The Pull Bag
Sean Murphy’s Batman White Knight Part 1

About this Episode
This is Kevin Conroy, and I am the goddamn Batman.
You've just jumped inside the pull bag. Join
TFG1 Mike and the rest of the comic reading crew
here at the GCRN as they make their great escape
into comics. From DC, Marvel, IDW, Boom Studios,
Xenoscope, and more, we have everything you want
to read right here. Transformers comics? Yeah,
we cover that. He -Man? Yeah, sure. DC superheroes
like Batman, Batgirl, Nightwing, and Batman Beyond?
Yep, we have those too. How about TMNT from IDW
and I Hate Fairland from Image Comics? Yeah,
we have all that here. Plus, so much more. It's
all inside the pull bag here on the Geekcast
Radio Network. So without any further ado, it's
time to talk about the comics we are reading
right now here inside the pull bag. Hello and
welcome to the pull bag. This is episode 331.
I'm, of course, TFG1 Mike. Joining me for the
first time since our I Hate Fairyland coverage
is Comic Revolve Dan. Hello, sir, the comic concierge.
How's it going? It's going. This is actually,
and I'll introduce the other guests in a moment.
This is actually a pullback comic concierge crossover.
It's actually all the secondary guests' fault
here. Because you had had trying to be DJV from
Simplistic Reviews on Comic Concierge to talk
about Gotham Central. I listened to that episode
and I'm like, oh, we should do DC's black label
Batman White Knight. Everybody say hello to DJ.
Hello, Vinny. It's your Uncle Bingo. Time to
pay the check. Yep. Batman 89. Anybody know Batman
89? Jack Nicholson, Michael Keaton, Kim Basinger,
Arliss. Come on. Of course. Arliss was in there
somewhere, wasn't he? Wow. He was Alexander Knox,
wasn't he? Robert Wall. Yeah. Yeah, that's Alexander
Knox. What's crazy is I saw Pat Hingle in a movie
the other day. It wasn't anything new, but obviously,
I think he's passed on, but I could be wrong.
I think he did die. I don't remember. Commissioner
Gordon in 89. Is it Hang Him High? He's a bad
guy in one of these Clint Eastwood movies. I'm
pretty sure it's Hang Him High. Every time I
see him, I'm like, that's Commissioner Gordon
from Batman 89. Yep, exactly. And the only reason
why I kind of recognized him was not the way
that he looked, it was the way that he sounded.
And I'm like, wow. All I can hear in my brain
is, oh god, we gotta keep a lid on this. If this
gets out... We gotta keep a lid on this one.
The whole city is going to hell. So, Sean Murphy's
Batman White Knight from DC Comics. This is the
first release for DC's new imprint, Black Label.
Now, let me ask you guys, what do you think of
Black Label, Dan? Well, this isn't actually Black
Label. It might, so to clarify, when it was first
released, Black Label wasn't a thing that existed.
uh black label's first actual book that was released
with batman damned and there was thought that
i think the trade uh was going to be released
under the black label branding um it is because
i see the logo right here yeah yeah yeah it's
more you know retroactively going back and changing
it i i understand in the thought was then they
would actually um because sean murphy has some
like unedited versions of black knight uh white
knight that we thought were going to be in the
trade but ended up not being um but anyways regarding
the idea of black label it kind of makes sense
trying to especially with a book like this that
exists outside of the normal dc universe it's
kind of its own thing it gives critters the freedom
to kind of do whatever they want they can go
for a more mature tone and dc's been was doing
that a lot with a lot of books that were outside
the realm of what their normal continuity was
but kind of maybe loosely connected like mr miracle
which is more so in continuity but definitely
geared towards mature readers you know they have
vertigo but it wasn't necessarily vertigo so
it's a good in between So I'm interested in seeing
where it goes. I do think, though, because DC
right now has a lot of different labels that
they're doing. I think Geoff Johns is going to
have his own label starting next off -print,
I should say, starting next year as well. They're
trying to relaunch Vertigo. They just had Young
Animal, but that's kind of no longer going on
because most of those titles didn't do very well.
But ultimately, I think as long as the books
are good, And I don't know if they're going to
now, moving forward, if they release something
like the Sago Swamp thing by Alan Moore, which
was Vertigo, are they now going to bring that
over to Black Label? Or what's going to be like,
quote unquote, Black Label? But I just don't,
I hope they didn't learn the wrong lesson from
Batman White Knight thinking. Why it was so successful
was because it was dark and more adult. And then
try to double down on that and we get some crazy
edginess that's ridiculous that we got in the
90s. So that's my concern. But obviously this
is very separate since this one existed before
Black Label was a thing. Yeah. What about you,
DJ? I'm full disclosure, I'm not... i don't know
if you would even consider this i guess i'm not
a real big elseworlds what if fan to begin with
uh there are very few i really like punisher
girls in the marvel universe i mean that's probably
it uh mainly because of uh my my my myopic view
of you know Elseworld stories. I like characters
kind of the way they are. But Stephen Amell is
going to be Barry Allen. Come on. You've got
to love that. I can't wait for that. Because
even if there's something, there's growth there,
it doesn't count because it's limited. So it's
like, I can't even like, oh, even if I'm enjoying
it, well, it's only these five issues, bye. So
I'm not really a huge elsewhere fan. I didn't
know much about this book going in. I had heard
the title and I didn't know. And I think somebody
had mentioned, oh yeah, it's like a what if situation.
