Altered Geek
Streamer Ads, Instagram Ratings, MTV's End, and YouTube Shorts!

About this Episode
Join Steve Megatron Phillips on Altered Geek as he dives into the latest in Geekdom! This week, we're talking about California's stance on noisy streamer ads, Instagram's new PG-13 rating, the end of an era as MTV shuts down its music channels, and the new "Pause the Feed" feature on YouTube Shorts. Plus, we explore how old movies are becoming streamers' biggest moneymakers. Get Altered, Get Geeky, with the Altered Geeks!
Hi, this is David Kaye, and you're listening
to Altered Geek. Geek. Geek. Altered Geek. Geek.
It's a wild ride. Join the discussion. Let's
dive into lore. From Star Trek to Transformers,
we're ready to soar. Superheroes clash as we
spark up a flame. Altered Geek Podcast. Remember
the name. Hello, and welcome to Altered Geek.
I'm your host, Steve Megatron Phillips, and joining
me in this adventure into geekdom is TFG1 Mike.
Well, well, well, we are back. Well, well, well,
what do we have here? Yes. Lots of stuff. Lots
of stuff that has nothing to do with robots or
robots. No, it does not. It has to do with artificial
robots, but. No, no. Oh, wait, no, it doesn't.
We do. We do have multiple stories, though, between
streamer ads. Instagram stuff. TV. And then just
technology stuff and, you know, everything that's
old is new again. Of course, because that's the
way it should be. So I can't remember if we talked
about this or not on the last one, but I remember
this one made enough of an impact on me. I was
like, we got to discuss this one about California
nixing. noisy streamer ads yeah uh they because
i mean let's face it when we're watching something
streaming most the time the volume is way louder
on the ads so it's like you're watching 2b or
you're watching you know any of the other services
with ads like prime video yeah um i this is one
i i commend state governments for yeah 100 because
they're and i get why they do it like the companies
do it on purpose because it's a shock value it
gets you to pay attention when you're otherwise
tuned out um but i mean i i've always just adopted
the thing from the 90s of where you hit the mute
button yep and just walk away And then you come
back and if you miss a couple of minutes, you
miss a couple of minutes. Granted, you could
just rewind. But yeah, it wasn't like live TV
where, you know. Yeah. So what's what's beautiful
about this is, is that they're saying like streaming
services like Netflix, Hulu, Prime Video will
be forced to maintain consistent audio levels
throughout their entertainment programming, including
ad breaks by July 2026. And. It's modeled after
a 2010 act that barred traditional TV and cable
from airing excessively loud, often startling
ads. And given that California's got a huge footprint
in the entertainment industry, it it'll probably
become a nationwide standard, which honestly,
I'm all for. Yeah. Yeah, they they passed the
calm act in 2010 and. It caps the ad volume on
cable and broadcast, but didn't apply to streaming
because it really wasn't a thing at that time.
I mean, it was, but it was still in its infancy.
Yeah, it was still in its infancy. Yeah. So here's
here's my thing with this is that. I don't think.
The broadcast like. I shouldn't have to adjust
my volume because your broadcast is too loud
or too soft. If you don't have your volume leveled
for the broadcast to be reached to whatever satellite
and then shot back down through my antenna. Yes,
I know I'm talking in old technology terms here,
folks, but you get the point. I shouldn't have
to turn my volume down to five and then turn
it all the way back up to 25. When commercials,
no commercials, cause I'm going to bring something
else up here in a second, but good. This is,
I love this. This is great. This is awesome.
Good forum. 100%. Let's go. Let's do it. Now
here's what I wish would happen. The people that
own forensic files, the, uh, the company film
rise. I am a subscriber to their YouTube channel
because I use their direct playlist on YouTube
for forensic files because I basically fall asleep
to true crime. Don't ask me how, folks. It's
a thing. I've mentioned it on this show before.
It's not because it's death and murder. It's
because it's... The sound of Peter Thomas's voice,
the narrator, Peter Thomas passed away a couple
of years ago. He's 91 years old, but he just,
he's one of those. He's one of those people that
has one of those voices. This is just a soothing
voice. Even when he's talking about somebody
killing somebody else by, you know, antifreeze
or something, or, you know, using a wood chipper
or something. it's just a thing. Okay. But the
problem I have is on YouTube, on my TV, and even
on the computer, the film, the broadcast, the
masters for forensic files are not volume leveled.
