the rumor. In one of the interviews or whatever,
he... He was pretty blatant with it. He said
that's all bullshit. So I don't know, he seemed
to be kind of vague in the other statements he
was making during that interview, but he was
saying that the Ghostbusters is bullshit. He
was saying that one of the other things that
he had been rumored for, he was saying that was
bullshit too. So I don't know if everybody just
likes knowing Chris Pratt's name out there and
he doesn't necessarily agree with any of that
or hasn't talked to him. But if not, he's playing,
he's doing his best poker face. making us think
that he's not gonna be in stuff. But he was definitely
making the rounds with some headlines there.
I will go with, you guys are stealing all my
news, so I gotta get creative here. No, since
we're gonna be talking about Mad Max a little
bit later, I thought I'd bring up, obviously
there was news immediately about... the possibility
of more films. That's not necessarily why I bring
this new story up, but they did talk to George
Miller about the possibility of sequels, especially
with as well as it has been reviewed and received.
And there was a long delay in bringing Fury Road,
kind of bringing it to fruition. And he has stated
that during that time, he has toyed with a lot
of different ideas. There's apparently at least
one screenplay that's already somewhat written.
from the article that I read and It had been
believed that this sequel was going to be called
Mad Max Furiosa and I know a lot of the podcast
talking about Fury Road where we're talking about
the Possibilities that you know this next film
would give us more of the Furiosa character But
it stated that the film will actually be called
Wasteland Mad Max Wasteland I don't know necessarily
that changes much or whatever, but I thought
the interesting part of the article and the reason
I wanted to bring it up was because regardless
of what it's called or what's in the works Tom
Hardy did confirm that he's actually contractually
obligated to a further three movies if Fury Road
was a success. So I guess regardless of what
direction they go if Fury Road is a success which
it seems like it has been so far that he has
a contract for three more films. What's your
opinion, Dan, on the idea of more Mad Max films
going into the future and creating more of the
whole franchise world? Well, speaking of someone
who hasn't seen Cherry Road, great! Yeah, I mean,
I would be fine with it. I mean, it's... I think
there's a lot to that world that you can kind
of expand upon and it seems like it's... If you
get a second trilogy or something like that out
of it, maybe that could be good. It's the type
of franchise where it lends itself decently to
sequels because based on the original trilogy,
you don't necessarily have to be super connected
to each film. So it gives you some kind of creative
license to do and explore completely different
ideas and themes. Out of all the different things
that are talking about sequels and like a whole
set of films, this one doesn't bother me that
much because it seems like each one at least
could probably try to be somewhat creatively
unique. Yeah, they're just so, I mean, yeah,
like thematically they're very not very tied
to each other. They're so different and I think
you can kind of just keep that going, you know?
Right. Amanda, without spoiling anything, because
remember, Dan, you haven't seen Fury Road yet.
What do you think about the idea of more Mad
Max films? As far as its track record goes, with
the sequels doing well, the music put out, it's
now a reboot, how many can they moke out of that?
I feel like they could go pretty far with it
based on the hype that it's gotten, but I just
don't know if I need more in my life. Does it
need more? You don't need more Tom Hardy in your
life? Tom Hardy can do some other things, but...
You know, he was a minor part of this, so. Yeah,
I mean, I think, I don't know, I'd be willing
to see some more. I'm not burned out yet by far.
I mean, it's just one film. We're used to, what,
there's been 11 Marvel films so far. I'm not
burned out on that. So I think three more Mad
Max films would just be like a drop in the bucket.
So, Dan, what do you got for your second news
story? The second news story is that the rumors,
or the parent, that Robert Kirkman will be...
helping to write the script for the next Transformers
sequel slash spinoff, which has me somewhat.
Hopeful, I guess you know for those that don't
know Robert Kirkman's probably most famous for
his work on The Walking Dead both the comic and
the show He's done a lot of different comics
as well, and I tend to like most of his stuff
So I feel like if anyone could you know get a
good Marvel or get a good Transformers film it
might be him I don't know if he has any experience
with the property previously, but I think he
certainly knows how to He knows that that type
of world and he knows how to write strong characters
so it might be the most bloody Transformers movie
we ever get but I guess as long as They have
actually stronger writers that aren't like, you
know the ones who wrote the other films I think
we might be good and it's I'm just happy to know
there actually might be a script to this one.
So You mean they haven't had scripts on the previous
board I I would assume not I just assumed it
was all ad -libbed, but it would explain a lot
I'm just hoping that at one point in the future
I can use a clip of you saying that you had some
excitement next to the next Transformers film
and see if that comes back to life. More, I should
say, let me caveat and say more excitement than
I did before. That doesn't take much. No, it
doesn't. Yeah, it seems interesting the way that
they're going about the future of the whole Transformers
film verse, I guess we can call it. You know,
because they talked about kind of having that
writer, I don't know what word they used, but
almost like a meeting of the minds with a whole
bunch of different people and tossing ideas out
and coming up with stuff. But I don't know. I
don't watch The Walking Dead, so I can't necessarily
speak to what he's done with that. But based
on what you say, hopefully, like you said, it
will actually lead to something of a plot and
script and some story. and not just shards of
metal running into each other that I can't tell
what's what. Yeah, and to be clear, I don't think
he's written the show verbatim, but he's the
one who created the comic itself. I know he has
a lot of input into the show, but I don't know
how much he is exactly just him. I think it's
a combination of the show running and whatnot.
Right. Amanda, what do you got for your second
news story? Oh, man. Anything left for you? I
guess. There's Jack Reacher 2. Did you see Jack
Reacher? I did, yes. And, Dan, you saw Jack Reacher.
Yeah, I did. And Johnny Courtney. You like Johnny
Courtney. You're one of the only supporters of
Johnny Courtney. I'm gonna hold it down. Okay,
so you're excited for Jack Reacher 2? Yeah, I
think it'll be pretty good. It's adapted from
one of the Reacher novels that came out in 2013,
Never Go Back. So I might have to pick that up.
I know Ed. I'm obviously familiar with Ed Zwick
as a director, and I like some of his work. I
don't think necessarily I liked all of his work,
but I like some of it. So I don't think that's
necessarily bad that he's involved again with
that. Dan, did you ever think you'd get a second
Jack Reacher? No. The first one was fine. I didn't
think it did very well, from what I can remember.
Might have done well enough to warrant a sequel.
I'm sure after Mission Impossible makes a trillion
dollars that Tom Cruise will be a hot commodity
once again. I've never read the book, so I know
there was some controversy with Tom Cruise being
in the role because he doesn't necessarily fit
the character based on the book, but I thought
it was fine. Like like a taken meats like born
identity in a way, but uh I think the what you
said that that's one of the most Heard arguments
I've heard her most common arguments. I've heard
about the film though is that you know people
that know the material Don't necessarily like
the cast you know crews in that role that say
it doesn't necessarily fit So I don't think you're
alone in that opinion. Yeah, it was I mean I
remember like He made it work, though, I would
say. Well, enough. I mean, I definitely think
maybe you could get a better casting choice,
but I don't think it was... The worst possible.
Yeah, it wasn't, like, awful. It wasn't unbelievable
in that way. Right. Was it too far off other
roles that he's played? No. Right. And I can't
comment too intelligently, since I haven't seen
the first one, so... I think it is on Netflix.
Alright, so I need to see the first Jack Reacher,
and what do you need to see? What did we say
earlier that you haven't seen? Skyfall? Skyfall.
That's more important. For my last news story,
I should go with the Star Wars news story because
that would get into the podcast, but we'll just
put that in the show notes. I just wanted to
bring up for those people that are interested.
I know most people might not even need to go
see Terminator Genesis or however you're supposed
to say that, since it's already been shown in
the trailers. But if you are excited or want
to build your excitement leading up to it, apparently
the 1984 Terminator is going to be re -released
into some theaters around the world. You haven't
seen a breakdown of actually where. The article
says 20 territories and over 800 cinemas. That's
not a ton of theaters. So I don't know if it'll
just be in other countries or if you'll have
the release here in America, but it's always
possible. Anytime something comes around like
this, it seems like movies roll back in and try
to cash something in on it. So for if you're
a die -hard Terminator fan, maybe it's time for
a trip to Europe to see the 1984 film on the
big screen or on IMAX or whatever they decide
to do with it before Genesis comes out. I am
super disappointed with the Genesis trailers,
though. I don't know why. they chose to show
what they did in those. Dan, have you seen the
trailer for that yet? Unfortunately, yeah. And
that's everything, so there you go. I was like,
wow, I would have been totally shocked at that
point if I had been seeing the movie right now.
I did not realize that's the direction they were
going to go. They didn't need to hype it up anymore.
It was good. Yeah, the teaser or whatever was
enough. Just knowing that it's Terminator and
who's involved, people that are excited about
it are going to be excited about it. It seems
like they took the most major part of the story
or twist or whatever and threw it out there on
the trailer. Usually it's comedies that are doing
that, but apparently sci -fi action is going
that route now too. So, disappointed with the
trailer, but... I said maybe you'll have an outside
shot to go see Terminator again on the big screen.
There's other news stories that we're not going
to get to, so you'll have to go to our website
page at GeekCastRadio .com and find the episode
post and check out all those other news stories.
One of them is involved in Star Wars, so we'll
leave it at that. But we'll get into our trailer
talk now. We're going to do this a little bit
different. Like I said, everything's fresh and
new today. New name, new logo, new everything,
so we're going to treat trailers a little bit
different this time. Everybody's going to get
one shot at talking about a trailer that's been
released this last week. It can either be a positive
or a negative, a yay or a nay on any type of
trailer. Dan, we've been letting you go first
with everything else, so we'll let you get the
first trailer spot, and hopefully I'll have one
left when it comes down to me. But what's the
trailer from this last week, and what's the reaction,
yay or nay, on it? I guess I'll go with, surprisingly,
the second trailer to Pixels, and I feel bad
about this, but I have... Faith that we might
actually get a good Adam Sandler movie. So I'll
go with I'll go with yeah I'm kind of like liking
what I'm seeing and I like the first trailer
I like the second trailer and it It makes me
worried because you know that Adam Sandler's
track record lately has been pretty awful But
I am guess I think what I like about this is
that it's not a concept That's a kind of dependent
upon him. So hopefully it will it will end up
working. It just I just really liking what I'm
saying Well, I think that's been somewhat of
the universal reaction so far to those trailers
I haven't heard a lot necessarily based on just
the second trailer But it seemed like everybody
once that first trailer for pixels came out was
talking about how it actually looked like it
could Potentially be something that was decent
I thought it right from the get -go just based
on a synopsis for that movie that it was gonna
be something interesting I wasn't sure exactly
what how they were gonna go about it what you
know the questions early on was what kind of
combination or what racial we would have between
live action and the animated parts or how it
was going to mesh. And I think the first trailer
kind of put most of that, any questions about
that at ease as far as if it was going to be
done right or not or cheesy or not. And I think
a lot of people are more excited for pixels the
more they see about it. compared to, you know,
not a lot of people were talking about it at
the beginning of the year as far as, you know,
being something that you anticipate or something
you think is going to do well. I mean, I know,
like you said, it has the Adam Sandler stigma
behind it, but I'm with you. I think so far everything
I've seen makes me interested for pixels. Amanda,
are you interested in pixels? Super interested.