So going in, I was just kind of like, okay, win
me over book, win me over an owl. Hold my thoughts
on if it won me over or not until we get into
it. Absolutely. For me, a comic, not just DC,
not just Marvel, any comic company, they need
to, in my personal opinion, market towards a
wide audience. And if that is going to mean that
they use a new imprint to show more adult stories
than what is in the rebirth or the new 52 or
the old continuity and as long as it's separate
from you know their kiddie stuff kind of a thing
sure go for it great you know for me it's like
this to me obviously is a it's not a one shot
but it's a it's a mini series that is separate
from like what um Is Tom King still writing Batman,
Dan? I don't... Sometimes they change writers,
so I'm not sure if... No, he's... Okay. He's
currently writing Batman, and he's probably set
in for at least the next 50 issues. Okay. So,
like, Tom King is currently writing Batman. He's
been writing Batman since the New 52 ended, Rebirth
started, Scott Snyder is off doing whatever Scott
Snyder is off doing. You know... The way I look
at White Knight is, and the way I look at stories
like this, is it gives another creator a chance
to do something with the character without affecting
the continuity of the main writer of the main
series of the main thing. So I think these are
cool. I actually enjoyed this story. It's one
of, if not the... One of the better, if not the
best, reversal of fortune Joker stories I've
ever seen. Because how often have we seen the
whole, hey, let's make the Joker the good guy
and Batman the bad guy kind of thing. You don't
see that a lot. Getting... Go ahead. What were
you going to say? Yeah, I guess I'm kind of the
opposite of DJ in that realm where I don't care
at all about continuity. in my in my personal
world like if they got rid of continuity all
together and just did whatever like they did
back like the civil civil right really before
you know you know fittingly stan lee was like
the person that really made universes matter
made continuity matter um but i'd be fine if
they continuity wasn't a thing um but i get why
people enjoy it because you get this it makes
it's unlike anything else you get legitimately
a 60 year long story um but i think In this,
you said that, you know, you reversal fortunes
of the idea of Batman and Joker, but I think
that's what it maybe presents itself as to start
with, but it ends up being something very different
than that by the end. Oh, absolutely, yeah. I
mean, that's just the basic, you know, quote
-unquote premise kind of thing, or what most
of the copy says, you know. Like, on the back
of the book, it says something about, you know...
What would happen if the roles were reversed
kind of thing? As I mentioned earlier, Sean Murphy,
writer and artist on this. Matt Hollingsworth
is the colorist. Todd Klein is letterer. With
Sean and Matt doing the covers. I love almost
all of the covers that they've done for this
series. I thought they were really, really cool.
Of all the things I really dug about this book...
Art's probably number one. Sean Murphy's art's
kind of like if, you know, like Greg Coppola
and Joe Mad had like a baby for some reason.
It kind of like, oh wow, that looks kind of like
old school Greg Coppola. Oh wait a minute, there's
that kind of anime kind of face there. I really
like the art. I like... I'm trying to think of
all the things I like. I'm not really a big fan
of this book. I like the use of nostalgia in
one section of the story. I won't spoil it. Let's
just say it has to deal with transportation.
I really like the stuff they did with Freeze
and Alfred. That stuff I didn't really see coming
with Freeze, but I bought it automatically. I
was like, oh! Oh, okay, that makes sense. I never,
like, I don't, Dan, you have to remind me, have
they ever dealt with that backstory with Freeze
before? Is that an original thing for this book?
I don't believe so. Like, I don't think they
ever had that, like, to my knowledge. You mean
the thing with his father? The thing with his
father, yes. That, I was like, I don't remember
that ever. I know it wasn't in the anime series,
but I was like, was it in a book that I missed?
Maybe they brought it up or something? I'm pretty
sure they have not until now. That's a cool way
to introduce the, at least connect the, we're
tap dancing around, the freeze technology, how
it developed with him. I was like, oh, that's
kind of a stretch where I was like, I could buy
it. I could understand it. When it comes to things
they do with other certain characters, I guess
we'll get into later, I couldn't buy it all the
way. Yeah, what do we think of how the books
are laid out? Not the art, not the images, not
the story, but what I'm meaning is, like, I'm
looking at cover one, and you open it up, and
it has this black and white drawing, and then
it has the quote, Given his newfound mental capacity,
I think you need to be worried. And that's a
quote from this issue that will come up later.
What do we think of that formatting for this
to make it separate from every other Batman book
out there? Well, I think that might be different
because that's not how the issues are laid out.
You don't have that opening for the first issue
when it's released by... This issue is just the
opening of the... the Batmobile traveling up
to Arkham Asylum. Um, so you don't, you don't
get that quote. I don't know if that was just
something they were using in the, in the trade
to separate it out from different installments.
Uh, but so I can't really comment on that since
it didn't really, uh, wasn't presented that same
way. Um, but I thought, you know, just looking
at the actual opening of the, the, the story,
I thought it was a good way to. establish itself
because it starts with a very familiar scene
of the Batmobile going up Arkham Asylum and you
know it's a very normal thing you see someone
a shadowy figure walk in they let him in a great
Batmobile I did like the look of the Batmobile
but then it gets changed where you walk in and
the person that's in change is not that of a
criminal or a known criminal but that of Batman
and then this slick -looking character, but you
don't necessarily... I mean, he says his name,
Mr. Napier, but I think it's a good way of just,
you know, that great leap forward in time where
it's like, okay, this is where we're heading.
