CINEMA GEEKS
Cary Grant Retrospective – Bringing Up Baby Review

About this Episode
Hi, this is Dan Gilbazan and you're listening
to the GeekCast Radio Network. Hello and welcome
to episode 222 of The Cinema Geeks. I am one
of your Cinema Geeks, Optimus Solo, and joining
me today, as usual, is the Comic Concierge. Hello,
Dan. Hey, how's it going? It's going well. We
are on the verge of a new series here, like we
kind of talked about a few times towards the
end of our Alfred Hitchcock series, which by
the way, if you were not following along for
those, we encourage you to go back and watch
some Alfred Hitchcock movies and listen to us
ramble on about them. We covered 15 films. And
then last episode, we did do a wrap party, which
was all kinds of fun, giving out different awards
and our rankings of our Alfred Hitchcock film.
So if you missed out on that, you can go back
and watch or listen to those episodes. And then
today, based on some interactions we had with
one of the actors throughout the Hitchcock filmography,
we decided to get a little bit more into the
world and life of Cary Grant. So we've already
covered four films throughout the Hitchcock series
that Cary Grant appeared in. And now we wanted
to start looking at some of the ones that were
non -Hitchcock films. So we got about... Roughly
eight films that we're gonna look at but as you
saw with the Hitchcock film sometime or Hitchcock
series Sometimes that can mean more maybe we'll
cut it short You never know but we got eight
that we're kind of tossing around to add to the
four that we've already Seen before we get into
what's first Dan just any thoughts or kind of
feelings as far as starting this new series and
what you're looking forward to or why you just
Why you were on board with it? We as much as
we are doing the Hitchcock retrospective just
you know When we got to a lot of the Cary Grant
movies, he was just, he was a fascinating figure
to watch. There are so many of his films that
I have yet to see or have only seen once. And
considering he's such a huge name in the world
of moviemaking and things like that, it felt
like a good opportunity. And plus just watching
the Hitchcock films, I just got in the mood to
watch more movies of that era. So it seemed like
a good way to pivot and keep it going. Absolutely.
I agree. He was a highlight of a lot of the films
that we covered that he appeared in. I was drawn
to him and I watched a biography on him. There's
a couple different ones out there, but I've at
least watched one of them because I was just
kind of fascinated by his life in general and
his journey through Hollywood. I think akin to
like a Grace Kelly, they have very interesting
stories out of the folks that we talked about
during that retrospective. So I thought it was
fitting to catch up on a few of these. A couple
that I have seen beforehand and there was a couple
that Dan had seen beforehand and then there's
going to be a good amount of first time watches
as well throughout these films. Is there any
film in particular that you're looking forward
to the most or is it all kind of a even slate
here? Looking to see some more of the movies
that he was. Nominated for an Oscar for because
maybe some of his more dramatic work because
we haven't seen We've seen hits of that with
us on the Hitchcock films, but I'm curious to
see like What else he can do beyond you know
when he's in kind of a different mode? Which
he is kind of bit of a different mode here, but
what we we can get to that Yeah, absolutely.
Yeah, we definitely saw some James Bond esque
roles in the Hitchcock series and a tiny Bit
of comedy, obviously, as well in North by Northwest.
But yeah, I'm interested to see that you mentioned
a couple of his award nominations. So that would
be like none but the Lonely Hearts and Penny
Serenade, I believe, were the two that he was
nominated for. And then we have some classics
that will bring up that maybe a lot of people
have seen or maybe it's a blind spot and it'll
give you an excuse to to watch another film.
I'm kind of like you, Dan, right now, if if I
have an excuse to watch more. Old films i'm kind
of down for right now like i'm going through
that phase and both of us have continued to watch
a. A handful of hitchcock films that we didn't
cover how many of you watch now since out of
the ones that we didn't cover. I have watched
i think to where we watched i watched the man
who knew too much as well as the the the lady
vanishes i've seen. The man who knew too much
was like leaving Netflix. I think it might be
gone now and then Lady Vanishes is on like to
be or one of those like one of the free One of
the free sites. So yeah I watched those two and
then I decided that with that box set that I
referenced a few times during the series if there
was one that I had the disc for That I didn't
even have to worry about searching and seeing
if it was really that I would I would watch those
as well So I've watched the two that you watched
I've also watched the most recent one was the
torn curtain. I just finished that yesterday.
And then the trouble with Harry. I watched that
one as well. I think it's just those four. I
might be missing one, but definitely have been
catching up with a few more of those. And I'm
interested in what this series will lead me to
watch after it as well as I try to fill in some
blind spots, because I definitely have a ton
of blind spots from the 1930s through the 1960s.
