CINEMA GEEKS
Max Payne Review

About this Episode
Hey, this is Greg burger and you are listening
to the geek cast radio network Hello and welcome
to episode 159 of The Cinema Geeks. I am one
of your Cinema Geeks optimists, Solo. Joining
me today is Hard Candy Mandy. Hey, bros. Move
your vault, Dan. I guess you would be one of
the other bros. Yeah. Hey, Dan. I think so. I
think so. We're all bros. And Mr. Ferthesent,
how's it going? Hi. Hi, we are here. We are back
for our first episode of the 2018 year, the calendar
year, so we're getting back today into some unfinished
business. We still have a few video game films
to cover, and I know you all are very excited
about that. Right, Matt? Dan? Amanda? What? Yeah.
Oh. Boomin' with excitement. Eventually we will
be done with this. So we're covering another
video game film today We're gonna be talking
about Max Payne if you guys are familiar with
our track record at this time of the year You
know the past two three four years of records
You're probably thinking that this is an odd
thing for us to be doing because usually we have
a whole slew of end -of -year beginning -of -year
type things that we do at this time of year And
that will be coming so don't fret we will all
be doing our movie awards our best of list here
coming up next episode then we'll be getting
into our box office predictions, our most anticipated
films. doing the final tally on our winter predictions
that we made back in the day. So we'll be doing
all that and taking care of all that business.
But we wanted to get one more video game film
sneaking in there before that. So we're here
today to talk about Max Payne, which is a 2008
Canadian -American neo -noir action thriller
film. That's what it's listed as on Wikipedia.
Based on the video game series, obviously of
the same name, Max Payne, this one stars Mark
Wahlberg, Mila Kunis, Beau Bridges, Ludicrous.
Chris O'Donnell, I didn't know he did any films
in the last decade. Nelly Furtado and a few other
people. Karl Lenko and some others that some
people would recognize. What we normally do though
is we start off talking about just the video
game. So Dan, we'll start with you. Did you have
any experience growing up or in the last decade
playing Max Payne games? I did. I did play Max
Payne quite a bit. Actually the first game. And
I remember when hearing that they're making a
Max Payne movie, thinking, well, that makes a
lot of sense because it's presented, basically.
It was like, you could legitimately just do that
story. So yeah, I did play Max Payne. Did you
enjoy the games? I did. I was a big fan of the
crime genre. And it was like, it was feeling
like you were actually participating in like
a classic noir film, but in the video game realm.
So I thought it was really effective on that
end. Excellent. Amanda, did you ever play Max
Payne? No sir. Matt, what about you? Yeah, I
played through the entirety of the first game.
I loved that game. It was definitely a grim and
edgier game than I was used to at that time.
Your health bar increased not by med packs like
you would see in Half -Life, but by taking painkillers
and you would get a limp and stuff. And it had
bullet time, which was the coolest thing back
then. Like you always were trying to jump one
way or the other to slow down time. Like it was
it was pretty huge when it came out. All right.
So you two are going to be able to speak to this
the most because I never played a Max Payne game
either. So how well does the movie represent
the games that you guys remember playing? Matt,
we'll start with you. Oh, man, like it's very
similar, like it's pretty much. A lot of the
beats are the same, right? Like the good cop
going rogue trying to figure out who killed his
wife for way too long and baby for way too long.
Like all of that was in the game. I don't remember
if the mega corporation thing was in there or
not, but I mean, it's been almost 20 years since
that game came out. Apparently the person behind
the game was not a big fan or at least the CEO
of 3d realms and producer that was behind the
game Scott Miller He actually was very much against
it made a lot of statements about the game when
it or the film when it came out because he Didn't
like some of the minor things I guess that they
changed He didn't like that the audience didn't
know why max was seeking revenge And I guess
there was some minor details that they kind of
changed around as far as who did what and when
certain things happened Dan, what about you though,
when it came to the gameplay that you remember,
did it have the same type of aesthetic or the
same type of feel that at least the game did?
