Altered Geek
The State of Podcasting and Apple’s Directory Issues

About this Episode
You're tuned in to Altered Geek. Hello and welcome
to Altered Geek. I'm your host, Steve Megatron,
the producer, Phillips. Yes, it's convoluted,
but I don't care. And joining me in this week's
episode is Alex. Hello, I was actually going
to say Alex Megatron Phillips, but then that
doesn't work now that you said your... That just
sounds weird if you throw in my last name though.
yeah but then i don't know it's gonna make people
question things like are we related am i a crazy
stalker fan did i forget my own last name something
like that all of the above i don't know sure
why not uh so as as some may have been wondering
what we were talking about we were talking about
podcasts and uh the whole social networking aspect
of it and kind of trying to create the whole
networks and because there's a multitude of different
things that have been kind of popping up over
the last several months, if anything, trying
to garner attention, whether it's professional
critics with user generated podcast reviews or
things like pod chaser, which is a pod. It's
basically a podcast social feed that allows users
to register. and have like a personalized timeline
with like real time guest appearances and reviews
and releases and everything else. So basically
what that allows you to do is you pull up your
profile on Pond Chaser. So, for instance, mine
has, you know, a brief about and then it says
appearances and it shows like every show you're
associated with. Now granted, you have to add
them and then they vet them afterward. Okay.
But you do this and then it says, you know, you
mark whether the host, whether you're the producer,
you're the editor, you're the voice actor, you
know, whatever. And then you tag the episodes
of the whole series or however it breaks down.
And then they add it to your appearances log.
or if you've guessed it on somebody's podcast
and then it gives you their total podcast show
count and then like an episode count of how many
episodes they've been on and then like total
air time that they've, you know, been breathing
air on podcasts. And although mine's not 100
percent accurate because there's a lot of shows,
I just was like, I'm not adding these because
it's take too much time to go back. It says my
episode count is twelve hundred and five. Yeah,
it's like 13, 1400 for Mike, for Furman. So it's
like, there's no way. Yeah. And so back that
far. Yeah. And it says like, I've been in like
30, you know, associated with, you know, 3 ,539
podcasts or something, which I think somewhat
counts like the producer and the host and the
voice acting role for the same shows. So you
get almost like a double triple. So. But it's
it's all I can check it out because Because I
know doing crossovers and then doing Twig for,
what have I been doing now, probably two and
a half years, nearly three years probably now.
You add all that up and I'm on an average of
one and a half to two hours per week, probably,
if you added up my times. Maybe sometimes more
than that, but it doesn't feel like much until
you start looking at like, wow, I've done like
200 episodes already. Yeah, it was crazy when
we did like the the basically, you know podcasting,
you know, this is your life or the history of
the gcrn and Kevin went through this He went
through this massive massive document that he
created And it essentially was and I'm trying
to see if I can find it although I'm probably
not going to be able to on the air But anyways,
he crafted this giant network stats type of thing
of the history, the master list, here it is,
of the network. And he, through tedious work,
went through every show and checked all of the
descriptions to see what hosts were on what program.
Oh, wow. And, you know, like when that show ran,
And, you know, how many podcasts they had under
their belt at that particular point in time.
It's sadly been neglected by Mike and myself
because, you know, life happens. But he's also
listed like interviews, you know, all the individual
shows and then and tag them in there. And there
were shows that were missing because. Purged
them when we were trying to create space on the
web server when we were hosting our own stuff
But he even went as far as to like any guests
or any guest hosts or co -hosts that were even
minutely Associated with the network he put you
know their names in and The the long list of
everything it's just crazy. But anyways It came
to a total at this particular point in time When
we recorded this and I want to say it was Last
year Mike had 2011 episodes. I had 985 and this
was like recorded I want to say like june of
last year Okay, so kind of it was insane But
yeah, it was kind of cool to kind of see that
and you know, I've been on other Podcasting platforms
like I've guest hosted on you know, like what's
on Joe mind or the podcasters roundtable or this
one's super old and defunct from like 2007 but
TF anonymous and which was Transformers anonymous
and they They had me narrate their their Christmas
story which was kind of funny and Don't remember
if it was his me or his Megatron, but it was
one of the two But I mean I've done a lot of
guests, you know hosting or I was a host of a
show and a guest host on other programs on TF
wire Back when that was a thing Because I'm thinking
back to when I was listening to podcasts the
beginning I stumbled across you guys. Yeah, you
were Yeah, you guys were not just doing GC like
the GC are and you were doing a lot of others
and you guys would Just remember well answer
talking nauseam about Was it earth to earth to
yeah, yeah, it was that and then you were credit
on Empire It was it was my Transformers website
and all things transformers with it Although
I let the name laps and I was like forget it
and I have all things transformers calm down.
So Okay, which goes right to it. I mean it goes
right to the post I don't even back in the days
where every podcast was mono and was only like
25 megs of download and sounded like bad AM radio.
You want to know what's funny about Altered Geek?
Sure. I exported his mono. But you would never
know because I export down, you know, everything.
And the thing is now that we record each person
on multiple tracks, it means you can have everything
leveled right before you end up downsampling.
Always record at the highest quality possible
and then Convert it after the biggest thing people
make is recording at low quality then editing
then saving it again at low quality and then
exporting Yeah, and that's that's the thing is
you're better off and that's that's the difference
to between Skype and Discord Skype while you
do have mp3 Skype call recorder and it does work
if you do the stereo thing It still doesn't break
down or level anyone's audio It records the whole
track at 128k a second, which is roughly what
you would set your MP3 to when you put it on
any platform anyway. But then any editing that
you do further lowers it. You're like compounding
your compression each time. Whereas, yeah, it's
compressed when you record it through Discord,
but they use a much, much more modern compression
algorithm. it just sounds better. You don't have
to be an audio nerd or anything just to hear
how much better it sounds, even without taking
into account that you record everything on separate
tracks. Yeah, and that's the nice thing about
Discord is that when you use its call recorder,
it allows you to save it as all the raw formats.
So like AAC, WAV, FLAC, there's a couple other
formats, M4A. So it does all these... high, high
uncompressed quality files. And, you know, it's
it's and I kind of refer to this of what Mike
Booth Ninja Powers used to say on the show is
garbage in garbage out. You recorded, you know,
low end, like you just said, you know, and you
get low end, you get crap, you know, just like
you would have going in. So if you recorded high
levels and then you export it lower, it's still
going to sound good. Well, and the other thing
to consider, too, is any time that one of us
goes off the rails of swears, it's a lot easier
if you're going to put your Barnard sounds on
one person's track than having to, like, overlap
everybody. Oh, definitely. Yeah. And that's a
nice thing, too, is when you're messing around
with it and, like, say Adobe Audition, I can
mute everyone else's track except for the person
in question. Yep. And... and edit only that person.
Although the last episode, I was like, I'm too
lazy for the binary signs this week. I just was
like, I'll just do ripple edits and did ripple
deletes on voices. And so I made them disappear
without necessarily making it obvious. We have
a tone favorite. pulling back the curtain, when
Birdman edits, he still uses Cooladder Pro because
he thinks it's 2002. Cooladder Pro evolved into
Adobe Audition. Here's the thing, it works. It's
abandonware now. There's actually many sites
you can just get it from because eventually it'll
stop working. It has trouble with some versions
of some of the newer creator updates of Windows
10, it'll crash sometimes. But he's like, I'm
going to use that to physically can't because
it's what he was trained in school on. I've used
it and it has it has some good parts to it but
it doesn't allow you to import certain formats
like if you if you get like a royalty -free music
clip and it's in something anything other than
mp3 or wave it will not work period and you then
you have to use an intermediary to convert it.
Whereas if you get a hold of audition any any
version doesn't matter any version of audition
will be significantly better. Some of the older
ones I've noticed, though, do not like, well,
actually, Audition's always been good. It's Adobe
Soundbooth, which they merged the good stuff
into Audition and then they phased it out. It's
honestly not much better than using Audacity
for a lot of the editing. We use Audacity if
we're recording the vocal. It will usually get
recorded as a mono file because just At Birdman
Studio, we don't have the space nor the cash
to go with a high -end mixing board anymore.
He had a really good one that died. We're not
spending 900 bucks or whatever he originally
spent on it to get a high -end mixing board to
let you have multi -tracks. Because most mixing
boards are either going to be just stereo using
analog out. or if they have a USB interface,
for the most part, the maximum you can do is
two tracks, like a left and right only. You have
to go to a significantly higher cost to have
every single person record on a separate track.
Well, yeah, and you can't use USB microphones.
You have to use the old method. Yeah, which we
have. Right now I'm using a USB microphone, but
I do have other dynamic mics and everything,
which is cool. But that adds more cabling, more
wires, more errors, more things that can happen.
When we're local, we'll record that way using
a few inputs, but it records mono. But again,
it's recording a full wave file on compressed
because you're local, which is cool. We've actually
gotten to the part where we prefer using Discord
because for anybody on a budget that doesn't
have a high -end recording studio, it does allow
up to, I think it's eight people can be recorded
on separate tracks or more. the nominal quality
drop that you get from going online with it,
it sure makes up for in the fact that you can
save it as an audacity file and you can go in
like, I will generally record everything, go
in, do some leveling for whatever needs to be
done, removing the audio, hiss, anything that
happens in the background, and then save that
multi -track file into a stereo file that then
we can use in whatever our choice of editing
software is. It's that little intermediary step
that would be a pain in the butt if you were
using traditional Skype recording calls. The
built -in recording feature that they have in
Skype now is horrendous. I've never used it,
mostly because I can't find it. Honestly, I don't
miss. I don't like Skype anymore. You just click
there's a plus button. You just click that and
then click record, and it does it. The issue
though, it is - It does it at like 32k, doesn't
it? Oh, no, no, no, no, no, no. It is 16k per
second mono with a sample rate of, I think, 22
kHz. That's horrible. So it's half or less the
frequency response that you get out of any other
recording, and then like - a fifth or sixth of
the data rate that you get out of even the normal
Skype recorder, if you use a third party. So
it's like five percent of the quality that we
get when we record over Discord. They thought
that was a good solution. That's horrible. I
haven't been a fan of Skype since Microsoft bought
it, to be honest, because it's just pure garbage.
It's amazing how bad it is considering how good
their voice chat features are on their gaming
hardware. It's because one hand doesn't talk
to the other. You would have figured it would
have been integrated. Get the Xbox team to work
on it. Because if they did, you'd have crystal
clear audio. But for whatever reason, they've
kept it as a separate division. Yeah, and that's
part of the problem is it's just Microsoft. Yeah,
so Discord is like a lifesaver. I never thought
I'd ever use it for... I was not a Discord person.
