Altered Geek
GDPR Compliance, Public Officials and Social Media Blocking, and PhotoScissors

About this Episode
You're tuned in to Steve Megatron on Altered
Geek. Hello and welcome to Altered Geek. I'm
your host, Steve Megatron Phillips. This episode
we'll be talking about two internet topics. Because
I don't know if they're gonna take up an entire
20 minutes or not. That's why we're gonna cover
two of them and some of the ramifications. And
it may come a point in time where we may have
to talk about What ones will be exploring further
in another episode? I think one of them may deem
some exploration with co -hosts in the future,
but I'm just gonna give my kind of reader digest
version of the thoughts of it. So, without further
ado, I'm going to get into the GDPR, the European
Union General Data Protection Regulation. I took
a class on this because I wasn't very well reversed
in this. Reversed. So, I wanted to kind of acknowledge
what this is, and I understand it now. I took
a class on, I forget what the website's called,
but it's Udemy. Udemy. U -D -E -M -Y dot com.
Which is actually a great place to take online
courses for cheap if you're not doing like the
EDX method. And honestly I probably would have
done the EDX if it weren't for the fact that
it costs so much. And as you know in the past
from me doing the superhero class, I'm a big
fan of EDX dot org. But Udemy seems to be another
one where you can get a pretty reasonable and
legit certification from because again, it's
a lot of college professors doing this, but they
give you like kind of this massive discount on
certain things. And so I did this intentionally
so that I would be GDPR certified so that I knew
what was going on, what goes into it. The class
was a little difficult to follow. I added it
to my my LinkedIn just as another qualification
that I know how to do something, but I think
that it's very important to understand the very
strict data protection rules and the job of having
this policy and compliance checklist, having
a data compliance officer for whatever organization
you have. And it's kind of any time you take...
Well, and also you gotta have a data breach notification
letter letting people know, so like sample text
for, you know, consequent forms, and how to avoid
costly penalties for noncompliance. So, and essentially,
from this information, you get a comprehensive
set of rules designed to keep, you know, personal
data of all European Union citizens collected
by any organization, enterprise, or business
safe from unauthorized access or use. which went
into effect on May 25th, 2018. Basically, the
law greatly affects the manner in which every
business transaction involving those citizens
is conducted from that point forward. Essentially,
what it means is a small company, say located
in Texas or somewhere else or Michigan, collects
personal data from a customer residing in Paris
in order to sell and ship a cowboy hat or a collectible
action figure. or DVD or something, to the security
provisions of the GDPR. And so importantly, they'll
be liable for any penalties imposed by not following
the provisions. There are no exemptions for size,
scope, location, or first offenses. You fail
to meet those provisions, you will incur penalties.
They kind of have that three strikes rule, three
strikes and you're out, where one of them leads
to a 20 million dollar European Euro fine, or
4 % of your business profit, whichever is greater.
So essentially, like us, we would get screwed.
Organizations that ignore it are opening themselves
up to uncertain liability, substantial risk,
and potential financial hardship. It suggests
that a course of action is required, including
establishing procedures, protocols, and policies
that address and meet the requirements of the
law. So essentially, if we do like a survey or
a form or a questionnaire, we have to give people
notice that it's being recorded, so like a little
checkbox. If you're signing up for a newsletter,
you have to say that's okay. You have to tell
everyone what you're using their data for, however
much it may be, and there's different levels
of the GDPR notification depending on how much
information you have to take. You have to also
tell them how long you plan to use that information,
how you plan to use it, who you plan to share
it with, and if they accept all that, you still
have to have a way for them to require a download.
of all of their data so like and they also can
request that you have to delete everything associated
with them which is perfectly legal if they're
from the the UK or the European Union so what
it essentially is going to break down to as well
is Now, if you're commenting on a message board
or a forum, or not a message board or forum,
but you're using comments on a blog post, they
don't necessarily have to go through all that
and remove it all. That can stay, but any identifiable
information they have about you, whether it's
name, email, birthday, last name, phone number,
depending on how in -depth they go. Us, we only
ask for the first name, email. You're good. Like
it's not I don't need to know your you know your
date of birth I don't need to know where you
live You know, what's your social security number
as or anything else like that, so it's I Totally
understand it. I totally get where they're coming
from like there does need to be like some kind
of a security crackdown the only thing I kind
of wish is that Yes, it affects anyone that deals
with somebody from the European Union is I almost
wish the United States had this and I say that
In terms of that. I really don't like them policing
anybody for the most part. We should be able
to do it ourselves, but Humanity as a whole is
stupid We can't please ourselves. That's why
there's so much chaos in the world But anyways,
it doesn't mean that one person is better than
another to police them but So anyways, it would
be nice because it would be great to be able
to go to say, Insurance Company A, you are not
allowed to submit my information to Company B,
C, or D. You cannot send my information and sell
it to the highest bidder. You cannot sell my
phone number. I don't want you selling my phone
number. I want it deleted from all of your records.