Somewhat, it felt more heavily CGI and like blue
screen, which is weird to say compared to a video
game, but like, I think it had more of an artificial
feeling to it when I was watching it. Like it
felt like if you're a drunken friend, Was trying
to explain the game to you and then like kind
of got the major beats but like kind of messed
up all the things in between Best way to subscribe
it gotcha gotcha So it seems like it has some
parts of the game that might be represented there
definitely has some of the characters and some
of the events But it seems like they did take
some some liberties as far as what they wanted
to create and what they didn't add in there I
know the one thing that I read as far as like
the Valkyries or the the demons or whatever is
represented in the film is not something that
was Evident in the game, but then I guess in
the film that's supposed to be part of a hallucination,
but it was never really clear that that's what
was going on to me. Yeah the game was much more
subtle with things and like I don't know like
how much Mark Walmart had to do with it but it's
he like played the game or had an idea of the
game but like wanted to I don't know like make
things cooler but by doing that he made it kind
of just dumber. Gotcha gotcha, so I guess a middling
score as far as how well it represents the game
from what it sounds like from what you guys are
saying as far as the actual film had a budget
of 35 million dollars and actual worldwide gross
is 85 million so more than double its budget
if you include both domestic and international
monies Interesting thing though here. I wonder
if you guys know what else was happening back
in October 17th 2008 This film opened up number
one at the box office That week that weekend
so it had made seventeen and a half million that
weekend and beat The other new films that were
released that weekend which were the secret life
of bees the film W and sex drive So that was
the stiff competition it was facing back in October
of 2008 It's a rough week of movies and I I will
sadly admit that I was part of that because I
did I did see this in theaters when I came out
and I Think it was opening weekend. I don't know
for sure, but I do know I did see it in theater
so you can partially blame me It was very similar
to the money that Hitman, Resident Evil, and
Silent Hill made, as far as domestic goes. So
it was very in line with those, I guess, from
a box office standpoint. From a critical standpoint,
not. as favorable. It was universally panned.
It has a current Rotten Tomatoes score of 16%,
which is based on 131 reviews. Mark Wahlberg
received a Golden Raspberry Award nomination
for Worst Actor for his performance in the film.
He lost. Anybody want to take a guess as to who
he lost to in 2008? Mike Myers for the film.
Guru? The love guru. Oh boy. So we're fired to
beat him out there when it came from that. So
that's what the critics thought of Max Payne,
but let's see what we thought of Max Payne. Amanda,
you haven't talked yet about the actual film,
so what were your thoughts of watching this one?
I actually like this movie. I've seen it a few
times, probably like a handful of times. Even
though I never played the game and didn't have
any attachment to it, I still thought it looked
super cool. But I also like Sin City. I think
that they're super similar in like look and tone.
I liked the Valkyrie scenes. I thought they were
dope. I knew that they were hallucinating. How
do you say this? Hallucinations. Hallucinations.
But I thought that they were done in a super
cool way where if I wanted to believe that these,
you know, people were actually being taken away
or killed by these Valkyries, you could because
they look super cool. I think that... The the
same chick is in hitman and Max Payton, right?
scandalous lady Mila Kunis's sister in this You're
asking remember details about this film at this
moment. Oh, look curry lanko. Yeah I think it's
funny that we have this movie pack of Max Payne
hitman and like Babylon ad in the same chick
as in the last two I don't understand why Babylon
ad is in that pack but Maybe I don't know. So
that it's not an entire ripoff? So your overall
initial reaction is positive? Yeah, and I liked
the whole drug aspect. It was believable as far
as made -up warrior drugs go. I'm gonna process
that statement for a second here. Matt, what
was your take on the film? Oh man, like... I
can see what it wanted to do, right? Like it
wanted to be like a noir detective film, but
it wanted to have like a modern edge. Like it's,
it's not terrible. It's just not good. Like it's
like, it's so middling with every choice it makes.
