Movie Week in Review
This Film Is Not Yet Rated Review

About this Episode
This is M -Wire, movie we can review. M -Wire
is brought to you by Audible .com Sign up today
to get a free audiobook download at www .audibletrial
.com slash GeekCastRadio Start today with a free
30 -day trial with over a hundred thousand titles
to choose from for your iPhone, Android, Kindle
or MP3 player. Don't forget to follow Audible
on Twitter at audible underscore com And now
the latest and greatest in movies with M wire
For 35 years a secret group has controlled the
way you see movies there are clergy in the room
These are moral censors. They forced great filmmakers
to change their art I was so devastated. I got
the call and they said NC -17. That's when my
blood turned to ice water. Because the studio
won't release your movie. No advertising budget.
You can't run TV spots. No one's ever found out
who they are. Who is controlling this thing and
how are they controlling it? No one knows. That's
the whole point. Until now. We're actually hiring
a private investigator to try to find out who
these people are on the board. It's time the
MPAA got a rating of its own. The MPAA... That
pinkish color building, there's absolutely no
way of going in. when an Oscar -nominated director
and a private dick They're gonna all start coming
out. We'll take some place. It looks just like
a little butt. dig deep. Oh, a lot of women.
We need to go for this. Got a rater. To expose
Hollywood's dirtiest secrets. Hello. One woman
is topless, breast exposed. So what I don't understand
is who's counted the f***? Do you ever do interviews
at all? No. I'm already divulging a lot here.
At some point I think I have to draw a line.
For seeing my pubic hair, we get an NC -17. Violence
is fine, sex isn't. You almost got us caught.
We're going, look at that man. Is he filming
us? Discover the movie. You are dealing with
a very powerful censorship group. Hollywood doesn't
want you to see. I'm going to say the F for it.
It's the fascist system. Hi, is this the MPAA?
Yes, yes. I'd like to submit my film for a rating.
It's a documentary. It's about how films are
rated. This September, censorship gets fucked.
Hello and welcome to M wire movie we can review
I am your host if June Mike and joining me is
more old and hello, sir How's it going? It's
gone and welcome ladies and gentlemen to the
special episode called rating pending It was
probably I think I think it was after I watched
the film that we're gonna be talking about this
time around I think it was after you introduced
me to it. I'm like hmm That's easy. Instead of
having a numbered episode, I can just call it
rating pending, considering the subject matter
we'll be talking about here. So, 2014 we ended
with episode 115 on Guardians of the Galaxy.
This year in 2015, MWIRE is going to have an
explosion of content. Not exactly Michael Bay
proportions of explosions, but the podcast is
coming back stronger than ever. My goal for MWIRE...
by new year's eve of 2015 is that we at least
get to episode 175 it's a very very lengthy and
tasking goal but that's that's the plan i don't
know if it's going to happen like that but that's
the plan uh coming up you're going to hear various
episodes um the goal now with movie we can review
is to hit movies from almost all generations
I may say to Dan or Kevin or Steve or I may bring
in some outsiders that want to do the horror
genre since that's not my thing. I don't want
to say that the podcast will hit all film genres
because it won't. But the goal now is with the
podcast is to kind of give you guys a variety
of tastes. Like just for an example here. We
will be covering over the next few months or
so Episode 116 will be paycheck with Ben Affleck
and Uma Thurman episode 117 will be an affair
to remember Episode 118 will be the man in the
iron mask Episode 119 will be Dragon the Bruce
Lee story starring Jason Scott Lee. I think I
think that was what his name was Episode 120
will be the Expendables and so you can see folks
that I'm going for a wide variety of Different
films to pique everyone's interest not just the
whole geek side of it What have you been up to
in your film watching sir? Well a little bit
of catching up with stuff. I missed in 2014 recently
We see they watch wild which was nominated for
two Oscars for leading performance for recent
with their spoon and Lord during that supporting
I liked it it was from by the same guy who did
Dallas Buyers Club and it's a little indulgent
but it's enjoyable and also enjoyed watching
I saw American sniper as well, which was like
Killing it in the box office in January setting
up records and I overall like that too. It's
probably Clint Eastwood's best movie since Gran
Torino, it's not it has issues. Definitely. It's
a little thin overall, but Bradley Cooper's second
there I thought you were gonna say it's probably
his best film since Million Dollar Baby I Would
say I think it's a better movie than Million
Dollar Baby. I will Million Dollar Baby is okay.