So some episodes are either too loud or too soft.
And the problem is what isn't leveled is the
audio in the stuff where sometimes Peter's voice
will be too soft. And it's not his performance.
It's the volume of his voice. Somebody did something
wrong when they did that production. And I don't
know if it could ever be fixed. But yes, this
California. The new thing here for for 2026,
but hopefully by 2026 that all the streamers
will have consistent volume because nobody wants
to get woken up by a Cialis ad at 3 a .m. watching
Netflix. I guess earlier this year, the Streaming
Innovation Alliance, which. Never heard of that.
Well, that's because it sounds like. A STD. Its
members include Disney, Netflix, Paramount Plus
and Peacock, who urged the FCC to refrain from
regulating audio levels on streaming platforms
because they argue that streaming services rely
on third party ad networks for dynamically inserted
ads, making it unworkable. But that's not reality
because. It's not challenging to normalize audio,
even when streaming services rely on third -party
ad networks for dynamically inserted ads. It
could just be programmatic that it levels to
a certain level when it's playing, or you force
the files that are sent in to be of a certain
normalization. It's not a difficult decision,
but I'm all for it. Yeah, me too. I hate the
fact that, I mean, I get annoyed when I watch
a streaming platform in general and I'm watching
a TV or movie and the audio levels, even in the
program, are out of whack. It grates on my ear
because I'm like, oh, I can't hear them, but
I can hear the crappy music that's being played
over top. You know why they do that now, right?
These days, why they've done it for the last...
Because Christopher Nolan. Okay, well, yes, there's
Mr. Nolan since 2008, yes, but... Okay, we could
always blame the Dark Knight. I'm blaming him
because he's like, oh, you don't need to understand.
It's like, that's why we had... Ladies and gentlemen,
you've just heard a preview of what Studio 2009
Episode 200 is going to sound like. Welcome to
the studio. That's right. Batman. That's right.
But. Oh, the reason I was going to say was they
want you to turn on the closed caption. They
want you to read your flipping screen. That's
why. That's why they screw up the audio levels.
So you have to read your flipping. I'm not reading
the screen. I'll turn that. all the way up to
100 if i can't hear it so i i've also figured
out netflix defaults to surround sound okay instead
of uh 2 .1 oh so you might want to check those
settings too when you're watching you have to
do it when you're in a program though and then
and then it kind of defaults but it's i i found
that funny that they they do that and i was like
oh so that's why the audio sounds like crap and
it's not It's not like on one track. It's like
on 50. Yeah, it's on 50 tracks because they assume
you're rich enough and powerful enough to have
a seven speaker surround sound system in your
one bedroom apartment in the middle of bum freak
northern Indiana. I mean, 90 % of the time I'm
watching crap on my television in my room, you
know, in my living room or on my phone or on
my laptop. I don't have surround nor do I care.
And I mean. additionally so i am i'm older so
i there's a lot of times i don't turn the volume
up and i will like if somebody else is sleeping
around or you know like just passed out and i'm
like i don't want to be noisy and have the you
know the screen as loud as possible yeah so i'll
turn on captions and often i'll just read the
captions while i'm watching it but i also noticed
that You also don't miss the inconsistencies
in the video, in the visual side, because you're
staring at the text, which I think is the thing
that they want. Yeah, they want you to stare
at the text. They want you to read your screen.
Well, they don't want you to realize that there's
things jacked up in the video. Yeah, well, that
too. But that aside, moving on to the Instagrams.
yes the instagrams i found this story i think
i think i brought i think i brought this to you
because i'm on instagram a lot and i don't follow
obviously but i saw somebody else post it on
instagram And I was like, oh, that's interesting.
So Instagram unveils new PG -13 rating. This
was a story on LinkedIn done by John Tomas, editor
at LinkedIn News. This was updated a week ago.
With parents and lawmakers scrutinizing both
social media and AI chatbots for their potential
harm. Good. Please do that, parents. Instagram
on Tuesday announced it will adopt the film industry's
PG -13 rating system. The change slated to roll
out this year will include interactions with
the platform's chatbots and limit exposure to
profanity, mild violence, and partial nudity.