I think it looks like a really cool idea. I think
they're going to integrate the CGI and the live
action really well. I think it's going to be
well done in that. regard and I think it's a
cool cast. Not gonna lie. Peter Dinklage, awesome.
Adam Sandler, okay, whatever. I'm still always
down for an Adam Sandler movie. And that guy
from The Wedding Ringer, what's his name? Which
one? Josh Gad? Yes, Josh Gad. And then, okay,
Kevin James. We're all hating you right now,
Kevin James, for the crap you just put out in
Poplar. But you better redeem yourself in pixels.
I'm excited. Yeah, I like Josh Gad, so that's
probably the cast member I'm most excited about
in that film. All right, so we're all excited
for Pixels 2. So that's Dan's yay for his trailer.
Are you doing a yay or a nay, Amanda? Let's do
another yay. For which one? Pan. A yay for Pan.
Why? A yay for Pan. Hugh Jackman is a villain?
What? He looks awesome. I think he'd be really
cool. I think the changes in the storyline are
going to be pretty interesting. I think it's
much better than giving us just the retold Peter
Pan story. Yeah, it's a retelling it looks like,
definitely. You could see where Hook was like
helping Pan instead of being his enemy in this
one. Maybe, I don't know if this is more of like
an origin story or retelling or what, but whatever
it is, I'm excited. It took me at least three
shots of Hugh Jackman before I came to terms
with the fact that that was Hugh Jackman. At
first, I did not recognize him in the first couple
shots. Later on, it became a little more obvious
when you looked at him, but I thought that was
a heck of a costume, design, makeup, et cetera
for him to turn him into something that we're
all so used to just seeing him as Wolverine or
something like that. I thought it was very intriguing
as far as his angle. I don't know if I'm... I'm
not the biggest Peter Pan fan in the world. I...
You know, the Disney Peter Pan film is not necessarily
my top 10 Disney films. I've never liked any
of the other Peter Pan films. I'm sorry, Hook
fans. But it's just not something I usually get
excited about. But I'm somewhat intrigued on
this one. It's going to take more than that to
get me excited about it. But I'm intrigued about
it. What about you, Dan? Yeah, I'm I don't know.
I so much I'm not a huge Peter Pan fan. I mean,
I just remember. Man I just I I don't this whole
like you know live -action fairy tale thing I've
not been I've not had a lot of good luck with
I mean I haven't seen a few of them like I haven't
seen Cinderella yet so I can't speak to that
one but I guess I'm a little hesitant I am I
do you think the idea of a You know Hugh Jackman
playing a villain character like this could be
a lot of fun so that has me Intriguing I do you
think does it seem like there's a lot of like
talented actors involved so you know hopefully
it can be better than hook We're both hating
on Hook. Visually, it did look like it had some
impressive stuff going on in the trailer there.
So I think at least from a visual spectacle,
it should be something fun to watch. And sometimes
that can be somewhat of a saving grace for some
of these fairy tale turned live action, is that
at least they're fun to look at. But like Dan
said, some of them haven't necessarily hit all
their marks, so we'll have to wait and see. So
two yay so far. A yay for Pan and a yay for Pixels.
I will go with a yay as well. I guess we're all
being boring. And nobody's going to be hating
on this one. But this one might not be as expected.
I'm actually going to go with a yay for the Steve
Jobs teaser. It wasn't necessarily a trailer,
it was more of a teaser. Now, I did see the other
Jobs film, which originally they were going to
come out the same year, I thought, Dan, but that
did not happen. That's like, what, two or three
years ago now since that last film, where we
got to see Ashton Kutcher as Steve Jobs. And
everyone at the time that both of these were
being talked about was more excited for this
one. And then the other one came out, kind of
got mixed reviews for the most part. And what's
making me say yay on this one is really centered
mostly around the cast and actually seeing them
in the roles. I didn't pay attention to what
the actual internet reaction to Michael Fassbender
was at being Steve Jobs. I don't know if it got
a positive reaction or a negative. I missed that.
I must not have been on Twitter that day. But
I actually think he looks like he could pull
this off pretty well from the teaser. Maybe I'm
in the minority here, but I think he looks like
he could pull it off well, and I think the supporting
cast around him is interesting. And I guess the
reason I'm most interested in this film is because
I've seen the other one and wanting to see...
Usually I wouldn't say that. If there's two films
about the same topic, I'm not usually interested
in either one, but I'm interested to see the
comparison now as to how they depict it. and
what differs between the depiction in this one
compared to the depiction in the Ashton Kutcher
film. So, maybe I'm just glad for punishment,
but I'm actually gonna give yay to Steve Jobs'
teaser. Dan, did you ever see the Ashton Kutcher
one? I did, yeah. Yeah, it was, Josh Gad was
pretty good. Right. It was fine. It wasn't, it
was honestly, it was, Kutcher did a better job
than I expected. Right. But, yeah, for this one,
I... I'm hopeful and see how it can be a you
know as Michael Fassbender's on my fantasy team
I hope he does amazingly well and wins an Oscar
there you go it's interesting because that movie's
gone through so many different directors and
and whatnot and I know those people are wondering
if it was even coming out this year so I'm curious
and hopeful but uh I was actually I kind of I
thought when they released like it was like a
promotional poster of Fassbender like uh like
in like an old like apple ad and i kind of bought
in then so i think he could do it it does seem
like fast friends are such a huge presence he's
such a like a in jobs is such like more much
in you know uh more you know uh undersold and
stuff so i wonder if it does seem like it it
doesn't seem like it fits his personality per
se but could be just a chance for him to do something
new right in that You always take risk if you're
going to doubt on Fassbender. So I think this
could be something that could be pretty impressive,
actually, if he pulls it off. Like you said,
he's got a pretty big presence, pretty big charisma
behind him. And is he going to be able to pull
off a very much more kind of behind -the -scenes
character like Steve Jobs? So I think it's going
to be interesting to see how it all plays out.
But I'm hoping that it will be better than the
other one. And like I said, I'm just more interested
in how they tell this tale and what. what angles
they go for compared to the other ones. It's
more of an intrigue just from the storyline standpoint
and not necessarily if it's going to be a good
movie or not. But I'm going to give a yay to
that one. There's some other trailers that will
be on the website as well. I know everybody is
dying to see the trailer for the second Maze
Runner film. Looks better than Virgin and Surgeon.
I actually will somewhat agree with that. I think
it looks way more legit. At least it's interesting.
I don't know what's gonna happen in it whereas
the other ones I feel like I've already seen
that story three three or four times But I don't
know if you want to you want to talk about the
scorched trials trailer or watch it. It'll be
there There's a couple other ones as well on
On the website so we're gonna take a quick break
And we will be right back to give you a rundown
of what we've been watching before we get into
our main review Of course of Mad Max Fury Road
so stick with us. We'll be right back On the
simplistic reviews podcast we talk movies We
talk TV We talk trying to make our spot sound
more exciting by adding explosions Yeah, I'm
pretty sure you could have got the point across
with sound effects. Not the real thing Download
the show on iTunes or at simplisticreviews .blogspot
.com. I'm sure your insurance company will cover
that. No, they won't. No, they probably won't.
All right, thanks for sticking with us. Like
we said, it's time for us to break down what
we've been watching, and it's been a while since
Dan has been on the show, so it's the theme of
the episode. We're letting Dan go first on all
things. So Dan, what's one of the things you've
seen over the last little bit or that you haven't
had a chance to talk about on air? Yeah, I've
not been here for a long time yet. I haven't
seen very little, unfortunately. I did get a
chance to catch up with two 2015 movies, and
I know you guys have talked about these already
on the podcast. But I've been interested to hear
what your take is on them, so I'm all ears. I'll
start first with Kingsman. The movie came out
earlier this year. directed by Matthew Vaughn
and the guy who brought his kick ass in X -Men
First Class. And I was highly looking forward
to this. I just didn't get a chance to see it
in theaters and was finally glad to check it
out. And I know there was, I guess, overall positive
reviews and I ended up really enjoying it myself.
Only thing like I didn't really, was not a huge
fan of was Samuel L. Jackson's take. I just thought
the character of the Lisp got a little bit...
Got a little much by the end. I was like, I don't
know if I needed that choice, but uh, that was
a lot of fun I thought it did hit that humor.