I don't know. I don't want to trash it cause
it's not terrible. Like it tries and is better
than a lot of the movies we've watched. That
is a ringing endorsement in this film series
for sure Dan, where do you fall as far as your
reaction to the memorable Max Payne? Yeah, I
think that is ultimately the biggest thing about
it is it falls in line with some of the other
movies that we've done We've done some really
horrible awful films Someone's that are like,
okay legitimately either intentionally or potentially
funny and then like this to me is middling of
the road and but also just ultimately forgettable
because as as a Matt said there's nothing like
I would say that is awful like I like like, you
know makes you question everything they're doing
there's some What is doing wrong or like normal
movie wrong things like if that was a very good
sentence But it's not like it was like put together
just horrifically or you know, it's not it's
not postal or something like that that is just
an awful piece of garbage that has no business
existing. It's just like some of the plot details
are a little muddled and looking at, for example,
the murder that establishes this entire plot.
When you kind of look back at it in the entire
movie that was spurred from it, it kind of never
really establishes the purpose behind that murder
or why it happened or things like that. Some
of the details make little sense or... You know
some continuity issues, but like they're normal
plot problems I think though like a lot of that
could because a lot of Norse I kind of have similar
issues would be fine if simply like Mark Wahlberg
was more memorable like This is a type of character.
I don't think works really well for Mark Wahlberg
the subdued like more, you know internal type
of character he's better like being obnoxious
or something like that it just doesn't it just
makes him boring as a character and then when
the action does come it's not as interesting
as it could be i i kind of applaud the fact that
it doesn't try to overuse like things like full
of time but also it felt like he could try to
use it a little bit more because the one sequence
we did get was probably the the best sequence
of the entire film I didn't hate it. I didn't
love it. It was just kind of there. It existed.
I think that sums up my thoughts too. It's a
movie that is not actively making me angry or
anything like that. It's not laughably bad as
we get with a bunch of the UA Bowl films. But
is there anything... Noteworthy about it. Is
there anything that stands out? Is there anything
that I'm gonna remember about it? I I mean honestly,
do you give more points to something like a couple
of the UA bowl films because I'll remember at
least more of those films than I'm going to of
this film even though this is a better put together
and realized film so But it is just so forgettable
to me and and I think that's the where it's gonna
Just kind of fall just in that average zone i
just i don't know i like even trying to remember
different scenes in different plots i'm struggling
very much with that. So I had a question for
you guys because it seemed like the one thing
that the critics kind of agreed on kind of touches
on a little bit of what Amanda was talking about.
This is, you know, both with the Rotten Tomatoes
and a couple other critics that had some reviewers,
a couple quotes from them, both some stylish
action. Another one said that his images are
richer than his plots. Another one said that
the most striking element is the production design.
So, you know, obviously Amanda made a reference
to Sin City and some of the aesthetics and some
of the visuals. Dan or Matt is that the best
thing about this film is the production design
and the the style or Or do you feel that there's
other things that are bright spots for it? Man
it's a good question I guess for the time it
probably looked a lot better. I know looking
at it now Ten years later. I'm thinking of specifically
like that, you know when that went out on the
ice sequence and things like that It just feels
very like maybe that I kept thinking about oddly
enough was that movie the spirit? just how like
the backgrounds did always seem kind of fake,
but I don't know if that was the intention they
were going for. I'll give it at least, you know,
if I'm looking at the things that were most interesting
or the things that I would probably remember
the most, it probably would be some of those
visuals, especially those drug sequences. I think
visually there was some creativity there compared
to some of the other elements, so I can kind
of get where they're coming from, but I also
feel like sometimes the visuals just were lacking,
but I don't know if that was just... to keep
back 10 years ago. Matt, what do you think about
the visuals or the style of the film? Personally,
I didn't like the whole, like, are the Valkyries...