Also, accounts that share... I can't read the
rest of this. Share age -inappropriate material
like links to alcohol won't appear in teens'
feeds. Meanwhile, Spotify announced that parents
in the U .S. will be able to manage the accounts
of their preteens. So yeah, this is the whole
thing. And Director of Safety and Policy at Meta,
David Miles, says... Instagram teen accounts
will be guided by a PG -13 ratings. Today, we
are announcing that Instagram teen accounts will
be guided by PG -13 movie ratings. By default,
this means that the teens will see content on
Instagram that's similar to what they'd see in
a PG -13 movie. Teens under 18 will be automatically
placed into a updated 13 plus setting, and they
won't be able to opt out without a parent's permission.
And because we know families are different, we
also introducing a new stricter setting for parents
who prefer a more restrictive experience for
teens. We invited thousands of parents worldwide
to share their feedback with us, helping us shape
changes. and ensure our efforts to align with
their expectations. These are significant updates,
and we want to take time to get it right. Updated
content settings will start rolling out to teen
accounts in the US, UK, Australia, and Canada
today, and will be fully rolled out at the end
of the year. So that was, he posted that one
week ago. So yeah. Good. Absolutely. Children
on social media, honestly, I don't have kids,
but I don't think kids need to be on social media.
Not really. Once you turn 18, have at it. That's
your decision. You're an adult at that point.
Fine, whatever. But as long as the parents are
responsible, fine, whatever. And I'm glad that
Meta, on this side of it, is taking... And I've
heard Adam Moseri, creator, founder, whatever
of Instagram, the guy that runs Instagram, he's
not probably the founder, but the guy that runs
Instagram currently, I follow him on Instagram
and I watch a lot of his Friday updates or Thursday
updates or whatever updates he does about what's
going on with new features on Instagram. And
I heard him talk about this and said kind of
the same thing. He's a parent of kids and little
kids, I think. uh and whatever but like hey it
if they're doing the right thing that's fine
by me you know and i don't know i just don't
you're the parent between the two of us what
are your thoughts so i mean i don't let my kids
on social media period yeah like they don't have
accounts nor will they yeah uh i I don't know.
I feel like it's a detriment to their development.
Okay. Like, honestly, I would dump social media,
but I kind of need it for my job and for... Uh
-huh. Like, I would love to just get rid of social
media. Like, I don't... And it's not even that
I... I'm like, oh, you old curmudgeon, you hate
social media, you hate being social with people.
It's like, no, I'm... It's more so I just am
to this point where I don't... I mean, a lot
of it's... I mean, there's a lot of good. You
don't want the noise. That's what you don't want.
There's a lot of noise anymore. It's just too
much. There's too much crap constantly going
on and everybody is focusing on the bad. Everybody.
And that's why I'm more, more interested in,
you know, like doing the, the discord servers
or yeah, I don't know. I'm just more a fan of
the, the old style, like, Oh, you want to be
a part of a community, join the forums or, you
know? Yeah. Yeah. Well, yeah, Discord has kind
of become our new forums. We're over there. We're
on the GCR and Discord and stuff like that. And
I agree with you. For me, it's more like I go
on social media, like specifically Twitter and
Blue Sky. I go on there. I post what I want to
post maybe once or twice or three times a day
that is not podcast episode release related.
on my personal accounts and i'll post this or
i'll post that or i'll post a photo or i'll post
a whatever or i'll like something we'll talk
about here in a little bit uh like what are you
watching now oh i just saw this trailer or that
trailer oh my god i can't wait to see this movie
or that movie or whatever kind of thing And then
I'll check my notifications to see if anybody
replied to me or if anybody did anything to whatever,
anybody said anything, whatever, any conversations.
Nope. No conversations. Okay. I'm out. And I
closed Twitter and blue sky. I don't stay on
Twitter as much as I used to. I don't stay on
blue sky. Like blue sky was a, I was never going
to leave Twitter. I put too much into Twitter.
But I still wanted to check out Blue Sky when
it debuted. I was curious. Matrix Prime sent
me a code. I was like, okay, fine, I'll join.
And that was the only one I was going to join.