I was like... Why would I want to do that? Is
it bent? Then people are like, you're old. Then
I was like, okay, well, what's it good for? Oh,
you can use it to record. I'm like, what? Then
looking it up and I went, oh, it's so easy. It
does so much work for you and then you can play
with whatever files you get when you're done.
Yeah. I vastly prefer. Discord at this point
for just cleaner audio. It's just it's so much
nicer to mess around with and You know, I'm not
paid off by by them and by any means but it's
yeah, I mean I I just I don't know I find it
to be much just much cleaner audio like in general
and and honestly like the levels are almost They
even have a capability that they can auto -level
and auto -clean up your audio right on their
plugin. I generally will use the audacity file
download for it because it does a bit of that.
It gets rid of most of the background noise without
losing any quality. What I usually have to do
is my microphone is usually a tad quieter than
everybody else's and I do that on purpose so
it doesn't ever peak at all. But when I record
with Birdman, he, due to the nature of how his
setup is at home, and because he's not at like
a normal computer desk because of his disability,
he records in his living room. And he's about
a foot and a half away from his microphone. So
his mic is always a little, he always sounds
a little thinner. And I usually have to do a
little boosting to his. lower end bass and cut
out some of the high end, do a little tweaking,
it's so much easier just to grab his stream and
just go, I have a macro that I run where it does
like a couple filters and then bam, it basically
sounds the same as mine. And it's just, it's
so much easier to do that than record everything
the traditional podcasting way of everybody's
all in one singular track and now we're screwed
or you have to spend like 40 minutes having one
person turn up their mic. No, no, turn it down
a little bit. Turn it up a little bit. Oh, make
sure that you're close enough to the microphone.
Don't talk away from it. There's a nice little
program, and I'm not sure you're aware of it.
It's from the conversions network. It's a defunct
software now at this point, but it's called the
Levelator 2. Never heard of it. I didn't even
know about it until about a week ago. I was talking
to a friend of mine that uses it. And he said,
so basically what it does is you drag a WAV or
AIFF file. so it will auto level the entire track
and it creates a new exported output file like
it'll be the same file name dot output and With
the still original extension. So if it's a wave
it'll say dot output dot wave and and so you'd
be able to still use it But what I've been doing
to level the podcast is it saves a little bit
of time especially when there's elements where
I'm not directly speaking in my microphone or
somebody else isn't. I will attempt to level
or boost as needed in the software and clean
it up. And then I will export the entire file.
And then I put it through as an AIFF file. and
it will reconvert. And then I re -import that
into Audition and export it as an MP3. And so
everything is pretty well -leveled when it goes
to the final export. It's an extra step, and
I'm sure it could be done in Audition. It auto
does everything, and I don't have to mess with
it. So I just dump it in there, and it works.
But it's free. It's totally free. Sounds like
there's a lot of tools out there that I think
go unnoticed by people or like if you're trying
to start a podcast there's a lot of people like
grasping at straws like where do I go? What do
I start with and I think a good recommendation
I would give because we've had people ask like,
you know, I want to start my own How do I do
it? And you know, you don't have to go with a
big content platform Just like you can you can
do it. Like there are guides out there and how
to if it's a small enough show and you're not
going to be having a ton like you're not doing
daily shows or anything and you want to just
sort of get your foot in the water you can go
with a like a blogger site from like google provides
it for free when you sign up for gmail and you
could actually use you know your 10 or 20 gigs
of gmail storage to host your files because for
the most part if you can press them and you're
posting them yourself the your episodes are going
to be less than 50 megabytes and you're not going
to be using a ton of data, and there's unlimited
bandwidth when you use Google Drive for it to
host it. The only problem with that is you can't
get accurate metrics from that. Again, this is
just for people starting out, right? Well, just
starting out, there's another option too. There's
podcast .com. Yeah, that's true. You can go with
one of those, and then it's just a matter of
the recording of it. If you're just doing it
singularly on your own, easiest way to do it
is just use Audacity to record your microphone
and you talking. You can play around with your
settings to see how it sounds. Just for the pure
recording, you can try editing. It's not going
to be pretty. It's going to be more difficult
to add in layers of music and different things.
There's going to be free options out there to
try. You can go with something like CoolEdit
Pro if you find a copy because, again, it's complete
abandonware now. Do you remember GoldWave? Yeah.
I had that before I even got Audacity because
somebody was like, get GoldWave because we were
doing voice acting for this Transformers dub.
And they're like, because I was like, I want
to do it. I can do the voice. And I was like,
I just don't have any software. And they're like,
yeah, go with GoldWave. And they sent me a link
to it because it was like pretty much abandonware
at the time in 2005. And so I downloaded it and
used it. And it was super difficult to use by
any standards. And I found Audacity to be much
easier to use, although you had to import the
MP3 capability, which is built in now. Oh, okay.
And I remember starting out with that and recording...
I recorded war stories for tfwire .com, which
was essentially I read fanfics submitted by users
to the website and I would do them in different
voices and narrate and everything else. So it
was completely me doing the audio play. There
was literally no sound effects or anything, which
at the time I was like... Didn't really know
what I was doing. It was the first foray into
the podcast world. And so it totally sucks. I
still have it Well, it's a good stepping stone.
It's a good thing to see how far you've come
Yeah, I should actually go back and listen to
that and then like have a cringe -worthy episode
where I'm just like listening to myself do that
and Because like the stories weren't half bad
it was the terrible acting on my behalf because
like a lot of the stuff just sounded like poor
attempts at doing voices. And so I did that and
then I moved on to All Things Transformers. And
again, it sounded like garbage because I started
out and I was reading directly from a script
instead of referencing it like I do now. And
it was like I was trying to copy other shows
I'd heard and it just didn't mesh with my methodology.
And I had a host that was a guest host on there
and for about six episodes and then I ditched
him and Mike joined. And then learning to edit
some of the things like periodically will have
different issues come up. Specifically, there
was an episode of the TFG one podcast where we
did the Beverly Hills cop commentary with Dodd,
myself and him. And for whatever reason, my track
was super slow motion, like My voice was talking
You know and so None of us could figure out what
was wrong with it and I kept re -importing it
and I would listen to the file the file was fine
but I'd import it it would be slowed down again
and we had no idea what was causing it and so
that episode was kind of lost the time until
you know later on and Just recently on the top
100 that just came out Mike said that two of
the people's voices did that On the episode and
I was like really they most certainly didn't
when When it was recorded I did the audio leveling
for everybody and it was yeah Yeah, he said that
What was he said that? Yeah, there was one particular
person he says, you know the recording this week
was extremely strange Remember when your old
Beverly Hills cop slowdown clip happened and
you don't know how it happened Well, he said
when he was editing that like yours and Kevin's
voices did that in this record and I was like
I said, you know, the other thing that you could
have done I said is just speed it back up Well,
I wasn't thinking about that either when I provided
him When I got the file, there were one, two,
three, four of us. So it's four individual tracks.
It was a two and a half hour recording, which
can be pretty large to do even simple editing
on any computer. You don't realize how much stress
I can put on the CPU. But I went in, did some
basic leveling, did some stereo mapping on it,
then saved it as a stereo file. There's no reason
that. two voices should be isolated and doing
that when they're both on the same stream. You
know, after the fact, right? Like it's not like
my individual track got messed up because I played
it back after I recorded it was perfectly fine.
Yeah, I typically test mine just to make sure
that everything worked out fine or to see how
much editing I need to do. And I don't foresee
like a lot of the issue. I think some of it could
be like processor speed in memory and like it
just not... Who knows what computer he's using?
Yeah, well... And it's all the wifi that he's
using. He's got a 10 year old computer at this
point. It was new. It was new. We were rebuilt
in like 2010, 2011. So, and I'm like, it's a
dinosaur. Yeah, it's probably... I have my dinosaur.
It's probably a case of, it's not actually that
the voices are messed up. It's not even streaming
the data to his audio chip fast enough. Which
is entirely possible. My machine, I wanted to
make sure that I future -proofed it so that it
was built to be an editing machine. So when I
have these huge two gigabyte WAV files that come
out from Discord, and it's then just as fast
as it does my mp3 versions when i was doing skype
yeah and i've got the same thing i'm using a
dual core but it's based on the on the ryzen
2 generation 8 gigs of ram solid state hard drive
nothing to write home about like it's you know
a sub 500 computer but it for audio purposes
it literally is the same speed as my new ryzen
6 core computer i'm like which has like an mvme
drive and i'm like why I'm like well because
there is there's a point where you know audio
um audio editing hasn't been like audio itself
and the transformation of audio hasn't been a
focal point of like processor improvements over
the years it's always been video video or compression
like you know data compression and that so there
really isn't anything out there like like the
old days where you had sound cards that had built
-in special hardware to do all that sort of stuff
it's all just dependent on the cpu so like But
I'll bet you that my dual core Ryzen here it
will outperform his like nine year old computer
Yeah, my what's funny is my old My old tower
has no Dedicated video card in it. It's got the
video that comes with the processor and it runs
fine Like I mean, it's still got most of its
guts anything that was useful. I brought over
to the new machine But it's pretty much a shell
but it has everything it needs in it. I mean,
for the most part. And my new system has an NVMe
PCI Express hard drive in it. It's got a couple
of solid states, a couple of SATA 3s and then
32 gigs of RAM and a six core processor. So I
mean, it's pretty solid, but. Oh, yeah. Just
one thing to watch out on that NVMe drive. I
don't know if you purchased anything with it,
but it's worth paying about 10 bucks on Amazon
and getting a heat sink with one of those. rubbery
sort of heat transfer pads and Holding it on
with like it could use to come to like an elastic
because MDME drives heat up like crazy like they
can go to like 100 degrees real fast and And
I was finding that I was getting really good
performance on mine initially on my main computer
I'd be like after 20 minutes and slow down to
a crawl and then I'd look at temperatures and
I was like, oh They don't even provide that's
one thing. They don't give you unless you get
like a super high -end one they don't give you
a heatsink with them. And it is something to
consider because when I put the heatsink online,
that $10 purchase dropped the temperatures to
less than half within two minutes. Because you're
basically plugging in something and it's pumping
it full of juice. It's so incredibly fast. You
can move data around so fast on those drives
now. The transfer speed is faster than the entire
hard drive space as we had back in high school
And that's just like moving files around Yeah,
and and honestly it's it's it's still I I mean
it has partially a heat sink that came on the
motherboard with it Like specifically for that
slide. Okay, so you have one of those ones where
it has that sort of like a little plate goes
over top of it Yeah, it's it's a I mean this
it's a $200 motherboard from Gigabyte made for
gaming, so it's got a lot of the built -in defenses
for heat dissipation. It's got a lot of breathing
room too, which is really nice. I went with a
medium, mid -level $150 motherboard, and that
was a year and a half ago, so mine's actually
a previous generation one that was feature -proofed.