Surprise surprise So alright, so we're starting
off today with In crime, we're gonna go through
chronological order for these first eight ish
films And then if we want to cover more we'll
have to break that rule a little bit But starting
in chronological order would take us to bringing
up baby first. So I just want to get your What
you knew about the film beforehand and then we'll
go to some facts about the film and then we'll
break it down so any Prior knowledge to bring
it up baby had you seen it had you heard anything
about it or how are you going into this one.
I'm going into this one relatively blind like
i've heard of it of course and i've heard it
when you see less like the greatest comedies
of all time. Often see it on list like that as
well as like some of the best performances by
cary grant but i couldn't really. Name you like
a scene that is it's notorious for anything like
that so this was. As blind of a watch for me
as you know, any of the retrospective we did
for Hitchcock. Yeah, same with me. I knew of
the film like it's one that the title, you know,
because you've heard it on a lot of different
lists like that or you've heard other critics
bring it up in different fashion. So like I knew
the title and I knew it was one that we probably
should be watching if we're talking about Cary
Grant. Other than that, I just knew Cary Grant
was in it and that was it. So like totally blind
going into this one as well. So Dan's going to
give us a breakdown of the film and then we will
break into our thoughts on it right after that.
Before the guys from Hangover were hanging out
with a tiger, Cary Grant and Katharine Hepburn
were chasing down a baby leopard in the screwball
comedy, Bringing Up Baby, directed by Howard
Hawks. Released in 1938, Bringing Up Baby was
actually a financial flop, despite its massive
star power. Maybe regular audiences weren't used
to seeing Cary Grant as the cheapest nerd wearing
glasses. Those glasses the studio requested to
be removed, but Hawks refused. So were they right?
considering the lack of success in the box office?
Well, maybe, Bringing a Baby was playing the
long game, as it gained more and more notoriety
throughout the years and is often considered
one of the greatest comedic films of all time.
For example, it ranks 88th on AFI's 100 years,
100 movie list. Also, it is included in the U
.S. National Register by the Library of Congress
for being culturally and historically significant.
In the film, Cary Grant plays David Huxley. a
mild -mannered paleontologist on the brink of
securing both a major museum donation and a marriage.
His ordinary life is thrown into cosmic disarray
when he meets Susan Vance, played by Hepburn.
She is an impulsive socialite who drags him into
a whirlwind of absurd events, including the care
of a tame leopard named Baby. Breaking Up Baby
is a classic screwball comedy that showcases
the chaotic charm of the 1930s. It pairs two
of the era's biggest stars Carrie Grant and Katharine
Hepburn and the zany tale of misunderstandings.
misplaced leopards and romantic hijinks. This
was Hepburn's first real attempt at a school
ball comedy. She previously had been seen more
as a serious actress. The Leopard Baby was a
real animal. To manage safety, scenes with Cary
Grant and the Leopard were filmed separately
using a double or composite shot. The film even
fell into public domain in the 1960s due to a
copyright lapse but was later restored and that
copyright regained. So this film has gone on
quite a journey. by itself. How does it hold
up all these years later and how does it fit
into the larger career of Cary Grant as we look
to kick off our newest retrospective, sending
it back to Kevin and myself to discuss just that.
All right, so those are the facts for bringing
up Baby from 1938. Dan, we've had a chance to
watch the film now. What was your first impression?
I think, you know, going in the comedy, if any
genre I feel tends to be the age of the worst
because comedy is often about context, you know,
and context changes over, especially, you know,
looking at how long it's been since this came
out. But a lot of the comedy here definitely
is more, I think, universal, broad comedy for
sure that is not necessarily tied to a certain
time or place. It certainly has a style to it
that is maybe you would call No absent clearly
of the time and i was worried about that like
will it hold up will be really funny and i think
this is a good example of a movie that is. very
much empowered by its stars like Katherine Hepburn
and Cary Grant. They are great. They work really
well together. This being Katherine Hepburn's
like really first time at comedy. Could not tell
that you know it's hard to go from dramedy from
dramedy from drama to comedy. People not talking
about you know those the when you have someone
who's a comedic actor doing drama like a Robin
Williams like how impressive that can be. I think
it can be just as impressive if not more impressive
to More dramatic actor then do comedy and do
it well because it's a very different skill set
and i thought she did a really good job i know
she had a lot of help and training along those
lines i think it is a movie that it goes at a
breakneck speed like this has a pacing that would
be like. No even faster today like it just it
does not slow down i think partially because
if it did it may start thinking about what is
happening and how warm world is this because
becoming it's like i don't like. Does this really
make sense is does this really you have to buy
into it like if you don't. Buy into it there
so many holes to poke in the sense of like this
is really make sense like will what do you really
make this is it so there's a lot of that going
on for sure i have to say that have a good time
with it i would does it rank as one of the greatest