Out of all the social media networks that popped
up at that time, was it a couple years ago? Whenever,
whatever. It was Blue Sky. It was Mastodon. It
was this. It was that. It was your uncle. It
was whatever. It was like 70. 30 other ones that
tried to pop up when everybody was exiting twitter
i was like but i've put too much work into this
i don't want to i don't whatever yeah i mean
and that's kind of my boat is like i put way
too much into twitter yeah over the years that
i'm just not dumping it yeah am i gonna go back
16 years to see what i posted 16 years ago on
twitter no i only do that on facebook because
facebook shows me that shit but it's one of those
things where like in facebook same thing i'm
not on like i go on facebook in a total of the
time that i'm awake in a 24 -hour day i go on
facebook anywhere from one To 12 times per day.
If I'm awake at midnight, I'll go on at midnight
because that's usually when I do the memories
thing. I like to get that crap done early and
just leave it and whatever. And then when I wake
up later in the morning, I'll check it and then
I'll leave it. And then I'll check it sometime
later in the afternoon, early in the afternoon.
Just to see. If anything new has happened or
anything with the section of, because again,
you talk about social media, talk about seg,
I'm going to say segmented audiences versus segregated
audiences. Cause I shouldn't be using the segregated
segmented audiences. Twitter is an audience.
Instagram is an audience. YouTube is an audience.
Blue sky is an audience. Discord is an audience.
Facebook is an audience. They're all different.
We don't have all the same people in all the
same places. This isn't a foreign land where
there's one social media network for everything.
Because there are countries that have one social
media network for everything. But, you know,
so... But I'm not... I don't find myself on it
just to be on it. Whereas when I first started
on stuff, 2008, 2009, 2010, I was on there carrying
on conversations with just random. Hey, new friend,
how are you? Oh, you like this? I like this too.
Let's talk about this. And it wasn't just you.
It was like other people that have never been
on a podcast we've ever recorded. just random
people just, and it was like a once or twice
a day thing. And again, the other thing that
switched for me with Twitter is they start, but
this is before the, the evil cologne empire started.
They got rid of third party apps, which means
they got rid of tweet deck, which was the most
unique and instrumental way to organize your
Twitter. Oh, I concur. Like. what and so they
got rid of it and then they bought it and then
they integrated it and then they got rid of it
again i don't even think it's still around now
well it technically is but you have to pay to
use it oh well then no sorry not sorry as much
as i as much as i miss it i'm not again like
i've already said in this episode i'm not on
it enough to warrant to pay for a service that
used to be free Yeah. Anyways, that's why I don't
participate in it. But, yeah. Social media, folks.
Don't let your kids be on it unless they ask
to be on it, unless they say, oh, hey, mom, or
oh, hey, dad. I met, like, let's say you got
little Cheetor over here, and little Cheetor
was at school, and he met little Rhinox. They
have their hatred of little Scorponok and little
Waspinator, whatever kind of thing. And, you
know, it's a playground bully, not bully thing,
but it's a, it's a playground rivalry thing is
what I meant to say. And little Cheetor and little
Rhinox want to have Instagram chats together
or something, or they want to have whatever.
So as long as, as a parent, you're monitoring
that, as long as you're on top of it. as long
as you know the filters are doing what they're
supposed to do sure fine but at the end of the
day i still say kids don't need social media
until they're 18 no and if then and even then
you shouldn't have it unless you absolutely feel
like you're it's so and this is and this is something
i've noticed is like kids are so fried nowadays
between social media And consistent video games.
We had video games back in the day, but the thing
was it either saved where you were or it gave
you a code to get back to where you were. Yep.
Or you just didn't turn the machine off and left
it running 24 -7 until you had time to go back
to it. Nowadays, everything is constantly...
I hate games that are connected to the internet
to play solo. I absolutely hate it. I hate the
fact that my games have to check in to play them.
Star Trek Online, okay, it's a massive multiplayer
RPG that's online. I understand that. I'm not
happy about it because I have enough of the single
player part. I never play with other people.