It's a little bit it gets the family dynamic
in that it's pretty awful Same similar with with
American sniper. I just like I mentioned I feel
like Clint Eastwood doesn't know human emotion
all that Well, he doesn't know how to portray
it on screen. So when it comes to like he was
dirty Harry, so I mean He's very he's a very
dry fellow so when he tries to Go get on screen
through actors. It doesn't always work. Especially
when it comes to relationships, but uh, I mean
Bradley Cooper's pretty phenomenal on that i
think it's probably the best performance he's
done he really like loses all of his bradley
cooperness and gets into the role yeah i mean
he um he is one of those actors that really surprises
me what he does these days yeah because for me
i the first time i ever saw him or ever knew
him was as Gardner's Sydney Bristow's will hurt
her best friend on alias does the first time
I ever saw him in anything Yeah, was was the
TV series alias and I've seen you know People
can hate it if they want to I thought he played
a pretty good updated version of face man in
the a -team Regardless of how horrible that movie
may be to some people I thought he pretty did
did a pretty good damn job as face, and then
I saw him in limitless Uh, you know, he's a very
versatile and very different actor. I don't think
he He's not one of those actors that just goes
for Where the money is he picks his roles? very
Very well. Yeah, he's been he's been being more
proactive working with better directors Like
he's especially with david r russell because
he's you know He did american hustle in silver
linings playbook with them. It's kind of odd
because this is the third year in a row He's
been nominated for best actor which is you know,
it's a Rare company that he's in so I I don't
think he's one of I want to put him on the top
echelon of actors today But I do think he you
know, he's getting better and better and like
you said He's picking better roles and just being
the douchebag that was in wedding crashers or
something like that So he's really good in that
role He he does he does make you he can make
you hate him very easily But you know every so
often he'll do a hangover three here and there
but all actors do that, you know Please tell
me that franchise is dead. Oh, please tell me
there's not gonna be a fourth hangover I think
it's I think it's good and dead because the third
one did not do very well So I think they realized
okay, this this cash cow is no longer no longer
viable And for me I've been watching a whole
bunch of movies that I haven't seen in a long
time or movies I've never seen such as You know
and an affair to remember and stuff like that
I even have I want to eventually try and I know
a lot of people will be happy about this I want
to eventually try to see bullet because I've
never seen that movie I've heard a whole bunch
about it but I've never actually seen it but
this time around in this kind of special M wire
we're actually going to be talking about a super
secret society that Hollywood keeps very well
hidden. Yes. Because in 2006, Kirby Dick went
ahead and made a film called This Film Is Not
Yet Rated. It's a documentary all about the Motion
Picture Association of America and the secret
society that they are. Yeah. And it's pretty
much an inside look to the process of how the
MPAA gives ratings out and how a film gets a
certain rating. It's a great documentary, but
it's a weird -ass process that they go through.
Yeah, it's you you see especially to the inconsistency
with the project with the process especially
when you know There's a good deal of talking
heads in this you kind of need that to get a
better background edit You have everyone from
Kevin Smith to trade stone and Matt Parker to
other, you know independent filmmakers and you
see Just how a scene in one film that's more,
you know more independent doesn't have this massive
studio behind it will Be rated like to gratuitous
to be a rated R But that similar scene and something
like American Pie will be fine because it's you
know, it's a studio film So there was some you
know, there are a lot of questionable Practices
that they that they do when making these ratings.