It would essentially do away with a lot of the
spam and a lot of the garbage that we get, the
solicitations, a lot of that. Because all that,
it falls under the totally 100 % illegal, almost,
if you're dealing with some of that. Especially
if you made a purchase, it doesn't mean that...
I wonder how they would deal with software, where
they bundle that garbage adware. Say you download
something from CNET. And then they make you download
a special installer that, in the installer, it
bundles another piece of garbage software that's
like a paid ad. And then it installs it. I know
they ask you if you want to download it, but
then they kind of trick you and they hide it
a little bit. I wonder if that would do away
with that as well, because I find that particularly
distasteful, which is why I have... I used to
go to download .com, which is owned by CNET,
a long time ago and downloads things. I quit
doing that years ago. I got sick of it. It just
got to be annoying. So I started finding other
places, like major geeks or somewhere like that.
I don't want to play that game anymore. I totally
get that. Moving into my other subtopic, which
I'm sure is going to be very interesting. We
have a rule. on social media. So it is unconstitutional
for public officials, including the president,
to block Twitter followers who criticize them,
a court ruled in a legal dispute over President
Trump's account. I don't normally talk politics,
but I think this is kind of an interesting dilemma
here. It's... So anyways, the lawsuit was brought
by Columbia University's Knight First Amendment
Institute argued that Twitter users blocked by
real President, real Donald Trump, had their
First Amendment rights violated in any decision.
You know, a federal judge here in the case ruled
that Twitter's interactive space, where users
can interact with Trump's tweets, qualifies as
a public forum, and that blocking users unconstitutionally
restricts their speech. The decision rejected
arguments from the President's team that President
Trump's own First Amendment rights would be violated
if he could not block users. This case requires
us to consider whether a public official may,
consistent with the First Amendment, block a
person from his Twitter account in response to
the political views that person has expressed
and whether the analysis differs because the
public official is the President of the United
States. The answer to both questions is no. I
kind of... I actually do sign with the court
in this instance for a public official because
I think that they should not be able to silence
you. You should be heard, but you shouldn't be
an animal about it either. And a perfect example
of that is, again, going back to the Thundercats'
roar. Do I like this series? No. Will I voice
my distaste with it? Yes. Am I going to be violent
and like, this series needs to burn for this,
you know, and you know, just start going crazy?
No. That's uncalled for. That's over -exaggerating
being a jerk. Somebody may like it, whatever,
that's on them, but I don't personally like it.
Again, it comes down to you should be heard.
You shouldn't be an animal about it either, but
that should be grounds on reporting harassment.
That should be a different entirely issue there.
But if he's going to use Twitter as his public
soapbox instead of using the radio or television
or news programs such as that, or press conference,
if he's going to use Twitter as that, that is
his public forum. Like that is his place to play
and inform people of what's going on. And so
basically, you know, they're viewing it as discrimination.
you know, because no governmental official, including
the president, is above the law, which is right,
and all government officials are presumed to
follow the laws that have been declared. That
is right too, although none of the politicians
do follow the law. But anyways, they disagreed
with the court's decision in considering more
steps, which I don't really see how you can consider
that being that it's kind of in our, you know,
bylaws, our constitution, like it's, you know,
you start blocking free speech. no matter what
side of the spectrum you fall on, you become
as bad as when the revolutionists and the British
were fighting. I mean, you're almost at that
same stage. And it's really sad, to be honest.
So anyways, this lawsuit first filed last year
was closely watched by First Amendment rights
in the digital age. for relevance because it's
the President's preferred speakerphone. So I'm
kind of on board with that. I kind of understand
it in that, you know, if you're a public official,
you're elected to do a job and you want to shoot
your mouth off. That's kind of the road that
you're going to have to do. You're just going
to have to deal with it, suck it up. Big big
boy just deal with people that are pissing and
moaning about you that there's really nothing
you can do about it Legally or you know or you
could just not manage it and just not be on social
media during the years that you're in in office
and Kind of just you know kindly shut your mouth
because mouth overloads, but multiple times So,
yeah, I'm not really sure what's going to go
down with this. It's definitely a thing that's
going to have to be watched as time goes on,
so to say. So anyways, what do you guys think
about some of those different topics there? We'll
have to turn back to some of these as time goes
on. So I wanted to end this episode on a lighter
for sales and I subscribe to different things
for different things, I found a website called
Mighty Deals, which is almost in a sense like
Groupon, but for digital stuff. I'm not in any
way sponsoring them or sponsored by them. I'm
just mentioning this because I thought it was
kind of something cool to go to if you're a creator
of any kind, whether it's graphical websites,
just designer in general. So they have courses,
they have free things, they have $10 and under
things, they have, you know, font bundles, they
have graphics and logo bundles, they have software.