I did the first two years I played it, but I
haven't done that in years. I prefer to just
play the stinking game and uh you know when new
stories come out yeah and then like the the dragon
ball z game dragon ball sparking zero quite honestly
there's no reason why you have to be connected
to the internet to play it right i mean they
have features that you can play against other
people but honestly it just i don't care like
i want to play the story and i want to battle
it out not a lot to go on and the old dragon
ball games are kind of crap by comparison just
movement and everything else um so like that
kind of bothers me like there was like battlefield
like yeah i played that online i never played
the single player so i didn't care about that
but like i would play a diablo 3 back in the
day and diablo 2 and those were like oh you gotta
have online access and i'm like i don't want
to play online i played the single player like
literally i don't i don't care and yeah It's
kind of the case with a lot of games anymore,
and I just don't feel the need for it. I miss
the days of just getting a demo, trying the game.
Okay, I like it. I'm going to buy the game, get
the disc. Well, they're like, oh, no discs. You're
going to install it. Oh, wait, it's locked to
your machine. Yeah. Now, I did get, because I
have Steam installed, which is pretty much the
only way I play games anymore. I had EA Play
for a while. I mean, I still have it, but the
only thing I have on there is like Battlefield
and like Mass Effect. Yeah. And again, it still
needs to check in. It still needs to do all that.
With Steam, I have all the Arkham games. I have,
which none of those should have to be online
to play. No, not at this point. DC Universe Online.
Still going somehow. I'll occasionally log in
and try it out and see what's new and play it,
but essentially that game still sucks. Xenoverse,
I don't see a reason for it to be online. Sparking
Zero, I don't see a reason. Multiverses, which
was Warner Brothers' attempt at doing a Smash
Brothers. Yep. They discontinued it in May. So
it never took off. It went through the beta.
I played the beta. And then it disappeared for
a while. And then they. I'm sorry, it went in
January 20 or January 31st, 2025. They released
season five of the game. And I was an original
adopter. I think I only put like five bucks into
it because I was like, I want to buy the BTS
Batman because it's got Kevin Conroy. Yeah. as
Batman and it's got, you know, um, I think it's
George Newbern or Tim Daly or whom, whomever
Superman, Superman. And then you've got Susan
Eisenberg is Wonder Woman and Tara Strong is,
is, um, that girl Harley. And then Mark Hamill
is the Joker. And so you have, you have all these
guys in there. Um, it went free to play. Like
they're like, if you already have it downloaded,
It's yours for life. Like you get to have it.
Yep. Um, they're not letting any new people download
it, but those of us that were playing it, we
actually essentially got the full game for free.
Nice. So that they, they had it nominated like
even earlier this year or last year for a, like
nominate them for the labor of love. Cause like
they weren't. gonna make any money uh but i'll
occasionally turn that on and play it because
it's it's entertaining it's like smash brothers
but you get to play with like dc properties yeah
and for that alone it's fun and you can unlock
costumes but there's no no payment you know no
microtransactions because everything's built
into the game now at this point very cool very
cool so but i mean and and that's kind of what
i'm getting at is like i just i don't let my
kids play a lot of video games i've I'll occasionally
play them as like a wind down thing. But between
like the podcast and everything else I'm trying
to get done that I have limited time for. Yeah.
Most of the time I don't play a game. And if
I do, I'll play like 30, 30 minutes or so. I
might play Smash Brothers. I might play War for
Cybertron, Fall of Cybertron, Multiverses, Battlefield
1 or 4, one of the Arkham games, Star Trek Online.
Star Trek Online, I'll check in and see if they've
done a new episode. If not, I'll play the episode
and then I'll promptly quit. Or I'll play Red
Alert 2, Command & Conquer. That's kind of just
where I'm at at this point. I'll do that. I don't
let my kids play a ton of games or anything.
I don't let them watch a lot of crap because
it's not only bad for their cognitive ability,
but people are even... i saw in a parent group
they were even talking about uh ai and allowing
their kids to use like chat gpt for like research
purposes and stuff no and there were a group
of us that were like uh no make them do it the
hard way make them have to struggle suffer yeah
yeah you know it's like it's called research
yeah yeah you want to do research kid you go
down the hall you go into dad's closet and you
pull out All 26 of his Encyclopedia Britannica.
Well, I don't have the Encyclopedia Britannica,
but I mean, physically go to Wikipedia and do
research. Yeah, but I'm not saying you specifically.