Sometimes you realize just how You know, it could
just be a random crap shoot with the depending
the difference between getting an NC 17 rating
and an R rating so Mean I see the rating system
now not not just for films, but also for you
know for video games on the video game side of
it They say what exactly the you know they say
what the rating is whether it's you know E for
everyone or M for mature and then under it they
give you a reason why you know over you know
extensive cartoon violence or Blood guts and
gore or whatever else and and all is the the
MPAA half of the ratings when I see what a film
is rated, it just says, oh, it's rated R for
this, this, and this, or, you know. And they
have, you know, it's the standard term, sexual
situations, or adult language, or, you know,
they have the whole thing now on TV where it's
like, you know, TV 14, DLSV, and this, that,
and everything else, but it, it always really
surprises me. when the MPAA is in the news or
anything like that because it's like, who are
these people? I mean, you know, that's what I
wanted to learn from watching this thing. And,
you know, come to find out that most of them
are just everyday people, right? It's a combination
of a, yeah, that's kind of the odd thing about
the MPAA is I think a lot of people think it's
like a government organization or something of
that nature, but it's not. It's an independent
organization that is run by and founded by most
of the major movie chains that they put together
and make the decision. That's why you see more
leniency towards more studio projects because
Those are the people that are making the the
system up. Basically they stepped in in To get
it kind of around that because before like you
had the rated ours the rated and you know rated
pg -13 Before this rating system you had well
when movies first started you really had nothing
and then you had the you know, the ultimate censorship
You had like complete censorship where you had
to bring your movie to this board and they would
decide if you can go, you know Be made or not
like there wasn't necessarily a rating but like
you anything that was objectable Got rejected
and you couldn't use that in your movie. Then
they kind of moved to this more rating system
and So I remember as a kid the rating system
in the 80s was G PGR NC 17 and X. Yeah and and
then pg -13 came out i think the first film that
ever really one of the first films major releases
was red dawn that was like one of the most notable
ones that had the pg -13 rating and a lot of
it was due to movies like gremlins and uh you
know indiana jones the temple of doom that weren't
necessarily but because it had no nudity or anything
like that, but PG was a little bit, you know,
parent gardens, they weren't quite that as well
when you have someone like literally tearing
the heart out of somebody. So PG -13 was founded
to kind of be that middle ground. And some people
have said that's done a lot of negative things
because now you have a lot of comedies that will
soften and be a little bit more. PC to get the
PG -13 rating rather than the R because getting
a PG -13 rating you have a bigger audience and
You're gonna potentially make more money compared
to an R rated film which tends to be you know,
they tend to make less and It's harder for you
know people to go see them Yeah, you recently
Put out your top 100 most anticipated films of
2015 and you had put on one of them that I forget
which film it was for. You'll remind me once
I say this, but you put on one of them about
how the 80s is the decade where we're all kind
of like, hey, franchise movies this and franchise
movies that, and this is where everyone has the
nostalgia and everything else. And the funny
thing is about that is that I remember a lot,
and I've said this before on the podcast, I mean,
M .Y .E .R.'s almost six and a half years old
now. Well, it's five and a half, almost six years
old now. Uh, and it's one of those things where
I've seen the podcast before. My mom let me watch
anything. I mean, seven years old, you know,
seven, eight, nine years old. I remember 80 late
88, early 89. I remember watching Beverly Hills
cop too, which came out in 87 and that is clearly
rated R obviously, you know, but it's one of
those things where. Nowadays, I would say I had
this feeling more around 2006 to 2009, but it's
like. those three years everything was PG -13
every single movie that obviously outside of
like animated films or any of that kind of I'm
talking about like things like a Beverly Hills
Cop 2 or things like a Terminator 2 or whatever
it is it's like everything nowadays it seems
like it's all PG -13 and I only noticed recently
the rated -R films kind of bringing it back I
mean In that three -year time period, I can only
think of any any film I had seen on TV for a
trailer or whatever else that was rated R, it
was a horror movie. I mean, yeah, I mean, the
rated R comedy certainly went away. They, you
know, they're making comebacks here and there.