Well And it definitely could tell it comes from
a Mark Millar comic just based upon its gratuitousness
and it's like high violence level I did think
at times I wondered if it was maybe going a little
too far I know that the notorious church scene
has turned a lot of people off or it's you know,
people loved it per se and it was Not what I
was expecting because I heard a lot of people
talking about the church scene I'm like, what
exactly is this and then I came on I'm like,
whoa, that is that is a lot of people dying I
don't think anybody was ready for that scene
unless you've had the whole movie told you or
spoiled. But you're right, a lot of people have
either liked that or hated that or that served
as a turning point for a lot of people. Either
they loved the rest of the film or they hated
the rest of the film after that. I know Brendan
from In Session Film absolutely hated the church
scene if I remember correctly. Did you think
it took a took a turn downward from there on
or did you did you I would say I like the training
sequences stuff more I didn't necessarily think
it It it was It degraded itself too far. I thought
it I still enjoyed what came after I just I felt
like I guess I just like the training sequences
more and like what they were doing and It felt
like the I guess the issue with it became like
I didn't I wasn't a huge fan of Samuel Jackson
but the villain character as a whole so it it
when he became more of a focal point in his like
app that he was trying to come i just i thought
i wasn't as interested in that and just i was
more interested in in the story of the main character
and even like his relationship with his like
his father and his mom or not his father but
his like you know pseudo stepdad and his mom
i kind of like that story a little bit More I
almost feel like you could have this story without
like the the Samuel L. Jackson character might
even even a little bit better But I still I still
thought it was a lot of fun. I thought the action
was well choreographed and I mean some of the
pop cultural not pop culture but like the meta
references to like James Bond and and why not
we're at there sometimes I thought okay. I don't
necessarily think you needed there, but I thought
it was Apped for what they were doing Right,
so I thought it made sense and Yeah, I'm looking
I mean I hope I don't know if they're doing I
think they are doing a sequel right? I think
that was enough. I believe so. I'd be curious
to see more and I thought it was one so I'm actually
gonna agree with you on just about everything
you said mainly the main two things which I kind
of said when we reviewed it as well was I too
like you could have could have dealt with some
longer training sequences or Even if they weren't
extended just some more of them because it seemed
like it you know that they started to tease that
a little bit they went through a few of them
and then all of a sudden we jumped way ahead
and I was enjoying them too much so I actually
would prefer like you to have see more of that
part of the film and I can definitely see what
you're talking about with Samuel L Jackson's
character I get that maybe you know what they
were doing and why they did it but the question
for me became it was taking me at times out of
the film a little bit it was a little distracting
to listen to him. Whether you agree with them
going for that angle or not is besides the point.
Not even just the lisp. I always thought what
he was doing just seemed a little bit... It was
almost as good as the villain plot from Teenage
Mutant Ninja Turtles last year. Kind of. I get
that it was meant to be kind of ridiculous to
go along with the Roger Moore type of James Bond
villains which had ridiculously moronic plots
for taking over the world. I felt like it was
trying to do that a little bit too much and went
the obvious route of like... using technology,
I think maybe they could have done something
a little bit more creative. I gotta ask if you
had, because there was a specific part that Amanda
really, she loved 99 % of this film I believe,
I'm not trying to speak for her, but she had
a big problem with one scene towards the end,
so what was your reaction to the jail cell sequence
that they did? with the boy and the queen or
the princess or whatever. Oh, like the last shot,
basically? No, well, yeah, just the boy. The
whole motivation, the promise of something of
that nature can motivate somebody to now save
the world and then they have to show that last
scene. I could have done without that hole. Yeah,
I don't necessarily, yeah, that definitely felt
like a Mark Millar joke, like just kind of going
for just the gratuitousness. I, yeah, I didn't,
I didn't, it didn't like... turned my stomach
or anything like that it just felt it was kind
of juvenile um and it did seem kind of just like
a ever a little bit far -fetched like it is very
uh like that seems unnecessary and uh don't think
you need to go all the way with it i kind of
you kind of subtlety can go a long way you know
and uh right had none but you didn't take advantage
of that Yeah, like, I'm kind of the same way.
It didn't necessarily negatively affect my viewpoint
of it, but I can kind of see, you know, why someone
would have a problem with that scene. It didn't
affect me one way or the other. I know some people
probably loved it. Okay, put it in the middle
of the movie about something else not as important.
Okay. It was more because you were saving the
world because of it. Yeah. It just seemed kind
of like, yeah, I mean, I know... Going like again
like speaking with the Roger Moore stuff like
Roger Moore's era had like was notorious for
their their puns and they're like they're Innuendo
and that wasn't Innuendo that was blatantly just
saying Maybe just a tad bit more Innuendo and
a little bit less This is exactly what we're
doing. So Right. All right. So we got to ask
you then Dan now that you've seen Kingsman What
would you give a final score and just so everyone's
aware like I said, we're doing everything fresh
and new today All new look and everything so
we're gonna change our grading scale. We're gonna
take a page out of the true romance Playbook
we're gonna switch our skills I've been talking
about it kind of for the last couple weeks about
how it's hard for me to wrap my head around a
one through five Scale so we're gonna go full
-on one through ten so Dan Kingsman What score
out of ten I would go probably like seven Seven
like, you know, it's solid, you know, it's it's
not groundbreaking by any means or I think it's
not nearly It's, you know, middle of the road
for Matthew Vaughn, and I think I like Kick Ass
more, and I still, I mean, I love First Class.
It's probably my favorite film of his, so I think
Seven is my overall goal, score, right? Excellent.
That's definitely a good score for that, and
I think we were pretty much in agreement for
the most part when we did our original look at
that. So we'll go next with a film that both
of us saw, and then we'll give you a chance to
talk about your other one. So... We both actually
had a chance to see, we'll start with the oldest
thing we saw, which I believe would be the first
Hellboy. I had never seen Hellboy. It had just
been one of those things where I just never could
get interested in. It's almost like The Incredible
Hulk or Superman. It just takes a lot more for
me to get interested in those things compared
to like Spider -Man or Batman or X -Men and that
type of stuff. But I don't know, Hellboy just
from the images. I wasn't interested, but I actually
enjoyed this film. I got kind of wrapped up into
it. We started watching it and we had to pause
it or stop it at one point and I was actually
looking forward to continuing it on and seeing
what happened with this. I don't like you to
kind of use the phrase that Kingsman wasn't necessarily
groundbreaking or earth shattering or anything
like that. I don't think Hellboy is either, but
I think if you're a fan of superhero films or
if you're a fan of comic book films or if you're
a fan of Gizmo, then... then this is definitely
something you should check out if you're... I'm
probably the only one that hasn't seen it. But
if there is someone else out there that hasn't
seen it, if you like any of that stuff, you should
watch it, because I think it is enjoyable. Gizmo
as in Guillermo de Toro. Yeah, because I can't
say that name. Thanks for pointing that out.
Not from the Gremlins. Not Gizmo from the Gremlins.
But, yeah, I enjoyed Hellboy more than I thought
I would. I enjoyed it enough to check out the
second one at some point here. But, I don't know,
like... I don't know if I'd put it on, like I
said, on the grounds of a lot of the other comic
book films we've seen, but so I'd probably be
closer to like a 6 out of 10, which is still
a positive, slightly above average. I'd probably
go right around 6 for me. But you love Hellboy,
so what would you give it? I'd give it probably
a 7 .5, not too much higher than you. I think
it's really solid. I like the look of Hellboy.
I don't think he's too cheesy. He's pretty cheesy,
but not that cheesy. Ron Perlman, awesome in
anything, and he's in everything. I think, actually,
my favorite character was Aquaman. Aquaman? Abe
Sapien? Yeah, Abe Sapien. That was my favorite
character. I liked that guy. He was hanging upside
down most of the movie, so that was fun to watch.
I think it's really visually striking in some
places, and I do like the little creatures that
pop up, and I liked it. Yeah, I think they did
well with a lot of the creatures and the monsters.
It was a fun watch. It's a good storyline. It's
not been done before. Dan, you've seen Hellboy,
I take it? Yeah, I have. You like it or dislike
it? I like it. I remember just not being a huge
fan of the ending. I felt like the climactic
battle was kind of a letdown. really enjoy the
second one actually a lot more. Okay, so now
I'm even more interested to see the second one.
I tried to get him to watch it last night, but
he didn't want to, so I stayed up and watched
it without... I've seen it plenty of times, but
I like... She literally left the bedroom to go
watch it. on her own while I slept. So that's
interesting. Dan, what else did you get a chance
to see? The only thing I saw was another 2015
film that I caught up with and another one that's
kind of, I think this was a little bit more polarizing
I would say and that's Chappy. I get to see Chappy
and you know from Neil Bromkamp, the guy who
brought us District 9 and... Elysium, and I was
highly anticipating this movie. Mostly because
Hugh Jackman is in the fantasy league, so I was
hoping for the best for it. I kind of capped
a bit on that one. Are you saying he's not the
best part of the movie? I'm saying that with
not making a lot of money and doing poorly critically,
it's gonna hurt me. So, Chappie is intriguing.
There's some stuff I really, really like about
it. Like, I love the character of Chappy. I find,
like, his, you know, the Charles C. Copley's,
like, portrayal of him and kind of, like, his
progression a lot of fun. Like, you know, the
idea of, like, an infant, like, an AI is an infant
and it kind of progressing and seeing that adjustment
throughout. I thought that was an intriguing
idea. I just feel like... I wanted I felt like
underwhelmed. It was like the the key that it
kind of like especially I felt like they didn't
go as far as I was hoping with with the idea
of artificial intelligence and and Neil Blomkamp
I think is like a great at tracking action and
he has a lot of intriguing visuals and for this
one I thought there were times what was good
but it just other for the most part it didn't
it didn't have those wow moments I was expecting
for someone like him. Maybe I just my expectations
are too high. and like I thought like Hugh Jackman
I thought it'd be fun to see him in like a villain
type role and he was just his character just
to me seemed kind of a little bit ridiculous
and there were a lot of like logical issues I
had just with things going on I did say like
I heard a lot of people who didn't like the the
n -word people I think I think I said their name
wrong I don't even know ninja yeah ninja and
the one girl and I like Yolande there you go
and I know like people like other people thought
their acting was awful. And I didn't think, I
thought they were fine. They're not fantastic.
But honestly, like if I didn't know going into
it, I would have thought they were just general
actors. Like I would never thought they were
unprofessional actors. I thought like those characters,
they felt like they were playing characters.
And I don't know much about their actual music,
but I... I assume that's not like they are in
real life. Maybe it is. So they are. They're
totally like that. Are they? That scares me a
great deal. Yeah, I mean, I agree. I wasn't thrown
off by them at all. And obviously, I wrote a
somewhat opinionated review about this one, because
the thing I had a problem with when this came
out was people... I just thought they were being
too hard on it. And I'm not saying it's the best
film of the year or anything, but I just think
people were crapping on this film a little too
violently and calling it the worst film of the
year and this type of stuff. And I just didn't
see that same issue. I really enjoyed the Chappie
character. We actually quote Chappie at least
once every three days. So we at least got that
out of it. She does a perfect I Am Chappie thing.