I'm saying as a generalization, I'm saying, no,
kid, go down the hall. The point is Encyclopedia
Britannica was our, as kids, was our research
at the time. but yeah no it's no yeah go to wikipedia
go to google go to whatever don't trust the i
the ai overview at first at least look at at
least the bottom three links or the the the most
the the the first three four or five links you
see kind of thing when you're looking at google
but uh so yeah yeah so i mean that and that's
kind of my boat is like i'm And we're even getting
to the point that our oldest is going to eventually
get a smartphone. So it's becoming a, okay, how
do I lock this down as a parent? How do I prevent
him from getting to things he shouldn't get to?
And I've been doing a buttload of research and
pretty much confirmed what I already knew, which
is most of the time when kids get to things that
they shouldn't, it's because parents didn't lock
it down in the first place. Yep. And so, I mean,
there are a ton of services that you can, you
know, if you don't want to deal with having to
do it manually to blocking them to social media
or blocking them to games or the app store or
media messaging, like for text messages, so they
don't get video or pictures. Yep. There are services
that you can pay for that. Well, you can buy
the device, you can pay for the service and it's
heavily locked down. It's already preset. Like
it's, it's a no brainer, you know, hands off
approach. Yep. And then there's the, you know
the people that are more tech savvy like i have
a router yep blocks all kinds of crap um you
know we have you know if we get a smartphone
uh like i use i use google infrastructure like
the android stuff so we use like family link
and i have all of their stuff logged through
that and through my own account so that i can
police it remotely and i can turn things on off
allow things disallow things You know, put time
limits. You know, you have it. I can do it in
there. But there's ways that kids are getting
around some of this stuff. And it's because,
again, parents don't lock stuff down. They don't
lock down the developer tools. They don't lock
down, you know, the ability to sign in another
device to that, you know, another account to
that device. Like, it's all these things that
parents don't turn off. yeah and so kids are
like oh i can i can bypass it by doing x y and
z and it's like no no it doesn't work that way
i own your device it's i paid for it i'm i'm
going to police it until you show you're capable
of policing yourself i have to do it for you
yep and i mean i i grew up on a flip phone you
know or you know those those uh bricks from like
cricket wireless or or the samsung flip phones
on verizon and then the eventually the motorola
razor and lg flip phones and i still love flip
phones i just i don't have one no the the only
the only i had a couple of flip phones the razor
was the best Yeah, and they brought it back.
Motorola has a modern day version of it now.
They've had it for a couple of years. But out
of all the multifaceted form factory phones,
the only one I really wanted to go out of my
way to try to find at the time, they don't make
it anymore because they don't make phones anymore.
But when LG made the wing, you remember this?
The wing. the wing uh i'll find it really quick
but um when lg made the wing they uh did something
really really cool and it basically is a phone
that flips out and it's basically two screens
kind of thing found it you see it okay yeah so
The coolest thing about this is you could do
whatever you want horizontally on the top screen.
And then you could still have your text or your
notifications or whatever you needed on the bottom
screen. That was the only like major, oh my God,
design, like weird design phone I ever wanted.
And I never got it because I wasn't into, like
I wasn't even really into the whole. phone market
thing at the time so it is what it is but like
yeah no uh i i miss when phones were fun which
is a series that uh mr mobile michael fisher
does well i mean you can buy you can buy the
motorola razor now for for like 500 bucks yeah
the new one and yeah yeah don't get me wrong
it's still i i would still be tempted for it
i'm although the the appeal Of the original is
lost on this new one. Yeah, a little bit. I and
I. I say it because. The whole beautiful thing
about the original. Was the design. Like the
way that it was set up. Yeah. And this new one,
it's kind of lost on that because it is a smartphone.
Like, don't get me wrong, I would. I would probably
still get it, except for the fact I'd be worried
about the bendable screen breaking. I love the
texture design of it and the screen on the one
side and then the full screen on the inside.
I would just be worried about it breaking. But
I still love the Razr. The original one was...
I would still love that phone today if I could
use it. unfortunately you need a smartphone for
just about everything nowadays but moving on
yes mtv oh boy mtv mtv is dead folks mtv is dead
music television paramount global has developed
that i was looking this is published two weeks
ago so Paramount Global has delivered a devastating
blow to music fans worldwide, announcing the
permanent shutdown of five iconic MTV music channels
by December 31st, 2025, according to the BBC.