You have ones like, you know, this is just the
end and, you know, some of the Seth Rogen ones
and, you know, 22 Jump Street 2. I think that's
actually not sure what that's rated. But yeah,
like you rarely see PG eating more unless it's
a cartoon. It's usually PG 13 or R. And then
like the limits of PG 13 are certainly being
tested by a lot of people, especially someone
and like Nolan, I know a lot of people mentioned
with like the Dark Knight that there's a lot
of violence in that, but there's not much blood,
which kind of gets into what they're talking
about, where you can show a lot of people dying
and getting shot up, but if there's no blood,
it's okay, so it's PG -13, but if there's blood,
it's R, which you think, I don't know if that's
really, if that should be the determining factor,
but you're right, most people are going towards
PG -13 and R is a rarity. It's weird too, because
I remember, in 2010, there was the movie The
King's Speech, which ended up being rated R because
they said the F word. And there's really nothing
objectable in that movie whatsoever. It's this
British drama about one of the past kings. And
there's nothing really objectable, but they say
the F word, so it's rated R. And there was a
to -do about that because it's a type of movie
you may want to show in your history class because
it goes over But you can't show an R rated movie
in history class. So they ended up re -releasing
it with a PG -13 rating just removing that. But
if you watch something like The King's Speech
and compare it to something like, I don't know,
The Expendables. Three just came out this year,
which is pj -13 I I would say which one's more
objectable Which one do you want a 13 year old
to watch? I would say there's probably a little
bit more questionable things in Expendables three
than there is in the king's speech, but it is
that f word that changes it so it's you realize
kind of like it's a very Objective type of thing
to do which is makes it this one entire process
that more that the entire process a little bit
more questionable because like you said you don't
really know a lot behind what got that PG -13
rating or that R rating it could do be pretty
much anything. Right and Kirby Dick's film here
this film is not yet rated it pretty much points
out with itself with the film with the documentary
itself it pretty much points out that you know
with the use of you know the f -word or showing
sexual situations. The documentary almost got
an NC -17 rating. The first draft of it, or the
first cut of it that they sent the MPAA did,
and they had to cut that back to get whatever
it is. I assume it's rated R or not. It's not
rated anything. Yeah, that's well And that's
the other thing too. Yeah, go ahead Is that you
mean people like well, why do you have to get
rated? Well, if you want it release in theaters,
you need to be related You need it for it to
be rated because the MPA is run by the theater
industry So if they don't rate it, they won't
play it. So you kind of stuck I mean luckily
he had a documentary. So there's other ways around
that but yeah, it is it's kind of crazy Yeah,
I mean, it is really nuts, and... I don't underst
- like, okay, I don't - I've said this before
on many podcasts that I've done in the length
of time that I've podcasted. For me, if it personally
does - it personally does not affect me. Who
Tom Cruise is getting married to or getting divorced
from or who's having a child. I don't care about
what he does in his personal life. I mean, unless
the guy isn't doing, you know, criminal acts,
even then it doesn't really bother me that much.
As long as he gives me the next great Mission
Impossible movie or whatever movie he's going
to be, you know what I mean? It's like, I care
about the body of work. I don't care about the
actor's personal life. But at the same time,
it's like, I still want to know. Who the hell
these people think they are that are in this
society to rate these films? And I think in the
documentary, he says that some of them are just,
like I said, everyday people, like teachers.
And you get the church involved. And of course,
you get clergymen or pastors or whatever you
want to call them, whatever church that they
have in there. When I watch this it boggles my
mind how secretive because they used a private
investigator throughout this entire thing to
try to Hunt some of these people down and I'm
like wow really what I mean it is like really
close net That's the thing too. Yeah, I mean
that's probably one of the most interesting things
about the documentary is that it Not only does
it get into what's wrong with it. It tries to
figure out what exactly you know who it is Yeah,
who yeah what it is and who these people are
and kind of like how they lied in a lot of ways
where they've said like people are only on this
board for a limited amount of time and you know
it and they're supposed to be people who have
kids of a certain age and how that's not necessarily
always true and it's you know, There's a lot
of secrecy behind it because I think it's there's
not nearly as much thought Put into it as as
filmmakers are probably like there to be they
seem to just put out whatever like there's a
good section with the creators of South Park
Who Parker? I'm a true Parker Marston who talked
about how and they knew that their firm was gonna
be ejectable So what they did was when they did
made something like well, please team America
world police They put in horrible scenes they
knew would get cut and they had no desire of
actually using them But they just wanted them
to focus on those so they could actually use
the things that they wanted to so it's like you
have to play these little games they got to get
what you want just because you know, they're
gonna focus in on weird things and how The kind
of the hypocrisy regarding like male sexuality
compared to female sexuality and how you know
It's like one's judged a lot harsher than the
other so it yeah, it's it's weird that it's so
There's no transparency whatsoever. So it's good
for an documentary like that that kind of goes
after it and tries to figure it out and Absolutely
Absolutely After you would watch this did you
come away learning anything? I think I mostly
from Finding out who the people were that was
kind of interesting But I don't think that's
the most impactful part most of it that what
you learned I think the best part of it is probably
from the filmmakers themselves and explaining
how odd it is and how I think I keep going back
to Trey Parker match so but I think they're a
good example because You know, they did something
like orgasmo, which was an independent film And
then there's something like South Park and with
team America, which was a studio film in there
They explained to the differences and how doing
independent films still give you they're like,
okay, it's NC 17 But they won't tell you why
but then when it comes to studio film they're
like, well remove this this and this and then
you're good So it is I don't know if there's
just less, you know, there's What you're seeing
though I kind of i'd be interested in kind of
seeing a sequel to this because I think a lot
has changed in five years especially with the
increase of stuff like netflix streaming and
on demand that you don't need the studio system
nearly as much as you used to you know, a lot
of people are Releasing films on demand now over
You know getting them released in theaters and
they're doing well I mean obviously you had the
huge above with the interview that happened this
year That ended up making a good amount not nearly
as much as it would in the theater But before
that this past summer you had something like
snowpiercer, which was did really well, too So
a lot of the issues that people had getting their
films really released because of ratings and
the MPAA They're no longer really a factor in
some ways because you can kind of go around them.