If I had shelled out an extra $50, it would have
come with something like that, but... Yeah, that's
one thing people don't realize if they're buying
those super fast NVMe drives, is that they produce
a lot more heat than any hard drive ever has
in the past. There's a lot of movement too. Yeah,
it's just because they transfer one to two gigabytes
per second. It's like, just fathom that. You
remember downloading, if you wanted to download
a floppy disk's worth, like one megabyte back
in the day, you would take you to fill up that
drive it would take you five ten minutes just
to fill up one megabyte and now it's like oh
that one gig three you know three hour uncompressed
audio file all transfer that and it's done like
now so you know there's that comes with the cost
so it i have a feeling that with these longer
episodes, especially when there's multiple people
on it, it might be that Blanchard's computer's
age is catching up with it, because I went back
and listened to it and I didn't hear any issues.
So that's another thing to consider, like the
podcasting is, if you have more people on, the
file size when you're working with it gets exponentially
bigger. Because one person talking for an hour
on one track is one thing. when you get four
or five people you now have five times the file
size to contend with and you know it's it's it's
an interesting you know world getting into and
to bring it back to what we were talking about
at the very beginning it's like i feel like if
you really wanted to start you know a large social
network type of of podcasting network it really
should have been done in like 03 to 06 right
in the infancy of it Because that's when you
would have established your name even if you
were like a nobody then but you were around and
then as soon as Podcasting hit the public consciousness
on TV when they were talking about it when then
people start looking to be like, oh who's established?
Oh, these people have like 200 episodes already.
They must be big even if you weren't and yeah,
I think the issue is a lot of people like Twig
and GCRN got in Before the masses did in the
07 to 2010 period And then from 2011 to 2016,
there was just this massively huge boom with
everybody going, everybody has a podcast, grandma
has a podcast. And then now we're hitting the
point where it's like oversaturated. You can't
really, like if you start a podcast, even if
you have this like very fantastic idea for anybody
listening, don't expect like to get any listeners
necessarily at the very beginning. Do it because
you love it. and you may never hit that million
downloads. Most people don't. It's not like it
was in the gold rush period. But it's a lot easier.
There's a double -edged sword. It's a lot easier
to start now because you don't have to know how
to code your own HTML website. You don't have
to know RSS either. You don't have to know RSS,
which is still a pain in the butt if you don't
know how to set one up. There's not as many easy
to use. websites you would have figured somebody
would have had a here's a website template that
has it already set up for you there really wasn't
that like it was all it was still all hand done
and you remember back in the day when you had
to worry about your own storage you might only
have not just like i'm only paying for you know
a gig of storage which was expensive at the time
you would also have to pay for your bandwidth
so if you became popular your show could only
grow so big unless you wanted to put more money
into it Now with the advantage of cloud storage
and advances in just podcasting technology, you
can pretty much have an unlimited storage space.
You don't have to worry about your space. You
don't have to worry about how much bandwidth
you use. You don't have to worry about the speed.
You just have to worry about setting it up. So
it's made it so much easier to get into, but
that also means that there's so many more people
doing it. Oh, yeah. But also the most podcasters
that, I mean, there's a lot more drop -off too.
Yeah, there's a lot where they start and do like
five episodes and they're done. And I've done
a couple of new shows where that's happened,
like all fizzle out and then like... But I mean
like there's people that do it, like there's
a lot of people that do it and that never do
anything else ever again. And then the problem
is their podcasts are still up and they there
is a point where I think if you haven't put out
an episode in like a year, year and a half, don't
delete the files but it should be delisted. It
should be. It should be run dormant unless you
have a plan of action. iTunes should be like,
you should get a notification. Are you coming
back anytime in the next year? No? Okay, we're
going to close your account. We're going to keep
your files here. Somebody could possibly, you
can host them, you can search from yourself,
but we're not going to have it listed. If you
want to argue, oh, hey, I'm going to get listeners.
Well, if you haven't posted anything in three
years, you're not going to. No. at least not
under that feed, it's not gonna be worth it.
And I think if they got rid of that clutter,
two thirds of the podcasts out there would be
gone out of the most websites. Oh yeah, easily.
And then you'd actually be able to find shows
that are current. Yeah, and if your show, let's
say you stopped making a podcast and it was insanely
popular and it still gets 10 ,000 downloads a
month or something. Well, it's like, okay, great.
At that point, if you're still getting that kind
of downloads, then you should try to capitalize
on that because if you're not going to, it shouldn't
be listed anywhere. There should be a thing on
YouTube where it's like if you do not release
an episode, if you do not release an episode
at minimum every two months, you shouldn't have
it listed. No, I agree. Yeah, I mean, and I think
that's part of the problem is the market is so
oversaturated. On every front and that that's
why it's harder to actually find anybody anymore
other than these famous people Yeah, and it's
like I almost feel like hey I should be friends
with a famous person because then if you if you
guessed on one of their podcasts Then you get
listeners that seems to be the only way to get
it anymore Used to be you get listeners by having
celebrities and people show up on your podcast
It does now you get maybe like you'll get an
uptick of twice your downloads But looking at
the metrics, it used to be like if you got, let's
say, like a Mark Hamill to do a 10 minute interview,
that's 20, 30, 50, 100 times what your listeners
work. And then out of that 100 times, maybe 20
% stay and keep listening. It doesn't exist anymore
because all these celebrities go on every other
celebrities web podcast. Or they start their
own. Or they start their own. And you still get
interviews with people. And if you look, like
Twig used to get 20 interviews 20 to 30 a year
so do we we're getting maybe two to three and
it's it's part of it is like you can get more
people you can add you can request it but it's
scheduling getting the time a lot of times you'll
ask and they're like oh like what's happening
sometimes now is they're requesting fees to do
interviews fees yes I've seen that now and it's
like what or you go to a convention and you'll
have press access And they'll be like, oh, you
can do an interview. It's fine. Oh, but you're
going to be recording an interview? OK, well,
then you have to arrange that with their agent.
You have to pay a fee. It's like, no, no, no.
No, you want exposure. This is how the interview
process works. You get an interview. You do an
interview, and we both benefit. But I've seen
that happening now with certain ones I know.
Fan Expo was like that in Canada. They are also
notoriously hard to get even -price credentials
for. But there was talk at certain people. for
interviews, like they're vetting your background
and it's like, oh, if you're not in the top 10
list on iTunes or Spotify, you're not getting
an interview. And it's like, but those top 10
people are regular media that are already doing
like television interviews with you. This is
the whole point of Fan Expo to be catering to
the fans. Yeah, and that's where a lot of them
seem to be losing their ground is that they're
just not in touch with what they're actually
funding from. But and that's something podcasting
was supposed to be the people talking, you know,
in an unfiltered forum that was away from the
corporate grind and corporate rules. And it's
now becoming exactly the same. Doesn't mean we
don't like it. We're not going to keep doing
it forever and ever and ever until we can't possibly
do it anymore. It just means if people wonder
why you don't see as many interviews, it's because
the opportunities aren't popping up as much as
they used to. And when they do pop up, of course,
you latch on to them, do them. The other thing
I've discovered, and I did this earlier this
year, like actually at the beginning of this
year, doing interviews with people that aren't
necessarily famous, but they're people that put
out specialized content. And when I say that,
I mean, we had like I interviewed a plethora
of people. On altered geek like that were other
podcasters other geeks twitch streamers podcasters
producers writers, you know public speakers Producers
of other programs and And I was kind of doing
it just you know one I was a part of a podcast
Group it's an it's an email thing and basically
you submit and say, you know, they'll randomly
pick you and then you, you say, yeah, this is
my show. This is blah, blah, blah. And then you
give them the show art and then people submit
into Google doc to sign up to be on your show.
And then I, because I had so many that were asking
to be on the show, um, and I had no way of scheduling
them. I created a scheduler, uh, or I put a scheduler
plugin in WordPress on altergeek .com and Gave
them like I opened up certain timeframes that
I was available and I let them choose and when
they wanted to do it and then once that block
was filled it was filled and then I could schedule
them according to that time and I think I had
like 13 people that I I did and then like every
Wednesday I had an interview show and then every
Friday did one of these and It worked out pretty
well during that time. It wasn't like as monumental
as like, you know your uh kevin conroy's or you
know the a lot of these these voice actors or
anything but it was still it was it was different
because nobody's doing that well and that's the
thing i know with the uh like the terrible warriors
that that other podcasts that we record with
uh they have found you know their avenue with
interviewing creators of uh like Tabletop games
like they'll actually contact people like not
just the publishers the people that are writing
the games They actually will do like interview
the creators and then they'll do their playthrough
of like three or four hours of the game sometimes
with the creator of the game and that's interesting
because it's not they're not like You know people
that are looking to interview people for like
tabletop gaming. They're trying to get people
that have like larger followings that they're
trying to get your will Wheaton's on and that's
like Yeah, but he's not the creator of the game.
It's just he runs games and he's famous for that.
Yeah, you're never gonna get those type of people
again. And that's the sad and unfortunate thing
is like, yeah, you might get lucky. Yeah, or
you can rely on people you already interviewed
or people that you know in the industry, you
know, to get you around things, which is cool.
But, you know, you got to find your avenue. You
got to find the thing that differentiates you
out there now. I know Birdman is going to be
doing an interview in the next few weeks. I've
drawn a blank on the person's name, unfortunately,
but there's a horror documentary on, I forget
which AD's horror franchise, I think it's Friday
the 13th. There's the, like Mike requested, can
I get a press screener to watch the documentary,
because he's super into AD's horror. And then
they were like, oh yeah, we like your podcast,
would you like to interview the director? And
it's like. Okay, so those opportunities do still
come up and those are gonna be the interesting
ones where it's like again It's somebody who
maybe isn't the most famous person yet. They
got a movie coming out They really want to talk
about it. So it's actually more exciting to do
that. Whereas the the big Gets, you know in quotes
used to be getting all of your favorite celebrities
back ten years ago and now You know, like we
just popped up. I think it's today Today's Wednesday
I believe when I put up the classic episode,
I think it was an interview with Robert Picardo.