Eww, I tried to put her on the spot. Like you
I would have liked to have seen more of that
and even if it was more of just the angle between
Patel's character and Chappie In relation to
ninja and Yolande in that group I think that
would have been fine and we could have got a
good enough movie out of that I don't think we
even needed Hugh Jackman's character. Yeah, and
I really wish there was like the whole like,
you know maker of the Patel Character I feel
like he just went away too much and I thought
like right there was it Don't know. I felt like
there was a movie that was like never could get
its complete footing at times like I felt like
it was Like getting to something it was like
oh, okay We're getting to something eventually
and then like Hugh Jackman showed up and with
a gigantic robot and killed everybody Yeah, and
it like mmm that was my like I thought they make
it to more and then the ending itself like where
we get to I just like I mean like I was I don't
know. I felt like I was trying to say something,
but I don't know if it did end up saying anything
or I just didn't. I wasn't picking it up. I just
for me, that was so like, you know, obviously
probably based and so, you know, trying within
like the idea of artificial intelligence. I don't
know if it really did anything, if it really
used that to. thematically in any way. I just
felt like it was just a means to an end. Not
much resonated from that, really. But like I
said, I did really like the character of Champy
himself and the overall idea of a robot as a
baby basically kind of growing and reflecting
from humanity and stuff like that. You don't
think that is thing! And I thought there were
some legitimately funny moments. Yeah, I just
questioned the fact that we have this high -tech
facility with top secret and very important technology,
and it just seemed like anybody could get in
that place. There was no security measures. You
have literally robot police, and yeah, nothing.
It's like anybody can walk in this place. You
can take the chip out. You can walk in. You can
even just borrow this for a day, take it home
at night. If you're Hugh Jackman, you can bring
in your side arm to your cubicle. Yeah, I was
always like part of me wondered too is that if
there are certain cultural things with them being
being so based in South Africa if there are certain
things that like implications I was missing yeah
like with him being bringing a gun to work and
like is that like a thing they can do? Everyone
that watched it there had no problems with that
part. If you wear those shorts, you can bring
your gun. Those shorts and that haircut. Get
it. Alright, Dan, what about a score for Chappie?
Man, that's tough. Part of me is like 5 or 6,
so I'll probably say like 5 .5. Like I said,
there are things I liked, but overall I just
was not... I felt like it was a step down compared
to even Elysium, which I had issues with, but
I thought visually I found it was a little bit
more interesting. Yeah, and I think we've been
pretty much on on par with all of all of our
Blomkamp stuff so far I think you like maybe
district 9 a tiny bit more than I did But we
were pretty much in line with Elysium and I'm
pretty much with you on this one I I don't think
it's the worst film that we that you know has
been made over the last year, too I agree with
you feel like like they got a lot of hate and
I I mean I could see some of the issues but I
don't know like the I Don't know. I felt like
it was just piling on. I don't know if I was
just I think someone said it, I can't remember
who said it, but somebody said it right and I
listened to podcasts over the course of the year,
I get them all mixed up, but I think what they
said is the reason it was getting so much hate
is because too many people went in not just expecting
it to be a different movie, but just wanting
it too badly to be... Something that it was never
trying to be like they wanted like they wanted
district 9 or they wanted something like in that
exact vein And I just think that was hard for
them to to come to terms with the fact that that's
not what was intended Yeah, like it's not I don't
think it's ever it ever desired to be a serious
movie I think people thought it was gonna be
but it I think it was it was more tongue -in
-cheek than I expected well, then maybe people
expected so Okay, well we'll get into one because
I've been waiting for a few weeks or maybe a
month or so to be able to talk about it and It
was good because it almost took that long for
for me to actually watch it. So the homework
you gave me a long time ago which was the Okay,
I'm gonna get the country wrong now Norwegian
Norwegian film headhunters. Yeah, and I would
tell you who it's starring The guy from Game
of Thrones. Yes, we had a Game of Thrones watcher.
Without that, I would have been like, still don't
know anybody in this film. But definitely an
interesting film about, I don't even know how
to sum this up though, about a guy who is living
beyond his means, who is basically stealing art
to help not even make... full payments on places
you can't afford to live isn't the most ridiculous
um i don't say that in a mean way or a bad way
but i'm saying like the thought process behind
someone who can afford like literally stole a
painting spoiler alert um but it happens right
at the beginning but steals a painting that's
worth i can't remember what it was or if it how
it translates to us but it was a lot of money
like to steal that just to make a quarter I think
he said it would pay like a quarter of the year's
rent for the place he was living like it just
is so unfathomable first to see someone else
living like that like you stole that much money
leave that house He was overcompensating. He
was only 5 '6", that's right. But anyways, it's
a story about him. He's stealing art and that
type of thing to help try to, you know, fund
this lifestyle that he can't possibly keep up
with to keep the... I'm gonna call her a trophy
wife because I think that's kind of how he sees
her. Because he's afraid that she'll basically
leave him otherwise without this lifestyle. Which
obviously thematically tells you a lot about
how in touch he is with... with his wife and
with his surroundings that he thinks those types
of things but without trying to get into spoilers
too much obviously stuff happens to the point
where they have a heist planned a big heist planned
and things go awry for multiple different reasons
and there's a lot of action and a lot of bloodshed
that that follows and it almost in a way Dan
I don't know if you got the same vibe or not,
but it had some elements that gave me kind of
reflections back to Gone Girl in a completely
different way. I mean, we're not dealing with
like a wife that's completely off the rails like
Rosamund Pike was in that film, but in a similar
situation where you just find, you know, this
person finds himself completely out of his element.
and trying to do things that, I guess if you
combine Gone Girl with Blue Ruin, where you just
have someone completely out of their element
dealing with people that are acting in completely
psychotic ways up to a point. But I thought it
was an intriguing film. Obviously it's in subtitles,
so some people won't like that, but I didn't
have a problem with that at all. I don't know,
I think I like this a little bit more than you
did, Amanda. Is that correct with that? Only
a little bit more. I don't know, I found it intriguing,
especially the last... I don't know if it was
the last third or the last quarter of the movie,
the last act where he's trying to find a way
out of this situation and make everything right.
I thought that was super clever and intriguing.
I don't know how believable it would be or not,
but... But I don't know, I thought it was an
intriguing film, so I'm glad you gave it to me
as homework. If I myself was scoring out of a
10, I'd probably be right in the seven range,
maybe six and a half, seven for me. I think the
only thing that threw me off was how hideously
unattractive this gentleman was. And there were
some scenes in here that I actually had to almost
turn away. But the worst scene for me that I
actually had to turn away the most is when he's
actually shaving his head. Oh, really? I thought
it would be like the Porter Potty scene. Oh,
that too. That gave me like bad memories of watching
Holocaust films back in the day. I do question
how any human being could do what he did there
without completely flipping out at first or during
the entire time. Like, to keep that calm in that
situation was ridiculous. But when he's shaving
with no... aid of any types of products and taking
somebody that had long hair for a long time and
just going completely bald like the way he's
doing it just made me shiver. Like that's gonna
hurt, that's gonna burn so bad, stop it. But
yeah, I enjoyed this film. What score would you
give it, Amanda? I know you're not as high as
I was. Based on the fact that everything kind
of came together in the end, I thought it was
pretty cool that... It turns out he was a little
bit smarter than you could see at first with
his decisions. Right. I thought that was pretty
cool, so I think that bumped it up a little bit
for me, but I'm probably at a five. Okay. And
I do like that there was even some details that
you might not have even paid attention to as
you're watching the film that come back to be
important details. So I thought, like you said,
there's some clever ways to do that. So five
from you, and like I said, I'm probably at a
six and a half, seven from me. We have just a
couple other ones we'll talk about real quick.
We'll try not to go too much in depth because
a couple of them are 2015 films that we don't
want to necessarily spoil. The one film that
wasn't 2015 that we got a chance to catch up
with finally was the movie Selma from late last
year. That was probably one of the last ones
on my list of shame for 2014 that I hadn't got
to yet. Being the history person and kind of
being in that world for years, teaching that
same time period and that type of stuff, I really,
really enjoyed it. I knew, I kind of had a feeling
I would enjoy this film. It would definitely
be in my top 10 for 2014. I have to completely
revisit that list now that I've seen everything.
So I don't know where it would fall, but it would
definitely be in my top 10 for 2014. I thought
amazing performances, especially from Chadwick
Boseman. I got the right person, right? That
is Chadwick Boseman, right? Yeah, I think so.
Yeah Which one you talked about the guy who played?
I'm sorry. No, no, not Chadwick Boseman. Denny
O 'Yellow. Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah I can't say his
name either because it's O 'Yellow. Oh, yes.
I said it right. Excuse me. He I thought he was
phenomenal I don't know if you could have possibly
found someone Better to cast as Martin Luther
King I thought that was nice. And this has been
talked about a lot, so I don't want to go too
far in depth to it. But just the fact that they're
not necessarily portraying him as this saint,
they're not necessarily portraying him as someone
who had all the answers. They're showing a little
bit of the underside, the not so pretty parts
of his life. And I, too, appreciate, like a lot
of people said, that they're not trying to focus
on his entire life. They're taking just one segment.
And I thought that was a good choice by them.
So I think this should have got a little bit
more love when it came Oscar season. I think
the snubs definitely, I would agree with that
now in retrospect. So really high on Selma myself,
I'd probably put this one at probably an eight
out of 10. Eight, eight and a half, somewhere
in there for me. You liked it more than you thought
you were going to, didn't you? Two words, the
feels, definitely. That's what I got out of this
movie. I cried. She got the feels. Yeah. It was
really touching and moving and I'm glad that,
like he said, that they made him look like a
real person and not just the sainted man who
had, you know, all the answers and stayed on
the right path all the time. So I like that.
I think I'd give it probably like a 7. I think
I also like the connections they made to the
other movements that were going on back then
because I think too many times the conversation
or films that are dealing with civil rights act
like these all were happening in a vacuum. if
it's a movie focusing on the Malcolm X side of
things or the Martin Luther King side of things.
Sometimes they try to make it seem like that's
all that was happening in the country when you
had all these different factions. You had people
that thought it should be done this way or people
that should... He's competing with Malcolm X.
He's competing with some of the youth organizers.
And I like the way that the movie kind of portrayed
that all of this is happening simultaneously.
It's not something that was just this street
and just that street that were fully separated
from each other. So really enjoyed this film.