So In the way they're losing their power in that
instance, but they I mean still you want people
want their stuff released in theater so I think
that's the thing I learned about just how how
Tighten eight tighten it this group is and how
impossible it is to kind of get around. So You
know the one thing I wish I would have learned
from this is how to join the damn thing. No,
I'm serious. No, I don't. But I'm saying like,
like, okay, sure. They showed in the documentary
that, you know, some of these people are teachers
or, you know, people, you know, that have relations
to the church or some of them might be Hollywood
producers or directors or studio heads or whatever
else. But how what's the process? How does a
teacher from How does a teacher mother of three
from BFE Kentucky get in, get a teacher and a
father of two from California? What's that whole
process of how they choose who is on there? That's
what I kind of would have liked to learn a little
bit more about. Not necessarily the personal
lives of these people, but the workings of their
application process. Yeah, that definitely would
be interesting. And like you said, you know,
how long, like, okay, say, you know, you know...
Guy over here is you know accepted did is there
a certain term? Is it like the presidency is
it like, you know speed? No, there's no I'm serious
I mean it might sound it might sound funny But
I'm being serious is is there a certain like
once you're approved does your application have
an expiration date? Well saying that you can
only serve for this this and they do mention
that in the documentary that there isn't supposed
to be a term limit but the issue is that People
aren't aren't necessarily following that and
I mean and that's kind of the tough that's a
good point though It's like how do you get into
this? MPAA this rating board to begin with and
Again, that's an issue that's nearly not been
released and still really hasn't been so it's
just you know I don't know what they do. It's
just people that it's something it's something
like the Nielsen ratings, right? It's like how
to how does someone get a Nielsen's box? I guess
I don't know. Do you get a phone call one day
and it's like hey, it's MPAA We want you to join.
I don't know. That's that's a good point. Good
question The Nielsen's thing is a whole other
topic for another podcast entirely. It's funny
you mention that because by the time this goes
up, it might be a few months ago, when Last Man
Standing had its episode Helen Potts. And Patricia,
what's her name, Patricia Richardson came back
and played Tim's character's neighbor. They go
back and forth, oh yeah, it was on for eight
long, you know. You know the other show and whatever
else is on eight long years and yeah, but we
had great neighbors the Nielsen's is just so
many just But yeah the Nielsen ratings that's
something we can cover on remote control or telecast
or whatever else But that would be an interesting
thing to find out because I I believe we were
uh... at the time back in the eighties i think
we were in the isn't nelson household with my
house because i remember us getting envelopes
of cash this is that this is what i told you
yet we get nelson ratings and will be cash it
seems a little bit uh... no no no i'm saying
is like i've signed you know i remember as a
kid you know getting the mail and seeing something
that they had Nielsen's board or whatever it
was that it said and my mom opened it and there
would be like anywhere from $10 to $25 in there
in cash and I'm like who does this and that's
all that was in there was the cat there was no
notice no nothing It's just just the money and
it's like, okay then that works, you know All
that did they deal in cash? You think they would
least go check but I don't know because there's
less paper trail. Yeah Less way to track them
down in this day and age. Yeah, what was the
very first rated -r movie you ever saw? Oh, wow
It's turn reader to read it or maybe actually
probably the predator I'm thinking the original
credit or that might have been the first rated
-r film I watched For me, it's probably It would
had it would had to have been Probably the most
one I can remember as a kid would probably Beverly
Hills cop too, but I know I'd seen a bunch of
Of Raider our film my family was like the opposite
of yours Like my parents are very strict on what
I was allowed to watch. I couldn't really watch
anything I remember trying to watch like kindergarten
cop and it was like PG. So it was that would
became an issue So yeah, I was but I had an older
brother who would you know Brent movies from
the? back when they had Blockbuster and things
like that, we would rent them and we shared a
room so I would end up watching them. I remember
watching Predator and being completely freaked
out in one of the early scenes where you see
the people skinned alive. I don't know if that
was technically the first one I watched, but
it's the one I remember the most. Maybe Robocop's
probably up there too. It's funny when you think
about how many R -rated movies had cartoons made
out of them in the 80s, but there were a few.