Let's see how we get there. So on that way, I
thought it did a good job of just establishing
the fact that this is a different story. This
is, you know, like I mentioned, it presents itself
as, okay, well, how exactly are we getting...
to a world where Batman's in jail and the Joker
or Jack Napier is driving the Batmobile. So I
think it's a good way of just establishing intrigue
within only, you know, within a few pages. Yeah.
And I really dig this story. I'm going to say
this now, and I will say it at the end of next
week's episode as well. White Knight, to me,
is on the same level as Gates of Gotham. and
Nightwing New Order. White Knight's a little
deeper than those are, but it's not the same
storytelling, but it's the same... I get the
same feeling reading this that I got reading
those. Like, I was pulled into the book on almost
every single page and panel that I read. And
ending the first issue with the Jack Napier thing
was really, really cool. The thing, a lot of
people don't like the Joker having a name. How
do you guys feel about it? I didn't know I didn't
want the Joker to have a name until probably
the Dark Knight. When you realize he's just making
up his backstory as it goes on. It's like, oh,
that's actually what it should always be. He
should be a force of nature. It shouldn't matter.
You hear me, Joaquin Phoenix. It shouldn't matter
what his backstory is. It shouldn't. He's just
a force of nature. The polar opposite of Batman.
We don't need to know exactly what, I mean, you
leave it up to interpretation. Anybody else can,
what everybody else can fill in is probably going
to be 10 times better than what they give you.
this joaquin phoenix movie or whatever they were
digressing could be amazing but it was like well
somebody's out there probably had a completely
opposite or different take on what joker's origin
is and they're kind of like i liked it when i
thought he was a comedian that did this or i
liked it when he was a gangster that did this
so i don't really need to know his backstory
when they said the jack napier thing i'm like
oh i guess they're going 89 but i mean i don't
like him having a name at all it's like i'm showing
up Doing stuff, no reason to the madness. Yeah.
Dan? That's what madness is, no reason. I don't
have a preference, to be honest with you, because
I think it's all how you tell the story and the
context in which you execute it. Like, for example,
The Killing Joke, probably the best Batman, one
of the best Batman stories, and probably the
best Joker story. You do get a sense of origin
within that. Of course, at the time, that wasn't
a book that was quote -unquote within continuity,
but It worked, you know, because it was able
to kind of look at what would drive a man to
become the Joker. And this, I think it's important
because it's, you know, it's idea of like what
could, again, like what is the defining difference
between Batman and Joker? And ultimately, you
know, Joker's biggest joke would be. to get at
batman would not be joker to you know to remove
that relationship um so i don't necessarily have
a preference i think if you're within continuity
uh i i prefer him not having a backstory like
i like to have that three joker story coming
up which is going to be another black label book
i i personally don't i'm glad that's not within
continuity um but for an elsewhere story story
or for just you know trying to do something like
this Or even like a movie or what have you. I
don't necessarily have a preference. I don't
think he needs one. But if you're going to be
able to do something with it, which I feel like
White Knight did, I'm fine with it. For me, I
agree with you. It matters, but it doesn't matter
whether he does or whether he doesn't. I think
what Sean Murphy has done in here has basically
been. and we'll get into this further in this
episode and next week's as well. He basically
took everything that I assume he loves about
Batman and the bat mythos and threw it all into
a unique original story that makes you think
about both of these characters, hero and villain,
whichever one is in whichever role you think
he liked. See, I got out of this that he didn't
like Batman at all. That's why maybe I have my
blinders on, but when I'm reading this book,
it's almost like a F you to Batman. Because in
this entire book, Batman is an irrational psychopath.
There's no rhyme or reason to him. He doesn't
give a crap about anybody but himself throughout
like 95 % of the story. That's why I'm like,
maybe he just likes the Joker or he doesn't like...
The code of Batman? I don't know. There's a scene,
I don't want to get into, I don't know how we're
going to tap dance around the story, but where
he's, Batman is just tearing through Gotham,
not giving a crap, ignoring his sidekicks, doesn't
care. I'm like, that... That seems like Zack
Snyder -y Batman. It doesn't seem like Kevin
Conroy Batman to me, where he's just like, screw
it, I'm going to drive a car, I don't care, I'm
knocking over people. That's kind of how I got
it. But again, I have a very... tight window
with my batman so when you expand it to where
he doesn't seem to give a crap he's throwing
caution at the wind he doesn't care about the
what commissioner gordon is saying or dick is
saying or barbara's saying and he's just jumping
in without thought it doesn't make me think he
likes batman that much make me think he likes
joker a lot but not i think it means he likes
them both because batman what I got from this
story overall is that they both have an unhealthy
obsession with each other. Right. But Batman,
you know, psychopath. Have you, have you not
seen, have I not seen Batman forever? He was
driving on rooftops and Batman forever. Come
on now. Batman forever, but he wasn't putting
people in fricking harm's way. Like this, but
this Batman literally is putting people in harm's
way and is essentially pie facing Barbara Gordon.