Dan, you saw that and you enjoyed Selma too as
well, right? Yeah, I did. I liked how one thing
that stood out to me was how they talked about
how the importance of media was for their movement
and how they broke that down and how the... Please
screwing up basically was key for them be being
successful So I thought that was that like I
enjoyed that scene and like you said the the
acting and whatnot was it was all pretty phenomenal
even Oprah I thought what did a really good job.
So yes, she can take a hit But yeah, I like that
like you said this straight Inside look at the
strategy that's going on to it all the different
meetings and that kind of the the you know Even
when they're all just around not necessarily
in a meeting But you know there's one scene where
they're just sitting around a house and they're
all kind of bounced off ideas it And you know
what's the most important thing and why this
won't work and why you have to focus on this
aspect instead of this aspect I thought some
of that was really intriguing so Yeah rave review
for Selma, and then we'll just kind of briefly
touch on a couple 2015 films because we got to
at least give our scores out there. We're not
gonna Like I said, I'm not going to try to spoil
anything, but we did get a chance to catch up
with Maps to the Stars. Good Lord. I had to because
my girl, Julianne Moore, on my fantasy team,
who I accidentally took way late in the draft
by mistake because she was in 7th Sun and Maps
to the Stars. But I had to catch up with that.
And I know JD gave a pretty favorable review,
I believe, on In Session. And I'm not seeing
it. This is bizarre. This is a film from David
Cronenberg about kind of the Hollywood lifestyle,
I guess, and the darker side of being involved
in, you know, Hollywood and the movie world and
that type of thing. But I don't know. This was
just too bizarre for me. And Rob Henson basically
being the same character that he was in Rover.
You know what I mean? hardly saying anything.
You don't know if he's intelligent or if he's
not. He didn't sing in the car. But I don't know.
I can't recommend Maps to the Stars. Maybe I
should like it more as someone who likes film
because he does have a lot of commentary on film
and casting. kind of the behind the scenes type
of stuff, but I just think it was a little bit
too extreme in a lot of the examples it was trying
to make, and I just couldn't get behind any of
the characters. There literally is not... My
major problem, and what I said to Amanda right
after we watched it, was I have a problem with
a movie if I cannot find one single character
that has one redeeming quality. It is literally
about... 10 even the side characters you could
you could take like the the 10 characters that
get the most screen time and Every single one
of them is void of any type of redeemable quality
Carrie Fisher Carrie Fisher makes an appearance
that would make anybody that has not seen Carrie
Fisher since Star Wars probably Have a heart
attack. She looked more like job of the hut It
was not a good time. It's another rare appearance.
Tim, for first time watchers, drafted all these
Star Wars and Avengers actors on his team, and
we expected all of them just to have one film,
but we've already had Mark Hamill show up in
Kingsman. We've had Carrie Fisher show up in
Maps to the Stars. Obviously Harrison Ford was
in Age of Adeline, so he's getting more appearances
than he should have. That wasn't worth it for
the two minutes that Carrie Fisher was in there
for him to get points for that. If I was rating
this one on a scale of 1 through 10, I would
probably sit somewhere in the 3 to 4 range on
this one. I'd guess maybe a 4. What do you say?
I'd give it a 1 .5. 1 .5, a rating review from
Amanda for Maps to the Stars. And then the other
one that we... I wasn't expecting to see this
many films, but this one came up on on -demand
and I didn't realize it was going to be here
already. So we had to... take the chance to watch
Slow West starring your boy Michael Fassbender
and again I know this just got released on video
or on demand and to some of those types of services
so I'm not going to talk much about this at all
because I know a lot of people are looking forward
to this. I have mixed feelings on Slow West.
I like parts of it a lot and I have some issues
with other parts. They definitely titled the
movie correctly. It is slow out there in the
West. Pacing may be somewhat problematic for
me, but I know a lot of people that doesn't bother.
And it wasn't the fact that it was a little bit
slow at times, especially towards the first half.
I think my major problem is that the slow times
weren't involving characters that I cared about
enough. I guess I'm just not a fan of Cody Smith
McVie. who is the boy that Michael Fassbender
happens upon. And I think if it was somebody
else playing that role that had maybe more to
offer for me, more appeal or more charisma or
something, maybe I wouldn't have had as big of
a problem with the slower parts. Michael Fassbender
plays a good role. I wish he would have even
been and had more to do maybe. But there's definitely
some interesting things. It's a very crisp, very
visually stunning look at the West. I think they
did, it seemed like my TV advanced somehow. I
don't know what number my thing is. I don't know
if it's 1080p or whatever it is, but I feel like
it jumped a couple hundred when this movie came
on. It was just super clear and super good to
look at from a visual standpoint. I like Michael
Fassbender's character. I do like some of the
things that they're saying about the West. For
me, there wasn't enough to chew on. I would have
liked even more to kind of digest and more to
think about from a thematic standpoint. I do
think there's some cool sequences. There's a
cool thing they do towards the end of the film
that I'm not going to say or not going to go
into, but just from a shot standpoint that I
thought was very kind of interesting and unique.
I'm torn on this one. You like this one better
than some of the other stuff we watch. Where
do you sit on a grade for this one? I would probably
give it a 5 .56 maybe. Yeah, and I think I'm
right in the same boat. I think I'd give this
one like a 6 out of 10. It was slightly disappointing
because I was really looking forward to this
one. I thought I would be a little bit higher
on it, but it's not a bad movie, so I'm still
going to give it a 6 out of 10. I was waiting
for some more cool gunslinger shots or something
like that. There is some cool gunslinger shots,
but I don't know. I don't have a problem with
any of the actual things that happen. I just
wish there was something more to think about,
something more to... some type of commentary
they were having more than what they did. And
maybe that's just me wanting something that they
weren't even trying to do. But I feel like they
were. With some of the narration that goes on,
they were trying to give some type of commentary
about life in the West and what not, which I
think they do to a somewhat of success, but I
just, like I said, I would have liked something
more to it. I just felt like I didn't quite get
as much as I wanted. So that means all that's
left is our main attraction, which will be Mad
Max Fury Road. But before we get to that, we're
going to give Dan a chance to attend to his new
fatherly duties of attending to his newborn son.
But before we let him go, we've got to revisit,
since we're back together finally, and do some
homework tasks for our next episode. So Dan,
it's the theme of the episode. So you go first.
So what do you got for me? Well, I'm going to,
I guess... Go a completely different route because
I gave you kind of like a foreign action film
I'm gonna not gonna lie. It's just not the most
uplifting movie, but I think it's quite good
And it's on Netflix currently streaming and small
indie film definitely One that kind of flew under
the not necessarily the radar for a lot of people
I would say and that's short turn 12 Okay, it's
about basically these people who run a home for
suicidal tween teens. I think it's quite good,
so I've been curious to hear what you guys think
about it. Okay, absolutely. We will definitely
search that out and watch that for the next time.
I have one that hopefully I haven't checked to
see if it's available on Netflix or Redbox or
what. So if you go searching for it and you're
not able to find it, I can give you a different
assignment. But I've been curious about this
one since we did our top 10 of that year. pretty
sure last time I checked that you had not seen
it, so correct me if I'm wrong, but it made my
top 10 back in 2013, I wanna say. Hopefully I'm
not getting the year wrong, but that would be
the film entitled The Book Thief. And you did
not see that, right? I have yet to see that,
no. Okay, I think it's one of those films that
I'm pretty sure I'm like. the sole fan of. I
have like probably a half dozen films that I
champion that no one has ever even seen or no
one likes so I won't be surprised if I'm kind
of on an island here but I would like to see
your take on it just to see maybe what I'm missing
that was negative about this film because I'm
not hearing enough praise so I'm guessing I'm
missing something that's bad about this film
so hopefully you can educate me on that. But
I'm pretty sure it was 2013 that it made my top
10, and I think it was even in my top five. I
think it's on Showtime or HBO On Demand, so I'll
have to take a look. Perfect. All right. So I'd
be interested to see your take on that. So those
are the homework assignments for next time. And
then, like I said, we're going to let Dan...
go to more important duties than talking movies
with us for now. But it's been great having you
back here for the new reveal of the new show,
the new name, the new logo, everything is new.
So hopefully people will enjoy hearing your movie
thoughts and we'll get to talk more movies coming
up. We do have a quick teaser that we do have
continuing our look at the half decade so far,
the 2010 through 2014. We do have some more episodes
of that coming up, so don't think that we've
forgotten about that. We've already given you
our top 10 fantasy, sci -fi films and our top
10 superhero films. So next up on the list will
be our top 10 animated films for the first half
of the decade. So definitely look forward to
talking about that. Dan, is your list already
good to go? I have like two films I need to catch
up on and then I think I'll be good. Alright,
so that'll be coming your guys away, so that'll
be next up in that run. Anything, Dan, that you
want to leave us with before you take off? No,
I got nothing. Are you seeing Poltergeist or
Tomorrowland? I'm hoping to see Slowest and maybe
Maggie. I'm gonna be championing Odd Demands
as of late. I might go to the drive -in. We'll
see how that goes. We'll see. Alright, we'll
look forward to whatever you see, whether it's
2015 in the theater on demand or just the homework.
So we'll talk to you next time. Talk to you guys
later. Alright, that means there is only one
film left to talk about and that would be, of
course, our main attraction this week. which
is our conclusion of our Mad Max marathon. We
started way back with the original Mad Max, then
we gave you an episode with the Road Warrior,
last week we gave you our thoughts on Beyond
Thunderdome, and now to conclude that, we jump
all the way here to present day where we can
talk about Mad Max Fury Road. So, Amanda, first,
before you went to the movie... gauge your level
of excitement for Mad Max Fury Road? Because
some people have been freaking out. We may or
may not know a fellow podcaster that was counting
down the days to Mad Max for at least it seemed
like 100 days. So we've got at least 100 different
tweets that said it's 76 days till Mad Max, it's
75. I know you're not that scale, but what was
your level of excitement before going into the
theater for Mad Max Fury Road? Were you interested,
intrigued, you didn't care? What was it? I was
pretty stoked. Just seeing the trailers really
got me hyped up for it. Seeing the crazy, intense
action sequence that was provided in the trailer
definitely had me on board. Okay, I got a question
because we have the secret weapon here at Cinema
Geeks because we have a cinema geekette and none
of the other podcasts have a regular female host
that we listen to. So, I listen to guys talk
about movies all the time. Every day at work
I get to listen to guys talk about movies and
what seems to be a universal truth amongst guys
is that there is what seems to be a true romance
for Tom Hardy. Everybody seems to love Tom Hardy.