yeah absolutely and you know it's funny you brought
up Robocop because because we live in such a
day and an age where everything is PG -13 a few
years ago I went back and I went to watch Robocop
and I'm like oh my god this movie is way too
damn but like I didn't remember I mean I you
know I was probably it was probably 91 92 when
I first saw that movie so I was 11 or 12 and
I Did not remember that movie being that violent.
Yeah, I mean especially at 209 and whatever else
and it's like, oh my god What is this rated?
I look at oh my god. It's rated R. Holy crap
Yeah, I mean it was very much in that time and
very much reflection of just the gratuitous violence
of action films during that period and you know
it Did a good job was like satirizing just how
ridiculous they were getting because you realize
like the 80s had some really brutal action films
Like really over -the -top violence, which we
you don't nearly get as much today most of it's
a little bit like we mentioned like PG -13 so
stuff like the Bourne franchise and You know,
they're the violence is limited, you know It's
brutal but not necessarily with body parts getting
blown up and stuff like that. You you get that
That's why you have the expendable guys. It's
is not as violent as it used to be No, it's been
I think you kind of read reach the apex of that
and then it started kind of going down to the
90s with stuff, you know I think diehard kind
of changed the game a little bit and then you
had more stuff like speed and then the matrix
came around and it's you know, you've seen a
different evolution and when I Comes to action.
So I mean it could always go back to that. It
does kind of It is, you know cyclical in that
air and that response usually when it comes to
Trends in movies. So it's you could always go
back to that in some way. I know I know Svartje
Nager and Stallone are trying to bring that style
back but not having much luck well, I know you
don't care for the third installment, but I mean
the overall franchise for me personally the Expendables
is there It's them reliving the glory days and
it's you know, all of those different stars coming
to get like you could not have done that in the
80s, you know, you could not have had a movie
like The Expendables 1 & 2 in the 80s and it's
now because again, we live in a generation or
we live, you know as people of the 80s, we remember
all that stuff and we always want I don't think
anyone that I know of maybe outside of, I don't
know, maybe outside of you or somebody else,
but it's one of those things where I don't think
anybody I knew in the 80s that wouldn't have
wanted to see Stallone, Willis. Yeah, I would
love to see it in the 80s. All in one film. And
I think the Expendables really capture that and
share the stories. You can nitpick the stories
and the plots and whatever else, but it's like
the scenes where they get to, you know, Be in
a room and fighting the bad guys together. I
mean everybody versus John Claude Van Damme.
Come on now. That was pretty awesome Yeah, I
mean, I don't know that actually just isn't I
find it tiresome I'd rather watch like, you know,
give me an option between Expendables three of
the ray two. I'm gonna probably go with the ray
two. I don't I just I don't I It just go the
action and those films get a little bit repetitive.
But anyways fact it's kind of interesting though
kind of getting back to the Documentary that
you know, it has had some effect on the MPA not
a large part I mean a lot of it's still the way
it is but one of the big talking points in this
was how films weren't able to Compare each other
like come to compare themselves to other films
that had the same writing or you know say hey
listen You're saying I can't be PG -13 because
of this but hey this movie has the same thing
and it's rated PG -13, but they did change that
practice in 2007 I don't you know, I don't know
if it's because of this maybe you know There
was a lot of pressure to do that But I think
that's at least one good thing where they are
allowing movies to compare themselves to other
movies get good ratings they're getting the proper
ratings, but It is interesting when you see certain
films rated certain things like I think a big
one like we mentioned is the Dark Knight where
it's like You could rate that are and I would
I could understand why because there's a lot
of you know You have to like the pencil scene
and you know the Joker himself He does a lot
of really intense, you know violent acts But
you don't it always like cuts away at the right
moment So I don't know like it to me that is
just as violent as seeing someone get blown up
a little bit because you're the left your imagination's
left to kind of fill in the blanks which can
be even more traumatic for a kid if Yeah, absolutely
and you know we you know back in the 90s we lived
in an age where we had something and I by no
means and Saying this movie is any good hell.