The whole time where she's like, what are you
doing? What are you doing? He's shut up. He doesn't
say shut up, but he's like ignoring her because
she's making good points of why, which I guess
leads to her joining, doing something else. But
it's like, I don't see this Batman. I don't see
Batman as that person. I don't see Batman as
he takes chances. He causes collateral damage,
but he doesn't do it to a point where he's endangering
people. And that's kind of what I got from this,
where he's just like a. like a monster like he
didn't anybody i don't think it's that he doesn't
like batman i think it's looking at the problematic
nature of a character like batman and what that
would actually mean and i think this is a different
batman this is a batman that i think that opening
sequence of him chasing after joker the way he
is is to firmly establish that this is not the
normal batman this is a taking that idea this
is this is a different world this is a world
without superheroes is the world without superman
this is you know a world with with just batman
in his like universe really and i so yeah it
is a very different batman it's not necessarily
the same one you would get and i don't necessarily
think that's a bad idea the question is what
what do you do with it and i thought what this
did it a good job to start with, and we can see
how it ends when we talk about it next week,
is looking at even a normal Batman and looking
at, like, even the best Batman in the world,
you know, even, like, an Adam West Batman, there
are problems that Batman would cause. And I think
what this does a good job of is looking at, okay,
if Batman existed and did what he did, is he
actually, you know... providing yes there's a
selfishness to it in a way you know He's going
to cause a lot of collateral damage. He's going
to cause a lot of issues, destruction, especially
in certain parts of the city, like how Duke is
used in this, who is a character I thought was
always been useless in normal comics, but I think
this actually worked pretty well. I thought it
did a good job of just pointing out the problematic
nature. And if Bruce Wayne's major goal is always
to stop crime and to make Gotham a better place,
really that's... He'd be much more effective
at doing that as Bruce Wayne than he would be
at Batman, because as Bruce Wayne, he'd be preemptive.
He could better the education. He could really
help create a better Gotham. So just the act
of being Batman has a selfish nature to it. And
you had already said, DJ, about the Dark Knight,
like Dan just said. In this, it needs to be Bruce,
you know. pulling little sniveling weasels out
of cars and ramming his Lamborghini into motorcades
like he did in The Dark Knight. So I do agree
with that. The thing of it is, is this story
is... It's a... It focuses on the relationship
of Batman and the Joker to the point of... You
almost... You don't forget about every other
point that's going on, but there were a couple
of moments with the freeze angle of it all where
I almost got taken out of the story because I'm
like, wait, we're going to freeze now? Is this
current or is this in the past? Not that Sean
Murphy did any kind of time jumping because it's
all in the current time span. It isn't like,
oh, this happened years ago kind of a thing.
But, I mean, this is like Christian Bale Batman
on steroids. Or something. It's more Ben Affleck
Batman. I guess if Bale's Batman wasn't this...
I keep wanting to say psychopathic. It's like
no... There's no man behind this bat in this
version. He's essentially just... I keep thinking
monster, and I think it would have worked for
me if, like you're saying, this was completely
through Napier's perspective. But because it
hops around, like you're saying, to Freeze and
Gordon and to Duke and all that stuff, I kind
of lose that where it's like, I guess in this
universe, Batman is essentially the Punisher.
He's not even Batman. People have always asked
people like my sister and my friends and cousins,
what's the difference between Batman and the
Punisher other than killing? And I'm like, well,
Batman is a detective. He's not like, you know,
going around a battle van, driving through the
city and shooting up places, not giving a crap.
He actually is a tactician in terms of I have
to solve crime and stop crime, but I have to
put the people first. I mean, I'm leaning more
toward the Paul Dini animated series. That is
not this Batman. This Batman is like a force.
Essentially, there's nothing to him other than,
I have to get the Joker. I have to get the Joker.
I have to get the Joker. It's not Batman. That's
essentially his one track of thought to him.
And that's kind of where I say, well, they stripped
this Batman down completely of all of the things
that I kind of liked about Batman. Well, that's
also a recent interpretation, right? Because
Batman, the original Detective Comics, that wasn't
Batman. He was much more violent. He did kill,
and he did kind of go off on a rampage. So I
think that's where you get kind of stuck. If
it's like, well, this isn't the way I want Batman
to be, well, I guess what I thought this did
a good job of doing is establishing up front
that this isn't. that batman this is a different
story and i think the way in in the whole journey
here to me was getting to that batman and like
how do you was was allowing giving that character
giving batman room to breathe to actually develop
into something rather than just being the same
thing Which is why I tend to not, I'm not usually
a huge Batman fan, is because his character is
often very stagnant. And I think that leads to
kind of repetitive storytelling. What's why I
kind of liked about this was like, okay, well,
let's play with the formula a little bit here
and kind of make him much more of a dick than
he normally is. I guess you could say very similar
to a Zack Snyder type of character. But then,
I don't want to jump ahead to what happens next
week, but I thought it was trying to come full
circle with it. That was at least my interpretation.
Yeah, it is trying to come full circle with it.
And the thing of it is, and you guys mentioned
earlier about all the collateral damage that
he causes and that he shouldn't be doing that.
Well, you know... neither should superman and
man of steel this is not batman man of steel
thank you very much no no no it's not this is
not henry cavill batman thank you interpretation
of the hero yeah yeah exactly i would actually
say he's worse than because at least in man of
steel it's like out of his control this is batman
making conscious choices of doing wrong knows
exactly what he's doing and people are literally
telling him batman you're doing horrible things
and he's like I don't care. He doesn't say I
don't care, but his face is, I don't care. Yeah,
like Henry Cavill, at least in Man of Steel,
you could argue he's fighting a little or another
god. He can't control that. These are choices
that Batman doesn't necessarily have to make.