comics of all time. That's a hard thing to put
on anything i think the fact that i still after
the movie all these years later is a good sign
and i can mention the performances are strong
but. I do think it is a movie that is, I would
say lightweight in the sense of it's not, it's
a bit, it's a fun romp, but it is a fun romp
that is a bit overtly ludicrous at times, I think
purposely so. I think that's a good way to put
it. For me, my first reaction was this film is
unhinged. Yes, this film like remember when we
were talking about the Hitchcock series and we
had the the stranger on a train and we had the
the Carousel go bananas and go like fly off of
track like to me this movie is doing that like
this movie is off the tracks it's spinning out
of control and it's completely unhinged but not
necessarily in a negative way I think it really
depends on what your bandwidth is for the breakneck
pace that you're talking about and the absolute
crazy antics that ensue. To me, this film is
either going to work for you or it's going to
be like nails on a chalkboard for you. It's not
going to be anywhere in the middle to me. It
might work at different levels, but if it's not
working for you because of the pace or because
of some of the sound and some of the different
things. I anticipate you're shutting it off,
or you're walking out, or at some point you're
gonna be like, I can't take it anymore, and you're
just gonna shut it off. I don't know, I feel
like those are some of the reactions you're gonna
get. For me, it's interesting, because you talk
about comedies and how they hold up, and I agree
that a lot of times comedies don't necessarily
hold up as well. I think that's true, though,
way more for comedies of our lifetime. and slightly
before, because I feel like those comedies from,
especially like the late 80s through, I don't
know, probably still today, I guess, but at least,
you know, 90s and 2000s, they rely a lot on references
and things that are tying back to pop culture
or society or things in that nature in a way
that makes them age. less gracefully than I think
some of the classic like comedies from like silent
film era like a lot of those comedies work, right
because It's not referencing stuff that you had
to be alive during that time It's just funny
things like it's just yeah funny reactions funny
ways to do things funny ways to interact with
people and I think it works better like I think
there's a higher chance of a early Comedy holding
up than there is more of a modern comedy. Do
you agree? Think for the most part. I don't necessarily
think it's always just about references. I think
it can be someone somewhat about style and a
sense of like it I do agree like when it's more
of Almost like clowning in a way like it's when
it's that fit looks because a lot of sign -filled
comedy is all about the physical Performance
and things like that. Certainly those hold up
more But when it is more situational, it can
have some struggles in how it kind of develops.
And especially in the sense of what it's making
fun of. Sometimes comedy, I think, doesn't hold
up well because of who makes the butt of the
joke. And sometimes that can be problematic in
that sense. Where it doesn't necessarily have
that. But I do think it's a good point where
if you look at a lot of comedies, tends to be
especially like you mentioned a lot of A lot
about you know, it's all about what you bring
into it not necessarily What the movie is doing
and I think that's probably why a lot We don't
see a lot as many great comedies where with this
everything is there for you there may be some
other jokes that we're not getting that are certain
references the certain times and things like
that, but It's really about the characters. That's
where the comedy is coming from and that situations
and that is easy to keep up with or understand
way down the line. Yeah, I agree with that. I
know before we get into some of the actual story,
not that we're going to get in a lot into the
story in this one, but before we go into like
some of the sequences, I guess, and some of the
gags and things of that nature, I want to spend
a little bit of time on Hepburn and Grant, especially
obviously since this is a grant retrospective.
Now Katherine Hepburn comes into this film as
the one that hasn't really done comedy right
or you know especially not this type of comedy
and you mentioned or you reference the fact that
she has People helping like I know they mentioned
one of the vaudeville veterans Walter Catlett
that comes in and tries to work with her and
get her to Understand her role in this but this
is more out of her wheel box, right and Carrie
Grant Comes from a vaudeville background which
makes it seem like this should be right up his
alley. My initial reaction in the first, maybe
call it 20 % of this film. I thought Catherine
Hepburn was way more natural in her character
and in her role than Cary Grant was in the beginning.
I'm not saying that Cary Grant didn't find his
feet and kind of get in the rhythm at one point.
And maybe he's doing it intentionally because
of the ludicrousness of the character he's playing.
But I felt like he was almost not quite clicking
at the beginning. And I felt like Kath or Katherine
Hepburn just like somehow came across as completely
natural in her role. What was your take on on
those two and their performances either at the
beginning or throughout the film? I think in
character is very over the top for certainly.
I think he is leaning into the the nerd type
of character. I don't know if. It was ever truly
that convincing, you know, because he's always
still Cary Grant, but I do think he is. It was
interesting reading that Christopher Reeve, like
took a lot of inspiration of his performance
of of Superman and Clark Kent from this movie.