I don't even think I've ever seen it It's so
horrible, but there's two different versions
at the time of showgirls in 95 There's an NC
17 version and in our version. I'm like wait
How the hell can that happen and then I look
at stuff today? There's the regular theatrical
version, and then there's an uncut version that
comes out later, and I'm like or And I don't
mean you know director's cut is I see the director's
cut stuff a little differently, like if you take
Daredevil, and I know people will be like, yes,
please, take Daredevil away. But if you take
2003's Daredevil, you look at the theatrical
cut, and you look at the director's cut, it's
a completely different aspect of story. It's
the same film, but they add a few scenes here
and there, whatever else, but you look at...
I see advertisements for everything nowadays
where it's like, oh, this movie just came out
in DVD or Blu -ray or whatever. And then three
months later, oh, hey, here's the uncut version
of the same movie. And I'm like, wait, what?
Yeah, you get that a lot, especially with comedies
where it's like the unrated version. I remember
American Pie, I think, was one of the big. uh
proponents to begin with where they always had
their own rated version which they had scenes
that were they were specifically made that they
knew would not make it into the movie but would
make it into the dvd and yeah i mean directors
cuts a little bit different because that's just
certainly means that it's more gratuitous or
you have more shocking images it just could be
that the entire frame of the film is different
because you know ridley scott's probably the
most infamous directors who you know like blade
runner has like six different cuts to it that
changes a lot of things, like Aliens franchise,
too. So you do see that. Like, Director's Cut's
a little bit different. Director's Cut could
also have the same rating, but unrated versions
are usually just, to me, just more of a marketing
ploy to get more attention. Absolutely. Well,
this kind of goes to what you were just saying
about, you know. they may have cut some stuff
out or they may have, you know, shot scenes for
this specific thing. I remember specifically
when it comes to animated films, the only film
I know that has, you know, a edited version and
an original uncut version is Batman Beyond Return
of the Joker. because they had to use the edited
version for showing it on TV. But it's two very
different ways that the Joker dies. In the edited
version, everyone sees he slips in a puddle of
water, throws the switch, and electrocutes himself.
In the original uncut version, Tim Drake shoots
him. It's one of those things where you just
never know what's gonna happen with what. And
with this documentary, I really, really enjoyed
watching it. I really liked having the knowledge
of some of the stuff that goes through the MPAA.
And I, you know, it's one of those things where
it was a very interesting thing. Like, I wasn't
sure what to expect out of this. So we're gonna
take a quick break, folks. We'll be back after
this. Now for a behind -the -scenes look at GeekCast
Radio Network's newest show, Talking in Circles.
So, Chuck, Greg, what are you guys thinking for
this week's show? Well, Dan, how about we just
talk about the things that we've read or watched
this week? We do reviews like that every week,
Chuck. How about a game, like Fact or Fiction,
or The Power of Names? Those are great, and we're
always coming up with new ideas for games. And
how about some top fives? You know how I love
my top fives. What about tournament style brackets
or sequel reboot and destroy who will win in
a fight taking too far crazy, but true news or
yes It appears we have lots of things to work
on Listen to talking in circles taking timeless
topics in new directions every Tuesday on iTunes
or geek cast radio .com the geek cast radio network
Hey, Dan, who's the guy with the creepy voice?
So, as I said before the break, folks, I wasn't
sure what to expect out of the documentary, but
after watching it, I, you know, got a little
bit more information. Looking back on the documentary
now, it feels like one of those real -life crime
programs I watch on Investigation Discovery,
where it's like, hey, go follow this guy or go
fights. It's so strange. Did the documentary...
Did it exceed any expectations you might have
or is there anything about it that you didn't
like or I mean I don't think necessarily things
that was really all that Concerning or anything.