He doesn't have to speed down and almost run
over old people. Almost. Yeah, I mean, he's actively
making bad choices in this, and I think that
opens up... The argument could be maybe Sean
Murphy is trying to make it a little bit easier
for him to then be able to flip over. Because
I think that's what this is trying to think,
right? As we're seeing Batman like this and going
to the opening, we see that image of Batman in
jail to push the idea, to lead us to believe,
all right, well, this is a Batman that's going
to go over the edge. This is him on his way to
become someone. When I read the first issue,
that's where that's where I thought it was going
was like, OK, well, this is this is going to
be a Batman that eventually becomes a villain
here. And we're, you know, for whatever reason,
Jack Neighbor becomes the hero. But then it doesn't
necessarily go and go in that direction. So I
don't know if that was a purpose, purpose, swerve
or what exactly. But, yeah, sorry. No, I thought
I was gonna be maybe going I thought I was gonna
do remember that Lex Luthor book that came out
a while back and it was like Mainly through his
perspective and like through his perspective
Superman is like this monster He's just always
has the red eyes and I was like, okay I can buy
that because we're looking at it through Luthor
how luther see he's the hero of his own story
and that's where i thought they were going where
joker is the hero in his of his own story in
this but it's not that it's essentially just
in this story joker is the good guy and batman
is the bad guy yeah and then we kind of like
they're going with that concept and not to jump
ahead but near the end they kind of like don't
go all the way with it i guess they kind of like
i don't know come a little bit short because
i i think it would have worked better for me
if they just went would have been full bore okay
we're in the mind of the joker all right this
is the joker's story in this story batman to
him is this creature who doesn't give a crap
he's entertaining to him the joker but he he
does the same horrible things he does that batman
doesn't realize that Joker understand or see
something in Batman and Batman doesn't see himself
that he's also causing all this damage That's
what I thought I was gonna go and the kind of
this doesn't do that And I think that's where
I was like, oh, this is just an interpretation
of Batman where Batman's a dick Okay, I guess
I have to take this And I think well, I think
too part of it was Joker or you know thinking
of what would be like how could he actually defeat
Batman like what besides just like killing people?
how could he actually defeat Batman? And one
of the ways to do that would be better than Batman,
would become who he is. They messed that up too,
though. They messed it up. Okay, you're saying
be better than what he is, and I thought they
were going to do that because the one thing I've
always been constant is Joker's as smart as Batman.
He's just insane, essentially, right? And I thought
they were going to do that, where Joker is...
He's going to use his wits and his guile and
his cunning to beat Batman and almost have the
city turn against him. But then they do this
thing which literally made me scream bullshit
in my room when I was reading it. I won't spoil
it, but he doesn't use cunning and guile to beat
Batman. He uses brute force. I'm like, bullshit.
No. If you're going to go the way where Joker
beats Batman, have Joker beat Batman in the wit
way. Batman can't do shit about that. What is...
I keep going to Dark Knight. Where Ledger goes,
all your strength, all your... You can't do shit
about this. You can't... I beat you. You can
punch me all you want. Doesn't matter. I win.
That's how Joker beats Batman. Not, I'm going
to whoop your ass. That's the part where I was
like, what? Certain things in this book kind
of made me go, oh, you look like you're going
one way and you went the other way. It's not
subverting my expectations. It's almost like
you half -stepped. You froze and you changed
your... course for some reason yeah i i don't
i i don't but what i was going to say is it's
not that i was doing that and i i think he was
using his words he wasn't necessarily using his
words he was using the public against him like
that was you know He was basically becoming that
politician, becoming that hope that Batman never
was. It wasn't necessarily designed at first
to be that physical. It was part of that. It
was utilizing Clayface to have all the control
of the different villains and kind of doing what
he couldn't do and then turning them against
him within this. So it wasn't necessarily he
was trying to punch his way out of it per se,
but utilizing, you know, the very city against
him that he thought he was saving i dug that
that part was cool but then near the end that's
skipping ahead a little bit he does punch his
way out of it which i didn't want him to do i
want him to completely not go physical with batman
that's not how you beat batman you beat batman
by out thinking batman yes but this yes however
this is a batman joker story you cannot have
a batman joker story without the two of them
having a knockdown drag out physical fight at
least one time sure but the way he does it is
not like the way the the one the story was setting
up and two their dynamic has ever been there's
no god bane should the fight should have been
if there was a bane batman fight i could see
that happening But there's no effing way I've
ever seen in any interpretation the way this
fight ends. Never. I don't know if this is again,
oh, it's something new, but sometimes you do
something new, Last Jedi, and it's like, what?
What are you doing? What was that? You keep your
Last Jedi out of this Batman podcast. You keep
your podcast out of my Last Jedi. So... For those
of you wondering about the story, as we get through
issue two of the series, the Joker is cured.