For 44 years, MTV has been a cultural juggernaut,
shaping youth culture, launching musical careers,
and defining how generations consumed music.
Fashion, pop culture, yada, yada, yada. The affected
channels are MTV Music, MTV 80s, MTV 90s, all
the good stuff. Club MTV and MTV Live have long
served as cherished. hubs for music video culture
across Europe and beyond. MTV Music, the flagship
destination for music videos, has been a go -to
for fans seeking the latest hits. MTV 80s and
90s transported viewers back to the eras of synth
-pop, hair metal and grunge, and bubblegum pop.
Offering nostalgia, the shutdown will begin in
the United Kingdom and Ireland with plans to
phase out The channels in the continental Europe
and other international markets shortly after,
while the main MTV channel will continue to operate,
its focus has shifted dramatically in recent
years. Yeah, reality crap. Once a music video
powerhouse, it now leans heavily into reality
crap. Like Catfish and The Challenge and leaving
little room for the music content that defined
its legacy. 81 to 2025. So just over 40 years
of music television. It is so sad. Well, they
should have just stuck with music. Yep. No doubt.
Y 'all. And then finally, we have something I
found. It's from The Verge, but I found it recently
because I just end up doom scrolling a lot of
places. But YouTube apparently will now help
you quit watching shorts. I thought that was
the whole point of introducing shorts is to have
us be on the platform doom scrolling for hours.
And I thought that was the point. YouTube has
added a new shorts feature that makes it easier
to manage how much time you're spending watching
videos. Mobile users can now set a customizable
daily limit that restricts how long they can
scroll shorts feeds, aiming to help viewers better
manage their time instead of endlessly scrolling.
When a user reaches their time limit, they will
receive a notification saying shorts has been
paused for the day. This notification is dismissible,
however, so it's on the user to honor these self
-imposed restrictions. Instagram and TikTok both
provide similar optional screen time limits,
though TikTok is the only service that expands
this to web users. Okay. And it goes on to say,
shorts are a core part of the YouTube experience.
YouTube said in its announcement, setting a scrolling
time limit on the shorts feed allows for this
explanation while helping users be more deliberate
about their viewing habits and manage their time
effectively. I get it. You want to help people
manage their time and whatever. And as someone
who has gotten into doom scrolling YouTube shorts
and Instagram reels. I maybe spend half hour
a day, maybe an hour a day doing that. If I can't
sleep in the middle of the night and I don't
want to get up to actually be productive, like
if I'm still half asleep kind of thing, I will
do it. Might be longer than a half hour or an
hour. But. I think it's a good idea, but the
fact that it says in the article that it actually
ends up being, you know, the user has to abide
by, oh, your daily time limit is up. Okay, I'm
going to put my phone down now and go away and
do something more, you know, productive with
my time. That's on the user. That's on the human.
that's not on youtube like i don't know well
they've it's kind of funny because they created
that culture yeah that's that's my whole point
in bringing this up yes absolutely it's like
you're you're complaining about about people
doing what they're doing but it's like you also
made the culture what it is like you caused this
Yep. Yep, yep, yep. Absolutely, they did. It's
their own fault, and now they're trying to backpedal.
Yeah, exactly. Like, oh, my God, we have so many
people on our servers. We have so many people
on our thing. We can't do this anymore, Captain.
We just don't have the power. oh god it's so
stupid so stupid i i mean i i applaud them for
again wanting to help us manage our time better
but like i i don't know okay i've already said
how often do you doom scroll anything you're
not depends on the time of day okay well When
you're doom scrolling, how long are you usually
doing it for? Ten minutes at a time. See, folks,
he does it less than I do it. I mean, it really
depends. It has to be to something that I find
interesting. Oh, yeah. Yeah, 100%. Well, that's
the thing. Like when I say doom scrolling, I'm
not scrolling through and watching everything.
I literally mean doom scrolling. I'm trying to
find something to watch. Kind of like cable.
So moving on. Yes. You brought up the. The one
video about the cafe. Yeah, the technology in
public is confusing. Yeah, so there was... Oh,
God, I want to get the credit right. Who is this?