And it's like, those ones are cool. Would we
get Robert Picardo then? Maybe, because we've
had a relationship where we had him on before.
But if we were cold calling him now, we're not
getting him. Yeah, and that's the other thing
too, is I definitely like, we've had a couple
of repeats simply because we've talked to them
in the past. And that's... That in some of them
we've got to reach back out to again because
they've got some new content coming that we're
very interested in but it's It's definitely changed
a lot The whole atmosphere over the last, you
know, I would I would argue the last like five
six years just because I've seen numbers like
taper off I've seen traffic taper off because
like if you're not one of these big conglomerates
Or you know, you're not one of these these big
places that people are going to hear these famous
people, you know For instance like if you're
not podcast one Westwood Or you're not on one
of the top five networks where we're talking
there's millionaires running it You're you're
probably not getting you're not being able to
sign like they're signing casting agents So like
they're going to talent agencies and being like,
can we get 10 people from your thing? And they'll
be like, oh, here's who we've got that are going
to be, you know, available in the next week.
And they'll get like they're running them like
they run late night talk shows. Oh, yeah, definitely.
And I one of the problems I had. What was it?
When did I get that? I get an email. It was a
while back. There was a somebody from I want
to say it was like podcast one, maybe. or something,
I don't know, but they had a new show that was
coming and they were really trying to push it,
like really trying to push it. And they contact
me and they're like, hey, would you mind doing,
you know, an ad for this particular show? And
they were like gonna pay and everything else.
And I was like... Yeah, it would depend like
one who was this guy like to like cuz I've never
heard of him and he was like some kind of a tech
guy or whatever and I was like, I'm interested
like, you know, cuz obviously money's involved
but At the same time I have no idea who this
guy is So like it for me to talk about him like
I kind of have to have a little bit of understanding
You have to balance the whole it's also a little
offensive that knowing that they're gonna pay
you you know, whatever they're going to pay you
to promote somebody who on their first episode
will probably have more listens than you have
all year because of the money they're putting
behind this person. Oh yeah, definitely. And
that was the other thing is like he was in the
top probably the top 20 in iTunes for something.
Because now the difference from now from 10 years
ago is you can buy your way in there. Oh yeah,
well you can go on Fiverr and you can pay and
they can boost you into the top numbers. Like
I don't know if you know that yeah, there's there's
that or you know, the old -fashioned, you know,
reddit campaigns Really? So maybe like oh because
really all it takes is one person to be able
to push somebody through The problem is you got
people circling the falchers being like pick
me pick me pick me pick me. Oh Yeah, totally
and I yeah, and it kind of bothered me that they
they even approached me like that like I like
okay guys like I don't mind promoting somebody
but like I'm also not gonna be inauthentic and
like just Yeah, the money sounded good. Like
how much they were offering but I was the thing
is we're we're also You know, there's Twig is
different in that, you know, we'll we we have
an open door policy on all All the things we
can say, you know, censorship wise, we'll goof
around, we'll be very crass blue, but what we're
not doing is we're not selling dick pills. We're
not selling, you know what I mean? Like every
freaking podcast now is selling blue chew or
me undies or like, it's to the point where it's
ridiculous. It's like, it's like, really you
got to like, that's what you think of podcasting.
It's so bottom feeding that you have to sell.
prescription Viagra over the like, you know,
gray area Viagra, penis pills over the internet.
And the other thing could be too, is people just
don't see any other way of monetizing their show
and so they just kind of eat it up, you know,
and do it. No, the people that are hawking this
are the people that have a million listeners.
Yeah. Like the people on very large networks,
like they're selling crap and doing live reads
of crap that is like, like these are... You're
making enough money as it is off of your brand.
Because most of the people that are getting those
kind of listeners are also doing live shows in
person or they're selling tickets or they're
touring or it's a side business. There's almost
nobody that I've ever heard or seen that does
all these ad reads for these products that this
is their only source of income. So it bugged
me. Nobody's approached us be like would you
like to sell dick pills? I'm not saying we wouldn't
sell them. I'm saying that I'm saying for the
price if they were like You know you release
uh, you know two episodes a week We'll give you
a thousand dollars a week to talk about these
dick pills Damn straight. I'm gonna talk about
them dick pills. But if if you're just like we'll
pay we'll pay you 10 bucks an episode Screw off.
No way. It's not happening because you never
know how much they're gonna try to offer you
but like That seems to be the big one is they're
advertising pseudo stuff that I know personally
isn't legal in Canada. The Bluetooth stuff, you
cannot get it in Canada because it is listed
as an untested illegal substance. It's been caught
at the border a few times because I noticed that
some Canadian podcasts were originally starting
to sell that stuff or offer it or have the codes
for it. like American listeners I guess because
up here you couldn't get it anyway but they've
completely stopped because there's a lawsuit
involved but yet in the states they're hawking
that crap left and right there's like uh or you
have people that get the audible uh one where
it's like you know the you know mentioned get
your free of uh you know ebook on audible blah
blah blah yeah the the whole audible thing I
I did that for a while during mwire when it was
like still pretty fresh like before Everybody
else was like kind of really doing it and I never
had anybody sign up through it It was just I
mean I attacked it under the intro. It was it
was something I thought I would try You know
just to see and I want to say was like during
like 2012 or something It was when everybody
same was Amazon Associates they shut down Amazon
Associates in Canada because they weren't getting
enough people Like they were even clicking through
the links and doing it I have an account through
that, but yeah, nobody clicks on it. The thing
with Audible, they contacted me a couple of weeks
ago. Would you like to be a part of the program?
Okay, let's see what it says. Two days later,
the same person comes to me, oh, you're in Canada.
Well, we don't actually have the service in Canada.
Is that okay? Because if you mentioned it, you'll
have to say it's for American users only. Okay,
what does it entail? So you want me to promote
something that you're... Like I actually yeah,
I actually asked I said I said so you're this
is open You know wide to pretty much anybody.
Yes Okay Who hasn't signed up for one at this
point? Like who hasn't actually signed up and
taken advantage of that one free book See I figured
out what they've done They've essentially turned
podcasters that are doing this for fun to try
and make money. They've turned them into the
free advertising pool Well, and then again, it's
so saturated because it's so free and any podcast
can get it. We're at a point now where I don't
think there's a single listener out there that
hasn't tried Audible that still would like to
try Audible. I tried it. Bank, when we got it
for a movie, we can review. I tried it. I got
it for free and I downloaded a Star Trek book.
And then that was it. But I mean, like, it's
been around so long now. It's like they're not
converting new people. So I don't know why it
exists. They have it there because they don't
have to pay you anything. And because every time
you say audible, it might bring somebody back
who's already had it. So I don't think that they're
converting new people. And that's a discussion
for another day. So they don't have to pay you.
Exactly. They're tricking people into giving
them free advertising. Yeah. And this is the
other thing too. It's like, I don't know if you've
been getting inundated with people wanting to
post guest posts on your website. Oh, I can read
you one. Today all They're all from India or
China Well see this is the thing I either get
them and they either come from some like marketing
company or something or they come from a Gmail
account if they're from a Gmail account I automatically
Spam them and like I put them in my spam folder
and I wipe them out if they're the other ones
I'll humor it and I'll respond and then I wait
to see how long it takes them to respond back
But I I send them this this response because
typically I had one offer me a hundred dollars
to post a custom crafted article to GeekCastRadio
.com. And they're like, for $100, you know, we'll
do this and we'll write up this article. And
then they start telling me, you know, in the
next email, what it's about. And, you know, they're
like, you know, I, you know, I bet you get these
quite often, blah, blah, blah. You know, and
and I said. Well, here's the one I got today.
And this was to the feedback email from Bavish
Nardani. It's probably a fake name because they
usually are. So I don't mind reading it. Hi,
excuse the impersonal email. I am a London -based
copywriter. Why are you contacting us in Canada?
And write regularly for several clients that
relate to the content of your blog. The topics
I write, including interior design, lifestyle,
home products, family, and so on. I'm ready to
offer any articles at no charge to you that you
can host in your blog. First of all, the website,
yes, it's set up as a WordPress site like a blog
site, but that's not really the intention. It's
a release site to show when we have articles
released. The only blog post we really post are
when we do gift guides, or if we're doing content
on on press conferences and stuff. They will,
of course, only be shared if I think your audience
will be interested in them. First of all, and
there's a little more on search engine optimization,
you get a lot of those emails too. To give a
taster, here are some blogs they're right for.
Memorybox .co .uk, espflooring .com. Yes, flooring
and this week in geek. rhodiumfloors .com. It's
a ghostwriter, ghostwriter, ghostwriter. First
of all, I'm not giving you access to the website
to write stuff on there because as soon as I
give you access, you're going to try to grab
some crap from it. Let me know if there's something
you're interested in. We can move the conversation
forward. Keep up the excellent work. You have
no idea who we are. Outreach specialist. I mean,
it's from a real company. It's A Nova. I looked
them up. They're in London. But they're just
literally going like. they're searching for any
podcast and they're just sending out a form email.
That's just one of them. We get crazy ones or
you get the ones that are like, common ones are
search engine optimization, ones where they want
to guess writing your thing. It's one thing if
you contact us through Facebook and you want
to start up, you're like, hey, I've wanted to
write some blogs that I wanted to do. We've done
that a few times where. Birdman gave access to,
you know, some people, either fans or people
that wanted to get their start and they wanted
to write a couple guest blogs, you know, to get
their feet wet, sort of on what it's like to
publish something or to post things. And then,
you know, he'll do a few of them, but it's like,
it's on a person to person basis and not some
random person from halfway around the world that
only writes, ghostwrites articles on flooring.
Like, it would be one thing if this person was
like, hey, I also, you know, I write tech news.
Like, okay, maybe we wanted to have more of a
news section that was regularly updated with
stuff from, I don't know, some stuff that's aggregated
from Ars Technica or product news from like CES
events and that. It's like, okay, maybe, but
you know what? It would be somebody that we know
that wanted to do it. It wouldn't be a random
person in India or London or China. At least
this one was worded properly. The ones we get
from China are crazy. It's always, we make handbags
or we make sprockets and parts for cars. Would
you guys be interested in reviewing? Reviewing
what? Reviewing a car part from China? Or we
make handbags. One of these days, I'm going to
say yes, and we're going to have twig handbags
and purses. It's one of these days. Well, one
of the funny things, I get a lot of articles,
either people wanting to be guest writers, and
they're like, I have this great idea for a post,
and I'm like, most of the time I'm like, okay,
free content, I don't really care, but I still
proof everything and I make them send it to me
in an email, or I make them use the contact form
I developed on the website where they can post
the entire article there and it goes through
into the backend database that I can then copy
paste. and it's ready to go, but I don't give
anybody access. Yeah, you don't give access.