You kind of see that because he really is playing
up like the nerd angle with the glasses and the
way he behaves. Things like that. But as the
movie goes on I think that facades Begins to
I think go away and it's better for it because
it never never feels very natural for him That
isn't certainly not his strength. I don't he
never comes. He's just like too tall and like
into like Manding or of the screen to really
pull off that type of like Schlubby like being
bossed around like it wasn't it felt very forced
begin with and I think the I feel like he's the
hardest person in Hollywood to play a nerd. Yeah.
He's Gary Grant, like he's somehow incapable
of not looking like James Bond, like, you know,
attractive and like all this other stuff. And
then they're like, well, just play the nerd.
I'm like, I'm not buying it. Sorry. You know
what I was reminded of watching it and as a weird
reference, but that when The Rock hosted Saturday
Night Live, he did it. He did a skit where he
was like Superman and Clark Kent. And it was.
Everyone knew that he was actually Superman because
like trying to be Clark Kent, but just, you know,
he had the cape on. He was just so big and so
obvious. It was like everyone knew it was just
kind of running joke that people weren't fooled.
And that's what I was reminded of. That's like
it just like, yeah, I can. I know that you got
the glasses, but I can still see the S through
the through the right through that. So did you
think Catherine Hepburn came across as like someone
who didn't have as many as much problem like
actually Filling out this comedic role definitely
she struggled Yeah, I didn't get any struggle
from her whatsoever her her character was like
is an oddball in a lot of ways like she's very
like They do make a good pairing they do think
they bought the bounce off one another and it
was you know intriguing seeing the kind of the
general roles flopped for especially for maybe
this old but Yeah, I think she really like watching
this if this you told me this was I never would
have thought this was her first performance like
in a role like this because she came off really
natural uh and her comedic timing is really well
done some of the physicality I don't think she
was maybe as strong with like when it was like
she had the had like fake fall and the and near
the end and stuff like that where it's like that
that maybe like that type of comedy wasn't her
uh strength but more the dialogue driven the
more character work She, I think she really went
for it. I want to talk about two other kind of
two other characters before we get into some
more of the plot. But I want to see if I'm alone
and I was the dumb one of the group or not. At
what point, like, did you know that baby and
the bringing up baby was going to be a tiger
before you watch this? I had no idea. I had no
idea there was a leopard in this movie. Or a
leopard, excuse me. Yeah, OK. I was like, well,
I was today years old when I learned that bringing
up baby is about a leopard. Yeah, I feel like
that should be a bigger because like some of
the stuff they do with this the leopard I know
like they used Yeah, it wasn't always where you
know, they did some camera tricks So it seemed
like he was it was in the back of the car when
really wasn't everyone not but yeah I had no
idea was looking at the poster I should have
realized it cuz they're with a leopard but I
never put two and two together No, not at all.
And then the other thing I want to do is kind
of more of a not a specific character but if
we're looking at all of the rest of the characters.
So all the supporting characters. I know Howard
Hawks, who is the director. This movie gets panned
like right away, just to kind of put that out
there like it does not go over well. There's
a lot of people that are saying it's going to
be a flop. It gets very negative reviews out
of the gate. And and Howard Hawks, I don't know
if this is an interview or a quote or if it's
just a summary of things that have been gathered
around what he said. But I know one thing that
he came to the conclusion that in his mind. I
say like at the time it was banned because now
it's it's Received pretty well like it's on a
lot of lists of like funniest movies of all time
And it's got a nice rotten tomato score. I think
I want to say it's in the upper 90s You know,
so it's got a lot of acclaimed sense then but
in that moment He was only the impression that
it was, you know not received well and it was
a critical failure and one thing that he Attributed
that to is he said that he had made a mistake
by not putting a normal person in the film and
and his idea was because everybody was crazy
and everybody was zany and screwbally and all
this other stuff that it wasn't gonna work as
well like he thought he needed somebody that
was like normal for the audience either to relate
to or to ground things or whatever and I guess
that he did he takes that in like has that effect
a film that he does later by Inserting some people
that are more quote -unquote normal What was
your take on this of the whole entire supporting
cast that we get and everybody that kind of comes
and goes in this fast paced crazy film that we're
talking about. I want to see you it's worth it's
interesting saying that because i didn't think
about it watching it like that there wasn't a
normal character i guess i saw you know her aunt
is pretty normal i know she's not in the movie
a lot or you know the lawyer and things like
that i guess i felt like they. and although they
had their moments were pretty normal I mean he
did he did have like the sheriff who was to me
was like he was playing that role. Yeah, because
even though he is very over the top at the beginning
and not necessarily believable as the nerd, when
it comes to his actual actions and dialogues,
like he's the one that seems sane while the world
is going crazy around him. Like he's the one
trying to keep up with what's what is. Is it
Elizabeth? Is that Katherine Hepburn's name?