He's taking these pills and supposedly they cure
him. He becomes Jack Napier. As Dan already said,
he goes the political route and tries to fight
Batman through, you know, all of that. I love
the fact there's two Harleys, like, quote -unquote
fake Harley and real Harley, and then fake Harley
turns into... Neo joke. Well, because there was,
again, this is why I say Sean Murphy really loves
Batman in general, not the character specifically,
but the Batman franchise, is because he's got
all this stuff in here that I can draw allusions
to. The fake Harley, real Harley thing, that
happened in one episode of Batman the Animated
Series when, I think it was Mad Love, where he
hit her. and she just left, and he went to replace
her, and he got this dumber than a box of rocks
version of her kind of a thing. So that's what
I see with the two Harleys thing here, and I
thought that was really cool. I don't know if
that's what he was going for. To me, what I took
that as was looking at kind of Harley Quinn,
that character, and kind of what she was first.
as, like, what she was established as, kind of
this strong -willed character, and, you know,
her, how she kind of fell in love with the Jack
Meepier part of, or, you know, the more humanistic
part of a Joker, and then what she kind of morphed
into within the last, you know, five, six years,
kind of just a one -note, very generic kind of,
you know, mini -Deadpool type of character. Yeah.
You're right. I took it as him basically looking
at kind of, you know, basically what Harley was
and then what she devolved into and then I was
actually kind of surprised that I thought that
was going to be the last we saw of that character
but knowing that she eventually becomes Neo -Joker
and where that leads to. Yeah. The story within
the first three and four issues of the eight
issues I love the complexity of it. I love all
of the stuff with it, I, you know, again, there's
a, um, there's a scene in, in episode, not episode,
issue two here, where, again, when I say that
I feel that Sean loves the Batman franchise,
and I make the, my own allusion to BTAS and the
fake Harley, yeah, you're completely right, Dan,
it is two different sides of her personality.
you know, kind of a thing, but my point in saying
that is that I see things in this that he's alluding
to, and we get to a scene with Napier and the
other villains, and I don't care what anyone
says, as soon as you hear Croc say, it was a
big rock, anyone that's seen Batman the Animated
Series almost got him, will know that that's
a reference to That episode from Batman the Animated
Series. One of the best episodes ever. Absolutely.
And I love the whole villain thing. I love the
thing with... There aren't many, you know, you
were saying earlier about how there aren't many
Batman stories that can be unique and interesting
because Batman's done everything over the last
80 years. To be clear for that, I'm saying that
sometimes he can become a stagnant character
where he's the least interesting thing. If you
look at a lot of Batman stories, it often is
him as a character. It's him as a character.
It's always like he stays stagnant and it's always
the same type of story. Even in the best... I
love Scott Snyder's run of Batman, but he's always
a second -tier character, which is what made
Tom King's run really fascinating, is that Batman's
actually been the main character of his own book.
And that's what I liked about it. This is why
I like interpretations of this, is being able
to try to... do something different and develop
them and kind of look at kind of the the cracks
of of the psyche of someone that would have to
do this like what would you know what would someone
be like even if you go back to um you know dark
knight returns i mean which is kind of a cliche
to do anytime anytime you talk about a batman
book but that that was redefining what batman
in some ways i mean it's not like he Maybe Frank
Reilly gets a little bit too much credit of redefining
Batman, but certainly was very different than
the interpretations around that time period.
And I think this is, you know, in that same spirit
of saying, OK, well, let's create an offshoot
and do something that is, you know, just tell
a story. And I think, you know, taking bits and
pieces, there's like you, I think there are clearly
even Sean Murphy has said he's taken. From everything,
from Tim Burtonverse, from the animated series,
and you see that eventually by the end of this
with all the Batmobiles. So I think he's taking
bits and pieces of everything to create his own
Murphyverse, if you want to call it that. The
thing I was going to point out was that with
certain of Batman's villains, just like with
Spider -Man and Superman and whatever, I've seen
so many different tries with certain characters
that it's very rare that I get shocked in what
they do with it. And what I mean by this is,
as issue two comes to a close, we have Clayface.
And Clayface is not long for this world. He's
going to be scattered. scattered, smothered,
and covered for breakfast tomorrow or something,
because that was a twist I did not see coming.
I understand why he did it, because the Hatter
helmet, the mind control thing, could not work
on every single army person, like turning the
super criminals into an army. The only way you
can do it is... Kill Clayface and feed him to
everybody. Oh, my God. That part just showed
to me how horrific it must be to be Clayface.
All the time you're like, oh, Clayface, that's
cool. But you're like, oh, this is horrific.
Because to be able to, I don't say survive that,
but just to be, you know, maybe conscious when
all this is happening must be the most horrific
thing of all time. So through issue three, issue
three, each of these issues has a really shocking
moment for me. And much like in Nightwing New
Order, when some stupid cop killed, I don't want
to say stupid cop, some stupid person on the
Nightwing force or whatever it was, killed Alfred.
Anytime Alfred Pennyworth dies, I'm like, oh,
hell no, they didn't just do that. But I love
what they did here with the freeze story and
they call back to the McGregor syndrome as much
as everyone hates Batman and Robin jazz hands.
We hate that, that movie, but like they, they
call back to that. They have Alfred's funeral
kind of thing. And this is Bruce has lost his
parents. Obviously that's, that's still a thing
in, in this quote unquote Murphy versus Dan said.
But losing Alfred, Alfred was the last part of
Bruce's soul. That's why, I mean, yeah, earlier
Bruce kind of didn't care, but, like, losing
the only father he's really known since his parents
died, that's going to drive a guy over the edge.