The best one that Birdman turned it down and
I was so mad at him because I really wanted the
content and I knew if anything was going to get
us listeners or weirdness would have been this
was when he randomly at E3, not this past year,
the year before was offered a gaming prostate
massager, basically a sex toy. that you're supposed
to stick in your butt while you while it was
going to be Bluetooth connected to your phone
and while you play games with certain things
happen noises happen it vibrates in your butt
and He turned he turned him down He just hit
find out no and then he messaged a bunch of other
people a bunch of other people that went to e3
that he knows the Journalism industry got the
same things and everybody turned it down. I'm
like, no, you don't turn that down. That is the
best content ever. He goes, we're not going to
use it. I said, we don't have to use it. We just
have to talk about it and explain, look at what
we got. He goes, oh, because that's the only
time where it was so outlandish that you know
it wasn't like a bot. It was somebody actually
trying to sell these things. we would have taken
it like I told myself we wouldn't take it we
wouldn't have like been like it would have been
a little disingenuous because we weren't going
to try to sell it for them but we would have
ripped it a new one and made fun of it so hard
like of all the things to get offered in one
of these like it's a prostate massager it's like
really yeah if it ever pops up again I'm telling
you do not decline that we get that we talk about
that Yeah, that would honestly that'd be hilarious,
but Yeah, I Yeah, I that's such a weird item
not gonna lie that's just weird It was so out
there that I was like, you know, there's certain
things that you turn down But your guys fan base
would would resonate with that just because it's
it's so out there Like mine would go with that
Well, I mean and it's the the image and that
you're trying to cultivate is very different,
too It doesn't mean you don't fit like you fit
in with anybody But at the same time, you know
You're the image you're putting out there is
not the image of wild video game sex toy Like
it's it's not that is a very it's very much a
twig, you know, you know weird keep it strange
unique the the fan base that Birdman has been
sort of cultivating over the years has been the
like anything is cool, bronies, like anything
that is unique, geeky to you, he takes it no
matter, you know, how outlandish it might seem
to other people. He takes it and goes with it.
And I was surprised he drew the line with this
and I'm like, dude, take him up on the offer.
Cause like it's the kind of content, not that
we're like Howard Stern, but you know, it's that
sort of attitude of - You guys are almost like
borderline there with like some of it. Yeah,
it's like, not shock, jock, it happens a bit,
but it's like, we're not, we don't restrict ourselves
to anything. And like we are the definition of
like explicit content, but it doesn't mean we're
explicit for the sake of being explicit, but
like, you know, we'll cover pretty much anything.
Like the one company sends us pornos, guess what?
We're reviewing some pornos and like we'll do
it where we cut out all the sex. I'm trying to
get back. We've got a few that we've got to do.
And the hard part is getting the edit points
to cut it out. So we review it as if it's like
a regular Hollywood movie. So these movies end
up being like 25 minutes long instead of like
two hours of porno. And it's literally, it's
like, well, the acting wasn't so great in this
part. And the people that give them to us, they're
actually okay with that because it's a different
type of content than what they're used to. It's
basically - You guys are putting it in a different
light. It's porn without porn. It's like, well,
what was they acting like? Well, the story was
hard to follow. That sort of thing. And it ends
up being funny because not a lot of podcasts
would necessarily go that way. And we'll do that.
And that's where our identity is. I almost feel
like we're the R -rated to NC17 version of GCRN.
GCRN is like the... PG -13 borderline R -rated,
if that makes any sense. Mm -hmm. And then, like,
UltraGeek is, like, PG? That makes sense? Yeah,
pretty much PG. Maybe PG -13. Depends on the
day. Depends on how angry or tired you are, or
if you have one of us on. Yeah, that's pretty
much it. Like, I can pretty much guarantee it's
gonna be probably, like... I don't know like
pretty much PG -13 most most often like he's
even some of the very slanted like I Don't know.
It's not quite not quite there. Anyway, but it's
It's kind of floats around depending on who's
on or or how irritated I am at some particular
company Yeah, usually but yeah I do get I do
get quite a bit of different contact though from
just different organizations or different blogs
that are like, hey, would you post this for me?
And I'm like, what's the context? What am I supposed
to get out of this? Somebody sent me, they're
working on an article for their site and I've
posted something from them in the past. It must
have been superpowers or something or vehicles
or weapons from sci -fi content. So they, they
said, um, you know, what was it that they sent
to me this time? Uh, it was a hundred years of
time travel and film, and it's a very short infographic.
And I'm looking at it and I'm like, there's not
enough here. Cause if you're talking a hundred
years - Are you trying to promote it on your
site sort of thing? Well, yeah, I mean they wanted
my honest commentary like written in a blog I
mean because one it's got their link on the image,
which I don't honestly care Because there's usually
residual cross -linking in some capacity but
You know they they talk about like on this infographic
about how you know in the in the movies where
anything is possible well TV does it too, but
you know Okay, I'll put that aside because this
is specifically for in film Well, then they talk
about, you know, time, uh, top methods of travel.
It says time machine, portal, science experiment,
you know, and then it's got, you know, backwards,
forward. Sounds very like, like it's a 12 year
old put it together. Some of the graphics almost
kind of give me that thought. Like somebody's
like, they're going for the bare minimum to click
the U in, but then not giving you any real examples.
Yeah, well and then this is biggest year of time
travel 10 time travel movies released in 2013.
Okay Well, it doesn't list any of them then it
says 110 time travel movies produced since 1921
and then this is top or 2 .8 billion Avengers
endgame and then it says our favorite time travel
films and then it has And I've never heard of
this film so it doesn't resonate with me and
it's it says Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's
Court 1921 yeah time travel as part of the plot
then they go Planet of the Apes the original
one then they say Superman well here's a problem
Planet of the Apes the original one is not a
time travel movie yet the second one yeah it's
not a time travel movie till the very end of
the second one like yeah Planet of the Apes is
not time falling asleep and being frozen it's
not time travel it's just normal it's just regular
sci -fi yeah It's just aging. Yeah, and and so
they yeah, they list that and then it's then
they get Terminator and then they get Bill and
Ted's excellent adventure Groundhog Day Back
to the future So they're literally they're listening
every big mainstream movie, but not necessarily.
Well, this is the thing culturally And you gotta
wait for this because then they go and then they
explain why each one is, you know you know whether
it's a time loop or you know why this and why
that or they use this you know um and then they
put harry potter in the prisoner of azkaban they
put one of the best rewind plots in history and
i'm like i'm like no i would i would argue groundhog
day is better but um yeah or even um uh edgar
tomorrow is a better repeat one yeah and so like
i send them back this message I said, because,
you know, I'm not wanting to shy away from like,
you screwed up so partially. So I go, looks pretty
cool. But I noticed a lot is missing from this
infographic. None of the Star Trek content, which
is famous for time travel, is listed. Not counting
the series, the films numbered four, seven, eight
and eleven all featured time travel in the very
in varying capacities. And you know, popularity
for is like even people that don't watch Trek
know the voice home. They're like, oh, the time
travel. It's the least track film out of all
of them. Yeah, like it's a pop culture phenomenon.
It's like, oh, that's the one where they travel
back to the 80s. Yes. Yeah. When it was shot.
And then I says also Looper, Hot Tub Time Machine,
et cetera. All those are missing. Deja Vu with
Denzel. Fantastic movie. People forget about
it. Yep. I forgot about that one, but that one
is a good one, too. But you know, I says I do
like some of the ones listed, but you can you
almost can't have a time travel list without
Star Trek in it somewhere. And then they're like,
you know, thanks for the feedback, although we
couldn't include all time travel movies in the
in the graphic alone. You know, we're going to
be expanding a bunch more in our blog post going
live next week, you know, and whatnot. OK, so
we're not including the most important ones.
Yeah, it's almost like we're going to list them
in a blog post because they're runner up. They
don't count like and it's like, OK, well. It's
like if you want to really count it though, Star
Trek did like, there were like five or six episodes
of the original series in the 60s? Did they at
least have the original or the remake of the
time machine listed? No. So the most important,
sorry, the very first time travel book ever written,
they didn't include the movies based on that?
Nope. Literally, the story that... Every single
time travel movie is based on about altering
Timelines is not included So as you can see I
was I was nitpicking and I knew there were other
ones I was forgetting I was just nitpicking because
you know, I watched track on a pretty regular
basis and It was severely lacking anyway, and
so I was having a hard time coping with that
To say the least and so Yeah, so suffice it to
say I may not get all the advertisements for
the podcast I get them for the website because
the website is old and Well, I should say the
domain name is old the website is not but There's
a lot of backlink edge. And so like I'll have
people that that'll send me a blog post and say
hey Could you link me? You know link this article
to this post or something in XYZ location and
Most of the time I delete the emails. I used
to like be nice about it like And say no, you
know, I just I don't want to go back and even
though they'll give me the URL and And I don't
want to post in there. It's mostly because like
one you're just trying to piggyback on my content
and then two It would be different if like they
were gonna pay something because I'm honestly
not going to do it for free. I don't even know
these people, so that's a seriously strong one.
If somebody offered you, they were like, hey,
I don't have cash, but I can give you a $50 Amazon
card. You'd be like, okay, for an old link on
a page that I'm not necessarily using anymore.
Yeah, I would do it for that, but there has to
be some kind of a like. Give and take like you
want something from me. You have to offer something,
you know, because yes And I've had a few people
that have like honestly just they'll PayPal stuff
and be like here you go. I'm like, okay You don't
get anything for free. This is not the case of
your friend Like you're not it's we're not like
hey Steve Can you put a new link like let's say
we were gonna launch a new site? I think yeah,
we're gonna have to update the website sometime
I'll help you with that. It's time to upgrade
the WordPress and all that, but even doing that
- You might want to move web host while you're
at it. That's something we'll talk about at another
time. But yeah, we're at a point now where because
we're not hosting the episodes ourselves on the
site, it's redundant having it the way it's set
up. We'll still have the backlog and have everything
there. We'll still probably end up using WordPress
or something, but we might - It's time for a
refresh because this is Twig 4 .0 and it's probably
been 4 .0 for what, nine years now? It's about
5 .0. Is it 5 .0? Yeah, I made the last two versions
of the site. Okay, but still, it's been about
five, six years, right, in this current format,
if not more. Yeah, something like that. So it's
probably time to make it a little more cohesive
and tighten it up a little bit. But let's say
we relaunched a new version of the site, the
new logos and everything, and we were like...