Is that a guy thing or do girls like Tom Hardy
too? I don't think Tom Hardy is on my scale super
attractive. Is he good actor? I like him, but
I've seen him in some stuff where he looks pretty
funky. But we already know that your scale of
what's attractive is completely off the charts
because you think I'm attractive. Alright, but
as far as Tom Hardy's movies, you know, and the
different things that you've seen him in, are
you a big fan of him as an actor or you're not
as much as all the guys that we listen to? All
the dudes. Including me. Um, I'm definitely not
hearing in any of my chick circles, oh Tom Hardy,
and you know, I got posters of him in my room.
No, they're not doing that. So I'm not really
sure, but I don't hang out with a whole lot of
chicks. So, um, not sure how that stacks up gender
-wise, but um, I liked him in Inception a lot.
I think that was my favorite role of his. Um,
and - Did you like him as Bane? I thought he
was a little bit, just how he sounded, I could
not. I loved how he sounded. I could not wrap
my head around it. Not all I can think about
though when I hear him is DJ doing the voice.
DJ, you ruined it for me forever. I'm never going
to hear the Bane voice and not think of you.
Thanks a lot for that. Alright, I will say that
my level of excitement was probably a little
bit higher than yours maybe. We're not talking
Star Wars level here because I'm about to start
a countdown for Star Wars and you know We've
only got what 200 days left or something I will
not do the tweet though guys. I will not start
tweeting about Star Wars every day I actually
already follow a Twitter account that gives me
a daily update and it's like 212 days till Star
Wars and then it gives some type of Star Wars
news trivia Article or something so I already
have that so I'm not gonna copy that but I'll
find so I'm not sleeping in the shed But it's
nothing's gonna equal that level of excitement
that I have for that film or the level of excitement
I have Damn, you haters for the minions movie.
I don't care I heard recently heard someone on
the podcast ripping on the minions trailer, and
I that person is dead to me Because I don't care.
I love those little guys Don't comment I was
yawning! There's a few other films that I'm probably
a little bit more excited for than Mad Max, but
it was definitely one of the ones for the year
that I was definitely looking forward to, to
see where they went. It's interesting, given
what we've just been through with the other three
films, and the very loose connections, the loose
timeline, the loose... as far as way, one's more
of a... a post -apocalyptic film as far as in
the vein of Chaos like almost like what you were
talking about with Rover or something like that,
you know with the connections to the road warrior
You get more from the first Mad Max that is almost
in line with Not Robocop, but something more
similar to where you know stuffs falling apart
But it's not there yet and then of course Thunderdome
is all kinds of different craziness and they
went to a completely different route with that
Apparently you and I are in the minority though
with liking Thunderdome More than all the other
films because everybody else likes road warrior
more. There's no our word in it So I'm a big
fan of that. I think that It has a lot more parts
that I found appealing a lot more aspects than
than the other two Yeah, I mean so haters be
damned. We like Thunderdome. So stop hating on
it But obviously if you're trying to compare
Fury Road to any of them, it's going to compare
most with Road Warrior. Very similar as far as,
you know, the action scenes being on the road
with the cars. I mean, obviously that's a theme
in both the first two films. You don't really
get that as much in Thunderdome, but I think
it relates most closely to Road Warrior. And
I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing.
I think that's maybe one of them that had the
most potential. to kind of tell more in that
vein and obviously that's the one that's most
well received. So we know what the excitement
level was going into it. Your first reaction
coming out of the theater, was it positive or
was it negative? I would say it was pretty positive.
I think I was thoroughly entertained and I got
out of the movie what I wanted. Okay. I too was
thinking pretty positive on this one. I don't
have a lot of gripes on this one. I know some
people might have problems with some of the pacing.
Some people might have problems with what the
focus of the movie was and you know obviously
it's built up like you know this is Mad Max and
this is Tom Hardy. Like we're getting Tom Hardy
as Mad Max and we're gonna get a whole film about
that and I think there might have been some people
that were disappointed with the fact that spoiler
alert he's not doesn't come across as really
the person that gets the most screen time. This
isn't a spoiler because it's been said pretty
commonly here that this movie almost seems more
like it's about the Furiosa character than it
is about Mad Max and Charlie's throne obviously
did a pretty darn good job in that role. Were
you disappointed that it focused more on her
than on Max or were you fine with it? I did want
to see more of Tom Hardy as Mad Max. I think
that in the opening scenes I got the feel that
that's what the movie was going to be about and
it kind of took the turn when we were introduced
to Furiosa and I was a little disappointed in
that because I liked where it was going in the
beginning, you know, with him as the center and
seeing things kind of through his eyes in a sense.
Like you said, I think Charlize Theron did a
pretty good job of that, you know, taking those
reins, but that's what I am disappointed in in
this movie. Yeah, and I can kind of see that.
It didn't bother me as much, but I can definitely
see people thinking that maybe the advertising
and maybe the way they thought the movie was
going to go ended up being slightly different.
If we're going to break down some of your favorite
things about the film, things you like, things
that stood out in a positive way, what were some
of the things you liked best about Fury Road?
The vehicles were so badass. I thought those
are really creative and really well done. I think
the guitar player, the war... The blind guitar
guy. Yeah, the war parties, they all have little
drummer boys and things like that and this is
just the larger scale and I really liked it.
I think it was, it reminded me a lot of the opening
to Rock Band or Guitar Hero. I can't remember
which one it is. I can see it being somewhat
of a WTF moment. Yeah, I just said that. For
some people where all of a sudden it happens
and they're like, what is going on? with this
guitar player but I think like you said and like
some other people said it makes sense because
you know it kind of harkens back to any type
of war party where you have that bugle player
you have that drummer you know you have that
flute player whatever it might be you know kind
of leading the charge so I think it makes sense
I mean it does obviously is bombastic but we're
talking about Mad Max everything's over the top
everything's supposed to be crazy what other
things did you like about Furia the most? I like
the direction that it went in to where the how
the earth was was how it was and how sick these
people actually were based on all this you know
fallout and and I liked how they showed that
it was more you know post -apocalyptic than the
others did as far as what really would have happened
if that would have That's something that the
other three films didn't necessarily do as much.
I mean, it sets it up with the opening and closing
narration in some of the early films that we
basically have a loose timeline of things that
have happened. We have a nuclear or some type
of nuclear scale war or bomb or something that
happens. We've seen that through the other ones.
But in Road Warrior and Beyond Thunderdome, they
never really touch on some of the fallout besides
the fact that We kind of have a desert -like
wasteland that we've been left with. This is
the first time I think that they've actually
done a decent job addressing that there is an
actual, you know, reaction or actual nuclear
fallout. Like there's gonna be some repercussions,
whether it be in the water, whether it be in
the genetics, or something that there's gonna
have some effects. So I think that was a good
touch that they did some of that stuff. I think
one of my favorite things about the film, was
maybe it was just because we had just recently
watched the first three films, but there was
so many nods to those other films. And that's
one thing that I haven't heard a lot of people
talking about on the other podcast is the number
of, of whether it be references, homages, you
know, whatever it is, little winks back to some
of the other films. And I think that's something
that you might get more in like a second watch
where you're actually trying to look look for
him and pinpoint him, but there is a ton of stuff.
And not just the obvious things, obviously the...
The music box. Well, that's one of the more details,
but I'm talking about like obvious from a standpoint
of, you know, having the same actor that was
in, you know, the original trilogy play. To Cutter?
Yeah, having To Cutter be the same actor that
is a... A Mortem Joe? Yeah, so that was a that
was a clever thing like you mentioned the music
box that we see Mel Gibson play with that that
makes it here Obviously, there's some some parallels
with the vehicles and stuff that you see through
that Yeah, but I think there's even some on the
same jacket I believe that that he's wearing
but I think there's some even some more subtle
things that aren't as obvious as you know Oh,
this has a music box and that has a music box
even the the war boys or whatever they call them,
the war pups, you could definitely make connections
to that and the kids from Beyond Thunderdome.
The one kid, the ghost face killer lost boy.
The ghost face killer lost boy that was in Thunderdome
with basically the white face and the black circles
around the eyes because that looked very similar
to what we see in the war pups in this film.
And there's other things too, like take the Master
Blaster from Thunderdome, and then the fact that
you have a little person who is one of the main
people at this kind of, I don't know what you
want to call it, at this oasis, where Immortem
Joe is. Like you have that guy, like... It's
one of his kids, I think. Looking in the telescope
and doing that type of thing. And you could almost
make a connection where he's... Playing the role
of master and then that his his one son who is
for sure a son That has the the problems with
them. That's riding on the war party could be
blaster I mean, I know some of those might be
more stretches, but there's that's just a tip
of the iceberg. There's a lot of other parts
that You can kind of see parallels to Little
subtle winks or some not so so and I kind of
enjoyed seeing those things and kind of being
able to to remember the connections between those
I think one of the main questions that a lot
of people have asked though, going off of the
fact that I got a lot of enjoyment from seeing
those references is, is this a standalone film?
Can this be enjoyed for just what it is? Or do
you really, is it a prerequisite that you have
seen the other films to enjoy this? Because I
think a lot of people have pointed out that the
flashbacks that Tom Hardy's character is having
throughout this film would mean absolutely nothing
to someone who hasn't seen. the previous Mad
Max films. Do you think that this one suffers
a little bit because it requires you to see some
of those films or do you think just some average
person that's never seen those films could walk
into this one and get the same amount of enjoyment?
I think both. I think that you definitely benefit
from seeing the original trilogy just so you
get that backstory and you can know Max a little
bit more what his motives are driven on. And
as far as it being on its own, I think that somebody
not seeing those films before can come in and
glean a good amount of entertainment from it
as well. Because, I mean, those visions, those
flashbacks, whatever you want to call them, I
think they can speak for themselves. Fair enough.