Valkyrie, right? Yeah. Like, are they real or
are they not? Since I didn't like that concept,
I don't like the visuals. Like, they weren't
unimpressive. Like, I mean... you know if you
look back old movies like sometimes they don't
hold up even my favorite like the the the star
wars prequels are real bad now like you could
tell that they didn't make a single clone trooper
and i think that this you know only being a few
years later does look better but they did a really
good job for how small the budget they had i'll
give them that I love the fact that with these
video game films We keep getting like lists and
rankings and quotes and stuff like that that
really make no sense Here's one for IGN. They
gave Max Payne the best video game adaptation
award of 2008 My notes only have This movie and
in the name of the king as the only two video
game films that came out in 2008 so learning
like animated movies No, it's like they're even
quoted as saying this is how sad games to films
have become that the only one Worthy of being
named the best of the year was also a movie that
we panned so it's like what is the point of doing
that? So I guess it's the best video game adaptation
of 2008 at least Amanda you had some notes on
the film that you haven't got a chance to go
to so what we're some of the things that stood
out from you in either a positive or negative
way. Oh, let's see. I like how the bad guys were
actually like bad dudes, you know what I mean?
Like they were badasses or they were like evil?
Both. They didn't have good intentions really
for anybody and it was all about, you know, certain
point drugs and revenge and power and control
and making the, you know, these super soldiers.
They knew what they were doing. They knew that
it was messing people up. But I liked that it
made it to where, like, it was believable for
me. Like, I can see the military doing this,
you know what I mean? Doing something to give
them an edge and not really caring what it's
doing to the subjects as long as they're getting
a result that they want. So I liked that the
bad dudes were believable and they were badass.
Anything else? Let's see. Oh When he's got the
naked chick in his room, he's like get your shit
and get out. He ain't about that life Okay, he's
not about that life. He knew exactly what he
was doing at that party and it wasn't picking
up chicks like how he was driven and I don't
know. I dug it. I don't really have like good
have any notes on this film Real quick Dan or
Matt we talked a little bit about Mark Wahlberg
getting a Golden Raspberry nomination. But the
one thing about this film is there are a bunch
of names that we do know. Like I said, Boat Bridges,
Ludacris, Mila Kunis, Chris O'Donnell, Nelly
Furtado, Donna Logue, who's been in a lot of
stuff recently like Gotham and those types of
things. Obviously Olga Kurylenko, we can talk
about her previous video game appearance. So
we do have some names that some people would
actually know. Did anybody give a performance
that was good? Dan, start with you. Did anybody
stand out as maybe the best performer? or were
they all Mark Wahlberg -like? I mean, I do like
Bill Bridges. Like, I do. I thought, although,
like, again, his turn of his character is kind
of strange, and why they kind of went through
the James Bond elaborate plot of trying to kill
Max Payne at the end, I guess that's just movie
magic, what have you. And Donald Logue, I enjoy
him always, you know, from back from, like, watching,
like, Grouded for Life, and I think that was,
like, on at the same time when this was out,
so... But yeah, what is kind of funny is I was
watching some interviews regarding Max Payne
just to remind myself, but hearing Ludacris talk
about his character is pretty funny because it's
like his explanation of his character and then
watching the movie, it's like, that's not at
all what he did. So that was pretty memorable.
And another interesting thing about that role
is it was written for like a 60 year old man.
But they went with Ludacris, so. I don't know
where you make that jump, but that's uh, that's
interesting. I mean how you get you gotta get
that money somehow. So I mean Ludacris I'm sure
he brought in Also, like if they if they didn't
bring in ludacris, it would have just been a
bunch of like white dudes So like like we already
had old white guy like let's get someone here
to do old white guy part two Matt what did you
think anybody that you liked in this or any other
manner? I'm gonna echo what Dan said that Donald
Logue was probably the best performance. And
I think Ludacris was probably the most likable
character because it seemed like he was trying
to figure out what was going on. And I would
have much rather had the movie just been from
his point of view the whole time. Makes sense
makes sense. All right. Well, if nobody else
has any other notes I guess we should go about
giving this one some sort of score if you can
remember the the curved or Weird scale we're
using I guess when you try to think of it within
the realms of video game films I don't know.