Yes. No, Susan. He's the one trying to keep up
with Susan. um and and all of the other things
and you know obviously we we kind of i guess
i buried the lead with the whole bone thing like
he's a paleontologist who's trying to put this
massive brontosaurus together and he's missing
one bone and that's kind of this whole thing
is is him trying to get a hold of that bone find
the bone once he loses it and then secure you
know a million dollars to fund his work and things
of that nature but i agree with you i think he
definitely is i related more to him the only
difference was is I don't know if I would have
had the patience he had. Yeah, everything that's
like you're hitting my car. Like what are you
doing right now? Like you're destroying my car
and those types of things. So I do. I think I
related to him in some ways, even though I wouldn't
have reacted probably the way he did to a lot
of he was definitely, I guess. Enough of I don't
know, it's weird because you're also like. trying
to buy him as this. I know it's a comedy. We're
not supposed to think this serious about it,
but he's like this paleontologist, intelligent
doctor, but he's coming across almost as someone
who's not intelligent throughout the rest of
it in like what he's putting up with and all
the other stuff. And obviously at one point he
becomes smitten by her or there's a love trial.
She comes across as crazy. Yeah, like she's insane.
Yeah. There's moments where you're like, oh she's
but I remember there was like a certain moment
where I kind of thought to myself I'm oh, she's
like actually not okay in the head like she's
not just acting She's not just like playing like
a trick on him. She's actually insane Yeah, cuz
she was like ready to marry him right away. It
was interesting. Like she certainly And at first
like I was when I first started I was wondering
if she was more more of a trickster than you
know when you have a moment with a purse i'm
like is she purposely doing this to try to get
him in trouble like is there the because like
i said i didn't going into this i didn't watch
anything i just watched it cold i'm like oh is
it going to be like she you know is is really
like this and i guess maybe i had a The last
movie we watched for the Alfred H Scott retrospective
in my head with the Joel thief and whatnot. It's
like, oh, is that going to be where it goes?
And it's like, oh, no, it's just she's just she's
really scattered brained on it. Like, I feel
like her character feels very modern in that
way. Like, you know, if you ever heard the term
like the Manny pixie dream girl, she's not quite
like that, but she a sense of like. She is very
in the moment, like she's very like. She is doing
the role you would expect Cary Grant to do, or
what Cary Grant would be known for in the way
that she's pursuing him. And she's kind of coming
up all these crazy schemes that keep them together
and everything like that, which is interesting.
Like when he calls about the leopard attacking
her, it's like, ow. So I can understand the,
yeah, she's crazy, crazy. And maybe she is, but
maybe he is too. And maybe that's. that they
both need You used to get the slap like I didn't
realize leopard was going to be such a key key
part of this entire movie like oh we get a leopard.
We're staying with this leopard like this is
gonna be this is gonna be the story is and then
we get another leopard that's where it's like
okay again I'm trying you're just like we're
just gonna have another leopard escape from the
circus. It's basically live action Looney Tunes
and not two leopards. We got two leopards. We
got a dog and a bunch of crazy people. And did
you know that the leopard was the same leopard?
Like the two leopards are played by the same
leopard. I assume so, because they didn't they
seem the same size like they didn't like the
one didn't seem bigger. So I don't know if they're
ever in a scene together. I guess maybe they're
not or they did some tricks with it. But yeah,
I guess it's played by the same. Leopard and
interesting to also to see that apparently Katherine
Hepburn Hepburn was totally cool with the leopard
being on set Cary Grant not so much I guess they
had to use a double in every scene that his character
had contact with a leopard Like he was having
no part of it. I don't I don't disagree with
them I was not made today. This could not be
made today like like it was well the one scene
with the dog in the leopard like What does that
seem like they were really like that seemed pretty
violent like the way they were interacting like
fighting and like yeah, I wasn't sure if the
I don't know dogs sometimes when they're when
they're playing they look like they're fighting
but it looked pretty like this seems a little
brutal. So yeah, that was interesting. But it
would be made today but it would be made it could
be made today but it would be very different
like there could be some CGI or CGI for the most
part maybe they have. that's obvious yes that
that that than that out of control and I assume
he was needing to be would have taken him to
a zoo where they they weren't putting him down
right they were taking him to a zoo. I think
so yeah something like they were he was not going
to be allowed in the circus anymore obviously
and then they let the bad leopard or the disobedient
leopard out of the back of a car because I think
it's the. Good leopard so we have a whole confusion
with that we have a dog that sometimes is being
chased by leopards we have the dog who took the
bone from the dinosaur and buried in the yard
somewhere and we're digging up hundreds of holes
to try to find that. Obviously we have a whole
sequence with jail cells where some people are
being locked in and some people are being let
out what did you think of once they're in the
jail cell and then Catherine Hepburn turns on
this like we're part of a gang. And starts talking
like a gangster like what did you think of that
whole sequence and then kind of how this movie
plays out in the end? That that finale is just
like the way keeps building and I think it actually
did a pretty good job of like. Setting that up
throughout. So like it all kind of makes sense,
you know, you stealing of the card all builds
upon itself So it doesn't all come out of nowhere
But the room the one would be though oddly was
thinking of during that was crazy stupid love
and how you had all these different plot threads
kind of come in together that all started the
kind of And it got crazier and crazier. This
one's different because it's not like a big surprise
reveal, but it's just these bets building upon
one another. And certainly you could see the
vaudeville type of comedy going into it. But
that to me was just the fighting this movie was
just all, all a bit ludicrous all the time. And
when she went with the, you know, she was being
a gangster and things like that. It just was
like, okay, like this is, it was a bit of a left
turn and it was just, this felt. If you told
me this entire movie was improv'd, I would be
like, OK, that all makes sense. Because it does
have that feeling where it's just yes and, everyone
is just yes anding and going from one thing to
another. And it doesn't necessarily always have
the most logical reasoning for that. Because
it's like, did she know there was a window there?