Which kind of transitions into me allowing, or
allowing me to kind of address something that
I was kind of having some conversations with
some people on Twitter, and if you're not following
us on Twitter, you need to do so so you can be
involved in these conversations, Hard Candy Mandy,
Eyes Not Wise, and Optimus Solo. You like that
plug? It did. All right. But one of the conversations
I was having with JD and Brendan from In Session
Film was about the chronology of the Mad Max
franchise. And I didn't want to necessarily address
it to them. right there because it's too hard
to address certain things on Twitter limits without
the Twitter webs without abandoning all sense
of formatting and punctuation and stuff like
that but I brought up that I do have a slight
issue with the timeline here but Not what you
probably think by me saying that because I realized
that the timeline is supposed to be kind of abstract
and These are all kind of their own films and
they all have very loose connections to each
other and there's not none of them are reliant
upon the timeline like You don't really need
to know how much time passes between Mad Max
and Road Warrior or between Road Warrior and
Beyond Thunderdome or where this one fits in
amongst those obviously in In George Miller's
minds there is not a, there is not a timeline
that you have to adhere to. It can all just kind
of be their own stories. And I get it from the
standpoint that if you're saying that, you know,
Mad Max is a legend, it's kind of like this folklore,
this person that's talked about. So these could
all just be kind of offshoots of this legendary
tale. And so they can all go in completely different
ways. He did say, you know, if he had a gun pointed
to his head that this would be taking place after
Thunderdome. And I know a lot of people after
seeing it would say it happened between road
warrior and Thunderdome And I don't think it's
important where it happens. I don't think it
matters where it goes but the reason I have an
issue with it is because I Don't necessarily
it has nothing to do with the movie. This does
not take anything away from Fury Road It doesn't
add or subtract anything from the movie. This
is completely outside of that as a creative mind
I would have problems Coming to terms of the
fact that I do not have a strict idea of when
events happen in my own story like I don't like
the fact that I I don't mind if he doesn't say
if he doesn't say like this is when this happens
and this is when this happens or if he says that
they're all Just offshoots of this folklore,
which he hasn't said. I was just making that
up as a conjecture, but If I'm creating this
person that I've now made four movies on I have
an idea in my head, in all the stories I've written,
the timeline of events. And the fact that he
doesn't even know, and he would say you'd have
to put a gun in my head and then maybe I would
say it came after this one, just seems weird
and bizarre to me from a creative standpoint.
Does he just not care? That's what I'm saying.
Like, is it just not important to him? Or does
he not care? I mean, obviously he's put a lot
of work into this. He's dedicated a lot of years
of his life to make these movies. He's written
this one. I mean, this was a long time in the
works. He's written other ones. He has, you know,
comics that are, you know, prequel, sequel comics
and stuff like that. So it seems like somewhere
in your creative mind, you should have a map,
a guideline, an outline of what's happening when.
I'm not saying you don't need to know, like,
this happened 7 .5 years after this. Like, nobody
needs an exact timeframe, but you should at least
know if it comes after or before events of a
different movie. So that's kind of my problem.
I don't think it takes away from Fury Road, and
I don't think, you know, you need to know when
Fury Road happens, but... I think just trying
to kind of assimilate all the different stuff
you're getting, even if they are all legends,
I would like to be able to play some somewhere.
Like be able to say, you know, whether it's 10
years or 15 years that this is happening after
this or this is happening before this. And I
think there are some spots in the movie where
it does kind of get confusing on the timeline
because you are having, and this is going to
be somewhat of a spoiler alert if you haven't
seen the original Mad Max, I guess, but you're
seeing these flashbacks. That are I assume clearly
intended to be flashbacks to events that happened
in Mel Gibson's Life in the first three Mad Max
films, you know You have him dealing with the
fact that you I mean you you have an arc with
this character You have the fact that he was
a cop. All right, that system was falling apart.
He had a wife and a child All right, that's all
facts and that the wife and the child are killed
Alright, whether it's because of decisions he
makes or whether it's just happenstance, that
happens. And that creates the character that
we get in The Road Warrior where he's kind of
distanced himself, he's become a loner, he's
off doing his own thing as a wanderer, but he
also doesn't have any connections to anybody
or anything to worry about, so he's on his own,
so it kind of makes him a little bit more dangerous
as well. And then that clearly leads up to where
you get in The Thunderdome where he is... kind
of forced into a position where he comes into
contact with kids again. And at first he wants
nothing to do with them, you know, almost the
same as the Pharaoh kid in the Road Warrior where
he's kind of had a couple instances here where
he's been exposed to kids and he's not wanting
anything to do with it. And by the time Thunderdome's
over, he's basically been their savior. He's,
you know, led them all, sacrificed himself in
a way to lead them all to safety, and then it
returns him to this wander state. So when you're
having flashbacks and now all of a sudden the
flashbacks are of a child that's What age would
you put that child at that's in those flashbacks?
Yeah, like six seven eight somewhere in that
time frame, you know first second grade age It
makes you think you know is Is that supposed
to be a flashback to the child that he lost and
how old that child would be now? Is it supposed
to be a flashback to some other child that he
came across along the way that he wasn't able
to save? Is it just in his mind? You know, it's
hard to say because obviously it's all his own
visions and his own flashbacks what you know
and over Whether it's 10 to 20 years that have
happened in this whole time span what could have
happened but Stuff like that. Or if it's his
own standalone film, is that the age that his
child was when it was taken from him? Or, you
know, how does that go? Yeah, so I mean I just
think some of those things, it would be easier
as a viewer to kind of put them all in your place
in your head if it matched up. If that would
have been a flashback to a baby. It would make
complete sense. The babies couldn't say anything.
No, but I mean if it was a flashback to a child
of some sort and they had changed the actual
context of the flashbacks or if it was a flashback
to like a 12 or 15 year old which makes it seem
a little bit more realistic that that much time
has passed but I don't know I just had some issues
with the fact that Not within the movie, but
just the fact that George Miller himself apparently
doesn't know when these events happen And maybe
that's me selling him short. Maybe he does know
and he just doesn't want to say Maybe it's because
he's 70 and he's about to die. So that's why
I made the comment that I do have somewhat problems
with the chronology of this franchise. Not because
it matters to the movies, but just because as
a creative person I would hope that you have
an idea of when stuff happens. Obviously a lot
has been made of the female angle in this film.
Whether it be people hating on the fact that
there's strong females or that it's a female
-led civilization. How I feel about that? As
a female, get over it. It's not a big deal. It's
a chick being a badass. I don't understand why
we don't have more of this. It shouldn't be a
big deal. Yeah, I think that's a... It's like
anytime when you watch your news and they're
making a big deal out of something that's nothing.
If we didn't have a random male chauvinist group
that's trying to cause up a stir, would we even
be talking about it? I don't... When Terminator
came out, did people make a big deal about Sarah
Connor? When Aliens came out, did people make
a big deal about Ripley? That's the right character,
right? Yeah. This just seems bizarre. Only in
our day and age where we're fueled by people
that can make a stink over the internet or over
Twitter or over random messages to message boards
or whatever. Like, gotta stop the future from
happening. Like, this would have never happened.
If this movie came out 15 years ago or 20 years
ago, nobody would be making this stink. So let's
just put that behind us. On the side note, what
did you feel about those woman characters? They
were pretty badass. I think it really tries and
make them out to be super badass, but I felt
like those old ladies were bad the old ladies
Badass, but the wise I feel like they're really
not badass. They're really whiny and I'm like
shut up. I felt Really bad I felt more For the
older mothers or whatever you I don't I think
they were calling the mothers right right um
Those bitches were hardcore. They they were getting
it and I felt more when they died in their death
scenes I did when when splendid died I think
splendid her name was like splendid or whatever
all the names of all the people Cheeto something
cheeto and splendid. It's all different food.
Oh not splendid. Um Yeah, I think they I think
they pulled it off pretty effectively and I don't
think Think it set up a good dynamic there where
you know they had the connection to Furiosa's
character where they somewhat knew at least the
lineage there You know and they were good shots
and they added an element to to the whole thing
Were you surprised at all at I? Guess well another
thing that has come up is did you feel any stakes
in what was going on like did it was there any?
Did you feel anybody was in danger did you feel?
Because some people have said that basically
they couldn't buy into the fact that there was
anything at stake because it just seemed like,
oh, they're going to go here, everything's going
to work out. I mean, there is people that die.
There's multiple characters that die. Did that
help raise the stakes for you, or were you in
the world no matter what? I feel like right from
the get -go you have this feeling of gotta run,
gotta go. There's nowhere in particular that
you really think you're gonna make it to. You
just have to go somewhere. You just have to keep
going. Like his instinct is run. And I do feel
like that drives the movie a little bit. Gotta
keep going. Keep going no matter what. Keep trucking.
And I know that they do have a couple locations
that they're specifically trying to go to, but
You know, as each one comes to pass and the movie
keeps moving along and their direction keeps
moving, I feel like that's what I got out of
it. That's what the stake was. You can't stop
or you're gonna die. Yeah. I didn't have any
problems because I was... I mean, obviously you're
pretty sure that Max is not gonna die. That Mad
Max is not gonna be one of the ones that... succumbs
to this whole journey, but I've had no clue who
else was gonna survive. I didn't know which bad
guys were gonna die or which ones of them might
survive to lead up to a second movie, which one
of the wives or which one of the mothers were
gonna live or die, whether Furiosa was gonna
survive the film or not. I was not necessarily...
buying that all of them would survive or would
not. So I mean, I felt the stakes. I mean, I
would have been completely shocked if Max would
have been killed. But outside of that, I think
I thought everybody was fair game. So I didn't
have a problem getting buying into that part.
I think touching back on the fact that, you know,
with Furiosa being the main storyline of this
movie, I guess you'd say, and the fact that she's
a woman, they make her so... Manly, I mean she
completely emasculates every everybody that she's
around Get the shaved head grease all over her
face You know the mechanical arm. She's she's
not She's not a weak woman character, but she
she doesn't come across as a woman the whole
movie either I think that's that's an important
thing that I I really didn't like either So a
lot of people talked about Furiosa being more
of the centerpiece, maybe, like you said, maybe
needing more Tom Hardy. Matt Hardy, that's a
different person. But overall, between them,
between all the mothers, between the villains,
between one character that we haven't talked
about, Nicholas Holt's character, did you have
a favorite person that you were drawn to during
the film, or a favorite character? I think at
first it was Max, but as he kind of faded...