We've all been kind of ranking and I guess with
a curve so to speak so Dan, where do you go with
Max Payne? Where does it fall? Is it the upper
half the lower half right in the middle? What
kind of score does it get when it compares? Yeah,
kind of looking back at Max Payne, I think its
biggest problem is like what's interesting about
the video game is that you're it's taking a lot
of the tropes of the movie genre or noir genre
and putting it in a video game world. That's
what's interesting about it is that it's like
playing being in a movie, but then once you take
that and try to make a movie out of it, it's
like a case of diminishing returns. It's like
you're taking a copy of a copy. and then it loses
part of what was interesting about it, because
it's back to the medium that inspired it, so
it ends up being, in a way, kind of purposeless,
and I think that's why you end up with a movie
like this, because it's a movie that, a property
that very much was based upon the identity of
other things, but kind of making it its own,
then you're basically putting it back in a flood
of things, I don't know. It's like taking sand
from a beach, and it's putting it in a cup, and
you put it on a Display at home and it makes
sense because it's like by itself, but what you
put it back into the sand again It's just hard
to recognize That was a bad analogy. But anyways,
I Would probably say this is say this is middle
-of -the -road for me I would call it like a
five out of ten put it around trying to think
of where it would fit similar movies like doom
I think I like doom more But it's around that
same level. It felt good to watch this after
watching Pulse not too long ago. But not to the
level of some of the more competent movies, even
something like Street Fighter, Mortal Kombat,
I enjoyed much more than my experience with Max
Payne. All right, Matt, what do you think about
grades and where it compares to some of the other
video game films we've talked about? Oh, man,
I think it like... It's got one of the dumbest
fight scenes, like, of any of the movies. And
you gotta think, like, House of the Dead had
that weird one where it would do, like, a 360
zoom around every character holding one gun,
and then it'd go to the fight scene, and they're
holding a different gun, and they might have
even been in different clothes. Like, it made
no sense. But, like, this one, like, when Marky
Mark's running through an office, and there's,
like... 60 squat guys, SWAT guys, just unloading
automatic guns, and he's just running, not hiding
behind anything, just running away, shooting
over his shoulder, and it would cut back and
forth, and he's not taking any hits, and they're
going down, but he's not looking, and they're
wearing tactical armor and shit, like it's got
one of the dumbest, but at the same time, it's
not a broken movie. It functions, it does all
the things you're supposed to do, it hits all
the beats, it's just not. Amazing. So it's hard
to really rate it low. I think five out of ten
is perfect All right, Amanda there someone in
agreement there. What do you think? I'll say
like six and a half seven based on just my enjoyment
level Where does it fit in your realm of video
game? Like what does it compare to like is it
better or worse than hitman for you? Man, I see
them as as kind of the same really Okay. Originally
the film was going to be rated R2, but they shaved
some stuff off so it would get a little bit of
a lower rating as well. I'm with you guys as
far as Matt and Dan. I'm like in the four or
five range. Like it's just, it's so middle of
the road and I'm struggling with where I would
put it. I think it's a better made movie than
Doom. But did I have more fun with doom maybe
does it kind of go in the realm of hitman? I
don't know It's it's definitely not gonna be
in my top echelon and it's not gonna be necessarily
one of the three or four worse So it's just kind
of there it exists and that's about all I can
say about it So I'm not gonna be overwhelming
positive or glowing review I don't think from
from most of us that we are winding down that
we only have a few more video game Films to cover.