Was that her plan all along? It was just, I don't
know. you know it's one of those things like
you said i think you'll know very quickly if
you like this movie by that point i was i was
bought in even if i could recognize just how
ludicrous everything was getting how about yourself
i do appreciate the deep cover uh reference by
the way um the yes and i like it um yeah i i
was a little like when she started doing the
the leopard gang stuff i was like okay like we've
gone a little too far at this point like jerry
the nipper and swing indoor suzy and everything
But I did, I was invested on like, how is this
actually going to play out? Like. How are they
going to get everything back to where it needs
to be? You know, he needs the bone. We need the
right leopard wrapped up. We need, and then I
was like, well, we still are completely ignoring
the fact that, you know, he's engaged to be married
and already I think missed his wedding or missed
something like important. What did you think
of that whole angle with Alice, who is his fiance,
who clearly is not into him that much. It doesn't
seem like in the beginning because it's like,
yeah, I want to get married, but you just need
to keep working and I don't want a honeymoon
and I don't want to be romantic with you at all.
What did you think of that angle and then how
she's just so easily discarded in this whole
movie and we end up with Cary Grant and Katherine
Hepburn together? Definitely did everything they
good to make us hate her as quickly as possible.
It's like, oh, she's just she's just a horrible
horrible person and the way it like in that way
it was like a surprise just in how like mentioned
earlier like how gender roles are swapped in
this because I can't think of a movie at this
time where Would you see an actor like Cary Grant
basically be that like the cheapest man that
is just being told what to do It didn't but it's
it's fitting of the film when the sense of like
everything is over -the -top But yeah, I think
like again like that's the one thing I would
say is like all these decisions are very transparent
like, you know why they're doing it and Again,
but I think it's just trying to keep going as
quickly as possible. So you don't think about
it too much. So yeah that And that's the thing
is like the moment you start to think it stopped
the question of like, well, does he shouldn't
he be more concerned about his wedding? But then
you're like, OK, but she was a horrible person
to me. He doesn't want to get married anyway.
So, yeah, yeah, I was just thinking trying to
it was trying to cover all the spaces. Then,
of course, we have the actual like, I guess,
climactic ending or whatever of the dinosaur
bones being toppled. Yeah, only spent like four
years of his life. Assembly I think I think that's
how they figured out that Brontosaurus is aren't
actually a real dinosaur Like you're not a very
good paleontologist That's what was when they
opened up on that I'm like, oh man, he's gonna
be really sad when he finds out that the you
know Or did they go back with that? Cuz I thought
they discovered no, it's not I don't I think
it's Brachiosaurus and like some other things.
I don't I haven't yeah, I don't I don't think
it's real, but someone could correct us. I should
call my cousin. He's actually isn't a paleontologist,
so he can scream at the at the recorder right
now. So one thing I have a question about, like.
And I don't know, you you may have watched more.
Classic films than I have, maybe if we were to
like Adam up, you probably have more in the 1930s
and 40s than I do. We always hear. in modern
times that people have different sounds based
on where they come from. Right. Like you have
the Boston accent or whatever. You have somebody
that you can tell is from New York or someone
from New Orleans or like you have like geographic
accents and ways you talk. Right. Because my
mind's blanking and I can't think of real words
that describe those things. But one thing that
was dawning on me as I'm watching this and I
don't know if it's a factor of the recording
equipment and the microphones, but is there also,
I mean, I know there's lexicon that comes and
goes. Like I know there's words that were used
in the 30s that are not used in the 70s that
are not used in the 2000s. Like I'm not talking
about just like words that come and go, but is
it the way they recorded vocals in this time
period? Or do you feel like people just literally
sounded different when they talked in the 1930s?