Hey Steve, could you put a link to us on yours?
Yeah, we're really good friends and we have cross
-promotion, we do podcasts together. It's a different
story of me asking you, or you asking us, than
some rando. Oh, exactly. Or if you get feedback
on the regular basis, you had one of the fans
say, hey, I'm watching my own podcast on anime
or something. Would you mind putting a link in
there? Sure, because you know who the person
is. If it was a fan, I would definitely do that.
They've listened to me. It's only fair. I would
do it. But yeah, it's kind of amazing. And I
guess they're playing a numbers game. They're
sending a wide net. They're just like, here,
they did a search for, let's say you talked about,
or let's say there's a product that came up that
you talked about for whatever reason. And that's
the key term they search for in Google. They
found every podcast that had a review or talked
about this topic. They're sending a form email
to everybody. And they're just hoping that one
person will post that link. Oh, definitely. And
I, yeah, I just don't I don't play by that game.
It's I don't have that kind of time on me. Yeah,
and I know like there there was even stuff like
I know Birdman was offered to work for I forget
what website it was, but they wanted him to write.
articles on things and the pay they were going
to give, a lot of these websites, these blog
sites, what they offer is not even like a word
per minute. I remember he ended up asking, so
what's my rate per word? And they were like,
what? And this is like a fairly, we're talking
website that was getting probably a million traffic
per month. And it's like, They didn't understand
the standard rates that you get paid to write
for, like that you learn in school for journalism.
And he's like, yeah, so what am I getting paid
per word? And they're like, well, what we were
giving, it's like a per article fitting. And
it's like, well, how long has the article got
to be? And then they're like, well, it's got
to be a minimum of this and this and this. And
he's like, so he didn't pay the math. He's like,
so you're saying I'm going to be working for
less than a dollar to a dollar per hour? Because
of what they were sort of expecting the length
and they're making sure that it's concisely and
there are people that think like all get 50 bucks
to write this article it's like But if it takes
you five six hours to write the article, it's
not worth it Yeah, see and I can comment on that
because when I was working for one tech website
writing and while I was laid off They They would
pay you $30 for a 400 word article Or up to 500
words and then the other one they would pay $50
up to a like between 700 and like a thousand
and At the time like I had no income. I didn't
really care but I was blowing like three three
to four hours on the longer ones because They
would give you articles that you had no idea
any of the like the tech information Like I had
to write articles about iOS devices. I've never
owned one and I don't like them It's insane.
They'll give you the basics, like here's what
we want you to write about or here's the topic
and then it's like go on and put it in your own
words so that it sounds like it came from you
and it's like. Well, in this particular site
though, they would basically take articles from
two to three other sites. Mostly it was the same
site. They would say, hey, we want you to write
this article. This is the basis and this is the
link. And you have to do the, the SEO linkage
for, you know, Google purposes of cross -linking
in the website on the post. And we want a minimum
of five of those. Then you get to write the,
uh, thing for the newsletter. And then you get
to write the title and then, you know, the whole
article. And if there was any pictures or anything
else and. Or video or something. And I wrote
probably 40 articles for them. And then they
had some kind of a staff changeover and I never
heard from them again after that. I mean, I got
paid for all of it, but it was still like I never
heard from them again. And I was like turning
out articles faster than anybody else after I
got the hang of it. But and they were all quality
articles. It's just that, you know, just whatever
reason, they just stopped contacting me back
and I'd email them like, hey, I'm ready for more
articles and they'd have to assign them. I haven't
heard from I can still log in, but I don't I
don't see anything now. But it's again, it's
like. they don't want Fox to write their content
because then it comes out looking like garbage.
Like how many times have you gone to look for
a review on a product and either a YouTube channel
is just the product spinning in a picture with
like Microsoft Sam reading off the specs or you
go to a website and you're looking for the review
and it's the same review on 30 or 40 websites
and it's just listing the product and telling
you why it should be good. Not that it is good,
not that there's an actual opinion, but why it
should be good based on the specs. Yeah, and
those type of things should just be blacklisted
from Google, honestly, because it's just a waste
of internet -like traffic. And I understand that
they pay for it, but still it sucks. We're getting
to the point now where the internet is looking
like the 1990s depiction of the future internet
without ad blockers on. But the problem is you
can turn an ad blocker on, it doesn't... But
DAB blockers don't block entire websites, where
it's like, oh, this website shouldn't exist.
Yeah. There's a browser I actually use called
Brave. I don't know if you've heard of it. Briefly,
I think. So what essentially it does is it uses
the Chrome engine. And it's a browser. And it
runs just like Chrome. It runs on Chromium. It's
it functions and looks almost exactly like it.
So what it does is it allows you to You can turn
shields up and shields down for sites. So like
let's say I go to Twitter or a tweet deck and
I got shields up and what it says is 99 plus
items blocked and then it shows you whether there's
cross site device recognition blocks cross site
cookies Connections upgraded to HTTPS whether
it has to or not Then it says cross site trackers
blocked and then it shows you all of the trackers
and there's like over It's probably like 300
of them here where Twitter just tracks you on
this and so if you've got shields up they can't
track you and They get zero data from it. So
I use it whenever I'm on like any of the social
media, you know whether it's Twitter Facebook
any of those things and It's actually really
nice. I use it on Facebook. It doesn't block
as much because Facebook doesn't have as many
trackers as tweet deck does But again, if you
go to facebook .com, this is a hilarious thing
there's Google ads and Facebook campaign ads
and it blocks and that's all they are or like
pixel dot Facebook where they track your whatever
the images are or whatever with it so it blocked
14 things just from uh, like our messenger window,
for instance, or, or Hotmail, it blocks, you
know, the cross site trackers from various sources.
And so I use this and it actually it's there's
when you launch a new tab, it says, for instance,
since I started using this, uh, it says 120 ,000,
uh, ads and trackers blocked 2 ,600 websites
upgraded to HTTPS 1 .7 hours estimated time saved.
because what it essentially does is it speeds
up your internet process by blocking those right
from the get -go so your pages actually load
and it's a beautiful tool. So it's basically
like there were tools similar to that back in
the dial -up days that were like built into your
actual like net zero dialing software they were
like the internet boosters all it did was turn
on that. So yeah I remember that I remember that
and it would turn off images too. Yeah, turn
off images, turn off ads, and it would cache.
If your computer had enough storage, it would
cache the most 10, 15 most common sites you went
to, at least their landing pages, back when everything
was still using inline frames. You know what
I mean? The outskirts, the table page would have
inline frames and everything. Your menus would
load instantaneously because that stuff very
rarely changed on the website. It would only
be whatever was on the main content of the, this
is before blogging really existed, but the main
page would be different. So you could go to a
website and it'd be funny, you'd have the border
of the website loaded instantaneously and then
you'd have to wait your 10 seconds for your page
to load in the middle instead of a full minute
for everything. So something, since we were talking
about shows and iTunes and everything else, So
I'm going through, I don't know if you've gone
through the new category since they switched.
I tried to set up our categories, but I found
that it was almost, there was even less to categorize
it. There's more options, but they're tuned in
such a way that Twig doesn't fit into a lot of
them. Yeah, and that's part of the problem is
alteredGeek doesn't really fit into a lot of
them either. So it has to be like lifestyle tech
would probably be the only thing that I don't
even know if it's a category for that Not really
Like I know like TV reviews because we have a
lot of those on geek cast radio When you go to
that page like we used to have Two or three of
them in the top 20 well because a lot of the
other shows that are like famous people or youtubers
or some of these other Jack rabbits that are
in the top they Like, Tooncast is in number 40
and All Things Transformers is at number 54 or
55 under the TV reviews section. And this is
under like the TV and film, for instance. And
then if you go to, I want to say, we have a few
other shows. I'm just trying to find them. But
it's just like these new categories like while
they're great having film reviews or or, you
know TV reviews or after shows or Things like
that. You don't Unless you're one of those big
popular hosts. You're not gonna see your show
in there You'd like after buzz TV, for instance,
they put out a ton of crap well, they fill up
the after shows because they do a lot of after
shows and I feel like you the way to solve this
honestly is You should only allow like if you're
gonna be in the top 10 of a category or something
It shouldn't show up in another one the owners
like the create the yeah You should only be in
one unless there is a overlap. Let's say because
you can pick your three or whatever There's a
possibility to be the top and all three if you're
really really downloaded now at the same time,
I also don't feel like If you have after shows,
let's say you have an after show for this. There's
like a million after shows you have. You shouldn't
be able to fill up everything with your one brand.
It should be brand specific. I wouldn't mind
if like, because This Week in Geek has a few
shows we've run. Well, maybe This Week in Geek
should be listed as, it shouldn't be top shows,
it should be top producers or top brands. Because
then, GCRN, would have a higher chance of being
up there because it would aggregate all of your
listens and all of your downloads from all of
your shows. And it'd be like, here are, like,
it shouldn't be listing individual shows. It
should be listing who the creators are. Because
then the podcast ones would be screwed. Because
it would be like, sure, they have the top 10
downloaded show programs, but they would only
be listed as one. Yeah. And I think that would
help having the different networks. You know
listed once because like podcast one or studio
71. I did find the podcast that that was trying
to Have me market their show and it's that marquis
brownlee From kbhd or whatever. He does he does
a podcast called waveform and he does like tech
podcast and gadget stuff He had a youtube show
reviewing stuff and he was telling me this and
i'm like who? And i've talked to a few people
there because they're over saturated, too Yeah,
I mean, there's so many of them like I honestly
I don't care if I'm gonna listen to somebody
talking about tech I'm gonna go to Leo report
like tech team. Yeah, that's yeah, and that's
the thing like it if you had said that name I'd
be like, oh, I know that is and the fact that
he's not like number one in that in tech category
period is Now they do have a category called
they do have a category called longest running
shows under technology which he's number one,
but they also listed this this waveform under
leisure, which I don't know how this is leisure.
Like, like. The only reason it's number one in
leisure is because they mismarketed it on purpose.