Maybe this should have happened first. Maybe
they should have had the Alfred death scene.
the beginning, which would lead to Batman being
a dick. Again, I liked everything they did with
the Alfred stuff. I didn't even think about the
McGregor syndrome. I was like, oh yeah, that
was referenced in the greatest Batman movie of
all time, Batman and Robin. I joke. It's not
the greatest. I was joking. There's a credit
card in there. No, it's a horrible film. I will
say one thing that's kind of weird with this
series is, you know, knowing that Murphy's both,
you know, drawing and writing it, his dialogue
is much more verbose than you would expect. Because
typically when you have a writer and artist doing
a book, you know, they tend to let the art speak
for itself almost to a default at times. But
this is a relatively wordy book, especially with
the Napier dialogue. I mean, I know that's kind
of the point because that's the weapon he's using.
It does get a little overbearing at times. Like
I think he could probably, you know, there's...
times where he uses ten words when he maybe could
have used five. But I just found it kind of interesting
that knowing that he is the artist here, it's
very rare to see that. It's usually the opposite,
where you get very little dialogue, because it's
like they don't want it to cover over the page
and cover over the art. But he seems... Which,
again, could be because he's more of an artist.
something the scripting the die and sometimes
that's the hardest part for an artist turning
into an writer or writing for more so than you
know their their drawing you know because movies
won't work with some great people like reminder
and stuff like that so i think that's like where
On a scripting perspective, that's where it gets
bogged down a little bit, especially the lettering
and the dialogue boxes. You can kind of overtake
the page and unfortunately cover the art to an
unnecessary extent. It's not always there, but
it happens especially within, like you mentioned,
the Napier dialogue or those different new sequences.
Again, that very much harkened back to something
like Dark Knight. But I just found that kind
of intriguing that that was something that...
was happening here so be interested in seeing
how that goes with because the next series that
comes after this yeah i i think writer artists
artist writers whatever you want to call them
writer artists um because i don't want to say
they have full control but they almost do over
the creative part of it i think they work in
all of the dialogue to where it should be without
taking away from the actual art. Like, again,
I've praised this since the pullback started,
since I started doing digital comics. Comixology's
guided view on issue three where Harley's like,
I'm really proud of you, Puddin'. Really? You
know, take me out tonight. And, you know, we
cut to a bigger scene. where you know duke says
take her out you clown or someone else will and
we cut to them you know cutting a rug it shows
a panel of basically her with her arm around
the back of his neck and this hot ass you know
red dress kind of like i just think that The
writing and where the letters are placed and
the way the story is done, especially with the
way that I read it in the guided view, I think
it actually works for writer -artists. I think
sometimes when you have a writer and an artist,
sometimes signals may get crossed, sometimes
they won't. Who knows? But I think Sean's stuff
actually does work for... him doing both sides
of it. Yeah, I'm not saying it doesn't. I think
at times his scripting, his dialogue can get
overbearing. Especially when it gets... I think
one thing he struggles with is providing context
or backstory for things. And that's where I think
it's a little bit overbearing. I'm not saying
it's bad, per se, but it's just... Um, there
are, there are times where there are words on
the page that don't necessarily need to be there
because you can just let the art speak for itself.
Um, and I think where that becomes a little bit
more challenging is where there's a little bit
more heavy lifting, um, because you have those
in Napier speeches where he's kind of, you know,
going on these different like diatribes about
what, what's wrong with, um, what's, what's wrong
with, uh, Batman. Uh, they're not, it's, it's
not always there, but there are times where it's
like, whoa, that's a. That's a page full of a
lot of, that's like almost, if I didn't know
better, I'd be thinking I'm reading a Brian Michael
Bendis book with all the dialogue. I don't necessarily
think dialogue's a bad thing. I just don't think
it's his strength as a writer. So, or as a creator.
So when, when, uh, it's the one thing like, you
know, bringing in. If he was working with another
artist, if he was working with, if he just had
writing duties, you think like half of this is
cut down? I think if he was working with someone
like Remender, he would probably be able to tighten
up a little bit. It's not necessarily bad. I
think it's just that you're doing a lot, so it's
challenging, but it's still really well done.
I'm not saying it's not well done, but I'm just
the one area where I think if you're looking
for improvement or where... You know, it's where
it doesn't match up to like, you know, the art
to me is like a 10 out of 10. That's where it's
not to that level, which is, you know, that's
it's to be said, because it's a difference between
a person who writes for a living, a person who
does art for a living. Like, I think a person
who does that remarkably well is someone like
Jeff Lemire, who's kind of the opposite, where
he has he's much more minimal, minimalist. And
that's kind of what I expected. And again, that's
what may just be my. subjective point of view
because when you typically go into a book and
it's an artist writing it like i mentioned it
it's usually your it's usually like oh they just
decided not to put any words on this page over
and over again but that's not the case here so
that's what it was more of a a shock because
of it more than than a poor execution choice
yeah and the way they end issue four Again, going
to the story of the, you know, Neo Joker, the
the the alternate Harley, you know, you know,
telling kind of her story to Mad Hatter and all
of this. And then they they they see this archival
footage of the the freeze and the Waynes and.