And the reason I'm saying this is because I feel
like some people are turned off to classic movies
because of how especially females sound when
their voices are recorded from this time period,
because I can totally see somebody thinking that
number one, Catherine Hepburn doesn't stop talking
in this film. Like she she talks a ton in this
film. Like if you had to count up the lines,
I'm guessing that like Her the lines per minute
like sure her ratio would be pretty good and
I feel like some people in today's audience would
be hearing the the non -stop aspect of her lines,
but also there's like a I don't want to call
it grating this like I talked a little I use
the word like nails on a chalkboard earlier like
Amanda had to leave the room when I was watching
this because she couldn't take the sound anymore
of hearing Catherine Hepburn talking and I don't
think I'm not saying like there's anything wrong
with Catherine Hepburn I'm not trying to say
that but there's something about like some of
these classic films and how the audio is done
or maybe it's just how people spoke back then
that comes across Different to me. Do you think
that or what is your take on that? I think certainly
there's a certain cadence and certain style certain,
you know that people when they think about that
time that implore I guess I didn't find it as
much with Kevin Kevin Hepburn. She just I didn't
find like her We're talking all that different.
She certainly is very fast -paced and I mean,
there's a certain like Quotation to like the
way she speaks, but I didn't I didn't notice
the tin like the tininess of like the way they
recorded it that makes it like Accentuated maybe
perhaps I know like it's interesting mention
that because I just recently watched some like
it hot and one of the characters in that basically
Doesn't a person impersonates another character
and he creates a voice for it That sounds a lot
like Cary Grant and there's a Joe and then another
character jokes is like no one really talks like
that Why are you talking like that? Which which
made me think of like that's just you know, this
is maybe that was a dig at Cary Grant in the
way he speaks Uh, but yeah, I think I mean I
didn't notice as much with this I feel like you've
seen it much more with a lot of like classic
noir and things like that where you know when
heparin was putting on that uh show of pretending
to be part of the gang where she was Keeping
that type of style and I certainly saw it there
but when she was just being her normal self,
which was abnormal to begin with And I didn't
really notice it as much. Yeah This film gets
credit with for a couple things as well. Um,
I know that there was other Screwball comedies
before this but a lot of people kind of point
to this as like one of the Like I guess godfathers
of of this Zany like I don't think any film has
ever been quite like this one from a pace standpoint
and from like how long it is But do you feel
like this one kind of had an impact on? Comedies
that came afterwards in this style or do you
think it's kind of a one -of -a -kind? I think
I certainly could certainly see like a lot of
romantic comedies that of like that came after
that I have a lot of, you know, certain elements
of this one for sure. You know, especially you
think of like the zininess, like even like something
like I love Lucy, which like in the way, like
you had so many hijinks and things like that.
I certainly could see a lot of that compared
to here. And it's very similar in the sense of
you have Lucy, who's the one where he's doing
all the craziness where, you know, similar to
this. So I think you can see a lot. I can't.
Like you mentioned, my experience with 1930s
comedy isn't huge, so I can't tell you if there
was one before this. But even knowing what comes
next for Cary Grant, something like His Girl
Friday, other movies we're going to do, I do
think I could see a lot of films that certainly
had to go back to this type of style or try to
Ate this but I'm thinking of like it happened
one night, which I think came out before this
trying to think if 1934 that was 1934 so for
a few years before but even that wasn't as Fast
-paced or insane. I think this went a certain
direction with it and then this like up the ante
Tenfold and I'm guessing you saw a lot more of
that with the 40s and 50s Certainly with the
type of comedy that came Yeah, absolutely Did
you have any? Trivia bits that you wanted to
give or final thoughts on this one as we kind
of start wrapping up our thoughts on bringing
up, baby Well, then we talked I mentioned I wanted
to talk about the one when we we mentioned already
we're cutting the the connections of Superman
which feels apt compared since just recently
came out also Apparently this might be the first
time In this film where gay is used as a term
meaning like what we consider gay now as like
not like something carefree because there's a
scene where he's dressed up in this nightgown
and yells I'm gay which I was not expecting that
whatsoever. I tell you that I'm like well that
was of all the words I did that was crazy which.
the the the Those I thought there's some interesting
techniques they use for using the leopard which
was cool like the one scene where he walks into
the bathroom and You know utilizing stained glass
and stuff like that Which they said if you look
you can see it or like and I didn't notice it
as much but you know, right? Who knows if it
there's another one I said that they made a giant
cage that we don't apparently see yeah that they're
inside or that the he's in the the leopards inside
and they were like capturing the the film and
the sound and everything by sticking things through
the bars so that you couldn't see the bars or
something around those lines. I think I read.
And I thought it was kind of crazy that there
was no musical score for this whatsoever, which
again, I didn't even notice because of just like
how it wasn't any time for it. Yeah, there wasn't
any time where there was dialogue the entire
time there was. Yeah, there was not like no one
kept, you know, had to have their breath whatsoever.