So I almost wonder if you game the system by
changing your your stats to purposely get in
a different category that I put myself under
under like knitting would be. Well, like, well,
like, for instance, the poll bag. it's comics
okay they used to have a comics section on itunes
or something they're you know very similar they
have all they have now under leisure is because
it was like hobbies and and fiction or something
like that before and so that's where it was at
well now it lives under the leisure animation
in manga category which makes it sound like animation
they're making it sound like anime only like
Yeah, well it says animation and manga and so
what's funny is you have You know Saturday morning
cartoon boom or something's number one then they
got a Pokemon podcast and then they've got a
Digimon one in there and Dragon Ball Z and then
Lo and behold number eight is the pullback in
that top 20 list and it's been there and it's
been climbing to the top because it's it doesn't
fit under any other category and so therefore
it's there and Uh, so it's very humorous to me
to see how some of these things are laid out.
Um, it, because like they go from all different
ranges in here, like hobbies, that's another
area. And you've got everything from, you know,
knitting to, um, you know, ham radio to world
of war cast, you know, or trivia warfare, or,
you know, things like that. So, I mean, it's
all these weird other things. And then you've
got. I don't know a lot of the categories just
seem to be just out of whack completely It just
doesn't make any sense to me Yeah, like I'm going
to look it up now like here's like I I For the
longest time was using an iPhone and I was using
like I didn't use iTunes itself I did everything
within the phone itself So I never even really
looked at tricks like I have my list of people
that I've listened to that I've been listening
to for years and occasionally I'll drop one or
come back to it in a year or two sort of thing.
But like I've got my staples and it's like, there
is a point where, you know, I have maybe subscribed
to 20 podcasts total in a month, maybe. And I
still like, I'll download most of them, even
if I don't listen to all of them, because I want
that to be counted for some people, but like
other people will skip them entirely. There are
certain episodes I'll skip, but if you had listened
to more than 10 to 15 shows in a month, You really
don't have time to listen to everything No, like
especially with more and more podcasts going
like daily like we're trying to get Probably
one to three episodes a week out just so that
it you know You can choose what you want to listen
to or not But like there are many many shows
now that are like Joe Rogan where it's like,
oh, that's nine hours a week Just for his show.
Yeah, and it's like I used to work for Glenn
Beck and he does nine hours and actually does
three hours Every day like Monday through Friday
And then he releases the same thing on a podcast.
And I mean, with him, you'll have, and people
like him, you'll have a listener base that maybe
only listens to his show. That's it. They listen
to nothing else. So you'll have, when you get
a certain size, you can have an audience like
that that literally only listens to you. Which
I don't know if it's really worth that. It used
to be back in the satellite radio days But like
the problem is a lot of these hosts are treating
it like satellite radio what it's not So it's
top shows top shows now. This is is this only
gonna show me Canada It you yours will okay mine.
So I'm gonna show number one show in Canada is
Zane and Heath unfiltered Then party lines uncover
which is a CBC Canadian to the for the number
two and three are Canadian CBC broadcast ones.
I guarantee you nobody's listening to those that's
being paid for I mean, that's that's public public
television. That's being paid for Then Joe Rogan's
number four call her daddy Barstool sports is
number number five The Daily which is the New
York Times summary as number six. Okay, that
makes sense It's summary of the news Ted Talks
Daily clearing I haven't heard of any of these.
Okay, number 16, the social. You know what the
social is? It's the Canadian version, it's the
Canadian view. It's basically the Canadian view
that they couldn't get, it's a bunch of women
tackling over stupid crap on CTV that my grandma
watches every morning. And they have apparently
a show because here's a question. What 80 year
old women are listening to this on podcast form?
Nobody. Or to make it number 16 on the list of
all... It's probably the same people that watch
The View. Okay. Yeah. Okay. Number 19 on the
list. It's Canadian true crime. It's true crime
documentaries talking about it. That's cool.
I understand why that's there. That's something
that people like to listen to on their computer
before bed. Like it's the whole like... Apple
Keynotes is number 22. There's a lot of CBC stuff
here that's in the top list and it doesn't make
sense to me because I know that there is a big
push for it. I'm wondering, I don't know, like
there's not a lot, like CBC produces really good
dramas and really good documentaries. They're
like, what if you mixed like, that's a good example.
It's like, what if you mixed HBO with a national
broadcaster at the same time? That's sort of
what they do. or like the BBC in the UK. There's
other stuff here that, I don't know, like literally
out of the top 50, I've heard of maybe five.
One of them is Dr. Death, that was popular from,
what is it, Wordaleer, where it's a documentary
about the guy, the doctor that killed a whole
bunch of patients and got away with it. Oh, okay.
Dr. Phil. What else we have here so so you want
to know you want to know okay number number 46
is Bill Burr Makes sense. Okay comedy podcast.
He does it, you know Every week. He's really
popular. I saw him live here funny And then again
a whole bunch of nobodies and then it looks like
I can break it down based on category Which I'll
do while you tell me what you're gonna say So
I was gonna say that So under the and this is
why I think it'd be funny to try just to just
to see how this works Because the whole Apple
system is a joke How they lay out iTunes because
or Apple podcasts Because I'm under and this
is a gripe I had a few weeks ago because it shouldn't
be here But it's it's a flaw in their system
so under Podcasts religion and spirituality longest
-running shows under that category Guess what's
number eight? You'll never guess it Well, let
me see. I'll tell you what number eight is in
Canada rhythms under my spirituality. Yes rhythms
rhythms for life with looks like Reverend somebody
and then if I go forward There's a Christian
storytelling one. Meditation minis. Another one's
like yoga. Bible Project is number three. Number
one is Oprah's Super Soul Conversations. Weird.
Oprah's not even on this one. Yeah, so the number
eight show, Smodcast. Okay, let me look to see
if it's in mine anywhere. And guess what is number
26? Fat Man Beyond. Oh, okay. Neither one of
them fit under spirituality and religion. But
yet they're here and they're in the top 25. It's
not... None of that is listed under mine. Also,
we don't have nearly as many categories. Maybe
they didn't roll it out for everybody. So everything
does look proper. It looks like there's like
Muslim ones. There's Jewish ones There's spiritual
it actually looks pretty Jesus calling stories
of faith. There's a lot on here But let me scroll
up and see I'll tell you the categories we have
because I clicked on store And then I clicked
on top and then I put that category so I'll see
what there is So we got news comedy sports history
true crime Society and culture, arts, business,
education, fiction, government. God, that would
be boring. But that's probably also all like
the political commentators. Health and fitness,
kids and family, leisure, music, religion and
spirituality, science, technology, TV and film.
And that's it. I think those are the old categories.
Yeah, we got the new ones here. So I know that
they've rolled it out up here because I know
that I had to select new ones from the iTunes
Podcast Connect. Yeah, I don't know. I'm just
so sick of the whole iTunes thing of how it breaks
down information. It seems like they didn't change
much in the last 10 years. It was really popular
for about six years, and then they just did nothing
with it. Well, it's basically when they stopped
caring about the iPod. You mean when Steve Jobs
died? Yeah. That's when they stopped it. I'm
just logging into the feed. And I just wanted
to see what are categories it listed under, because
I couldn't remember. Yeah, because like the top,
what's funny is all the stuff they like Studio
71 is garbage. Trying to see where it tells me
what categories I'm under. Well, if you're on
Spreaker, all you have to do is go into the show.
the individual showing them on the SSD customization.
It's so convoluted, even just getting things
posted there. At least with Streaker or these
platforms, they'll actually push things out to
iTunes as an extra thing. iTunes used to be the
be -all, end -all, and now it's just an extra.
I know. What's funny is we get more traffic from
Spotify than we do iTunes now. We don't. Let
me see where we get ours from. But first, actually,
let's see the feed. And see, this is the sad
thing, is they have a thing called featured providers
on the homepage of the store. So like Washington
Post, NPR, Comedy Central, Vox Media, iHeartRadio,
The Ringer, Podcast One, New York Times, Wondry,
The Economist, Night Vale, Forever Dog, Slate.
Okay. Bloomberg, Entertainment Weekly, Twitch,
ABC News, ESPN, CNN, Wall Street Journal, Audio
Boom, Campfire, The New Yorker, and Starburn's
audio. So like, basically anything under those
flags should not be anywhere in the whole lineup.
Okay, I remember now I was torn here because
the three categories we have for iTunes now,
we're listed under entertainment news, video
games, and film reviews. Because we do all those.
But we also do a lot of tech news, but tech news
and entertainment news are considered two different
categories. So you just do the master one news.
You'll just you'll never get anywhere with that.
I know. So that's what we've got there, but like
I'm going to see what the breakdown is, because
I know I was surprised like like that of how
many platforms it pushes out to like I now that
I've got the the pixel, I'm using the the Google.
podcast app, it is not nearly as good as running.
One thing I will give Apple is their podcast
app. Stop talking to me. I pressed the button
and now it's talking to me. You're like, go away,
stop. Go away, assistant. But anyway, it's not
nearly as good. The iTunes podcast app is fantastic
on the iPod and on the iPhone. It is by far the
absolute best. way to listen on mobile, period.
There's nothing that comes close to it. It's
the one thing that they've kept strong even if
everything else about them is falling apart.
It's the one thing that Google and Android just
haven't been able to do, is make a good podcast
app. Because I've got the Spreaker app on my
phone as well, and it's way better than the built
-in podcast app. That's because Google's is not
a dedicated app. That's the thing. You have to
download it separately, even though it's made
by them. It uses a few APIs and interfaces. Yet,
for instance, if you close the app by swiping
up to close all your apps, it will not stop the
audio. You have to do it manually. Oh, yeah.
OK. So let me see. The breakdown of what we've
got. Where's that button here? Sources, right?
Or are we looking at sources? Yeah, sources.
So our media break up is 39 % is Apple Core Media
iPhones. Then generic Android app is 14%. Chrome
is 10%. So that would be people just listening
on the website. Yep. iTunes. The program itself
is 10%. iPods, sorry, is 5%. Somebody's using
the Opera browser, and that's 5%. It's Mike.
I understand. Probably. iPads is 5%. Somebody
listens, or 3 % of people do Apple watches. I
don't know what overcast is. podcast addict Google
podcast is 0 .3 % then we don't have any listeners
on Spotify like at all which is surprising because
I know it pushes out to oh wait a minute somebody
else has that's right somebody else has this
week in geek on there and they haven't had a
podcast in three years, and I contacted Spotify
to say, hey, this is a non -existent thing, we're
an existing brand that's been using this name
for 12 years, and then I was waiting for them
to determine whether or not we should be allowed
to be using this name without anything else in
there, because the classic feed that I created
works on there because it has the word classica,
whereas... just playing this week and geek will
not work on there. That's the thing that pisses
me off. If you have not had a podcast in three
years, you should be removed. Yeah, it's just
crazy to me. At least now we can break down and
see what everybody's actually listening to us
on. But it is funny that you guys have more people
on Spotify and then we still have a lot of iPhone
users. Yeah, and they were saying that it was
weird that we had that problem. Let's see here.