Into a side character almost I think Nicholas
Holt I was always really interested to see what
was going on with him and his character Yeah,
I seem to be the most The one with the most redeeming
qualities I'd say well I think one of the most
impressive things that this movie pulls off is
it is it is like I said Bombastic might be the
best word to possibly that I can think of to
describe this film and it is action full till
no holes barred crazy ludicrous Futuristic apocalyptic
action like like you said with the guitar guy
on the car with just craziness going on cats
Yeah people with deformities people with mechanical
things people with all kinds of different weaponry
all kinds different vehicles It would have been
easy to be just this fast -paced action thriller
But it's also able to pull off the fact that
there is multiple characters on both sides that
they actually develop somewhat. You get a feeling
for Nicholas Holt's character. You get a feeling
for Furiosa and Mad Max. Obviously those are
the main three characters. But you get feelings
for more than that. You get a feel for some of
the moms that are with Furiosa. You get a feel
for some of the mothers that they meet up with.
And some of the bad characters as well. Joe's
character and... some of the people in that outpost.
Like they do a little bit to kind of give you
a little glimpse into some of those characters.
Now obviously they can't explore all of them
like in depth, but you kind of get like the caricature
of each one. You get like the idea that they
kind of have this personality or they kind of
have this motive or this backstory whether you
know it or not. So I think that was impressive
that with as much action and as much fireworks
as going on that you still had multiple characters
that you could kind of at least see a little
more than just the surface. Like the bullet farmer.
Right. And what was the other one? There was
the bullet farm and then the... Something about
the gas. Was it gas? Gasoline. Gasoline. That
was another nod that we did. Another nod to the
old films. Yeah. Yeah, I mean, and even like
the... Yeah, I mean, there's just people all
over the place that you can kind of feel connections
with. And, you know, everybody had their different
arcs. I think maybe most is Nicholas Holt's arc
in this. Obviously, he makes the most changes
from the beginning to the end. But I think, like
I said, that's just another impressive thing
outside of the action. But even if you're just
in it for the action, you're going to be in for
a fun ride. I don't think anyone can deny just
the visceral appeal of the action and the pace
of some of those chase scenes and just kind of
the music and everything behind it. No matter
where you're looking, you're going to be seeing
something. crazy going on I feel. I think a couple
people have brought that up too that this is
going to have some re -watchability because there's
no way you can see everything that goes on with
one viewing. You could watch this movie probably
two, three, four times and still find yourself
seeing things that you hadn't seen before because
there's so much going on in the background, the
foreground, you know, from side to side. whether
you're looking for nods to the old films, whether
you're just looking for details, you know, crazy
costuming or parts of cars or weaponry or whatever,
there is a lot going on. And I think maybe one
of my favorite scenes is in and this is not a
spoiler because it's in the trailer, but the
scene where they're in one of those chases and
the guys are on those long poles that are that
are going back and forth. But even Max at one
point is going back and forth on one of those.
Those were some impressive scenes because it.
It's just crazy that that would even be something
that was going on like some of it and it's clearly
some tried -and -true tactics by some of these
people like they've been in these situations
before and I think that's something that the
original Mad Max films did well too is it wasn't
like this is their first rodeo doing these things
like they've Adapted to their surroundings. Yeah,
they've organized but they've adapted their surroundings
they've they've come up with ways to do certain
things and they have like different tactics and
It's fun to see what those are, whether it be
the Polkats or whether it be whatever. Certain
ways that they shape their cars and they drive
them or whatever it might be, like certain defense
mechanisms and certain attack mechanisms I thought
was very interesting. Anything you didn't like
outside of the fact that you thought maybe a
little bit more time on Tom Hardy's character?
Any negatives that you'd like to bring up to
draw back against the movie? Nothing I could
say without spoilers, I guess. Well, everybody's
seen it by now. We're the last podcast to talk
about it. Um Like I said, I don't really have
much outside of like I said I would have liked
my my creative mind to have a little bit more
of a concept of when stuff happened But that's
just a nitpick on the outside of the movie as
far as the actual movie goes I don't really know
if I have much of a nitpick I think there was
a couple times where the pacing got a little
slow in the in the vehicle with Mad Max and and
what was going on like I agree with JD at times,
you know, for that first whole act you don't
really get to hear much from Mad Max due to his
situation and it kind of takes him out of the
movie for a little while. So I mean, I didn't
necessarily have a problem with that, but I thought
there was... The garden tool that was attached
to his face? Yeah, but I thought there was some
pacing within the vehicle as they're on their
run down Fury Road that at times could slow down
a little bit, but I think the action is so fast
paced when it is happening that you almost need
those times to catch your breath. So I don't
really have too many nitpicks. I thought the
baby scene disturbed me quite a bit. The baby
scene was disturbing, and that is for sure. I'm
just glad they did it as subtly as they did,
even though it wasn't so subtle. Yeah, I was
not expecting that to quite happen like that
did. It was a little shocking, but like you,
I'm glad they didn't get to see too much of what
was going on with that. Any last thoughts about
Mad Max Fury Road, or a grade out of 10? Think
touching back on a morning Joe, I think and when
they accordion neck the accordion neck I thought
that was kind of clever look cheesy, but I mean
it was clever I guess I think just seeing the
effects on his body and Him more so than the
others I guess just because it was so Dramatic,
I guess I thought that was a pretty cool touch
to kind of set up What you know his character?
But as far as a grade goes, I think I'll give
it an eight eight out of ten That's a high score
on the Amanda scale unless you're an animated
film. I You know, I had my final thought like
I said Not only is it a fast -paced action film,
not only do you get some characterization that
you don't usually get in some of these summer
blockbusters, but I think, too, there's some
thematic things that were important that it was
touching on, you know, in humanity and the drive
to survive that they have here, and just kind
of some human elements that I'm not going to
get into any of those because I think some of
them would spoil things, but just kind of this
whole journey on survival and trying to basically...
create a new situation, kind of rise up against
the status quo and make a better land for you
and your offspring. I think there was some touching
stuff on that as well. So I think there's multi
-layers to this that can be enjoyed, or you can
just. being in it for the fun ride. And I'm with
you on this one. I think I'll give it the exact
same grade because I don't want to argue with
you about it. So I will say 8 out of 10 for Mad
Max Fury Road 2. Definitely probably going to
top a lot of people's mid -year list here in
the next month when they're recapping the first
half of 2015. I can see this being in the top
3, 2, or 1 for a lot of people. 8 out of 10 for
Mad Max Fury Road. If you disagree or agree with
us, please go to GeekCastRadio .com, find the
episode post, and let us know what you agree,
what you disagree with, as far as our points
that we brought up with Mad Max Fury Road. Or
if you agree or disagree with any of our thoughts
on the other films we talked about, Hellboy or...
Headhunters, or Selma, or Slow West, or Maps
to the Stars, or any of the other things that
we talked about. As far as looking ahead to tomorrow
and the weekend here, like we said, we got Poltergeist,
we got Tomorrowland, or the film I know Amanda's
looking forward to on demand, Human, Centipede
3. Cheese, Louise. No? Chocolate City. Chocolate
City. Chocolate City. Chocolate City. That's
what you're watching, some Chocolate City. Black
Dome Crack. I didn't say that. And then as far
as next Tuesday coming up on Blu -ray releases,
oh my goodness, two of the most huge hits of
the last six months are being released on Combo
Pack. The Loft, starring I believe James Marsden,
or Jason Marsden, or somebody within the last
name Marsden I believe. Or, I know you've been
waiting for it, the Combo Pack for The Seventh
Son. So if you missed Seventh Son in theaters,
You can pick it up on Blu -ray on Tuesday. I
wish that I had missed it in theater so I could
still be excited for it and not as disappointed
as I am. So nothing to buy this week on Blu -ray
unless you want to get a special Orson Welles
set since we've been celebrating an anniversary
of such with him, I guess, this year. So save
your money for Tomorrowland and all the films
that are about to hit your theaters. Don't waste
it on DVDs of The Seventh Son. Just take our
word for it, it's not worth watching. Alright,
next week's question has to deal with, I knew
I could find a way to tie that Star Wars story
back in, but I didn't bring it up in the news
section, but there was a news article about Lawrence
Kasdan, who is one of the main writers for the
original Star Wars trilogy that has been obviously
involved with Episode 7, and he had an article
come out this week that was talking about movie
runtimes, and he was saying how he doesn't understand
why... these summer blockbuster films can't tell
their story in less than three hours, like most
of the Avengers and that type of thing. It seems
like we just keep running longer and longer,
which I don't have a problem with long movies,
but he was making a comment basically that, you
know, you should be able to do your story in
an hour and 30 minutes, hour and 45 minutes,
and why do we have to keep getting longer and
longer with these movie runtimes? So I was interested
as far as a question goes as to what everybody
else thinks about movie runtimes because I don't
really care I don't care if it's an hour and
a half. I don't care if it's three and a half
hours I can sit 15 hours of Lord of the Rings
just fine But maybe everybody else has a different
opinion. So are movie runtimes an issue with
you? And what is the ideal runtime of a film
in your mind? If you're going to the theater,
what is the ideal length that that film is? And
does it change depending on what genre it is?
Anything about movie runtimes. Are they too long?
Are they too short? Or what do you wish they
were more like? And we'll answer those thoughts
with our own thoughts next week. Get a little
feedback from your responses there, and we'll
find out what Amanda thinks about. movie runtimes
and if they should be shorter or longer. I'm
just a glutton for punishment. I don't care if
it's bad or good, I'll sit through a longer one,
preferably. All right, so thanks as always for
joining us here on The Cinema Geeks. You can
contact us in the following ways. You can email
us at feedback at GeekCastRadio .com. You can
visit the... main page there, geekcastradio .com,
and click on our episode post where you can comment
and we will interact with you, we'll reply, or
you can interact with us on Facebook by searching
out Geekcast Radio Network. TFG1 Mike will keep
you updated with every type of podcast that the
network puts out there. So if you're not just
a movie fan, you can keep up to date with stuff
about comics, stuff about cartoons, stuff about
TV, video games, whatever it is. We always have
something coming out at you each day of the week.
If you want to directly interact with us, You
can do that via Twitter. Yours is? Hard Candy
Mandy with I's, no Y's. If you want to interact
with Dan, obviously his Twitter is at Movie Revolt.
Mine is at Optimus Solo and be on the lookout
because coming soon will be our show Twitter
which will reveal hopefully as soon as I set
it up. So something to do with Cinema Geeks.
So hopefully that's not taken. Alright, that's
it for us. Be sure to check in next week for
your next chance to listen to the Cinema Geeks.
No chapter markers for this episode.