I can only can you imagine this with like also
like a almost like a silent film soundtrack?
Playing at the same time like I don't know if
I would have been able to take that Yeah, yeah,
that would be a little much. Uh, so yeah that's
that that I found kind of fascinating because
I feel like often with score like I don't notice
it like when I first watch a movie like I don't
really notice it until like the second time and
this and when I saw that I'm like, oh, yeah,
there wasn't any score and I guess I could certainly
see why but yeah, that's all I had The only other
one I had I think was the fact that that whole
segment of the dress being torn and Carrie Grant
walking in front of it and trying to help her
hide it was from an actual experience that Cary
Grant had in real life. So apparently he was
talking to one of the people in the film about
it and then they decided to put it in the film
as well. So definitely interesting there. And
this is not the last time that we are going to
see a couple of these different team ups. So
first of all, Howard Hawks, who directed this
one, also directed Only Angels Have Wings, which
I don't think we're covering, but at least not
in this first section, but he also does His Girl
Friday. Which will i believe be the next one
we're going to cover so we're going to get to
see howard hawks with carrie grant twice right
out of the gate and then catherine hepburn. Did
four films i believe with carrie grant and we're
going to be talking about we talked about bringing
up baby and then we will talk about the philadelphia
story for sure she also was in a holiday from
nineteen thirty eight with carrie grant. As well.
So we're going to get to see a couple more of
these team ups happen again as we go through
this journey. Last thing I kind of wanted to
ask you, Dan, since this is a Cary Grant specific
like series and we're not just looking at the
films, we're kind of also taking a special look
at him and his performances. Obviously, we saw
four different times where he's teaming up with
Hitchcock. We had notorious suspicion North by
Northwest and the what's it? What's the thief?
the How did this one add to what you view Cary
Grant as and like, what are you looking forward
from the rest of this retrospective? Do you think
we're going to see a lot of other different sides
like we did with this one or kind of like, how
did this one fit into that, like your vision
of who Cary Grant was? This, of course, I think
obviously is the most that's pure comedy. This
is getting to see him, I think, in his most natural
state, even if in the beginning he's playing
the little schlubby type of guy. So that was
fun. It definitely you get it was good to see
him like kind of utilize like some of his greatest
talents as a comedian because You got a little
bit of that with the Hitchcock film. So I I'm
intrigued to see like you always those people
who get Prizes they play the same character in
every role and here you get a little bit of a
different character, but I'm Looking to see like
do we get more variations? Like, you know, is
he just always carry grant Kenny kind of escaped
that, you know, just the star power that he's
known for And so far like, you know, I still
feel like we've always every role we've gotten.
He's always carry grant I enjoy carry grant so
I'm not gonna say that's a bad thing But I think
I'm just intrigued to see like how that is moving
forward Yeah, it's gonna be interesting too because
the next one that we're talking about which is
his girl Friday from 1940 is also classified
as an American screwball comedy and it's the
same director and this is also the one that apparently
he tries to put he being Howard Hawks tries to
put some more one or two more regular folks in
there to balance out all the screwball so I'm
interested to see like where how much these two
that we're covering first like mirror each other
or how his curl Friday tones it down or how that
goes because Those are gonna be an interesting
comparison between the two of them Obviously
Philadelphia story is a romantic comedy as far
as how it's labeled So we get a little bit more
comedy our arsenic and old lace is a black screwball
black comedy So we're definitely gonna get some
more comedy and then it looks like the ones that
he was Nominated for penny serenade is listed
as a melodrama and none but the lonely hearts
is a drama slash romance. So that may be interesting
ones because we're going to get to see a different
side of him in those two. Plus he was nominated
for awards in those two. So I'm very interested
to kind of see where those go. And then I think
the ones the last two were rounding up is ones
just listed as a romance. And then the last one
is listed as a screwball comedy. So we're going
to end with a screwball comedy as well. So I'm
intrigued as to what these are all going to bring
Dan final thoughts as we wrap this up and also
let people know how they can stay in touch with
all the stuff you do. Yeah, so far, you know,
like I said, it was I started off with a strong
comedy and I think. I mean, I would be interested
to see what some like what our audience thinks
of as considering like it's it's style and pacing
and how well it would hold up, but looking forward
to seeing more. Absolutely, and how can people
stay in touch with you? Oh, yeah, of course.
And you can just search for Comic Concierge on
all the different social media platforms. Absolutely.
You can get in touch with me at Optimus Solo.
You can search this show out at the Cinema Geeks
or you can keep track of everything that happens
at the website at the Geekcast Radio Network.
So that does it for this episode. Tune in next
time for another chance to listen to more of
the Cinema Geeks as we talk about the 1940 Cary
Grant film, His Girl Friday.
No chapter markers for this episode.