I noticed on your regular This Week in Geek feed
that everything is double. That happened. Something
weird happened, and it was actually to do with
Vlog Talk. It was put in some sort of weird feed
loop where it doubled the feed up. And I had
to go in and be like, stop. And it happened like,
it shouldn't be doing it anymore. But it happened
like one day where I was like, Birdman goes,
hey, is it wrong with the feed? And I'm like,
why? He's like, I think I'm seeing double. Yeah,
as of the August 31st, that's when it stopped
happening. OK. And the other issue is there like
I've noticed that there's I Think I have to go
into the website and change the feed on there
because it's pulling the feed from a couple sources
because I think the actual Feed from the website
If you click subscribe to the RSS feed on the
website, I don't think it's pulling from the
same source Hmm and there's there's a couple
issues where it's When you got to feed this old,
I think it's pulling from a few different places.
Because when I searched This Week in Geek through
Google Podcasts, it found two different feeds
of This Week in Geek, one with the current artwork,
one with different artwork, and it's the same
content. I can tell you why part of that is,
and that's because the website is set up to be
more or less the distribution hub. Yeah, yeah,
that's that was that was the original setup so
Yeah, it's time for first and it's got the current
logo. That's the funny thing and the one that's
on the RSS feed does not The website does has
the current one, okay Like the current design
and everything so it's it's actually kind of
funny because I don't think it's actually pulling
from that anymore so okay, so For the classic
feed, we kind of get this working with Spotify
because the classic feed, which has minuscule
downloads, because it's all reposts of the interviews
and stuff, that is 67 % Spotify. And then everything
else tapers off to nothing. So if we can get
the main feed working on Spotify, You're probably
looking like it would double or triple our listeners
Maybe I'm just gonna have to put the main show
I'm gonna have to double up the show If I get
if they're unwilling at Spotify to say hey these
guys were first of all that podcast that stopped
three years ago it's just a copycat of ours and
like the president of us working is like we were
operating six years before them and three years
after they ended. There's one called This Week
in Geek by the Southgate Media Group in America.
It stopped producing content a year ago. Birdman
said he used to get emails every now and then.
He would get an email from somebody saying, Hey,
you're using our name. Stop using us. And he
was like, uh, correction. We've been running
like 10 years longer than you. Like some people
try to pull the thing of like, uh, uh, you know,
you're, you're pulling it. And then we've actually
had people tweet at us. Like it was great being
a guest on this week in geek and that's like,
um, that's nice, but, uh, who are you? We haven't
had somebody who's like, We do this. I was a
tabletop gamer. It was like, oh, I had a great
interview. I was on This We Can Eat because they
don't have the Twitter handle because we've had
the Twitter handle since 2008. Somebody will
think it's us. I have a form letter I use now
where I go. Basically, I'll tweet back at them
and be like, oh, sorry. I think you got us confused
with a copycat of ours. but you know we do the
same sort of interviews we've been out this long
and with 1 ,300 episodes and you know if you'd
like come check us out and you know and you know
smiley face and I got it'll be like a passive
aggressive thing at the people that not at the
person who like was interviewed but the people
that are pretending to be twig mm -hmm and if
their argument is if they're like oh you know
it's not the case we've never heard you know
we've never heard you bull bull yes because you
use the name and you're marketing yourselves
as the same thing. And the time that you would
have signed up, you would have been looking for
that Twitter handle. You would have been looking
for that web domain. And you would have been
like, oh, crap, somebody else is there. And you're
just like, well, we'll just hope we'll get bigger
and get to the point where we can claim that
we were there first. And you get a lot of people
that do that with other podcasts, too. It's like
they don't realize how copyright works, that
you don't even have to file it. you just have
to provide proof that you were there first. The
proof's in the pudding. It's like, oh, would
you like to see domain receipts for going back?
First of all, would you like to see content?
Would you like to see episode one? Would you
like to see our interviews that we did seven
years before you existed? Would you like to see
the receipt from our web domain that we've been
paying for for 13 years? We had somebody do that
with remote control, the telecast, Couple other
shows. Well, yeah, but let them take it because
I've been waiting for episodes for like years
now So let somebody else do it Yeah But yeah,
you get people try to say claim your domain or
claim your your your content or something Mm
-hmm And to be honest like the world wide web
is a big big place but the name of your program
and the type of content that you do and we do
is unique enough that you would have to know
we exist before you start something. Yeah. It's
not like we're an upstart with no media presence.
Like, you know, people in the industry, people
in radio, people in television, people in video
games, they know who we are even though we're
not like... We're not like an IGN level or anything.
We're not even, you know, we're not close to
anything there, but we're known within the industry
enough, more so than those podcasts are that
are starting up. So what I know it pisses Mike
off and pisses me off is like the goal for you
to pretend that you didn't know and then try
to claim that, try to get something out of us.
Or we've had people contact the feedback email,
like the speaking .net saying, oh, we've got
the .com available for sale, 10 grand. F off.
ThisWeekendGeek .net has been that domain forever.
If we acquired the .com, we wouldn't even use
it as the main thing. We would use it as a redirect
because .net is the brand at this point. There
would be no point. That would be like if you
acquired 12 different domain names or domain
and you would just use them as redirects to your
main site anyway. So it's like, we're not giving
it 10 grand for the name that we already have.
That the .com means nothing when the .net domain
that we've been using is what gets us traffic.
Yeah, I don't know. It's getting a little crazy
out there with a lot of the copycats and everything
else going on. I almost thought as a joke. I
was going to start a GCRN rival website. I just
pretend to be somebody completely different,
anonymize it, and just see how far I could get
before I saw you and our Blanchard. More likely
Blanchard throw a conniption fit over it. Are
you kidding? Blanchard wouldn't even notice.
I would notice before he would. He wouldn't even
notice until I called, it's like with the host,
Dave TFG2. Cranford or something make it a full
parody and he probably wouldn't even be able
to tell well like I Had somebody oh, that's what
it was somebody try to steal all things transformers
All right, I'm like I've been around since 2008
buddy, sorry Well they tried what tried to claim
your content or tried to like website name Oh,
they like just like tried to sign up for or tried
to claim that you took it from them or something
Well, they they just took the social handles
and everything else and all this other, you know,
like just purposely trying to Well, you haven't
had the case where like they've downloaded your
episodes and then tried to pass them off as their
own I've had that happen before with a couple
of shows specifically mwire and I'm like more
power to you except for the fact that if You
know, you know, don't get hit with copyright
before I will but not to mention that in your
show you all the links would be towards you like
in the audio they have to cut that I hope that
it would make no sense Because it would all be
redirected to you in the first place But yeah,
and I've heard of people having them happen like
it's different thing where like if We share a
show and you know, we like we have a few of them
where we syndicate it a few days later It's like
because you're in a partnership on a show that's
different than what I was talking about is like
when somebody goes and is like We're just going
to data mine your entire content archive and
try to find a way to monetize it somewhere else.
People do that with YouTube all the time. They'll
take somebody's podcast, like Rogan was a big
one where they'll take their content and just
flip the image to reverse so it doesn't hit the
algorithm, or pitch the audio up and down and
then try to get like 100 ,000 views for posting
a podcast. The bots are getting smarter, or the
algorithms are getting smarter at finding these
sorts of things. And I don't think it happens
quite as much with podcasts, but I think if you
were somebody that had a massive following, you'd
have a lot more of that happening where somebody's
trying to find a way to take your feet. But now
that Spreaker and all these content platforms
push your content to multiple things like iHeartRadio
and everything, I think it's a lot less likely
for these sorts of things to happen. except in
the case where somebody was on Spotify before
we were with the same name, and it's the exact
same name. That's why it wouldn't accept it when
we tried to push it through. Because if I pull
them up, that's what's infuriating. What's more
infuriating is it's like if they had a better
sounding podcast, people, when your podcast sounds
like crap, it's like, oh, you're dragging our
name down. Oh, yeah, totally. I totally can relate
to that. But I think that about wraps up this
conversation, though. Yeah, I was going to say,
it's not even the topic we were going to be talking
about. No, but it kind of ran its own course.
So I guess we got this out of our system, and
then should we give it a teaser what the topic
was going to be? Yeah, totally, totally. So next
week, we'll... Well, I'll let you interrupt since
it was your idea originally. Sure. So I'm going
to, you know, set the stage here. We had a private
discussion. We're like, what are we going to
talk about? You know, we've got a few ideas floating
around. And I said, OK. I had recently watched
a few weird ads pop up like old commercials on
YouTube. And I was like, you know what? Advertising
for children and kids and adolescents now, which
I don't see a whole ton of because they don't
really keep regular TV, but. from what I do see
is dramatically different from everything pre
-2000. And it was going to be an interesting
topic of how advertising for toys, for food,
for everything has changed how they market to
kids over the years. And then that could sort
of parlay into other topics later on. Especially
the 90s seemed to be the peak. 80s had a lot
of ads for kids, but I think the 90s is where
they really made the push for children's advertising,
and then the dramatic changes happened shortly
after. That was my idea for the topic that we
were going to talk about before it was all about
podcasting landscapes. Totally. Until next time,
we've been - Alex. And I've been Steve and so
you can get a hold of us on the social medias
at At this week in geek I'm Pretty much anywhere
at this point. I should probably make a little
recording that we pop in here with everything
Because you can contact us so many different
ways Alex at this week in geek .net feedback
at this week in geek .net Twitter you can get
a hold of me deafface swag or just this week
in geek And you can get a hold of me on geekcastradio
.com or at AlterGeek or at SCP21. So until next
time, get AlterGeeky with the AlterGeek.
No chapter markers for this episode.
Hosts
More from Altered Geek
All Episodes →
Skydance Acquires Paramount, DCU Critiques, and Audible AI

AI Dystopia, Corporate Mergers & "Memoirs of the End" with Author Vincent Ryland

Transformers 40th Anniversary Release, Darkwing Duck Casting, Toys R Us Comeback, Gremlins 3 Teaser & Studio Re-releases