The Nazi stuff. Wow. Yeah, exactly. Like. That's
a way to end, like, oh, wow. You know, I mean,
who'd ever thought, you know, Nazi stuff would
be in a Batman book? You know, I mean, it's not
like, you know, you know, Indiana Jones and,
you know, Junior can come in on, you know, a
motorcycle with a buggy. But I completely bought,
like, when they explain Freezes Baxter, I'm like,
huh. Yep, that makes a lot of sense, especially
with the rapid aging thing. I was like, oh, yeah,
why wouldn't he be? I mean, I guess Freeze's
backstory has been limited. to me as much so
when they it's it's ripe to expand the pounder
you know do whatever you want with which i never
thought i never saw the nazi thing coming in
when i read i was like oh yeah that that's that
makes sense that would make a lot of sense and
The arc he kind of goes through, though, he's
kind of like the sea character of this whole
story. I dug Freeze a lot. Every time Freeze
shows up, I know you said it took you out of
the book a little bit, maybe because I'm a huge
Freeze fan, but I want to know more. Tell me
more about that. It wasn't that it took me, it
wasn't the fact that he was there that took me
out of the book. What takes me out of the book
is, like, ending the scene with Joker and Harley,
like going home, like where, like where it has
their dialogue on their page. And then it starts
freezes page and it has, you know, the finish
of what their dialogue is. It's more so like
the pacing, not pacing, but the, the way it's
displayed, the way that it's formatted, that
wasn't the, no freeze is a much a part of this
story as any of the other characters in it. And
it's absolutely awesome. I think it's great.
And if I had been reading this single issue,
oh man, I wouldn't be able to deal. I'm glad
I waited for the trade because I would not be
able to just deal on a monthly basis or however...
I think this was a monthly series for obviously
the eight issues, but I don't know. As we...
get to the end of the fourth issue. DJ, how are
you feeling about the story at this quote -unquote
halfway point? At this point, I like where it's
going. As it's going. I think that they could
have done something a little bit more... What's
the word? I don't say better with Batman. The
way they treated Batman kind of rubbed me the
wrong way a little bit. So that's kind of my
only hint. But again, when it comes to the artistic
style of this book, I mean, this book is great.
I was on Comic Con Series with Dan before watching
Gotham Central, and I love that gritty style.
And I think there's a little bit of that here.
The way that Murphy kind of uses certain characters,
and I know it's an Elseworlds story, it was just
hard for me to wrap my brain around the treatment
of certain characters. Barbara Gordon, Batman,
stuff like that. I like the intent. I like the
intent. Dan, what about you? Yeah, I really kind
of enjoy this. experiment that he you know that
he's doing right like um i i like that i i thought
it was going to be a simple like okay batman
turns evil and then joker's good and and go from
there um but i like that it ended ended being
more of kind of a deconstruction of the mythos
of batman's world um along with that and you
know and pointing out i putting out some of the
legitimate logical issues with a character like
Batman and what that would mean, and then having
someone like Joker take a different approach.
And there's a lot here going on, perhaps too
much at times, with sometimes maybe a character
like Neo Joker, her development seems a little
bit weird, a little bit more fast -paced than
some of the others. As G .J. pointed out, it
is a gorgeous book. morphe has a very gothic
aesthetic that you know it doesn't necessarily
feel like if you go to like the timber art movie
it has a similar feeling but it's a little bit
more cartoonish uh where this it it has that
more um it has that feel um you know it's funny
they mention anime because he's done sean morphe's
done something like tokyo ghost which is very
much in that realm so uh i think it kind of all
puts it's all put together pretty well um and
i kind of just like the no holds part of it in
a way. And I, and do also really like the way
he draws Batman. Um, just, he looks just like
a hulking figure, but, um, uh, not to the point
where it's like actually the Hulk. Um, but I
don't know. I just, I just, I enjoy this world
that he's creating and, uh, like this little
universe that's like picking and choosing different
things that wants to use. So. Yep. Absolutely.
All right. Well, I don't know what's going on,
folks, but I'm starting to get a cough in the
back of my throat. I'm coughing, too. Oh, no.
It's Joker gas. A cagastrophe? Smoke them if
you got them? A plume of purple puffs puts down
our podcast pals? A situation that may be more
of a gas than we expected? Will the tenacious
trio catch their breath? Or will they be too
choked up to continue? Find out next time on
Geekcast Radio's Pull Bag. Same bad time, same
bad podcast channel. You've just heard the latest
episode of The Pull Bag. the GCRN's first comic
review and discussion podcast. There are several
ways to get in touch with us and leave feedback
for the show. You can visit the website geekcastradio
.com where you can comment on the episode and
all of our different podcasts. You can rate and
leave a review for the show on iTunes. Be sure
to leave us feedback. Become a fan of us on Facebook,
facebook .com slash thepullbag. Send us an email,
feedback at geekcastradio .com. Follow us on
Twitter at ThePullBag and at GeekCastRadio. So
until next time, make your great escape into
comics and unleash the geek in you. We're making
a sketch based on if that was real. Coming out
of Megatron's idea, Megatron was like, yeah,
we should do something on Space Force if it was
a real thing. I was like, well, I'm just going
to make it based on Delta Force with Chuck Norris,
so let's do that. Yeah, I see Mad About Trump
on Comixology for $9 but for $10. I see Trump's
Titans, which is a series. And I see the Trump
Titans Space Force. The Judas contract will be
really interesting in Trump Titans. Yeah. I have,
yeah, the Trump Titans. Let's see, the first
one is Trump Titans versus diversity number one.
And then, like Dan said, Trump Titans Space Force
number one under the Trump Titans series logo.
I've got the IDW book that they put out by Shannon
Wheeler, Shit My President Says, and I want to
do that on the podcast eventually just because
it's illustrations done by Shannon Wheeler from
the point of Donald Trump starting his Twitter
up until just after he won the election or after
he gets sworn in. And I've been wanting to do
it, and I just haven't had the time to do any
of this stuff.
No chapter markers for this episode.
Hosts