I've used them for a couple of things. One, they
had a coupon for the GDPR aspect, so I was able
to use that. I should probably put that on the
old site, but the new site is going to be launching
soon, I think. I think I've got enough done on
it to bring it out soon. design your own WordPress
theme. You can do an Adobe Illustrator CC Master
Class. So like for instance that's $17 and you
get a class. And then I downloaded a software
as well called Photo Scissors. And I really wasn't
sure what to think of it at first and it's...
I tried out the demo, you can't save anything,
but I tried out the demo and I used a variety
of images. I used one where it's like me and
TFJU and Mike from our first official picture
not during the wedding. I used a picture of the
stuff on the site. I used family photos. I used
superhero characters from images on websites.
And essentially what you do is you in green you
highlight and you scribble all over the The image
that you want to save Whether it's a character
or something else. I will say animated in a really
dark theme. It works really hard, but it does
work I find this infinitely easier than Trying
to manually create or pull backgrounds because
it uses like a sense of AI to kind of do this
a little bit It kind of helps you figure this
out. You can remove background around hair. You
can remove backgrounds around people, objects.
If you want to move people and images or ...
animals, or whatever. It creates a PNG transparency
of it anyways. So I used this photo scissors
from TRX, T -E -O -R -E -X, and it works because
I'm not particularly good at Photoshop. I use
Adobe Fireworks, which is old. It's still the
CS6, but I use this because I enjoy doing I actually
make every one of the graphics on GeekCastRadio
that I do or really anything in Adobe Fireworks.
I have not been a Photoshop person. I don't like
Photoshop. I think I'd be more of an Illustrator
person if I could figure it out, but there's
way too many commands and I've been using Adobe
Fireworks since the year 2002. Back when it was
Macromedia, so I just I don't really want to
switch unless there's a reason. So anyways, I
bought this software because it was like nine
dollars. And after trying it out, you can select
the marker size that you want. You highlight
what it is you want to cut out. Like they use,
for example, a parrot. And then they have him
standing on a branch, and then they have him
with, you know, there's bushes behind him. You
scribble all over the image you want to save
with green, this little green plus marker, as
it were. So it looks like a bunch of scribbling
marks. And then you use... red and do squiggly
marks around the outside of the bird. And it
smart cuts out the background, just completely
removes it. And then so you can drag the image
however you want, you can resize it and then
you could physically put it back. And it works
on just about every complex background. You can
remove, like I said, around hair, you can remove
backgrounds from transparent objects in the real
world. You know, some objects are transparent
and removing backgrounds from photos kind of
damages it. It's kind of interactive, so every
time you make one of these changes, it'll redo
and you can change the feathering radius, the
aspect ratios. It's super simple to do. Like,
you can do this for eBay items, they even say.
Like, they show like a handbag sitting on a couch.
They cut out the couch and just, you had the
handbag playing background. They show a, you
know, they're making a, you know, this girl on
the beach move from one spot to another. Like,
they physically move her and drag her over. They
do this with this bird, too. Like, it's insane.
Like, I was like, ah, this is gonna be garbage.
And so I downloaded it. I mean, it's like a $20
software, but I was like, this is gonna be crap.
And then I downloaded it, tried it out. I was
like, oh, that's surprisingly good. So I plan
on doing that for more significant arts when
I want to use specific superheroes and there
isn't an image that exists of them all collectively.
So now I can actually do this because Blanchard's
required me to do this at points. And I'm like,
I don't know how to do that. So now I really
don't have an excuse and I can resize. I also
did it with comic covers. I didn't want the background,
but I wanted the specific image of a character
off the comic, and I tried it out on that just
to see how it worked, and it worked spectacularly.
I don't usually do product reviews or software
reviews, but this is pretty simplistic. You don't
have to know anything graphically to be able
to do this software. It's pretty simple. You
seriously just scribble on it, and then scribble
on it with the other, and then... save it, and
it's good. It works great. I thought I'd mention
that Mighty Deal site just because I find it
to be very interesting to try out. They've got
other ones where you can add and change photo
colors. You could take a black and white photo
and put it in color. You could enhance photos
with other softwares. They have UX apps. They
have various... softwares that'll clean up. And
then they've got, you know, build your own website
type software, they've got plugins for things
for Photoshop and other things. I don't know,
it's really an interesting site and I kind of
stumbled across it by accident searching for
something else and I was able to actually use
it. A while back, I wanted ideas for specific
art. opted not to do it, and then I just stayed
subscribed to the newsletter, and then lo and
behold, the GDPR thing came along, and then I
did that, and then I saw this, and I was like,
oh, let's do it. So anyways, just throwing that
plug out there. So I hope you guys have had a
somewhat educational and entertaining episode
of this. So until next time, get altered, get
geeky with the Altered Geeks.
No chapter markers for this episode.
Hosts
More from Altered Geek
All Episodes →
Open Source Adobe Clones & The Art of Waiting

Skydance Acquires Paramount, DCU Critiques, and Audible AI

AI Dystopia, Corporate Mergers & "Memoirs of the End" with Author Vincent Ryland