This was the last one of the two 2008 films as
we talked before so we're gonna make a jump next
time all the way to 2010. Nothing in 2009 to
talk about unless we wanted to go back and talk
about one of the Street Fighter sequels. So in
2010 we got to Prince of Persia The Sands of
Time. After that we just have Need for Speed,
Warcraft, and Assassin's Creed. Amanda, what's
your anticipation level for Prince of Persia
the sands of time? I'm actually excited to watch
it because I've seen it once before and I Feel
like I liked it headphones. It'll be a first
time watch for me So hey, I can't be worse than
some of the other stuff. We watched canopy Dan.
What's your excitement level for Prince of Persia?
Actually going into this this was like the one
I was looking forward to the most because I remember
actually having some interested in when it came
out I I've not really played in much of the Prince
of Persia games. I've watched people play them
and they've always looked fun. But I felt like
it's probably, if I remember correctly, one of
the more high budget ones. You know, I think
a lot of effort went in. Plus, you know, it's
Jake Gyllenhaal playing a Persian, so that should
be awkward. Yeah. Matt, what do you think? Prince
of Persia, the most exciting one left for you
or are you more excited for Need for Speed? Oh,
geez. At least Prince of Persia is like... fantasy
which is my my bag so like i think is that the
only one we got left that's fantasy I mean Warcraft
is pretty fantasy. No Do we have to with that
one? Hey, we got four more films fighting for
a spot in our overall rankings four more films
that could sway the tide and Bump people out
of different spots. So we got to give them all
a fair shake We got to be complete us here guys
if we're gonna do it. We got to finish it off
strong So the four films left to cover and then
this Spotlight will be put to bed. So it's Prince
of Persia next on this spotlight in our Kevin
Smith spotlight The next film up will be dogma
And then like I said, it's gonna be a few weeks
before we get to that because we have all of
the end of year and the 2018 beginning of year
stuff to get to next so we got some of the fun
Episodes that we do every year. Hopefully you
guys are looking forward to that Dan Matt Amanda
anything else that you want to say as far as
video game films or things in general? Are you
ready for your year -end list Amanda? You mean
am I ready to start looking at all this stuff
to do? We're still trying to squeeze in one or
two films we're trying to get him in under the
Behind the buzzer Dan. I know you have been hard
at work You've been watching probably more films
in the last month than Amanda and I caught in
like six months So how's that process going and
how's your list shaping up? Yeah, I like legitimately
I think it doubled the amount of movies I watched
in 2017 in December in January. Luckily I have
a lot of PTO time during that time so I was able
to catch up with a bunch. Pretty good. I still
have like two major ones. I still need to see
the shape of water and hopefully you're going
to see the post on Martin Luther King Day. But
doing really well. I'm trying not to watch too
much and overload myself and then like end up
like with like movie fatigue and you end up getting
confused with each other. things of that nature,
but I'm really trying to put my list together
and it's really hard. I'm trying to fit more
and more into 10, but that number won't budge.
You can only put 10 in that. It's not very forgiving.
Matt, I've got a question for you because one
of the other things we have coming up is our
box office predictions for 2018. Have you started
the research? Are you ready to take the crown
from one of us? No, I couldn't even name ten
movies coming out in 2018. I'm so behind Don't
worry, in a month's time you're going to be able
to name quite a few of them. That's where we're
setting the stage for 2018 coming up, but before
that we will do probably what we did last year.
We'll have some interesting top lists. We'll
have some awards that we give out. Try to keep
it a little bit more of a variety than just your
simple top five or top ten list. Look forward
to that. We'll also have some blog posts coming
out that Dan and I are working on behind the
scenes to do like what we normally do with our
genre films, our performances as far as actors.
actresses, our technical awards. We do that every
year, so that will be coming as well. So keep
your eyes peeled to the website and the Facebook
page as those come out. You'll get notice as
far as that goes. So that's it for this week.
End of the year. Next time, all of our awards.
So tune in then for another episode of The Cinema
Geeks. No shadows, no reflections here. Lying
cheek to cheek in your golden rays. Dissolving
some tragic -
No chapter markers for this episode.