Because I'm not clicking on the link. I'm scrolling
up. God, this was so long ago. Wow, we really
haven't done a podcast, folks, in so long that
this is so long ago. There's the Gen X tech.
Where are you? Okay. Come on. Really? I don't
know. There we go. Here it is. Dylan. paladino
hopefully i said your name right dylan but dylan
paladino on instagram is the is the real or is
the is the is the link that we have here and
he goes into a cafe with a laptop and one of
the reasons why i wanted to bring this up is
that i remember back in the early days of gcrn
when we were just getting started We used to
hang out with Steve Saylor a lot. And Steve used
to be one of these guys that would bring his
laptop to cafes because that's how Steve writes.
At least that's how he used to write. I don't
know how he does it now. But at least back in
those days when he was writing, he would go to
a cafe or a coffee shop or whatever, and he would
sit down, put his earbuds in or whatever, and
he would drink his coffee and sit there and write.
So this Dylan guy goes into this coffee shop
and has his laptop and, oh, sir, we want everybody
to unplug here. He's like, okay, sure. I can
abide by that. He unplugs. He sits there just
waiting for his coffee and looking around. He's
by himself. He's not with anybody else. And apparently
everybody got freaked out because he was just
sitting there looking around, even though he
was sitting at his own table. It wasn't like
he was standing in the corner. It wasn't like
he was standing behind anybody or anything like
that. He was at his own table. Oh, sir, you can
use your phone. You can pull your phone out.
Huh? You can't use a laptop, but. It's a laptop
free cafe, but it's not a phone free cafe. Technology
is confusing in 2025. Thoughts? No, I think culture
is getting way too weird. It's like either don't
have the electronics in the place or have them,
but don't sit there and freak out for people
that are people watching because you told them
to get off of their laptop. It's like maybe they
have other things to do. That you can't do on
a phone. Yeah, exactly. It's just so silly. And
I... I don't know. And the other thing about...
Everybody now pays what they're... The phone
has become everything. The phone has become literally
every... It's a phone, even though we don't use
it for that, because don't call me, text me.
You know... But it's one of those things where
it's a phone, it's a text messaging thing, it's
an instant messaging thing with whatever instant
messaging thing you use. It's an internet device.
It's a gaming device. It's technically a mobile
computer. It's a World Wide Web thing. And now...
You can pay for everything. Here, just tap it
or swipe it or blah, blah, blah, or put your
phone screen up to this screen. You know, I remember
1989 when I was nine years old, wondering where
technology was going to be 10 years from then
in 1999. By the time we got to 1999, I'm like,
well, technology has come a long way, but not.
Not as long as I thought it would go. And here
we are, you know, 26 years later in 2025. And
I'm like, Oh God. Oh boy. Technology. It's a
nice tool to have, but the culture surrounding
it just sucks these days. I agree. So yeah, so
there's that. And then what was the other thing?
Oh yeah, the other thing. The old movies are
now streamers' moneymakers. You want to talk
about this? I was going to save it for next one.
Oh, okay. Well, we can save that and we can save
the other stuff too. Then that's fine. Sounds
good. I think next next episode will focus on
the. The old movies and television are now streamers,
moneymakers. And then some of the shows that
we're watching. That way we can kind of get a
little bit of an update that's not necessarily
news centric. There you go. No news next time,
just topics. Exactly. There you go. So, if you
like what you hear on the podcast, subscribe
on your various favorite podcast platform. And,
of course, check out Altered Geek there. You
can also comment on the episode post on geekcastradio
.com or comment on Facebook. Otherwise... You
can catch Mike and I on pretty much everything
on Geekcast Radio right now. Yep, pretty much.
And interact with us there on the website and
on our Discord channel. If you need the link
for that, it will be in the episode show notes
as well as on the top of the website and the
bottom with the different social icons. So until
next time, get altered, get geeky with the Altered
Geeks. From classic icons to new sci -fi dreams
With every episode we'll unravel the themes Let's
geek out and laugh, keep the spirits high Together
we'll journey reaching for the sky Join the discussion,
let's dive into lore From Star Trek to Transformers,
we're ready to soar superheroes clash as we spark
up the flame alter geek podcast remember
No chapter markers for this episode.
Hosts