I didn't like it I heard a lot about before I
ended up watching it be there was a because I
heard a lot of the Issues with the MPA before
it came out and they kind of just took them all
and put them into one documentary. I mean I think
what I like what I like about it is it takes
a you know, the typical talking hedge format
and you mentioned like the true crime aspect,
but I think that's important to make it more
than just You know people complaining. I think
it adds a little bit and Gets into you know,
it's more of an investigation piece if I can
find out well What is the story behind all these
other stories? So I did I did like that. So I
It does feel like a movie that Is a little self
-important at times, you know, it's definitely
like, you know, the director is Out to prove
something but at the end, I don't know what we
learned a lot We for those who aren't aware we
get information. What does it really? Come up
with a solution to it or anything like that or
An alternative or is there an alternative? Maybe
there isn't so maybe that's the only one negative
but now it I got exactly kind of what I expected
and I do think the best part of it are just the
stories from the different filmmakers and getting
that firsthand look into that process because
you know, I do look Enjoy learning about that
because it's a it's a part of the movie business.
You don't really hear about a lot And uh, it's
interesting when you think about it where it's
like you spend all that time and effort making
this movie And then you know some guy you don't
even know has ultimate authority over what happens
to your film So it is it's it's a weird system
in that way. So but I don't know Yeah, it's it
is very weird because you know, like you said,
you know if you put You know Four or five six
months, you know one two years worth of work
into a film You then have to send it off to get
rated kind of like kind of like how you send
stuff off to get graded like comics or toys It's
like, you know obviously with the The grading
system that's more to figure out the actual value
of of a comic or toy But it's similar to that
and and it's like okay. I've done all this work
on this thing I'm gonna send it off and not know
or not know what they're gonna nitpick at or
not know what they're gonna find offensive and
it It's the end I know it's to get The ratings
for the films to have them show in theaters,
but it really feels like all is the MPAA This
is a giant organization for film screenings The
main purpose of the MPAA is to design something
so the government doesn't get involved I think
that's the idea is like to keep it away like
so they have the movie theaters have more control
That's kind of the that's why they're a little
bit more That's why they're kind of particular
over the entire process I think because they
want to be able to control it themselves and
they don't want to give up that control and I
think there's actually kind of a Find out like
what it was like before the NBA and PAA there's
actually a really good scene in the square C
square C C film called the aviator where Eve
Howard Hughes kind of were trying to release
one of his films that he directed and they're
kind of going over the poster and they're objectifying
the poster and trying to say what's wrong with
it and he has to speak about it and trying to
kind of defend his His poster in his movie and
it's really interesting this to see because that
is literally a board of people that were across
that were standing there and it was him and they
were just kind of discussing it and again seeing
that system compared to this and they're both
problematic in their own ways. But it's just
kind of crazy when you realize that. And the
only real difference that's really occurred is
that we now have ratings. And now those people
that are in those chairs are not seen. So it's
kind of crazy. It is absolutely crazy. Is there
anything else you want to talk about on this
before we get out of here? No. I mean, I would
say if you watch this and you enjoy it, there's
Director did a documentary after this called
the invisible war which is completely different.
It's about Kind of relate rape that happens in
the military that goes unnoticed. It's very heavy
documentary, but it's quite good I would recommend
that I think that is still streaming on Netflix
I know as of this record the showman that is
not yet rated. It's currently not streaming but
check back here and there and it's usually on
it comes off and goes on it every so often so
It might be on iTunes or Amazon Prime or something
like that. I know it's on iTunes. It's on Amazon
Prime, but not for free streaming. But you can,
right? Well, right. Yeah, that's what I'm saying.
All right, folks. That's going to do it for us
here on this edition of MWIRE, as I said at the
beginning of the podcast. Coming up next is episode
116, which is Ben Affleck and Uma Thurman in
Paycheck, along with Aaron Eckhart, Mr. Two -Face
himself. Interesting seeing him outside of the
Harvey Dent persona. So that's going to do it
for us. Where can people interact with you online,
sir? Well, I'm on Twitter at Moogervault, and
you can find all my stuff at Geocast Radio. Alright,
you can also check out Dan's podcast on GeekCast
Radio every Tuesday called Talking in Circles.
So, keep those film reels rolling and we'll catch
you next time! First, you can visit the website
geekcastradio .com, where you can comment on
the episode and all of our different podcasts.
Be sure to rate our show on iTunes and leave
us feedback. You can follow us on Twitter at
gcrnmwire. Become a fan of us on Facebook by
searching Geekcast Radio Network. You can email
us at feedback at geekcastradio .com. Call the
voicemail line 502 -526 -5821. Please remember
to tell us the show you're leaving the message
for, and your name. So until next time, unleash
the cake in you! In a world... There, I said
it. Happy?
No chapter markers for this episode.
Hosts


